GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Name the countries Canada could defeat in a war (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=992270)

Black All Through 10-14-2010 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy (Post 17602609)
St. Kitts...

:1orglaugh x 2

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 10-14-2010 07:26 AM

Canada existed in 1812, we just weren't officially a country, and while it was largely the people of Canada who won the war, we weren't literally Canadians yet. We were mostly under British rule, and it was under the guidance of the Brits that we were ale to send the Americans running back home after their failed invasion. In fact we owe a large part of the thanks to the native population for us not being a part of that unstable shit heap of a country. The Americans were scared shitless of our injuns.

Anthony 10-14-2010 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minicivan (Post 17605884)
hahaha... "if memory serves me correct"

You're a 40 something Filipino porn slinger who loves guns and MMA. I think you meant to say "if everything I just looked up and skimmed through in Google..."

Oh I've done this research years ago when the boast of Canada burning down the White House were made on GFY. So yes, the quote "if memory serves me correct" is apt.

What exactly does being 40, selling porn, loving guns and training/fighting MMA have to do with any of this? Or was that a disparaging remark to downplay and character assassinate and draw a straw man argument? Because it doesn't take away the fact that my information is right.

charlie g 10-14-2010 07:32 AM

Panama, antartica, mexico

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 10-14-2010 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony (Post 17605770)
Almost got it too..

Now we've got the America bullshit opinion of what happened. See we both have one. You held a little ground, mostly around Lake Erie. Things bounced around back ad forth between sides on Lake Ontario. You failed miserably in trying to take Montreal. The Americans kept on trying but couldn't organize their shit worth a fuck and due to the fact that they mostly sucked kept losing back everything they gained to what wasn't exactly a strong enemy force. Through the majority of the attacks America lost out due to the fact that the Brits were simply a more effective force, and during the majority of the attacks the American troops struggled just to keep going due to their lack of skill and experience. Almost is a bit of a overstatement, but I wouldn't expect an American to admit they failed at winning a fight they started. :2 cents:

ajrocks 10-14-2010 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornstarXS (Post 17602809)
ya i say before we go global domination we should take care of our shame, our red-headed step child, Quebec.

Man would it ever be great to beat the hell out of that red headed step child Quebec.

Anthony 10-14-2010 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry Jew Cat (Post 17605930)
Now we've got the America bullshit opinion of what happened. See we both have one. You held a little ground, mostly around Lake Erie. Things bounced around back ad forth between sides on Lake Ontario. You failed miserably in trying to take Montreal. The Americans kept on trying but couldn't organize their shit worth a fuck and due to the fact that they mostly sucked kept losing back everything they gained to what wasn't exactly a strong enemy force. Through the majority of the attacks America lost out due to the fact that the Brits were simply a more effective force, and during the majority of the attacks the American troops struggled just to keep going due to their lack of skill and experience. Almost is a bit of a overstatement, but I wouldn't expect an American to admit they failed at winning a fight they started. :2 cents:

A fledgling country fighting the world's superpower to a draw not impressive? Burning down the fucking capital of the UK in North America not impressive? What the British did was in retaliation to America's attack. Read your history, the UK Navy started this war, not America. And the UK didn't win, nobody did. Read up on the Treaty of Ghent.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry Jew Cat (Post 17605903)
Canada existed in 1812, we just weren't officially a country, and while it was largely the people of Canada who won the war, we weren't literally Canadians yet. We were mostly under British rule, and it was under the guidance of the Brits that we were ale to send the Americans running back home after their failed invasion. In fact we owe a large part of the thanks to the native population for us not being a part of that unstable shit heap of a country. The Americans were scared shitless of our injuns.

Well I was impressed, but I take it back. Just more nonsense.

People of Canada won the war? Sure, there were part of Canadians in the UK British and Navy, but to say it was the people of Canada who won the war is a joke. That's why all the history books repeat what you are spewing. Right? Ummm, no cause it's wrong.

How about those Canadians who fought for the USA? Do you take pride in those Canadians who fought for the USA and brought the British Empire to a draw on the battlefield?

