Online porn is a lot bigger than you think - GoFuckYourself.com

HELMY · 06-03-2010, 07:10 AM

According to this article:

http://dvice.com/archives/2010/06/infographic-onl.php

dyna mo · 06-03-2010, 07:17 AM

i wonder where they came up with all that baloney.

Barefootsies · 06-03-2010, 07:21 AM

Thanks for the insight fine sire.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i wonder where they came up with all that baloney.

Indeed.

SimpleJack · 06-03-2010, 07:27 AM

Damn, those are some crazy statistics! Number 11 is very disturbing!

CaptainHowdy · 06-03-2010, 07:27 AM

Porn is God?

Konkan · 06-03-2010, 07:52 AM

It is tremendous number of adult sites on the net. Also the number of wankers is growing up ,too

Oracle Porn · 06-03-2010, 08:04 AM

Roald · 06-03-2010, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oracle Porn

haha

Scott McD · 06-03-2010, 08:30 AM

I'm guessing most of those were made up. Or just a very rough estimate at the least...

TopbucksMatt · 06-03-2010, 08:37 AM

We have some thoughts on this image @ http://blog.pinkvisual.com/real-porn...t-not-so-fast/

bbobby86 · 06-03-2010, 09:24 AM

thanks for share this useful information...

madawgz · 06-03-2010, 10:51 AM

only 24m sites? pfff

Porno Dan · 06-03-2010, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i wonder where they came up with all that baloney.

I was thinking the same exact thing

DamianJ · 06-03-2010, 11:27 AM

Look at the sources they quote for at the bottom.

Total made up shit.

Quentin · 06-03-2010, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ

Look at the sources they quote for at the bottom.

Total made up shit.

Ding!

Pay no attention to these stats, folks; they're nothing but what some members of the U.S. military would refer to as 'SWAG' -- Scientific Wild Ass Guesses.

DamianJ · 06-03-2010, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quentin

Ding!

Pay no attention to these stats, folks; they're nothing but what some members of the U.S. military would refer to as 'SWAG' -- Scientific Wild Ass Guesses.

Heh! I like SWAG, not heard that before.

Quentin · 06-03-2010, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ

Heh! I like SWAG, not heard that before.

U.S. military personnel have an unfair advantage when it comes to coming up with great abbreviations; virtually everything in their lexicon is eventually abbreviated.

For example, the cumbersome "Time-Phased Force Deployment Data" became TPFDD, which most personnel end up pronouncing "tip fiddle."

One of my all time favorite military innovations in terminology is the WWII era term "snafu," which stands for "Situation Normal: All Fucked Up."

NemesisEnforcer · 06-03-2010, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HELMY

According to this article:

http://dvice.com/archives/2010/06/infographic-onl.php

This part is interesting:

Quote:

The second most astonishing number in this fact-filled tableau: Internet porn earns $4.9 billion worldwide per year. That's particularly laughable in light of the fact that sexual material on the Internet is so ubiquitous and easy to find for free. Who's paying for this stuff?

So that's how the porn business continues to thrive: It's built on the backs of people who don't know how to find stuff on the Internet.

papill0n · 06-03-2010, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Thanks for the insight fine sire.

what a fucking loser

Dennis69 · 06-03-2010, 02:27 PM

I wonder how true #3 is... 1 in 3 viewers are women!!!

Waiter · 06-03-2010, 04:54 PM

interesting and useful

JFK · 06-03-2010, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quentin

U.S. military personnel have an unfair advantage when it comes to coming up with great abbreviations; virtually everything in their lexicon is eventually abbreviated.

For example, the cumbersome "Time-Phased Force Deployment Data" became TPFDD, which most personnel end up pronouncing "tip fiddle."

One of my all time favorite military innovations in terminology is the WWII era term "snafu," which stands for "Situation Normal: All Fucked Up."

FUBAR came from the same era

$5 submissions · 06-04-2010, 12:22 AM

That's 10.8 cents per user per second of viewing porn. What are the forecasts for this amount? Downtrend?

Maybe focus on selling EXPERIENCES instead of 'canned content'? See sig

Davy · 06-04-2010, 12:49 AM

There are 300 million people in the US, but yet only 40 million are said to be watching online porn regularly? What's wrong with you people?

martinsc · 06-04-2010, 03:14 AM

Bill8 · 06-04-2010, 04:05 AM

That inforgraphic has been making the rounds.

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/06/03...cally-whe.html

This is the link to the whole and I think original graphic:

http://i.imgur.com/iBG0P.jpg

This is the text from that boingboing post:

-----------------------------------------

Today, I finally caught that infographic on Internet porn facts that's been going around like a bad itch in a delicate place. I'm a bit skeptical about how accurate it is?if you scroll to the bottom you will see that the number one source is an article in the Daily Mail. But, it did make me think about how a single soundbite statistic doesn't necessarily tell you everything you need to know to understand the big picture.

Case in point, according to said infographic, Utah has the United States' highest online porn subscription rate per thousand home broadband users. My first thought: "Heh, dirty Mormons."

