GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Bombshell: Silverstein Wanted To Demolish Building 7 On 9/11 (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=965007)

theking 04-23-2010 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17068187)
""Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel - Samuel Johnson

From Wikipedia

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false-flag plan that originated within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of the Operation Northwoods plan was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington."

The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere."

Several other proposals were included within the Operation Northwoods plan, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted[citation needed] and the proposals included in the plan were never executed.

Never executed...are the keywords. Ever heard of brainstorming and the methodology used to brainstorm. The US has think tanks...civilian and military...that propose all types of plans and contingency plans...verging from the ludicrous onward. Get over it.

mayabong 04-23-2010 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17068202)
Never executed...are the keywords. Ever heard of brainstorming and the methodology used to brainstorm. The US has think tanks...civilian and military...that propose all types of plans and contingency plans...verging from the ludicrous onward. Get over it.

Yeah if it was executed, you'd be the first one calling for castro's head and calling people like me retarded for questioning the events.

dav3 04-23-2010 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17068175)

The guy in this video would know better than you or the writer of that site:
Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17067452)


L-Pink 04-23-2010 05:59 PM

Hey king, executed ..... like your loyal dog? You fuck!


.

theking 04-23-2010 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 17068221)
Hey king, executed ..... like your loyal dog? You fuck!


.

Well...it is clear that you are begging for my attention. It was my dog...it is my way...it is my life. I do things as I choose to and do not need...want...or ask for your approval...thank you very much. You are now dismissed.

D Ghost 04-23-2010 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17068110)
I am aware and have been aware of the video...but in what context was "pull it" used. Did he mean pull the firefighters and police out of the building to not and try to save the building as it appeared the building was on the verge of collapse. Others that have claimed to have spoken with him about this matter say that is what he was referring to.

If he in fact had the building had been rigged for demolition I am satisfied that his insurance coverage would be voided...and there would probably be a criminal investigation since I seriously doubt that it is legal to pre rig a building for demolition while that building is exposed to the public for use and has people employed there.

Why would he say "pull it" to mean "get the firefighters out" - that makes no sense in that context.

L-Pink 04-23-2010 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17068231)
Well...it is clear that you are begging for my attention. It was my dog...it is my way...it is my life. I do things as I choose to and do not need...want...or ask for your approval...thank you very much. You are now dismissed.

Not begging for attention, just reminding you you are a total douche.


.

Serge Litehead 04-23-2010 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17067452)
what r firefighters saying?


this guy talks more sense than official story ever did..

CaptainHowdy 04-23-2010 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 17067581)
Can we blame Obama somehow?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh ...

PornoStar69 04-23-2010 06:12 PM

USS Liberty was a false flag operation fully approved by the LBJ administration

google/youtube that.

theking 04-23-2010 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoStar69 (Post 17068249)
USS Liberty was a false flag operation fully approved by the LBJ administration

google/youtube that.

Pigshit.

L-Pink 04-23-2010 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17068268)
Pigshit.

Dipshit.


.

L-Pink 04-23-2010 06:25 PM

Lots of questions need answered folks ....... goodnight.


.

BFT3K 04-24-2010 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17068030)
Sort of like the government calling the tea parties racist radicals.....

No, not at all. The government is not calling the TP anything - it is the media that picks sides in the American Bowel Movement.

D Ghost 04-24-2010 06:51 PM

tea party heh... infested and infiltrated recently by Republicans (*cough* *cough* Palin) looking for support.

fatfoo 04-24-2010 07:01 PM

Interesting - "Larry Silverstein collected nearly $500 million dollars in insurance as a result of the collapse of Building 7."

SmokeyTheBear 04-24-2010 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17067412)
From what I read it was a reporter that was there. They tend to be credible. Maybe I'm missing something.

if a reporter told a reporter about what he overheard , thats hearsay. Did he hear it himself ? unlikely . Lets just suppose larry makes important phone calls to his insurance agent with reporters all around for the sake of the argument. The most someone would be hearing would be half a conversation.

DBS.US 04-24-2010 08:57 PM

http://firefightersfor911truth.org/

mayabong 04-24-2010 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 17072008)
if a reporter told a reporter about what he overheard , thats hearsay. Did he hear it himself ? unlikely . Lets just suppose larry makes important phone calls to his insurance agent with reporters all around for the sake of the argument. The most someone would be hearing would be half a conversation.

People still believe the official story? haha


D Ghost 04-24-2010 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17072119)
People still believe the official story? haha


interesting....

