3D Porn, is it the future? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

DVTimes · 04-17-2010, 04:53 PM

3d is not expensive if you do not want it to be.

i have seen one firm doing a 3d webcan for £40.

bigpappa17934 · 04-17-2010, 05:22 PM

I am sort of debating now over the idea of holographic porn. Again...it will take a new piece of equipment in EVERYONES home...but this particular piece of equipment could be used for the every day viewing in the home of TV programs and such...so I might think that this would be the best Idea to attack. I also heard that you can take ANY digital image and produce it holographically with the right holographic projector....so that might be the ticket. It would just need software editing.

MRock · 04-17-2010, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigpappa17934

Cool. Thanks for the info there MRock. Now...does anyone know WHERE to purchase camera equipment both still and video?

This was posted by someone a few weeks ago here on GFY. Simple solution for 3D video selfshot style: http://www.minoru3d.com/

cam_girls · 04-18-2010, 03:22 AM

3D TV without glasses are supposedly pretty good but not up to mass production quality.

They project 9? different images at different angles so each eye gets a different image.

It will take off for sure, but there will always be a place for 2D, media will be 70% 3D and 30% 2D

I did write 50/50 but I just channeled "more than 50", "imagine the possibilities", "will gain more and more market share every year". So there you go! Quotes were taken from RicksBlog about the iPad.

GatorB · 04-18-2010, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cam_girls

3D TV without glasses are supposedly pretty good but not up to mass production quality.

They project 9? different images at different angles so each eye gets a different image.

It will take off for sure, but there will always be a place for 2D, media will be 70% 3D and 30% 2D

I did write 50/50 but I just channeled "more than 50", "imagine the possibilities", "will gain more and more market share every year". So there you go! Quotes were taken from RicksBlog about the iPad.

If you now anything about how REAL 3-D works then it's impossible to do without glasses.

bigpappa17934 · 04-18-2010, 09:56 AM

So I would say that 3D is still something that everyone is still thinking about but no one is doing really yet...right?

DamianJ · 04-18-2010, 10:13 AM

To answer your question, no.

CheeseFrog · 04-18-2010, 10:59 AM

3D was "the future", 50 years ago. Now it's just a gimmick.

SonOfaBeach · 04-18-2010, 04:40 PM

DXG has a consumer level true 3D camcorder coming out this summer for $600. It says the content can be played on the new 3D tvs that are out (using glasses). The view screen built into the camera is stereoscopic so you can view what you shot - in 3D - w/o glasses.

PC Mag article on it: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2362650,00.asp

3D tvs are already sub $3K - and now cameras will start popping up under $1k. I definitely think there will be a market for 3D porn by late this year or early next.

At least that's what I hope - squatting on several 3D domains!

04-17-2010, 04:53 PM	#51
DVTimes xxx Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: UK Posts: 31,606	3d is not expensive if you do not want it to be. i have seen one firm doing a 3d webcan for £40. __________________ The Affiliate Program

04-17-2010, 05:22 PM	#52
bigpappa17934 The One and Only Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Denver Colorado Posts: 221	I am sort of debating now over the idea of holographic porn. Again...it will take a new piece of equipment in EVERYONES home...but this particular piece of equipment could be used for the every day viewing in the home of TV programs and such...so I might think that this would be the best Idea to attack. I also heard that you can take ANY digital image and produce it holographically with the right holographic projector....so that might be the ticket. It would just need software editing. __________________ Twitter Facebook SnapChat

04-18-2010, 09:56 AM	#56
bigpappa17934 The One and Only Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Denver Colorado Posts: 221	So I would say that 3D is still something that everyone is still thinking about but no one is doing really yet...right? __________________ Twitter Facebook SnapChat

04-18-2010, 10:59 AM	#58
CheeseFrog Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: AZ Posts: 1,724	3D was "the future", 50 years ago. Now it's just a gimmick. __________________ Cary \| AIM: cheesefrog \| ICQ: 4287002

04-18-2010, 04:40 PM	#59
SonOfaBeach Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Tampa Bay, FL Posts: 240	DXG has a consumer level true 3D camcorder coming out this summer for $600. It says the content can be played on the new 3D tvs that are out (using glasses). The view screen built into the camera is stereoscopic so you can view what you shot - in 3D - w/o glasses. PC Mag article on it: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2362650,00.asp 3D tvs are already sub $3K - and now cameras will start popping up under $1k. I definitely think there will be a market for 3D porn by late this year or early next. At least that's what I hope - squatting on several 3D domains! __________________ Sig nificant

04-18-2010, 03:22 AM	#54
cam_girls So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 2,968	3D TV without glasses are supposedly pretty good but not up to mass production quality. They project 9? different images at different angles so each eye gets a different image. It will take off for sure, but there will always be a place for 2D, media will be 70% 3D and 30% 2D I did write 50/50 but I just channeled "more than 50", "imagine the possibilities", "will gain more and more market share every year". So there you go! Quotes were taken from RicksBlog about the iPad.

04-18-2010, 10:13 AM	#57
DamianJ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: A magical land Posts: 15,808	To answer your question, no.