GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   SLK55 or SL55 (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=444151)

Pornwolf 03-14-2005 11:02 PM

SLK55 or SL55
 
Sure, you can say real men drive the SL.

Sure, you can say the SL has more power.

But, does it look as cool?

SL 55
http://www.playerscarrental.com/MBSL55.jpg

SLK 55
http://www.500sec.com/images/spyphotos/SLK55.jpg

Hmm...

Bigfuck 03-14-2005 11:03 PM

I take the SL

Young 03-14-2005 11:04 PM

Get the best of both worlds....the looks plus the crazy power.

http://www.autopress.be/Temporaires/...edes%20SLR.jpg

SLR

boner 2.0 03-14-2005 11:04 PM

I take the SLK, looks slick :thumbsup

Dirty F 03-14-2005 11:04 PM

Sl ofcourse.

KingAsher 03-14-2005 11:04 PM

The SL65 or The SLR :thumbsup

Pornwolf 03-14-2005 11:09 PM

Something about the SLR just doesn't look practical. Who needs more poweer than the SLK already provides? I'm a grown man, I'm not drag racing anywhere. I live in a metropolitan area where I'm lucky to be able to do 100 for more than a minute.

If you live in another area that allows you to do more than that regularly I envy you.

Young 03-14-2005 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
Something about the SLR just doesn't look practical. Who needs more poweer than the SLK already provides? I'm a grown man, I'm not drag racing anywhere. I live in a metropolitan area where I'm lucky to be able to do 100 for more than a minute.

If you live in another area that allows you to do more than that regularly I envy you.

I completely agree with you. But I'm 6'1"-6'2" I test drove the SLK before settling upon the G35. There wasn't enough room in the SLK for me. I need my seats wayyyyy back.

Pornwolf 03-14-2005 11:14 PM

In the new one or the old one?

cool1g 03-14-2005 11:15 PM

slk is a chick car!

Young 03-14-2005 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
In the new one or the old one?

the old one, i was just bout to hop back in here and point that out. this was in 03

Sami 03-14-2005 11:16 PM

I would also take the SL.

jimb 03-14-2005 11:16 PM

SLR is the best.....but SL if you cant afford the price tag of the SLR.

Jim

pornguy 03-14-2005 11:16 PM

Neither. Dont spend the money on a car like that for some fucker with no insurance to crash, or some fuck stick in the parking lot to key or ram a grocery cart into it.

Young 03-14-2005 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cool1g
slk is a chick car!

well alot of MB enthusiasts were mad that Mercedes was borrowing the SLR's face for the SLK and the SL's retractable hardtop. Mercedes went against all the criticism to attract more men to the car.

Sosa 03-14-2005 11:18 PM

either one would do :)

eamedia 03-14-2005 11:19 PM

automatic, automatic... id rather walk

KingAsher 03-14-2005 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
Something about the SLR just doesn't look practical. Who needs more poweer than the SLK already provides? I'm a grown man, I'm not drag racing anywhere. I live in a metropolitan area where I'm lucky to be able to do 100 for more than a minute.

If you live in another area that allows you to do more than that regularly I envy you.


Man, I'll tell ya from personal experience, you dont need ANY room to open that car up, and its, just the most rediculous car, maybe ever........ That car is on a whole different world !!!!!

Young 03-14-2005 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eamedia
automatic, automatic... id rather walk

get used to it, manual gear boxes will soon be all but gone. Don't be fooled....these cars aren't fitted with "steptronic" (aka torque converters) they are REAL electrohydrolic gearboxes. Once you drive a Ferrari with paddle shifters, or even an M3 with SMG II. You will all but forget about manuals. Cars are now utilizing the same technology found in F1 racing cars....you don't hear those guys complaining and they're doing 210 down straightaways :1orglaugh

sonofsam 03-14-2005 11:35 PM

m5

8 chars :)

Young 03-14-2005 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
m5
8 chars :)

aren't M5's banned from Canada? Or is it just the M3? I remember hearing something about this :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

not acutally banned...just something fitted on the car doesn't meet canadian standards. kinda like the GTR's and the U.S.

