Affirmative. However, as much as you may know or think you know about pornography, you aren't able to see the image in context. I do not plan to anchor this one image to a page, claim foot fetish, throw tgp traffic at it, and expect a string of million dollar checks from CCbill.

This is for use within a design which, surprisingly enough, will include other many images, and text. Hence, trust me, the image completely relevant.

fuck em all.......yummy

Tell you what...

Don't pay one iota of attention to anything that I just said...

Ask some true foot fetishists how they feel about it...

You can put it into whatever context you want and you are right that I am not seeing the rest of the series or what you will do with the rest of your design composition... you asked what people thought of that shot and you mentioned that it was for a foot festish deal and that she was tied to the chair...

So based on the criteria that your yourself established... it does not work as a shot for either foot fetish or bondage or crossover for both... I see where you think you are doing foot fetish because she has her foot up... I can see where you think you have a bondage shoot because she is tied to the chair (supposedly) but the shot does not sell/tell/deal/feel any of what you are trying to cater to by any of your described assumptions.

Foot fetishists are going to be reaching for a Bloomingdales catalog to jerk to before they get aroused by that shot and bondage enthusiasts are going to spot you as a bdsm fake from a mile away.

You asked for criticism. Were you just expecting compliments on your focus and flat lighting instead?

I agree with Far-L, ya oughtah research what the foot thing is all about.

The girl is okies though but them clothes...

Get lace, get stockings, get nylons, get some shadows, boots, hi-heels.

Foot is a sign of dominance. Show it that way.

Maybe I am lettin to much out of my closet, but I like feeters if they are nice. I don't fuck feet, and they do not step on me, but I do like seeing them step on others.

Dirty? Definatly hard on material? No, I do not think so. Its just part of the kink element.

FarL, had you had actually read and understood the original post as it were intended, I was searching for comments on regarding the transition of the model to a white background... i.e, whether the photoshop work looks fine, whether it looks too sharp around the edges, whether the outlines are mishaped, whether the outlines were not smooth enough, and etcetera. When you look at an image for a long enough time period, as I did in Photoshop, you can convince yourself that graphically, it looks fine, when infact there are a number of flaws you've just missed. A second, third, fourth opinion on the issue at hand (i.e, the smoothness/quality of the girl's outline) is always useful. Hence the words, "Did I miss something, does something need adjusting, does it look OK?" rather than "how is the focus and lighting".

The foot and arms were mentioned only to curb a possible page replies asking why her foot is sticking up or whether she is an amputee or not. As if I hadn't already noticed.

You can criticize the photography itself until your heart is content, however, your comments fall on deaf ears. I am not the photographer.

im with aaron, i want to see the goods, then ill tell you what i think

but the white has got to go!

what an odd pic... not unpleasant, just very odd...

:helpme

Actually FarL, I do not at all dispute your comments regarding surfers spotting "fake content". It is an excellent point to be raised.

I will post an assortion of images from these sets to foot fetishist forums, and see what the target audience thinks before putting this content out. If they don't like it or feel the content to be weak, I won't concentrate on these sets any further.

Forgive me for only now do I think it is clear what you are looking for and I apologize for not understanding specifically what you were looking for....

But I guess it was pretty open ended...

"on a white background? Did I miss something, does something need adjusting, does it look OK? This is for a foot site, and her hands are tied behind the chair. thanks in advance for any feedback..."

;-)

Now I agree with much of the earlier photoshop advice. Obviously there are design reasons for shooting against a white background but I would add that your photographer can shoot white against white. It requires attention to exposure, depth of field, shades of white, highlights, rim lighting, and a host of other issues that one could do to make your photoshop work easier to deal with in post production.

You don't need to worry about the deafness problem since you seem fine with reading and writing.

Sorry for coming off harsh in my earlier posts. Don't mean any harm. Just trying to give you some solid criticism to consider for your business. You can take or leave it because I am not telling you what to do.

50...

why not focus more on her feet? she's so beautiful that it really takes away from the actual foot fetish.

Understood, FarL.

Solid or even harsh crticism can be good, and in hindsight, I appreciate your comments.

If anyone else has comments... toss them in before I hit the sack. :glugglug

Nothing that no one else hasn't already said..

The shoot spans 220 images & 4 different themes, a decent amount of photography is dedicated only to her feet and legs (solo foot, tickling, high heels, feather dusters, etc).


<img src="http://www.hotlinkpro.com/3.jpg">


<img src="http://www.hotlinkpro.com/2.jpg">


Whether or not foot admirers would actually be interested is another matter... I will be seeking further comments on foot boards.