![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
you have to go one way or the the other. you argued that there was some overlying premise to the initial post. and of course, there is not. there are several premises. again, i can pull them out of the post if you like. then, when i mentioned this, you moved on to the title. if the title was to come into play, then the statment "it was started on the premise of both (paysite and affiliate)" - would be completely bogus. as the title did not mention either. but now it seems you are back to disregarding the title. if that's the case, and you agree that there is more than a single premise in the initial post - you have no more ground to stand on. - we agree to disregard the title - we agree that there is more than one premise in the initial post if that's agreed, then i am correct. "it was started on the premise." the initial premise (ie the premise the post started with) in the first post had to do with paysite owners. there is no way of getting around it... |
:glugglug
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
So, anyone can help me out with my question about Quebec's sale tax? Does it apply the same way the GST does, or are the rules different? I'd like to hear about someone who has had to deal with the Quebec's gouvernment about that and knows their official position.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Neither of us have disagreed that there are several premisies in the thread. The point of contention is the idea you seem to have that the thread was Started regarding paysites and not alliliate, putting much more emphesis on paysites than affiliate. Not the case. I felt they were equally weighted in the presentation on the first post. The initial premise of the thread was regarding paysites. But it wasn't "THE PREMISE" as you stated, implying that it was made for paysites and affiliate was an afterthought. Paysites were "a premise" of the thread - which i agree to, not "the premise" as you initally stated and I caught you on. |
Quote:
( did I say premise - damn you quiet) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I won't define stupid and start an argument :) I was just adding to the sarcasm of your post... Now you can argue on the fact that your post wasn't sarcastic. |
Quote:
fense = fence alliliate = affiliate emphesis = emphasis Strange..but the transition to adult webmaster did not erase my past education or life experiences as it appears to have done to you...thank god you were not my financial consultant...I can just see your case synopsis to CCRA.. My boy aint done nothin wrong...he good folk...except for the rash...but it done get better soon... And to paraphrase something you said earlier..."You don't have a clue, do you" (altered for dramatic effect) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sad, very sad. |
Quote:
p.s. idoit = idiot arguement = argument |
Quote:
bend over baby |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
so that's completely false. Quote:
and i certainly never implied that affilate's were an afterthought. period. Quote:
'started on the premise...' which, of course it was. |
Well boys, enjoy the circle jerk...
I am obviously outwitted by a person who built a fortune in the "financial" arena. Is this like saying you are in the "entertainment " business..when you sell popcorn at the local theater. Sorry mate, but you don't talk the talk...Like I said earlier, you don't just make it in the mainstream world and then jump into the adult biz and forget it all. You don't have it...you simply don't have what it takes...thank god for porn... |
|
can 49thParallel and quet both shuttup already >? and let people post usefull info not some bullshit you can disscuss over icq or whatever privately...
|
Quote:
I took that to mean this just cause paysites owners were mentioned first doesn't mean that was the reason the thread was created. ok, I think we have a misunderstanding here. Quote:
I think it all boils down to what you meant by the term "started". If you meant it to be the begining of the thread then you are right. I took it to mean that the thread was "created"(started) on the premise of paysite owners and took offense to it. is that the situation or did I miss something? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh damn, I must remember the first rule of advertising..."know your audience"...so here we go, in simple terms that you can comprehend... food...good..yum Enjoy your evening, whiz kid.... |
Quote:
on this topic in gfy you've posted more useful practical information than ANYONE else without a doubt though. |
Quote:
no where did i say anything about afflilates. Quote:
that's it :) |
Quote:
Does he want to say that Sleazy is nothing cause he doesn't make as much money in mainstream biz as him? :helpme |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You also know I've been looking for something to agrue with you about for some time now. :) It no fun to all dance together in harmony around the fire every night. Too bad it was a God damn terminology miscommunication. I was really hoping you were going to jump in on that low profile/stardome thread i started about you a few weeks back. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
but i am still low profile. i don't put my sites or business in anyone's face each day, like so many high profilers do. 99% of anything i talk about here has nothing to do with business. i'm soooo glad i don't deal with affliliates :) |
Quote:
you know nothing of this business, that is obvious. you say you run a large accounting firm? yet you don't understand gst? riiiight. keep dreaming lol. |
Please keep going guys, my pizza just got here.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You, on the other hand, as I illustrated on another post, have made your own bed by skirting the law for 6 years...suck it up Princess...the Piper is a calling. You chose to not voluntarily comply to the laws...Rev Can will help you comply...but you already know that, don't you... |
Quote:
Quote:
i hear lovematch is holding another 50 buck 20K image sale. better jump on that... ahahaha. |
Quote:
noone KNOWS the law. any good lawyer will tell you that - another sign that you are a fool. I had my advisors review Quiets GST appeal, he wasn't skirting the law in any way, shape, form, or fassion. - another sign you are a fool. soo many signs point to the fact that you're a fool. Guess that means you're a fool. Period. |
i know what's going on
sleazydream,quet and 49parallel are playing this game to win dvd :Graucho |
Quote:
And thank you for once again pointing out that I do know what I am talking about....with sound business advice that has worked for me and ... let's see, 99% of the other businesses in Canada... But, who am I talking to,...oh yes, the fella that has paid Rev Can $600,000 in 6 years...hmmm. I see what you mean...you certainly do demonstrate superior business planning and outstanding tax knowledge ... And thanks for the Lovematch offer, but I hear he is out of business..but should you offer up one of your sites for a similar price...I am open to negotiation... |
Quote:
And come on, this is getting weak..Quiet did not charge Canadian customers GST...unless every single one of his clients was a treaty indian (with permit numbers and signatures to back up the claims)...this is skirting the law...everyone know this.... |
Quote:
600K gst. you know, the 7 percent tax thing. and that was a year ago. so now it's been 7 years. nothing to do with income tax. fuck you are stupid. now, tell us more about you non-existant advertising company. :glugglug you must be a huge success, coming into adult and going to the lowest whore (50 bucks for 20K images). then balling you eyes out when you got ripped off (did i mention you were an idiot?). |
Quote:
Quiet paid more than $600k to the GST office alone - not even counting the income tax he's paid. solid business advise still accounts for the VAST majority of new businesses ending their first year in total financial ruin. Are you high? |
And really....work on that spelling and grammar for god's sake...
Translation...grr...grunt...grunt..grrr...I am a financial mogul...grunt grunt...you shiny..me like |
Why do I bother...GST...goods and sales TAX...oh, look, it is a tax..it must be, it has the word tax in it
...you skirted the tax by not having the intelligence to realize that ALL Canadians must pay GST on goods and services, hence the name Goods and Services Tax. In the eyes of CCRA and in mine, you purposely tried to evade the legal requirement to collect GST on Canadian purchases....get it now..whiz kid(s) |
Quote:
One good point though, knowing most native reserves 99% of Quiet's Canadian clients WERE probally treaty indians, or at least 99% of the Canadian clients that got charged back for fraud credit cards. I owned my own brokerage company (with a partner) for investments and insurance. I wasn't no bean counter. I was and am a salesman. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123