Quote:

War of 1812

The Upper Canadian Volunteers (U.C.V.) were a small military unit organized at Fort George, Upper Canada, in July 1813 by Joseph Willcocks to fight with American forces during the War of 1812. The U.C.V. participated in the occupation of the Niagara peninsula July to Dec. 1813, and withdrew to the U.S. after burning Newark (Niagara-on-the-Lake) in December 1813. The unit fought in all the major battles of 1814, including the siege of Fort Erie where Willcocks was killed. After the war, its members received free land grants from the American Congress
War of 1812 Upper Canadian Volunteers - Roll of men belonging to the corps of Canadian volunteers In the service of the United States under the command of col. Jos. Willcocks who were ordered to service in different detachments. List taken At Batavia As Of June 1815

Name: Date of Enlistment Status
Smith, Luther, Sgt. July 18, 1813 Wounded at Bridgewater
Squires, Ephraim H, Sgt Dec 12, 1813
Thomas, Seneca, Sgt. July 18, 1813
Seely, Silas, H, Sgt. July 18, 1813
Bennett, John, Pvt July 18, 1813
Fosgat, Silas, Pvt Dec 7, 1813
McGee, William Pvt July 18, 1813
Mallory, Abraham Pvt May 18, 1814
Gaugh, John Pvt July 18, 1813
Dean, Silas Pvt Nov 12, 1813
Griffith, Joseph Pvt Jan 31, 1814
Sherwood, Nathan Pvt Nov 12, 1813
Johnson, John Pvt July 18, 1813
Simmons, John Pvt Feb 18, 1814
Curtis, Grove C July 18, 1813
Fraser, Samuel, Pvt Nov 7, 1813 Wound ed at Bridgewater
Merselas, Cary, Pvt Dec 12, 1813
Palmer, David Pvt Dec 12, 1813 Taken prisoner, Black Rock
Huffman, William Pvt May 18, 1814
Lewis, Jonah Pvt Dec 12, 1813
McGee, James Pvt July 18, 1813
Gilbert, Abner Pvt July 18, 1813
Tufford, Phillip Pvt Nov 3, 1813
The above list or roll of men were mustered as aobve described and were discharged at Batavia June the 15th.
B. Mallory,
Major Commanding

_Richard_ 10-14-2010 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry Jew Cat (Post 17605930)
Now we've got the America bullshit opinion of what happened. See we both have one. You held a little ground, mostly around Lake Erie. Things bounced around back ad forth between sides on Lake Ontario. You failed miserably in trying to take Montreal. The Americans kept on trying but couldn't organize their shit worth a fuck and due to the fact that they mostly sucked kept losing back everything they gained to what wasn't exactly a strong enemy force. Through the majority of the attacks America lost out due to the fact that the Brits were simply a more effective force, and during the majority of the attacks the American troops struggled just to keep going due to their lack of skill and experience. Almost is a bit of a overstatement, but I wouldn't expect an American to admit they failed at winning a fight they started. :2 cents:

you mean, of course, keep losing to a bunch of farmers and natives? I love this whole 'you were british then' hahahah

no, the AMERICANS kept on calling us british and picked on the smaller, far more available, younger cousin to lash out like a butt-hurt bitch

so yea, stroke whatever egos necessary, and we'll see you again in your '1-2 day invasion'

cause the world now knows that really means 'several years'

TheLegacy 10-14-2010 08:11 AM

Technically we could invade and take over anyone - the world wouldn't even see it coming and no one would believe the country being defeated simply because we'd just say, "we're on a peace keeping mission"

Anthony 10-14-2010 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 17606069)
you mean, of course, keep losing to a bunch of farmers and natives? I love this whole 'you were british then' hahahah

no, the AMERICANS kept on calling us british and picked on the smaller, far more available, younger cousin to lash out like a butt-hurt bitch

so yea, stroke whatever egos necessary, and we'll see you again in your '1-2 day invasion'

cause the world now knows that really means 'several years'

i love when Canadians argue with each other on their flawed history retelling. :) I don't care if you are a Canuck Richard, you are still the shiznit in my book. As I know you forgive me for being an American.

