Yet More Proof Manmade "Global Warming" is a Fruad - GoFuckYourself.com

Dcat · 06-09-2010, 06:17 PM

Legal verdict: Manmade global warming science doesn?t withstand scrutiny

A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania?s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fail to stand up to scrutiny.

The cross-examination, carried out by Jason Scott Johnston, Professor and Director of the Program on Law, Environment and Economy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, found that ?on virtually every major issue in climate change science, the [reports of the UN?s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and other summarizing work by leading climate establishment scientists have adopted various rhetorical strategies that seem to systematically conceal or minimize what appear to be fundamental scientific uncertainties or even disagreements.?

Professor Johnson, who expressed surprise that the case for global warming was so weak, systematically examined the claims made in IPCC publications and other similar work by leading climate establishment scientists and compared them with what is found in the peer-edited climate science literature. He found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it ?seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.?

The 79-page document, which effectively eviscerates the case for man-made global warming, can be found here.

Financial Post

Read more: http://opinion.financialpost.com/201...#ixzz0qPLlkV00

Dcat · 06-09-2010, 06:23 PM

Also of interest..

Back in 2007 the Weather Channel Founder said "Global Warming Greatest Scam in History"

"It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create in [sic] allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus."

Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming ?Greatest Scam in History?

BestXXXPorn · 06-09-2010, 06:24 PM

LOL, as if I needed more proof than virtually every single atmospheric scientist saying it was a scam :P There were like 15,000 signatures from scientists saying it was nothing more that hot air (no pun intended)...

But the powers that be will just ignore that... I mean if it's not convenient to their goals it's simply not true.

dav3 · 06-09-2010, 06:27 PM

Stop worrying about if global warming is a scam or not and just do your part to not consume everything in sight.

Chosen · 06-09-2010, 07:22 PM

Fruad is cool

Dollarmansteve · 06-09-2010, 07:48 PM

climate scientists are motivated by greed and their ego. 'Popular' fields of research receive the most grant money. More grant money means more ego, more 'i told you so', more hot grad-student research assistants. Just because the cause is painted as 'good' doesn't mean it isn't corrupt.

Dcat · 06-09-2010, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dav3

Stop worrying about if global warming is a scam or not and just do your part to not consume everything in sight.

Why worry?

Well, because they are about to extort a LOT more of "your" money from "you" using the scam as the pretext.

WHY have they spent untold MILLIONS over the years paying off corrupt scientists and brain washing people to believe in Global Warming? Did they just one day decide they would spend all that money for the good of Polar Bears?

No, it's an investment. An investment with the following formula:

Tax, tax, tax, and more tax. Carbon taxes, Cap and Trade taxes, Global Carbon taxes, government allowances and permits to emit carbon dioxide, and on and on.

fatfoo · 06-09-2010, 07:51 PM

Maybe nuclear weapons tests contributed to global warming? Just an idea.

cykoe6 · 06-09-2010, 07:56 PM

I don't understand......... I saw on the BBC and CNN and in the NYT many many times that the science is "settled".

Sly · 06-09-2010, 07:58 PM

What about Manbearpig?

I think that we should be taking better care of the planet, no doubt about that. Using less, cleaning up after ourselves better, making the world a beautiful place. But I never did jump onto the man-made global warming crusade. It almost turned into a religion... a massive group of people declaring with absolute certainty (and sketchy "proof") that it did in fact exist while refusing to entertain other possibilities.

Dcat · 06-09-2010, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cykoe6

I don't understand......... I saw on the BBC and CNN and in the NYT many many times that the science is "settled".

lol .."science" and "settled" should never appear in the same sentence.

TheSenator · 06-09-2010, 08:10 PM

Farts......don't believe a thing

stickyfingerz · 06-09-2010, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve

climate scientists are motivated by greed and their ego. 'Popular' fields of research receive the most grant money. More grant money means more ego, more 'i told you so', more hot grad-student research assistants. Just because the cause is painted as 'good' doesn't mean it isn't corrupt.

DING DING DING DING!

Babaganoosh · 06-09-2010, 10:34 PM

Coup · 06-09-2010, 11:12 PM

"science is a scam"

-University of Pennsylvania?s Institute for Law and Economics, as reported by http://opinion.financialpost.com/

Dcat · 06-14-2010, 02:05 PM

The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney, says IPCC insider

Lawrence Solomon June 13, 2010 ? 8:50 am

The UN?s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, according to Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and IPCC insider. The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was ?only a few dozen experts,? he states in a paper for Progress in Physical Geography, co-authored with student Martin Mahony.

?Claims such as ?2,500 of the world?s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate? are disingenuous,? the paper states unambiguously, adding that they rendered ?the IPCC vulnerable to outside criticism.?

Hulme, Professor of Climate Change in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia ? the university of Climategate fame ? is the founding Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and one of the UK?s most prominent climate scientists. Among his many roles in the climate change establishment, Hulme was the IPCC?s co-ordinating Lead Author for its chapter on ?Climate scenario development? for its Third Assessment Report and a contributing author of several other chapters.