But wait! The fact doesn't actually tell us that the good people of Utah consume more porn than, say, Californians. It merely tells us that Utahans are more likely to pay a regular subscription for their porn. Sure, this could be an example of religious hypocrisy caught red-handed. (Ahem.) But, it might also be something far funnier: People who are so clean-cut and law-abiding that they don't even feel comfortable illegally downloading their porn. (Or, it could just be that the citizens of Utah are more likely to not be terribly Internet savvy, in which case, as a public service, I'd like to take a moment inform them all the RedTube exists.)

The point: We have a statistic. But we don't have enough information to know what that statistic really means.

---------------------------------------

Paul Markham · 06-04-2010, 04:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davy

There are 300 million people in the US, but yet only 40 million are said to be watching online porn regularly? What's wrong with you people?

I doubt if that many regularly care watching porn sites.

06-03-2010, 07:10 AM	#1
HELMY Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 494	Online porn is a lot bigger than you think According to this article: http://dvice.com/archives/2010/06/infographic-onl.php __________________ XBIZ™ \| The Industry Source

06-03-2010, 07:27 AM	#4
SimpleJack Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Not Sure Posts: 169	Damn, those are some crazy statistics! Number 11 is very disturbing! __________________ -- -- [email protected]

06-03-2010, 07:27 AM	#5
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,522	Porn is God? __________________ Tjeezers.cam plus all sites $12.000,00. Transfer within 24 hours.

06-03-2010, 07:52 AM	#6
Konkan Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 3,537	It is tremendous number of adult sites on the net. Also the number of wankers is growing up ,too __________________ Only one affiliate program for Pussy and Cash

06-03-2010, 08:04 AM	#7
Oracle Porn Affiliate Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Icq: 94-399-723 Posts: 24,433	__________________

06-03-2010, 07:17 AM	#2
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,204	i wonder where they came up with all that baloney.

06-03-2010, 08:30 AM	#9
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	I'm guessing most of those were made up. Or just a very rough estimate at the least... __________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

06-03-2010, 08:37 AM	#10
TopbucksMatt Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 111	We have some thoughts on this image @ http://blog.pinkvisual.com/real-porn...t-not-so-fast/ __________________ Matt Mobile Marketing / Community Manager www.Topbucksmobile.com email: [email protected] Twitter: @pinkvisual

06-03-2010, 09:24 AM	#11
bbobby86 partners.sexier.com Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 11,926	thanks for share this useful information... __________________

06-03-2010, 10:51 AM	#12
madawgz 8.8.8.8 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Noordermarkt Posts: 30,509	only 24m sites? pfff __________________ TAEMDLRMSKRJIXMRLSMRJ.

06-03-2010, 11:27 AM	#14
DamianJ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: A magical land Posts: 15,808	Look at the sources they quote for at the bottom. Total made up shit.

06-03-2010, 02:27 PM	#20
Dennis69 Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Dreamland Posts: 1,685	I wonder how true #3 is... 1 in 3 viewers are women!!! __________________ HaHaHa

06-03-2010, 04:54 PM	#21
Waiter Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 15,986	interesting and useful __________________ The Best Web Hosting Plan ... Amerinoc.com / Unlimited Transfer / Unlimited Web Space / Unlimited Domains / Unlimited Email + Databases ... And much more at Amerinoc.com

06-04-2010, 12:22 AM	#23
$5 submissions I help you SUCCEED Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas Posts: 32,195	That's 10.8 cents per user per second of viewing porn. What are the forecasts for this amount? Downtrend? Maybe focus on selling EXPERIENCES instead of 'canned content'? See sig __________________ Need a NON-ADULT income stream? We build your YOUTUBE CHANNEL for only $20 per video! For Hire: $3/hour or $400 per month Marketing Specialist Virtual Assistants

06-04-2010, 12:49 AM	#24
Davy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Germany Posts: 4,323	There are 300 million people in the US, but yet only 40 million are said to be watching online porn regularly? What's wrong with you people? __________________ --- ICQ 14-76-98 <-- I don't use this at all

06-04-2010, 03:14 AM	#25
martinsc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: 127.0.0.1 Posts: 27,047	__________________ Make Money

06-04-2010, 04:05 AM	#26
Bill8 Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 1,901	That inforgraphic has been making the rounds. http://www.boingboing.net/2010/06/03...cally-whe.html This is the link to the whole and I think original graphic: http://i.imgur.com/iBG0P.jpg This is the text from that boingboing post: ----------------------------------------- Today, I finally caught that infographic on Internet porn facts that's been going around like a bad itch in a delicate place. I'm a bit skeptical about how accurate it is?if you scroll to the bottom you will see that the number one source is an article in the Daily Mail. But, it did make me think about how a single soundbite statistic doesn't necessarily tell you everything you need to know to understand the big picture. Case in point, according to said infographic, Utah has the United States' highest online porn subscription rate per thousand home broadband users. My first thought: "Heh, dirty Mormons." But wait! The fact doesn't actually tell us that the good people of Utah consume more porn than, say, Californians. It merely tells us that Utahans are more likely to pay a regular subscription for their porn. Sure, this could be an example of religious hypocrisy caught red-handed. (Ahem.) But, it might also be something far funnier: People who are so clean-cut and law-abiding that they don't even feel comfortable illegally downloading their porn. (Or, it could just be that the citizens of Utah are more likely to not be terribly Internet savvy, in which case, as a public service, I'd like to take a moment inform them all the RedTube exists.) The point: We have a statistic. But we don't have enough information to know what that statistic really means. ---------------------------------------