But as for the correct history, it was the British, notably the British Navy that started this whole war. We were just defending ourselves and maybe trying to get some of that prime Canadian Real Estate round the Great Lakes. LOL

Anthony 10-14-2010 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLegacy (Post 17606070)
Technically we could invade and take over anyone - the world wouldn't even see it coming and no one would believe the country being defeated simply because we'd just say, "we're on a peace keeping mission"

I love Canada. I was just up in Toronto this past weekend. Hate your new HST, and think that's a huge joke being forced down all of your throats.

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 10-14-2010 08:31 AM

We kept you out of our country when you were invading us. That counts as a win in my books. Even though we were technically under British rule, and the move into Canada came as a retaliation against the British. It is considered a victory for Canada by most Canadians because it kept us as Canada, and not a part of the US. For the Brits, the French, and the natives who lived here and fought to keep America out. So what about the Canadians that fought for your side? There were about 500 of them. What about all the Americans who fled to Canada and fought with us remaining loyal to the empire? That's a plain old pointless argument.

They Americans thought they could march right into Canada and crush us. They even said so. It turned out they were sadly mistaken and defeated repeatedly, gaining zero ground in the process. You could overthrow the Brits in America, but you couldn't manage it in Canada.

Sorry to tell you, but you didn't accomplish shit in that war.

And for the record. You keep blaming the Brits for starting shit. You started that shit way back during the american revolution...

_Richard_ 10-14-2010 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony (Post 17606106)
i love when Canadians argue with each other on their flawed history retelling. :) I don't care if you are a Canuck Richard, you are still the shiznit in my book. As I know you forgive me for being an American.

But as for the correct history, it was the British, notably the British Navy that started this whole war. We were just defending ourselves and maybe trying to get some of that prime Canadian Real Estate round the Great Lakes. LOL

the correct history is simply that the british were already fighting a war against the french, and what set this off was the trade embargo that America felt was 'unjust' in the eyes of international law. Something funny, considering the whole flotilla fiasco recently. Further more, the 'impressement' issue was the british going after Royal Navy Veterans and Deserters, and getting them back on the new ships meant to take over the seas and eventually set the stage for victories during ww1 and ww2.

So while the term 'just defending yourselves' is a good one, it's more a "'we want to take out the northern territories 'Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois and Wisconsin'", and from what i recall, it was all the southern states voting to have the war, and all the northern states voting against it

but i'm sure you forgive me for being canadian :1orglaugh

Loch 10-14-2010 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 17602579)
i'll start

Luxembourg

You mean like back in the day when they fought their way into the US and burned down the White house? :1orglaugh

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 10-14-2010 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 17606202)
the correct history is simply that the british were already fighting a war against the french, and what set this off was the trade embargo that America felt was 'unjust' in the eyes of international law. Something funny, considering the whole flotilla fiasco recently. Further more, the 'impressement' issue was the british going after Royal Navy Veterans and Deserters, and getting them back on the new ships meant to take over the seas and eventually set the stage for victories during ww1 and ww2.

So while the term 'just defending yourselves' is a good one, it's more a "'we want to take out the northern territories 'Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois and Wisconsin'", and from what i recall, it was all the southern states voting to have the war, and all the northern states voting against it

but i'm sure you forgive me for being canadian :1orglaugh

Northern states were still selling us supplies during the war, when they were supposedly forbidden to. So how about all the Americans who kept us going? If America could have organized their shit eve half-assed, maybe they would have had a chance. It's not like we were a strong force to contend with, but our Brit leadership could at least keep their shit together. The Americans made no real lasting advance into Canadian territory because everything they did was a bumbling mess. Hell, even the French and the Indians took the British side. That is saying something.

Anthony 10-14-2010 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry Jew Cat (Post 17606154)
We kept you out of our country when you were invading us. That counts as a win in my books. Even though we were technically under British rule, and the move into Canada came as a retaliation against the British. It is considered a victory for Canada by most Canadians because it kept us as Canada, and not a part of the US. For the Brits, the French, and the natives who lived here and fought to keep America out. So what about the Canadians that fought for your side? There were about 500 of them. What about all the Americans who fled to Canada and fought with us remaining loyal to the empire? That's a plain old pointless argument.