Xenophage 03-15-2005 12:03 AM

I am thinking abou getting the slk55 I just can nto justify the price of the sl55 but the retractable hard top and the fact that it is even with 80-100K porches for 60K makes me go hmmmmm. bang for the buck... slk55 is good.. still ahev to go test drive it and see if I like it as much as the porsche.

Manowar 03-15-2005 12:32 AM

SL for sure.

Pornwolf 03-15-2005 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
m5

8 chars :)

BMW's are for rich teens until you get onto the 6's and 7's.

quiet 03-15-2005 01:02 AM

neither do it for me. but the sl55 is the only one i'd consider. slk looks like a squashed version of the sl..

Pornwolf 03-15-2005 01:05 AM

Honestly, compared to the last one the new SL is a bit squashed so the SLK isn't much worse to me.

2HousePlague 03-15-2005 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
Honestly, compared to the last one the new SL is a bit squashed so the SLK isn't much worse to me.

Agreed.


j-

Illicit 03-15-2005 01:18 AM

Sl for shizzle... My buddy has one, nice car

adonthenet 03-15-2005 01:19 AM

slk55 all the way

spideriux 03-15-2005 03:38 PM

slk55 looks better

PlugRush Sascha 03-15-2005 03:42 PM

Alpina B7.

And...

BMW > Mercedes Benz

I'm German, I should know. LMFAO!

maddox 03-15-2005 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
Sure, you can say real men drive the SL.

Sure, you can say the SL has more power.

But, does it look as cool?

SL 55
http://www.playerscarrental.com/MBSL55.jpg

SLK 55
http://www.500sec.com/images/spyphotos/SLK55.jpg

Hmm...

Sorry dude but real man drives BMWs or porsches or other REAL sport cars, not this kind of luxury for the old peeps

axelcat 03-15-2005 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Young
Get the best of both worlds....the looks plus the crazy power.

http://www.autopress.be/Temporaires/...edes%20SLR.jpg

SLR

wow..........

Xenophage 06-04-2005 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
Sure, you can say real men drive the SL.

Sure, you can say the SL has more power.

But, does it look as cool?

SL 55
http://www.playerscarrental.com/MBSL55.jpg

SLK 55
http://www.500sec.com/images/spyphotos/SLK55.jpg

Hmm...


SLK55 also still lookig at the sl500 but its a slow poke compares to the slk55 and it cost 40K more... now the sl600 is different altogether but its 100K more..


I was looking at them today..

Xenophage 06-04-2005 10:42 PM

http://www.mbusa.com/media/images/ma...L600R_main.jpg


Click here for specs

MSRP $130,120*
EngineTwin turbocharged 5.5L 36-valve V-12 engine
Net Power493 hp @ 5,000 rpm
Net Torque590 lb-ft @ 1,800 - 3,500 rpm

Xenophage 06-04-2005 10:44 PM

here is link to compare roadsters


http://www.mbusa.com/brand/container...&body=roadster

Also the new Bently roadster is very interesting at 150K

Xenophage 06-04-2005 10:49 PM

http://photos.ebizautos.com/5165/669487_1.jpg

they are making this into a roadster I hear


http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...atego ry=6118


6.0 Liter 12-Cylinder Twin-Turbocharged 552HP Engine feeds the All Wheel Drive system.

pstation 06-04-2005 10:52 PM

what exactly is the point in spending that much on a car?

Xenophage 06-04-2005 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pstation
what exactly is the point in spending that much on a car?


The slk55 is 60K which is a expensive car but not an out of this world car.

and it goes real fast.. which is what apeals to me. Real fast at a decent price. I like good bang for the buck..

show me other options on a car that goes 0-60 in 4.9 seconds thats cheaper than 60K and if it looks decent I will get that instead.

pstation 06-04-2005 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LegendaryLars
The slk55 is 60K which is a expensive car but not an out of this world car.

and it goes real fast.. which is what apeals to me. Real fast at a decent price. I like good bang for the buck..

show me other options on a car that goes 0-60 in 4.9 seconds thats cheaper than 60K and if it looks decent I will get that instead.

i wasn't criticizing the car, i just don't see any real advantages it has over a 20k honda in "real world" use, but that's just my take on it.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123