![]() |
Critique my Flv player Please. Honest opinions!
OK, I got negative comments about my buttons so I have tried to make a whole
new look. http://slomoplayer.com How does it look now? Honest opinions appreciated. Seriously, I want to know what will make this a good player for your website. Thanks |
I think it looks pretty good. Easy to understand and use. I'm no expert in this kind of thing though.
|
I really like the idea of your player that's for sure..
- Clicking the video area should pause/start the video. - Skin isn't all that appealing when compared to the standard players. Really needs some work there. Would be good to be able to build your own skin like flowplayer. - using things like slowmo is confusing. You should be able to set it while the video is paused. Kept trying to get it to work, figured it was broken, and then I finally clicked on it while the video was playing. - Seems that a bunch of things require the video to be playing before they will work. For example, I can't seek while the video is paused while I can in jwplayer/flowplayer. Basically, you need it to function like flowplayer/jwplayer and then add on your cool features. |
Quote:
Here is the original player : http://www.pornsceneindex.com/Watch/...y_Blonde_Rocks |
Not bad. Maybe lose the gradient. On a single color the buttons would pop a little more, and perhaps keep the PLAY / RW/ FF on one side, with the LOOP, SLOW, and audio on the other.
|
Quote:
It was easier to set it up that way since I didn't need to execute the play functions. But that is something that can be done for sure. I didn't think about seeking while paused so good point! I will continue to work on it. |
i think the slowmo and the loop feature are great, the player control bar and buttons looks cheesey. just copy one of the nice JW Player skins or Vimeo's player.
you are an Actionscript programmer? anybody know if JW or Flowplayer have slowmo and loop plug-ins? |
Quote:
make it look good though. Hmmmmmmm? I split the buttons because I wanted to make the progress bar centered but not make it shorter. That's a tough one because when looping a long video the "start" and "end" buttons get really close making it tricky to get the exact loop of something short like a cumshot. |
Quote:
I'm distributing the player so maybe that is not in their license. Yes, I'm an Actionscript programmer. I doubt these other players have plugins for loop and slomo because I would have used their players instead of making this one. I searched for a way to do this but found nothing short of using Flash Media Server or encoding multiple videos at different speeds. I didn't make this player with any intentions of selling but after using it for a while I decided to see if other webmasters might want to use it. I love using it when I'm watching porn. I loop the cumshot and slomo that MoFo everytime. :1orglaugh My gawd, the stuff you don't see at regular speed! |
I haven't read the other comments, but I'm on morphine and don't want to right now. I don't like the gradient and colorful slow button. Makes it look old school and "bling bling" ish. Great idea though, I might give it a try on one of my fight video sites. Bookmarked this thread.
Check these out to see popular video player skins so you can see what the people want: http://www.longtailvideo.com/addons/...larity&dir=asc |
Seems to work pretty well here, looks good.
|
Quote:
http://www.longtailvideo.com/addons/...184/Trekkie?q= WTF!!!! Those players have been around for a long time and that allowed them to develop a lot of skins. I will develop new skins over time for sure. Bottom line, surfers don't care. The whole thing disappears when they play the video. My task is clearly to make webmasters like it. That's hard. :1orglaugh I think the novelty of the features of loop and slow motion will win the surfers faster then the webmaster. Webmasters are super critical because they know the inner workings of websites and know what "good design" is. Surfers don't know that and I don't think they actually care. They care if it works and they see the video. But I will definitely work on some new skins as things progress. :thumbsup |
Quote:
I hope you try it out on your sites. I'm really excited about it, but of course, I made it so...................... I need to stick to programming because at least I invented something with this player, I never invent anything in porn. I don't really know much about porn. I'm just a programmer that said "Wow, they let you sign up and start working right away in porn, no hassles". So I built sites without really understanding what surfers really want in porn. I just throw up categories of porn and that's all I really know about it. Some people will say "just do what you like"; but that is not all there is to it. |
Quote:
|
I like it very easy to use but the buttons could do with some work to make them stand out more
I actually like the shadow too looks like the player is floating I havent been taking drugs ..BTW LOL |
Great functionality, just needs a designer to make it look the part - goodluck with it, loved the way you have setup the loop and slowmo (as others have said).
|
it sucks the whole 100%
|
hmm, not bad at all ... but the colored SLOW button looks like a sore thumb there :/ ehm, and call me nitpicky, but the FF/RW arrows look edgy to me ... those shud b smoother imo ... else, nice approach to some new features in a flv player ;)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
One point for me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Slomoplayer has 4 slow speeds, that plugin has just 2. The video restarts a little when changing speeds; not on slomoplayer however. I could add backward slowmotion, but don't really think it is useful. Fast forward might be good but not really felling that for adult applications. Slow motion means the surfers see more, fast forward means the surfer sees less. |
Quote:
I drew the graphics inside of flash. That's best when the graphics change size, but that's not so relevant in this player. The size changes based on the size someone sets the player but it's never going to be huge and pixelate. |
Quote:
|
I think you should also consider a "web2.0" sort of style for your site instead of the current one. Just a thought....