They Americans thought they could march right into Canada and crush us. They even said so. It turned out they were sadly mistaken and defeated repeatedly, gaining zero ground in the process. You could overthrow the Brits in America, but you couldn't manage it in Canada.

Sorry to tell you, but you didn't accomplish shit in that war.

And for the record. You keep blaming the Brits for starting shit. You started that shit way back during the american revolution...

On the flipside, the UK with Canadian regulars also couldn't do shit. Over and over again, I've said it. It was a stalemate, with both sides not able to win decisive or hold any ground. Hence the Treaty of Ghent. To keep on spouting that US lost the war is absolutely wrong. I will concede to your thinking and explanation that it's considered a win because you kept the US out of Canada, by Canadians. The rest of the world and history sees it for what it is. The Americas, a new country, held the premiere World Superpower to a draw.

As for who started the war, I don't blame anyone. It's in the annals of history who started it, and it was the British Navy. Look it up, or not. That way you can keep on with your incorrect and personal view of history.

shake 10-14-2010 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 17602622)
we could win them all...we will just send in celine dion first

everyone will run away screaming...lol

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

quiet 10-14-2010 09:16 AM

this thread turned kind of gay.

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 10-14-2010 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 17602622)
we could win them all...we will just send in celine dion first

everyone will run away screaming...lol

We sent her to Vegas for how long? It didn't work. That's why we're perfecting our new WMD now. Bieber. They have no clue how powerful we are becoming.... :1orglaugh

Anthony 10-14-2010 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 17606202)
the correct history is simply that the british were already fighting a war against the french, and what set this off was the trade embargo that America felt was 'unjust' in the eyes of international law. Something funny, considering the whole flotilla fiasco recently. Further more, the 'impressement' issue was the british going after Royal Navy Veterans and Deserters, and getting them back on the new ships meant to take over the seas and eventually set the stage for victories during ww1 and ww2.

The trade embargo was unjust, and the impressment of American Sailors to fight for the UK against the French was just another, if not the main reason for the war of 1812.

Quote:

So while the term 'just defending yourselves' is a good one, it's more a "'we want to take out the northern territories 'Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois and Wisconsin'", and from what i recall, it was all the southern states voting to have the war, and all the northern states voting against it

but i'm sure you forgive me for being canadian :1orglaugh
I've already stated that it was another grab for land for the Americas as well as another chance to give the UK a matching black eye after the Americas Independence. I am not aware of any split between the states on whether we went to war or not, but if history is any indication of my country's declarations of war, bullshit excuses have been used to go to war for less.

And of course I forgive you for being Canadian, as I do all my Canadian friends that end up living in the USA, becoming citizens and card carrying members of the NRA. :)

_Richard_ 10-14-2010 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony (Post 17606365)

And of course I forgive you for being Canadian, as I do all my Canadian friends that end up living in the USA, becoming citizens and card carrying members of the NRA. :)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh touche

JFK 10-14-2010 09:54 AM

:BangBang::ak47: 101 Canadian Victories:thumbsup

moeloubani 10-14-2010 10:04 AM

Well considering a bunch of rag tag dudes on dirt bikes are wiping their asses with the US in Afghanistan right now I'd have to include the US on the list. Look tough, act tough but I guess when it comes time to get down to business you guys can't do shit. :)

quiet 10-14-2010 10:15 AM

they are wiping our asses as well.

moeloubani 10-14-2010 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quiet (Post 17606500)
they are wiping our asses as well.

as long as they're wiping our asses im happy lol but i know what you mean

the only reason canadians die so much in this stupid afghanistan war is because of dummy USA and their idiot reputation around the world...whose idea was it to side with these dummies? i mean the government not you ppl reading this (puppets hehe)

CamJack 10-14-2010 10:25 AM

Maybe Niagara Falls

Or the Buffalo Bills Madden 2006

bushwacker 10-14-2010 11:32 AM

Haiti, definitely Haiti.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123