Paris Hilton Video - I don't understand.
 

Someone explain to me how this video can be 'legally' released to the public without Paris's consent?

If the company releasing the video does not have model IDs and a model release, how can they legally distibute this tape?

no clue... normally every human has the right on his own pics & sounds... you can't film somebody and make cash with him...

It's better that you don't understand and just go with it....

Well that's what I thought. As a content producer, I am required by law to have copies of the models IDs and a signed model release. How can this be required by me and not the company that's marketing, selling and distributing this tape?

That's a good answer - thanks for wasting my time :(

thank me for the views

Not if it's in public :)

bump coz i'd like to know

i sued somebody for putting a pic of me on his server.. and he had to put it down...

so every third class lawyer should be able to forbid the paris hilton video :-/

so nobody can sell the sound of my fart without getting my permission? cool :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

i cant go out with my cam , film some girls and add them to my sluts of the week list.. they could request that i delete the pics from my servers

Yeah it does makes you wonder.

because criminals and shady people do shady and criminal things to make money.

pretty simple.

youd think that Paris Hilton has enough money to reach any of these dumbasses selling the video and have them tied up in court for years in litigation.

I guess not ey?

Yes - this is true :thumbsup

what does that have to do with this topic?

Um, my bet is that the releases are in order and everyone's purses are fattened.

I think it's because whe was the one that wanted to be filmed.

I believe both of them the right to the tape equally. :2 cents:

Do you REALLY think Paris needs money from an amateur porn shoot?

The most important article of evidence in here is, where is the MODEL RELEASE?

You cant release movies without them, regardless of how fat Solomans pocket is, i HIGHLY DOUBT Paris Hilton is getting money from this and would ALLOW such a hardcore flick of her to be released like this.

Hey I could be wrong, i just dont see her needing the few million this is gonna make, which we all know MOST will go to the producers.



:thumbsup

Hmmmm - interesting :winkwink:

fletch, I think it's more about the fame than the fortune. you do know they have a "the simple life 2" coming on FOX?

He seems to be quite good at it.

But doesn't Paris have a pending lawsuit against Rick whats his name?

stoner

stoners are cool

Ive never understood it either. I guess they have to catch the people selling it and have proof.

they have Rick's model release :glugglug

yeah, his jizz all over her tits while she stroking him should be the ok sign

I was thinking the same Fletch but to tell you the truth i think her ego to be a public star is bigger than what she needs her pocket book to be ... interesting how there is a second season of the shitty ass show "simple life" airing on fox this summer so close to the release of this video ...

She is prolly no different that the attention starved sluts on Hollywood and Vine that are willing to do anything for fame not for money ...

just my opinion

This is why in my post I said, "Hey I could be wrong."

Im never afraid to admit that fact.

I just dont see this as the same as Pam and Tommy, its very different in my opinion.

Why would she be suing him and allowing the release? Publicity only?

Thats somewhat of a reach, but again "Hey, I could be Wrong!"

;)

Ok, the answer you all have been waiting for.

I think this is all a conspiracy and they meant for it to turn out this way but here is how it went down. Its all about loop holes. Some dude got a hold of the video and started making money off of it, Rick was pissed he wasnt making any money off the video so he went in search to find someone dumb enough to licsense him the footage for a couple grand. Even though the guy that sold him the footage did not have legal rights to the footage, he gave legal rights to Rick by signing a release. So now if anybody gets fucked, its the guy that sold Rick the footage, after all Rick is not doing anything wrong. It gets tricker, the guy that sold the video turned out to be only 17 but Rick was told he was 18. Now they cant get Rick or the kid that sold the tape.

wow

Maybe it's because she's a public figure and it's considered nesworthy..I dunno, but I'm sure the folks over at Redlight have paid their lawyers lots of money to ensure minimal damages...

just too bad Atherton made all the REAL money from Paris Hilton...

The guy in the video taped it. She knew she was being taped. She did not object to it at the time of filming. Maybe this is a case of it being HER fault for not signing legal hahahahahahahahas stating that no one was to make $$$ off of it or show it publically.

People make money off of people ALL the the time without age release forms. Can you say Girls Gone Wild? It is different in their situation, but all the same. Things done in public can be filmed and rebroadcast even for a fee. If this guy filmed Paris and she knew about it and let him keep the tape, I say it's her fault and has very little recourse. :2 cents:

If I fuck and film a willing woman over the age of 18 and choose to show my friends, there is nothing illegal about it. If I set up shop and charge them $10.00 to see it, why would I need records of her age if I KNOW that she is 18+ for sure? What is going to happen? Some fed is going to knock on my door and want proof? Look up her drivers license with your search warrantes asshole. Come back and see me when you ACTUALLY have something. Kiss and tell isn't against the law as far as I know. These are just thoughts, I am no way trying to state that these are facts. Just my $.02

With the money to be made (or has been made for that matter) it is probably worth a small legal battle that Solomon will most likely win.:2 cents: Thoughts? :glugglug

She's a producer.

Director I think,

fluffer

I wonder what daddy (Hilton) thinks.

Lot's of great conspiracy theories....only one true story.
Rick has the rights.


Chicago webmasters I just confirmed for the Mancow Show I'll keep you posted before I go on.

Sykk-

Atherton made money by bilking consumers into thinking they'd actually see the video- he never had one.
Also you are going to tell me that more people go online to view porn than consumers with VCR's and DVD player's?

Simply not the case bro- There are more people in the entire world that own a VCR than a a credit card, or a computer. That's a fact.

This tape is also NOT the xray vision tape- Most everyone has not seen this

I'd bet less than 1% of the worl'd population even saw the first tape online.

Isn't he dead!?:helpme