Rochard 04-24-2010 10:32 PM

This is some more fucking bullshit story where people with too much free time on their hands are making shit up instead of buying a membership to a porn site.

We've gotten to the point where "someone can say something" with zero fucking proof, and everyone believes it.

Here's proof:

Jeffrey Scott Shapiro states, ?I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard.?

?Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building ? since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.?


Basically, a journalist who was there that day claims that "several people" told him that Silverstein was on the phone with his insurance company. The entire article is based on information that a fucking journalist held onto for years. Newsflash, journalists don't "sit on information" for years. No less do they make claims based on "multiple sources" that they fail to name.

Then in the same fucking article you have the following:

"?While I was talking with a fellow reporter and several NYPD officers, Building 7 suddenly collapsed, and before it hit the ground, not a single sound emanated from the tower area. There were no explosives; I would have heard them. In fact, I remember that in those few seconds, as the building sank to the ground that I was stunned by how quiet it was,? writes Shapiro in his Fox News hit piece."

So you have an article that a journalist sat on for years, which claims "someone told him something" and then in the same article you have a witness that says "There were no explosives were used". This seems to be more and more common.

The guy on the Youtube video who "claims he heard a countdown" didn't fucking hear jack shit. He heard nothing. He said he heard a "a transmission from a walkie talkie that a red cross person was holding, where he was holding his hand over the receiver". Further, he says he couldn't make out what was being said (or if anything at all was being said for that matter) but the sound it was making was "pulsed" with a "steady rhythm" which in his view was a "count down". Amid the confusion of that day he heard a muffled transmission that he couldn't make out but he "thinks" it "might have been" a countdown. Seems to me there was a lot of fucking alarms going off that morning; All the firefighters had these personal alarms that were going off in the dust clouds - maybe that "steady sound" he fucking heard was an alarm, and it was being covered up because it was nothing more than annoying.

You people are sheep.

http://www.rochardsbunnyranch.com/rock/tinfoil.jpg

Rochard 04-24-2010 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17072119)
People still believe the official story? haha


This video is some more shit. It says "buildings do not do this spontaneously" which is very true. But they do fall like that when hit with a massive fucking airplane.

This video tries to tell you that "buildings only fall like this" when intentionally brought down. That's not true. Buildings fall like that when they collapse, which is exactly what happened with the two towers. Plain and simple.

mayabong 04-24-2010 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 17072170)
This video is some more shit. It says "buildings do not do this spontaneously" which is very true. But they do fall like that when hit with a massive fucking airplane.

This video tries to tell you that "buildings only fall like this" when intentionally brought down. That's not true. Buildings fall like that when they collapse, which is exactly what happened with the two towers. Plain and simple.

Thats the tower that wasn't hit by a plane retard...

BFT3K 04-24-2010 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 17072170)
This video is some more shit. It says "buildings do not do this spontaneously" which is very true. But they do fall like that when hit with a massive fucking airplane.

That building was not hit by an airplane.

BFT3K 04-24-2010 10:39 PM

You beat me by a hair.

SmokeyTheBear 04-24-2010 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17072119)
People still believe the official story? haha

what does that have to do with what i said and you quoted ?

i never said anything about the validity of the "official story".

Just to refresh your memory i was discussing what hearsay is in relation to the thread topic and larry discussing pulling the building with the insurance agent.

Just to clarify from wikipedia.

"Hearsay is information gathered by one person from another concerning some event, condition, or thing of which the first person had no direct experience"

The only person that knows who larry was talking to was larry, anyone listening would not only not know who larry was talking to but also only be hearinng half a conversation.

DaddyHalbucks 04-24-2010 11:15 PM

All the conspiracy theorists can suck my dick.

SmokeyTheBear 04-24-2010 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 17072170)
This video is some more shit. It says "buildings do not do this spontaneously" which is very true. But they do fall like that when hit with a massive fucking airplane.

This video tries to tell you that "buildings only fall like this" when intentionally brought down. That's not true. Buildings fall like that when they collapse, which is exactly what happened with the two towers. Plain and simple.

it's silly to really be on either side of the fence with too much passion on this matter as using examples just don't cut it as we don't really have anything close to compare.

No large steel office buildings have ever collapsed period from fires,let alone at near free fall speeds, none, zero, ever.

but... i bet a cow has never accidently ran into a wood chipper. If my cow did and i told you about it, if your friends say it couldn't of happened because it hasn't happened before is factually wrong.

