![]() |
How does this model look?...
on a white background?
Did I miss something, does something need adjusting, does it look OK? this is for a foot site, and her hands are tied behind the chair. <img src="http://www.hotlinkpro.com/image6.jpg"> thanks in advance for any feedback... |
nasty :thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
Put some cheese in her feet.... and get rid of the white hat on a white background
|
i need to see pink
|
Quote:
|
yeah that background is not good. looks like she was photoshopped onto it..
|
she looks like silly :winkwink:
|
she looks with her eyes.
|
she's got a huge callous on her damn big toe!!! :BangBang:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
A drop shadow might help.
|
the white is too harsh, go black
|
Quote:
on second thoughts, that's a toe nail. |
Quote:
|
Fuck her foot?
I'm sure you'd love that :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Hot girl!
Yeah... I agree with the very light drop shadow behind her head... it kinda sets lost in the while background. Hot girl though. |
Quote:
Juicy email me a good photo of yourself at [email protected]. The ones people keep photoshopping are getting worse cuz of the recompressions. thanks |
Quote:
??? |
I like her !!
I'd like to see the same shoot with the photographer under the chair on his back... taking the pic with her foot right up to the lens. :winkwink: |
i dont like her at all, drop her like a crack habbit on payday
|
its a good pic...but the white has to be toned down a lil
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.wantongirls.com/tanya_close.jpg |
*reaches for the reset button...
|
Quote:
|
feather your mask a bit, 3-5 pixles before you pull her off the original BG, her edges look too sharp. Or mask your white and Gausian blur a bit. (cheesier, but it works)
|
I fucked her !
|
that's funny, I have a Flash design for the licensed content site we were putting up, PinkContent.com and I used 'Pink' by Aerosmith as the soundtrack.
that project's on hold, licensed content biz sucks, exclusive is better. |
looks like a good masking job to me, why would you want soft blurry edges?
|
I'd gag it!
|
she's cute but needs more pics for you to have our opinion!:321GFY
|
Not bad.
|
hmmm lol. Not to bad
|
For a 'babe' site this is a great shot. (White hat on white background is not good though.)
For a 'foot' site, it sucks. The focus of the picture is the girl, not her foot - it just happens to be stuck up in the pic. You can't even see her other foot. Worry less about the girl, and more about the feet. The foot fetish surfers don't really care if the girl is a babe, they care about the feet. Mutt does that girl naturally not grow pubic hair? If not, how the hell did she get it that clean? If that's a wax job, it's the best advertisement for ripping-enduced pain that I've EVER seen! |
What is the point of tying her to a chair and making her smile like she just got asked to the prom by the quarterback of the football team?
If it is bondage, then do bondage If it is foot fetish do that If it is both then make that clear in the shot Foot Fetish is not about just taking shots of feet either You need to go back to porn 101 or do some remedial work The white background is not the issue The composition is not the concern The model is not the deal Knowing your NICHE.... That is what counts. |
Quote:
|
Just curious: How tall is the model?
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123