![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Twitter page dead: http://twitter.com/DChambersxxx |
Quote:
|
For those of you sitting in porn valley sweating over a few HIV+ performers, I'd love to have you come over to Thailand and see what a real HIV+ cluster fuck is like.
Not sure what all of you expect. Your guys are fucking guys and your girls are escorts on the side, some of them barebacking for extra money (god bless them). The fact that you've only had a few positive tests over the years is very surprising to me. |
OC Modeling didnt do anything, nor does any agency out there. With all the shit that is transmitted why isnt there a screening process to prevent gay actors or gay for pay actors from working with straight. My 2 cents. I have absolutelyy no problem with homo sexuality. Gay Marrige or anything like that. I do however say they should stay with thier own.
|
Not that this isn't a serious matter..but at the end of the day the percentage of HIV cases in the industry is minute compared to the number of performers shooting day after day. I would much rather take my chances fucking performers in the industry over the typical LA guy/girl off the street.
|
Don't blame it on the M/M sex. Blame it on straight production companies not requiring condoms like they should.
Most gay studios have gone condoms only and gay is much stronger than straight right now so that whole "nobody will buy it" argument is full of shit. Yes, there would still be bareback straight studios and they may sell more copies, but it's nothing different than what the gay industry experiences right now. Plus, the most popular gay sites are condom only. Time to start using condoms AND testing like most gay studios and stop putting your models at risk. Even if you start screening for prior M/M work there is going to come a day when a 100% hetero actor turns up poz from being an inter-venous drug user. Do the right thing and save a life. Condom only sets. |
Quote:
I agree 100% that we should be using condoms in straight movies, btw. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
first, you made a thread saying "Way To Go OC Modeling", so by that title it would appear that you are blaming OC. Is it really up to the talent agencies to monitor models STD's? Isn't that what AIM is supposed to do? second, i believe that bisexuals, especially male bi's, are the main cause for the spread of HIV to heterosexual females which ultimately leads to the spread of HIV to straight males. of course iv drug users are a major cause of spreading bloodborne diseases, but i think the case in point here is within the adult film industry.. with that being said, why on earth would a studio or female actress take the chance of shooting with a gay/bi male performer when the incubation period of HIV is still a question mark? the other major problem i have with testing is that you only need a recent test to shoot scenes that does not factor in the fact that a performer could have had unprotected sex with an infected partner days before a shoot and therefore may be infected and still have a clean test.. to me, the system has always been flawed and i am surprised that there have not been more issues in the past.. how many events like this are going to be needed before stricter standards are put into place? maybe if the studio owners had to have unprotected sex with performers before the shoot. there would be more concern... :2 cents: . |
Quote:
I prefer using the free clinic for the same swab and making a $35 donation which covers their cost plus a few dollars. They'd be more than happy to do it for free though. Then you can sero match, which means HIV+ actors can still perform, but only with other HIV+ actors -- and still with condoms so that in case they have different strands they do not re-infect. Indeed, there is a backlash against bareback videos ... overall. It still has its fans though. Most of my consumer friends like bareback videos because they're forced to use condoms in everyday life and it's a way to enjoy it without putting themselves at risk. Of course, the models are still at risk. :Oh crap HIV isn't all models have to worry about. Hepatitis makes life a real bitch and sometimes kill. All can be avoided with condoms. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Everyone seems to be focused on gay sex as the initial exposure. Ever think that maybe patient zero had a heroine problem? Sharing needles is another way to be exposed to AIDS. Just floating around another possible scenario, playing devils advocate. How many of you in the business have seen some serious drug use by those in the industry? They really haven't identified who patient zero is yet, so far it's only rumors... It'll come out soon enough. I really hope no one else is infected, wishful thinking...
Spanx! Jack |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.avert.org/usa-race-age.htm statistics suggest that most HIV cases in the US are homosexual and or black. 'The overall 5-year relative lung cancer survival rate for 1995-2002 was 15 percent.' and like someone here in this thread did suggest I would be happy to have HIV instead of lung cancer. :2 cents: |
Quote:
but the condom thing only works if at least 80% of the big and medium size companies are in |
who is he dating?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
HIV/AIDS.... they get tested every week, before every shoot? How do they currently do it or are suppose to do it. Next question, how long do you have to have AID/HIV before it will show up on a test? If the person contracted it a couple days before would it show up on a test? |
Quote:
I shoot a lot of porn and people think im so professional because i don't hit on the girls or try to bang them. Shit like this+herpes makes it way easy to look professional.:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.lukeisback.com/?p=14204 To AMA Joe: And if that doesn't work I'm going to beat you fat disgusting ass. The only way you can get pussy is basically paying for a private and calling in a "POV"? Weren't you just at my house on my birthday on 9/11/2010 enjoying my carne asada, beer, women, and liquor? Couldn't you have expressed your opinions to me in private without going to GFY, and (I might add) breaking the law? PS: Every agency has male talent that are "switch hitters" and have done gay porn to break into the business. Not just us. Everyone!! Even the legendary male pornstars have a few gay scenes under their belt. On a side note: I happen to agree with you on the whole gay men not being in straight porn, however: AIM, no agency on Earth, or any other group that I know of can keep track of what a performer is doing in their private lives 24/7. Hence, the title of this thread I find especially insulting and enraging. AIM acted in a 100% professional manner and notified 1st, 2nd, and 3rd generation performers within 24 hours. Kudos to them on that. In A Nutshell: Expect to be hearing from our lawyers. You will be sued. You will lose. You will pay us money. If that doesn't work, see me out in public, I've survived a year in prison in Atlanta without being killed, I am not a pushover. I'm not afraid to slap you like the bitch you are. AMA Joe :321GFY |
Industry standard is once per month. A test is good for 30 days. Some female performers have been known to require that the male talent get a fresh test and don't work with anyone else until working with her. Tough thing to do and expensive but to fuck Sasha Grey I'd do that.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I guess I could google this, but curious to find out how long it has to be in the body with you being contagious before a test could even detect it. I could never be a porn star with out protection for the simple fact I wouldn't trust people to just "not work with or sleep with anyone else" since the last time they were tested. If any one of those people recently fucked around (work or pleasure) and got aids I would be playing russian roulette. I don't trust many people, muchless people I don't know with my life. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why don't they test for it? Who fucking knows. Probably because in reality, no one really gives a shit about the performers. There is no excuse otherwise. They don't test for herpes and HPV because everyone in the industry already has it. |
Quote:
Yes, that is a FACT. |
Quote:
|
I would point out how much of this industry is based on the sexual performances of women who are willing (and preferably eager) to have sex with both men and women. I would point out that having unsafe sex with an infected person (combined with bad luck) is what you get HIV from, not man-on-man action.
But I don't think it will do any good because chicken littles are just listening to the panicked voices in their own heads anyway. |
Quote:
Yes, that is a FACT. :thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Already while I am reading this thread I cringe at the fact that if it is this guy who tested positive, he is being publicly outed and ridiculed in this manner. In what is already probably one of the most trying and difficult times of his life, he now is dealing with it in a very public way that must be absolutely brutal for him to endure. I feel sorry for him, and wish more people would treat this situation with a little more respect. :2 cents: |
Quote:
And Jay -- no offense, bro, but you're a POV dude...and not that much of a lady killer, either. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BTW: I am 100X better looking than everyone that reads GFY. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123