Hulme?s depiction of IPCC?s exaggeration of the number of scientists who backed its claim about man-made climate change can be found on pages 10 and 11 of his paper, found here.

Financial Post

link

seeandsee · 06-14-2010, 02:10 PM

global give me money to do nothing and talk is warming out side is OVER, people its end, nobody give a shit about that, they want jobs!

Hentaikid · 06-14-2010, 02:11 PM

"law and economics" professors are experts on hard science now

The Duck · 06-14-2010, 02:12 PM

Amputate Your Head · 06-14-2010, 02:13 PM

It's really kind of a moo point. (A cow's point of view).

Even those with only a single cell left of common sense should know that we obviously cannot continue to rape and poison our planet. If global warming is some sort of international marketing tactic to sell CFL light bulbs, then so what? We need to stop killing and polluting every fucking thing we touch anyway. And that makes it moo.

Bill8 · 06-14-2010, 02:33 PM

What does the "verdict" of a bunch of law and economics professors have to do with the science?

Economics professors brought us the last 20 years of bubbles and crashes, and never successfully predicted a thing except how to spew media bullshit to put money in their own pockets.

And lawyers say what they are paid to say.

Read the science itself, and learn enough about it to understand what the scientific method is modeling.

Of course there is disagreement. Disagreement is how the scientific method works.

It's not voodoo and asskissing and moneychasing like economics and law.

---

Not that there is any point in debating with wingnuts.

And wingnuts are afraid of the scientific method, so fat chance of them studying it.

2MuchMark · 06-14-2010, 02:54 PM

People who think that Global warming is not happening fucking make me sick. Just because the president of the Weather Channel doesn't agree, Global Warming isn't happening? Give me a break.

WEATHER <> CLIMATE.

For fuck sakes, learn the difference people.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/no...e_weather.html

_Richard_ · 06-14-2010, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babaganoosh

_Richard_ · 06-14-2010, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dcat

He found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it ?seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.?

"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis"

funny or no? hahaha

mgtarheels · 06-14-2010, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill8

What does the "verdict" of a bunch of law and economics professors have to do with the science?

Economics professors brought us the last 20 years of bubbles and crashes, and never successfully predicted a thing except how to spew media bullshit to put money in their own pockets.

And lawyers say what they are paid to say.

Read the science itself, and learn enough about it to understand what the scientific method is modeling.

Of course there is disagreement. Disagreement is how the scientific method works.

It's not voodoo and asskissing and moneychasing like economics and law.

---

Not that there is any point in debating with wingnuts.

And wingnuts are afraid of the scientific method, so fat chance of them studying it.

You're so ignorant on the subject you're speaking, that I couldn't even laugh at your comments.

06-09-2010, 06:17 PM	#1
Dcat Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mexico Posts: 1,607	Yet More Proof Manmade "Global Warming" is a Fruad Legal verdict: Manmade global warming science doesn?t withstand scrutiny A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania?s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fail to stand up to scrutiny. The cross-examination, carried out by Jason Scott Johnston, Professor and Director of the Program on Law, Environment and Economy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, found that ?on virtually every major issue in climate change science, the [reports of the UN?s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and other summarizing work by leading climate establishment scientists have adopted various rhetorical strategies that seem to systematically conceal or minimize what appear to be fundamental scientific uncertainties or even disagreements.? Professor Johnson, who expressed surprise that the case for global warming was so weak, systematically examined the claims made in IPCC publications and other similar work by leading climate establishment scientists and compared them with what is found in the peer-edited climate science literature. He found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it ?seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.? The 79-page document, which effectively eviscerates the case for man-made global warming, can be found here. Financial Post Read more: http://opinion.financialpost.com/201...#ixzz0qPLlkV00

06-09-2010, 06:24 PM	#3
BestXXXPorn Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Asheville, NC Posts: 2,277	LOL, as if I needed more proof than virtually every single atmospheric scientist saying it was a scam :P There were like 15,000 signatures from scientists saying it was nothing more that hot air (no pun intended)... But the powers that be will just ignore that... I mean if it's not convenient to their goals it's simply not true. __________________ ICQ: 258-202-811 \| Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com

06-09-2010, 06:27 PM	#4
dav3 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 7,348	Stop worrying about if global warming is a scam or not and just do your part to not consume everything in sight. __________________ Webmasters :: Juicy Ads :: ACWM :: Crak Revenue :: Money Tree

06-09-2010, 07:48 PM	#6
Dollarmansteve Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Location: T.O. Posts: 2,849	climate scientists are motivated by greed and their ego. 'Popular' fields of research receive the most grant money. More grant money means more ego, more 'i told you so', more hot grad-student research assistants. Just because the cause is painted as 'good' doesn't mean it isn't corrupt. __________________ I died.