|
it looks shitty, in full screen., with all colors and things., looks like we are still in 90's
in the whole the idea sucks., why do i need to watch video in slow motion ? this is not the first time i have seen your site., i have seen it previously and out of curiosity i checked that slomo player and i didn't liked the idea and the player. i only liked the function loop video., else the color filters and that much buttons , make your player for geeks and not for regular users., no offence. just my opinion. |
Quote:
Without those or some other streaming software, you can't skip forward in the video past what is already downloaded anyway. Which means you can just click in the progress bar and skip forward just as fast if there is no streaming server. In other words : 95% of webmasters are not going to be able to fast forward in a way that even matters since they are not going to run wowza or Flash media server. Those 95% will only fast forward through what they already saw when the video was downloading. So, I might add it, but I don't think it will make people who don't use wowza say "wow! This is great". |
agreeing with the masses here. just needs a makeover and it'll be more appealing. had a few UI quirks but that could also be handled with a more clean/intuitive design
find a designer who can lay you out a player mock in illustrator, grouping the elements so you can easily export and turn them into clips. i doubt it would cost that much as it's a pretty flat & easy job. then you can take their main elements and expand from there, following their general design scheme. the player concept itself is great |
or....
why don't you take one of the preset player skins and just dick around with the vectors until it looks "custom" and follow their design scheme for your extra buttons/clips/etc? |
Quote:
But did you cum when you jacked to a loop? :winkwink: All the buttons fade away if you move the mouse away from them so that helps. I will do a new design soon. |
Quote:
Explain. I don't know what web2.0 style means. I thought web2.0 was using a flv player for videos. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
lose the gradients! :winkwink: |
Quote:
Quote:
Maybe you should just slow down, get down your horse and try a more humble and proactive way. You could be selling lots of copies but you're so stubborn and greedy you can't even see reality. Comparing your player to the best in the market and even charging more than the top player in the market won't be of any help. And as cool and novelty a "loop feature" can be, I'm pretty sure most webmasters will take the player with more features (specially those that actually MAKE MONEY) rather than a novelty. In other words: you can't compete with the best with something that looks as a bad crack trip (your first version) or a super amateurish "I don't give a fuck" look. Just my humble opinion, of course :2 cents: |
The funny part is I sent someone your way yesterday. Hope you act smart and take good care of him, you're making Paul Markham look as a very thoughtful and coherent person
|
Quote:
$36 left to my name. Nothing but bacon, sausage and eggs in the fridge. Hoping that will last 3 weeks. Hot water heater is turned off to save electricity. Furnace turned off too. Working in a closed off room so my body heat will help heat the room. Just praying that my dogfart check is not 2 weeks late like last time. I love life, at least what I've heard about it. ... |
Quote:
How am I charging more when the player is free? Sorry that I used a big font to say "without" because evidently that irritated you more than anything I actually said. About you contacting me to do a cool design : You said : "You cannot use the design I'm thinking about for anyone else". But you didn't want to pay for an exclusive design. Why would any programmer do a free design for you but you have a contract where the programmer cannot reuse the design. How does the programmer survive like that? |
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
Quote:
Uh, and btw, your player isn't free. It's free only with deactivated features, then it has a price tag for sites that don't charge (???) and then ANOTHER price tag for sites with subscription based models. Am I lying? Thus, last time I checked $99.95 is more than $95 (FP) or $89 (JW) Quote:
|
Quote:
Bullshit! Bottom line : You wanted me to do something for free but only if I would not use it for anyone else. Sorry bro, but what good is that to me or anyone else? You wanted me to agree to risk being sued for making my own player and you were not even going to pay for that. I did agree that I would make you an exclusive player for you to resell in your designs but I asked for $10 per license but you had to buy in bulk, at least the first time, for a total of $300. So you hit the road running when you heard $300. You didn't want to pay $300 fo 30 players that you would sale for $900. End of Story. .... |
Quote:
:2 cents: |
Quote:
As everyone else has stated, you need a better skin. If you're starting out, you need to go look at the best player skins out there - and yours has to be BETTER. |
Quote:
Well, this is not my first try at making a skin that webmasters like so I'm doubting that magic will happen on the next try. I hope the function of the player will be the deciding factor for now. I have never stopped surfing a website because I didn't like the player buttons, but I do stop if the player doesn't work. Some will choose design over functionality. Yahoo has a much better design than Google but it's not enough to keep them competitive. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123