With all the money and griping and insurance by now we should have just rebuilt a duplicate building 7 and tried to replicate the results to make everyone happy.

SmokeyTheBear 04-24-2010 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 17072199)
All the conspiracy theorists can suck my dick.

That's discrimination!!!! :winkwink:

Besides everyone should know by now the "official story" and every theory yet ARE ALL based on a conspiracy, i have yet to hear anyone with a "lone terrorist" theory. Are you saying you believe 9/11 was planned, funded and carried out by one man alone ? this i wanna hear..

directfiesta 04-25-2010 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 17072168)
This is some more fucking bullshit story where people with too much free time on their hands are making shit up instead of buying a membership to a porn site.

We've gotten to the point where "someone can say something" with zero fucking proof, and everyone believes it.

Here's proof:

Jeffrey Scott Shapiro states, ?I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard.?

?Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building ? since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.?


Basically, a journalist who was there that day claims that "several people" told him that Silverstein was on the phone with his insurance company. The entire article is based on information that a fucking journalist held onto for years. Newsflash, journalists don't "sit on information" for years. No less do they make claims based on "multiple sources" that they fail to name.

Then in the same fucking article you have the following:

"?While I was talking with a fellow reporter and several NYPD officers, Building 7 suddenly collapsed, and before it hit the ground, not a single sound emanated from the tower area. There were no explosives; I would have heard them. In fact, I remember that in those few seconds, as the building sank to the ground that I was stunned by how quiet it was,? writes Shapiro in his Fox News hit piece."

So you have an article that a journalist sat on for years, which claims "someone told him something" and then in the same article you have a witness that says "There were no explosives were used". This seems to be more and more common.

The guy on the Youtube video who "claims he heard a countdown" didn't fucking hear jack shit. He heard nothing. He said he heard a "a transmission from a walkie talkie that a red cross person was holding, where he was holding his hand over the receiver". Further, he says he couldn't make out what was being said (or if anything at all was being said for that matter) but the sound it was making was "pulsed" with a "steady rhythm" which in his view was a "count down". Amid the confusion of that day he heard a muffled transmission that he couldn't make out but he "thinks" it "might have been" a countdown. Seems to me there was a lot of fucking alarms going off that morning; All the firefighters had these personal alarms that were going off in the dust clouds - maybe that "steady sound" he fucking heard was an alarm, and it was being covered up because it was nothing more than annoying.

You people are sheep.

http://www.rochardsbunnyranch.com/rock/tinfoil.jpg

Sheeps went to war on " no proof " ...

DWB 04-25-2010 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17068202)
Never executed...are the keywords. Ever heard of brainstorming and the methodology used to brainstorm. The US has think tanks...civilian and military...that propose all types of plans and contingency plans...verging from the ludicrous onward. Get over it.

4 words: Gulf of Tonkin Incident

DWB 04-25-2010 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dav3 (Post 17068053)
So if Tower 7 was already rigged with controlled explosives, one would assume that the other two towers were rigged the same way.

Logic doesn't belong here. Get out.

theking 04-25-2010 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 17072300)
4 words: Gulf of Tonkin Incident

I suppose you had a point to make?

PornoStar69 04-25-2010 06:03 AM

theKing = COINTELPRO Gov agent

how much they pay you $1000 weekly?

Rochard 04-25-2010 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17072172)
Thats the tower that wasn't hit by a plane retard...

Oh jesus fucking Christ, your fucking so fucking stupid it's not funny.

Two towers fell, billions of tons of concrete and what not, right on the fucking doorstep. According to the article mentioned in this thread the FUCKING BUILDING WAS PHYSICALLY MOVED OFF IT'S FOUNDATION.

Rochard 04-25-2010 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 17072239)
Sheeps went to war on " no proof " ...

Sheeps went to war with the wrong fucking country. Seems to me nearly all of the terrorists came from one fucking country..... And we haven't even looked at them now have we?

Serge Litehead 04-25-2010 07:53 AM

Rochard, what do you think about this video? BS?

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17067452)
what r firefighters saying?



theking 04-25-2010 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holograph (Post 17072606)
Rochard, what do you think about this video? BS?

One man's opinion...zero proof...end of story.

Serge Litehead 04-25-2010 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17072631)
One man's opinion...zero proof...end of story.

destroying evidence in a crime scene is normal by your standards?

react 04-25-2010 09:09 AM

When he said "pull it" he as referring to his finger.

You guys are fucking retarded.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123