06-09-2010, 07:51 PM	#8
fatfoo ICQ:649699063 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 27,763	Maybe nuclear weapons tests contributed to global warming? Just an idea. __________________ Send me an email: [email protected]

06-09-2010, 06:23 PM	#2
Dcat Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mexico Posts: 1,607	Also of interest.. Back in 2007 the Weather Channel Founder said "Global Warming Greatest Scam in History" "It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create in [sic] allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus." Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming ?Greatest Scam in History?

06-09-2010, 07:22 PM	#5
Chosen VIPPay.com \| AdultWebSponsors.com Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 63,151	Fruad is cool

06-09-2010, 07:56 PM	#9
cykoe6 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vegas Posts: 4,499	I don't understand......... I saw on the BBC and CNN and in the NYT many many times that the science is "settled". __________________ бабки, шлюхи, сила

06-09-2010, 07:58 PM	#10
Sly Let's do some business! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 31,340	What about Manbearpig? I think that we should be taking better care of the planet, no doubt about that. Using less, cleaning up after ourselves better, making the world a beautiful place. But I never did jump onto the man-made global warming crusade. It almost turned into a religion... a massive group of people declaring with absolute certainty (and sketchy "proof") that it did in fact exist while refusing to entertain other possibilities. __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc. Click here for more details.

06-09-2010, 08:10 PM	#12
TheSenator Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: NJ Posts: 13,337	Farts......don't believe a thing __________________ ISeekGirls.com since 2005

06-09-2010, 10:34 PM	#14
Babaganoosh ♥♥♥ Likes Hugs ♥♥♥ Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: /home Posts: 15,841	__________________ I like pie.

06-09-2010, 11:12 PM	#15
Coup 🚨 PBBC International 🚨 Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: /👁\ Posts: 9,931	"science is a scam" -University of Pennsylvania?s Institute for Law and Economics, as reported by http://opinion.financialpost.com/

06-14-2010, 02:05 PM	#16
Dcat Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mexico Posts: 1,607	The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney, says IPCC insider Lawrence Solomon June 13, 2010 ? 8:50 am The UN?s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, according to Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and IPCC insider. The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was ?only a few dozen experts,? he states in a paper for Progress in Physical Geography, co-authored with student Martin Mahony. ?Claims such as ?2,500 of the world?s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate? are disingenuous,? the paper states unambiguously, adding that they rendered ?the IPCC vulnerable to outside criticism.? Hulme, Professor of Climate Change in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia ? the university of Climategate fame ? is the founding Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and one of the UK?s most prominent climate scientists. Among his many roles in the climate change establishment, Hulme was the IPCC?s co-ordinating Lead Author for its chapter on ?Climate scenario development? for its Third Assessment Report and a contributing author of several other chapters. Hulme?s depiction of IPCC?s exaggeration of the number of scientists who backed its claim about man-made climate change can be found on pages 10 and 11 of his paper, found here. Financial Post link

06-14-2010, 02:10 PM	#17
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	global give me money to do nothing and talk is warming out side is OVER, people its end, nobody give a shit about that, they want jobs! __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

06-14-2010, 02:11 PM	#18
Hentaikid Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,249	"law and economics" professors are experts on hard science now

06-14-2010, 02:12 PM	#19
The Duck Adult Content Provider Industry Role: Join Date: May 2005 Location: Europe Posts: 18,243	__________________ Skype Horusmaia ICQ 41555245 Email [email protected]

06-14-2010, 02:13 PM	#20
Amputate Your Head There can be only one Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Somewhere else Posts: 39,075	It's really kind of a moo point. (A cow's point of view). Even those with only a single cell left of common sense should know that we obviously cannot continue to rape and poison our planet. If global warming is some sort of international marketing tactic to sell CFL light bulbs, then so what? We need to stop killing and polluting every fucking thing we touch anyway. And that makes it moo. __________________ SIG TOO BIG

06-14-2010, 02:33 PM	#21
Bill8 Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 1,901	What does the "verdict" of a bunch of law and economics professors have to do with the science? Economics professors brought us the last 20 years of bubbles and crashes, and never successfully predicted a thing except how to spew media bullshit to put money in their own pockets. And lawyers say what they are paid to say. Read the science itself, and learn enough about it to understand what the scientific method is modeling. Of course there is disagreement. Disagreement is how the scientific method works. It's not voodoo and asskissing and moneychasing like economics and law. --- Not that there is any point in debating with wingnuts. And wingnuts are afraid of the scientific method, so fat chance of them studying it.

06-14-2010, 02:54 PM	#22
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 49,499	People who think that Global warming is not happening fucking make me sick. Just because the president of the Weather Channel doesn't agree, Global Warming isn't happening? Give me a break. WEATHER <> CLIMATE. For fuck sakes, learn the difference people. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/no...e_weather.html __________________ Custom Coding \| Videochat Solutions \| Age Verification \| IT Help & Support www.2Much.net