Online porn is a lot bigger than you think
 

According to this article:

http://dvice.com/archives/2010/06/infographic-onl.php


http://dvice.com/assets_c/2010/06/In...2293-40106.jpg

i wonder where they came up with all that baloney.

Thanks for the insight fine sire.

Indeed.

Damn, those are some crazy statistics! Number 11 is very disturbing!

Porn is God?

It is tremendous number of adult sites on the net. Also the number of wankers is growing up ,too

haha :1orglaugh

I'm guessing most of those were made up. Or just a very rough estimate at the least... :2 cents:

We have some thoughts on this image @ http://blog.pinkvisual.com/real-porn...t-not-so-fast/

thanks for share this useful information...

only 24m sites? pfff :1orglaugh

I was thinking the same exact thing

Look at the sources they quote for at the bottom.

Total made up shit.

Ding!

Pay no attention to these stats, folks; they're nothing but what some members of the U.S. military would refer to as 'SWAG' -- Scientific Wild Ass Guesses.

Heh! I like SWAG, not heard that before.

U.S. military personnel have an unfair advantage when it comes to coming up with great abbreviations; virtually everything in their lexicon is eventually abbreviated.

For example, the cumbersome "Time-Phased Force Deployment Data" became TPFDD, which most personnel end up pronouncing "tip fiddle."

One of my all time favorite military innovations in terminology is the WWII era term "snafu," which stands for "Situation Normal: All Fucked Up."

This part is interesting:

:1orglaugh what a fucking loser

I wonder how true #3 is... 1 in 3 viewers are women!!!

interesting and useful :thumbsup

FUBAR came from the same era:thumbsup

That's 10.8 cents per user per second of viewing porn. What are the forecasts for this amount? Downtrend?

Maybe focus on selling EXPERIENCES instead of 'canned content'? See sig :)

There are 300 million people in the US, but yet only 40 million are said to be watching online porn regularly? What's wrong with you people? :)

That inforgraphic has been making the rounds.

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/06/03...cally-whe.html

This is the link to the whole and I think original graphic:

http://i.imgur.com/iBG0P.jpg

This is the text from that boingboing post:

-----------------------------------------

Today, I finally caught that infographic on Internet porn facts that's been going around like a bad itch in a delicate place. I'm a bit skeptical about how accurate it is?if you scroll to the bottom you will see that the number one source is an article in the Daily Mail. But, it did make me think about how a single soundbite statistic doesn't necessarily tell you everything you need to know to understand the big picture.

Case in point, according to said infographic, Utah has the United States' highest online porn subscription rate per thousand home broadband users. My first thought: "Heh, dirty Mormons."

But wait! The fact doesn't actually tell us that the good people of Utah consume more porn than, say, Californians. It merely tells us that Utahans are more likely to pay a regular subscription for their porn. Sure, this could be an example of religious hypocrisy caught red-handed. (Ahem.) But, it might also be something far funnier: People who are so clean-cut and law-abiding that they don't even feel comfortable illegally downloading their porn. (Or, it could just be that the citizens of Utah are more likely to not be terribly Internet savvy, in which case, as a public service, I'd like to take a moment inform them all the RedTube exists.)

The point: We have a statistic. But we don't have enough information to know what that statistic really means.

---------------------------------------

I doubt if that many regularly care watching porn sites.