GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Read the FUCKING rules People (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=998699)

Machete_ 11-23-2010 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 17722730)
I doubt there are too many "surfers" on GFY. People like to refer to their enemies as "broke surfers" or "anonymous trolls" every time they have a difference in opinion, but those people need to realize just how many affiliates and site owners there are, and how private a lot of them are. I know a few popular GFY shit disturbers that have been labeled as surfers when I know for a fact they own decent sized sites, seo networks, or mail...

if you don't have a sig, you are a surfer

lazycash 11-23-2010 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Machete_ (Post 17722766)
if you don't have a sig, you are a surfer

Can I borrow your AWE sig so I won't be called a surfer?

Machete_ 11-23-2010 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash (Post 17722775)
Can I borrow your AWE sig so I won't be called a surfer?

Sure, go ahead. I stole it from someone else anyway.

Zuzana Designs 11-23-2010 02:35 PM

I heart GFY and like to see Eric drop the hammer when needed.

will76 11-23-2010 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 17722672)
not true...

so just a simple "not true" but you don't want to share the rest of the info ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 17722730)
I doubt there are too many "surfers" on GFY. People like to refer to their enemies as "broke surfers" or "anonymous trolls" every time they have a difference in opinion, but those people need to realize just how many affiliates and site owners there are, and how private a lot of them are. I know a few popular GFY shit disturbers that have been labeled as surfers when I know for a fact they own decent sized sites, seo networks, or mail...

I refer to the people as "anonymous trolls" who are actually anonymous. Not the SleazyDream complex where you are a nobody if he hasn't heard of you before. But the people who obviously have been around here for years and know whats going on but they make fake nicks or anon nicks so they can come in talk shit without anyone knowing who they are. In most cases its probably the same 4-5 people who have been doing it for years, get a name banned and keep coming back under a new one, or they "buy" one.

Deej 11-23-2010 02:41 PM

Im sure LC makes appearances now and then... Im unaware of his nicks...

Franck... I believe is still around... I havent asked him lately... but I have my assumptions about some round heya...

cykoe6 11-23-2010 02:58 PM

This thread is a real classic. Thanks GFY! :1orglaugh

CyberHustler 11-23-2010 02:58 PM

For real? 6 pages?

sextoyking 11-23-2010 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash (Post 17722775)
Can I borrow your AWE sig so I won't be called a surfer?


Lcash,

Don't sweat the small stuff - people talk crap all the time.

Some of us know you in the biz - it's all good.

NaughtyVisions 11-23-2010 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NanoBot (Post 17722889)
For real? 6 pages?

About two of them consisted of LazyCash and Jesus H. Christ bickering like a married couple.

Here's a recap:


Eric 11-23-2010 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 17722730)
i doubt there are too many "surfers" on gfy. People like to refer to their enemies as "broke surfers" or "anonymous trolls" every time they have a difference in opinion, but those people need to realize just how many affiliates and site owners there are, and how private a lot of them are. I know a few popular gfy shit disturbers that have been labeled as surfers when i know for a fact they own decent sized sites, seo networks, or mail...

b i n g o!!!

Eric 11-23-2010 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zuzana Designs (Post 17722823)
I heart GFY and like to see Eric drop the hammer when needed.

Now now... Our personal time is not to be discussed on GFY!

gideongallery 11-23-2010 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 17719938)
He can start with the obvious ones who have admitted openly that they are not in the business. Easy one to start with: gideongallery

Then easy enough to get all the loudmouths who brag how they "used to be in adult" but now they are so smart and rich because they ONLY do "mainstream" and just come to GFY to make fun of us stupid people in the adult industry. They have posted it themselves here over and over.

Just getting rid of all the surfers on here who have outed themselves trying to pretend to be millionaires in "mainstream" will be easy enough and wipe out a shitload of 'em. :1orglaugh

The rest pretty much reveal themselves with their aggressive behavior and general lack of knowledge about how anything works in this business.

i could get enough sales to qualify for any limit he set
i still own a sit load of pornstar domains, which more than cover their cost just on the redirections.

if i took the affiliate commission they earned and just bought traffic from choker i could easily latter rince repeat until i got the sales number necessary.

he would hav to set the number pretty high get rid of me, and if he didn't apply that same level to everyone then he would be guilty of censorship.

Do you really think a company that sells porn would love to document record of them censoring free speech when they have to hide behind those laws to justify their existance.

handing government documented proof that the next anti-porn law is justified because they censor free speech for a lot less valid reasons is just plain stupid.

AaronM 11-23-2010 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Duck (Post 17721270)
Scroll down to the last post in the thread I will link below where user AaronM is accusing me of selling content with children in it which is a very serious claim and completely false, ask any of my hundreds of customers over the years. This should be grounds for immediate ban? I also sent you an email regarding this.

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/996102-aaronm-negative-rep.html


The grounds for immediate and permanent ban should have been when you were caught doing what you did.

You're a lying cunt to sit there and claim what I posted was false in any way.

Amputate Your Head 11-23-2010 04:41 PM

Do not underestimate LC.

back in the day when I had the hammer, I banned him upwards of 20 times a day. He is a master of creating fake nicks, if nothing else. :2 cents:

Amputate Your Head 11-23-2010 04:42 PM

tree hundy

baddog 11-23-2010 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash (Post 17722605)
Baddog figured it out above, Mark was just shortening my nick Lazy Cash - LC. Should have been obvious to me, but when you see the letters "LC", immediately Lawrence Connor comes to mind.

I am glad someone was able to figure it out. Did not think it was that difficult.

Sly 11-23-2010 04:50 PM

<- just a surfer

Eric 11-23-2010 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 17723107)
i could get enough sales to qualify for any limit he set
i still own a sit load of pornstar domains, which more than cover their cost just on the redirections.

if i took the affiliate commission they earned and just bought traffic from choker i could easily latter rince repeat until i got the sales number necessary.

he would hav to set the number pretty high get rid of me, and if he didn't apply that same level to everyone then he would be guilty of censorship.

Do you really think a company that sells porn would love to document record of them censoring free speech when they have to hide behind those laws to justify their existance.

handing government documented proof that the next anti-porn law is justified because they censor free speech for a lot less valid reasons is just plain stupid.

I actually did the research long ago. I know what you can do, and DO DO in the biz.

baddog 11-23-2010 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 17723154)
<- just a surfer

Rust proof?

AaronM 11-23-2010 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 17723158)
Rust proof?

:1orglaugh:thumbsup

Juicy D. Links 11-23-2010 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 17722615)
did someone say lc wet his pants ?

http://www.teamclickcash.com/funny/polish_party.jpg

i never get invited to the good parties :(

franck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CyberHustler 11-23-2010 04:55 PM

:1orglaugh

AaronM 11-23-2010 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links (Post 17723167)
franck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Yep...

I see Franck and L.C. but who are the two ugly chicks?

baddog 11-23-2010 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 17723176)
Yep...

I see Franck and L.C. but who are the two ugly chicks?

Polish and Juicy

AaronM 11-23-2010 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 17723183)
Polish and Juicy

Clearly Juicy's sister.

Veggetto 11-23-2010 05:07 PM

The ban hammer is out!

gideongallery 11-23-2010 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 17723155)
I actually did the research long ago. I know what you can do, and DO DO in the biz.

thank you

ThumbLord 11-23-2010 05:43 PM

so I am ok?
as in not in trouble (yet?)

NaughtyVisions 11-23-2010 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThumbLord (Post 17723275)
so I am ok?
as in not in trouble (yet?)

I almost said "Being XBIZ nominated, I think your safe." Then I did a double take at your sig...

http://www.gimme-website.com/badges/...rnominated.png

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

ThumbLord 11-23-2010 05:50 PM

np NaughtyVisions :)

Eric 11-23-2010 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThumbLord (Post 17723275)
so I am ok?
as in not in trouble (yet?)

I consider you suspect, at the very least, so I have my eye on you!

ThumbLord 11-23-2010 06:03 PM

thanks my friend !
as in keeping an eye on me, that is

TurboAngel 11-23-2010 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 17723189)
Clearly Juicy's sister.

LOL


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Juicy D. Links 11-23-2010 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 17723189)
Clearly Juicy's sister.

:(:(:(:(:disgust:disgust:disgust

Minte 11-23-2010 06:48 PM

I have a sig! and a reasonably short UIN. It's not for sale however.

baddog 11-23-2010 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte (Post 17723416)
I have a sig! and a reasonably short UIN. It's not for sale however.

I am waiting for when you really need the money, then I am going to jump on it.

Juicy D. Links 11-23-2010 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 17723421)
I am waiting for when you really need the money Juicy, then I am going to jump all over your sweaty, oiled up succulent body.

:helpme:helpme:helpme

baddog 11-23-2010 07:19 PM

that too.

GatorB 11-23-2010 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 17722730)
I doubt there are too many "surfers" on GFY. People like to refer to their enemies as "broke surfers" or "anonymous trolls" every time they have a difference in opinion, but those people need to realize just how many affiliates and site owners there are, and how private a lot of them are. I know a few popular GFY shit disturbers that have been labeled as surfers when I know for a fact they own decent sized sites, seo networks, or mail...

Well The Demon has ADMITTED he's not in the industry and even states he hates porn. Now I don't how much more proof you need when you have a CONFESSION.

The Duck 11-24-2010 03:28 PM

I see that my email and post here about AaronM accusing me of selling cp content has gone ignored even though the rules clearly state allegations of that kind are grounds for immediate ban if proof is not presented. These kind of allegations are very serious and can hurt my business a lot and time after time he is getting away with it.

I guess the rules do not apply to the "bro's".

Deej 11-24-2010 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Duck (Post 17725899)
I see that my email and post here about AaronM accusing me of selling cp content has gone ignored even though the rules clearly state allegations of that kind are grounds for immediate ban if proof is not presented.

I guess the rules do not apply to the "bro's".

Give it a rest Duck... you know full well of what hes referring to and what has been proven in the past. We know youre Kandah and the comet trail that follows...

Youre denying the allegations?

Deej 11-24-2010 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte (Post 17723416)
I have a sig! and a reasonably short UIN. It's not for sale however.

the piss gif in your sig I think quite possibly is the very first gif I ever truly LOL'd at before I even knew of LOL...

Awesome :thumbsup

The Duck 11-24-2010 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 17725903)
Give it a rest Duck... you know full well of what hes referring to and what has been proven in the past. We know youre Kandah and the comet trail that follows...

Youre denying the allegations?

Yes I am. Provide proof of any transaction or find one single customer where I have sold content with under age models. Now you are making the same allegations without posting proof and you should also be banned according to the rules.

You guys don't seem to get it, throwing your shit around on a public forum may seem all fun and games but in the real world and the business I am in it may land me in jail.

AaronM once registered one of my company names out of spite that I had not registered yet, that should tell you where he is coming from in regards to attitude towards me.

Machete_ 11-24-2010 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Duck (Post 17725899)
I see that my email and post here about AaronM accusing me of selling cp content has gone ignored even though the rules clearly state allegations of that kind are grounds for immediate ban if proof is not presented. These kind of allegations are very serious and can hurt my business a lot and time after time he is getting away with it.

I guess the rules do not apply to the "bro's".

AaronM is a BRO.

Rules don't apply to BROS.

Deej 11-24-2010 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Duck (Post 17725915)
Yes I am. Provide proof of any transaction or find one single customer where I have sold content with under age models. Now you are making the same allegations without posting proof and you should also be banned according to the rules.

You guys don't seem to get it, throwing your shit around on a public forum may seem all fun and games but in the real world and the business I am in it may land me in jail.

AaronM once registered one of my company names out of spite that I had not registered yet, that should tell you where he is coming from in regards to attitude towards me.

First I said nothing, nor am I worried that I broke any rules.

Second, I know damn well his stance on you.

Third. Perhaps he misworded, I cant say... maybe you didnt actually sell that package... did you or did you not advertise a package that had said content?

Fourth. Id advise against you continuing this, especially here. I know full well that Eric isnt happy about any of this and as much as a "BRO" aaron is... Eric isnt fucking happy that it has been brought up by either of you. He has said OVER and fucking OVER that this topic shouldnt be discussed here, by any party.

The Duck 11-24-2010 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 17725951)
First I said nothing, nor am I worried that I broke any rules.

Second, I know damn well his stance on you.

Third. Perhaps he misworded, I cant say... maybe you didnt actually sell that package... did you or did you not advertise a package that had said content?

Fourth. Id advise against you continuing this, especially here. I know full well that Eric isnt happy about any of this and as much as a "BRO" aaron is... Eric isnt fucking happy that it has been brought up by either of you. He has said OVER and fucking OVER that this topic shouldnt be discussed here, by any party.

To clarify what AaronM is on about is a package I put together years ago with public content where in one photo there was in the distant background a blurry image of a child (fully clothed) that had nothing to do with the scene. This was of course unacceptable and I immediately pulled the package off the market and learned from the experience to always check my content very closely.

However I would not call this CP and AaronM has for years been twisting this to that I have been selling CP content. Fair enough it was a mistake on my part and will not happen again but the witch hunt AaronM has been putting me through since is just not fair. I would NEVER EVER sell content with under age models and I will personally report anyone who does. I have gotten many offers from Russian producers to sell their disgusting content and I have reported them all to ASACP. With this I have said all I want on the topic and I apologize to Eric for any inconvenience. I have not actually noticed any post where it was stated that this was not to be discussed.

Machete_ 11-24-2010 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Duck (Post 17725980)
public content

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Agent 488 11-24-2010 04:02 PM

where i do i find this public content? links?

Deej 11-24-2010 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Duck (Post 17725980)
To clarify what AaronM is on about is a package I put together years ago with public content where in one photo there was in the distant background a blurry image of a child (fully clothed) that had nothing to do with the scene. This was of course unacceptable and I immediately pulled the package off the market and learned from the experience to always check my content very closely.

However I would not call this CP and AaronM has for years been twisting this to that I have been selling CP content. Fair enough it was a mistake on my part and will not happen again but the witch hunt AaronM has been putting me through since is just not fair. I would NEVER EVER sell content with under age models and I will personally report anyone who does. I have gotten many offers from Russian producers to sell their disgusting content and I have reported them all to ASACP. With this I have said all I want on the topic and I apologize to Eric for any inconvenience. I have not actually noticed any post where it was stated that this was not to be discussed.

Yea I know the pic. But see thats all it took. YOu then tried to be combative to Aaron which he only uses against you. Shit, the cry baby thread was so hypocritical on your part it didnt even begin to be funny.

You could have just said what you did now to Aaron and Im sure it would have never festered into this "witchhunt" you deem it as.

Cool deal. Can we all hug it out over a bacon log now? I didnt fuckin think so.,,

Back to my artery clogged day of photo manipulation.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123