1.Shot him in a face with deagle .
2.Cut him to little pieces, and feed the pigs.

maybe all the stuff on csi is all hollywood bullshit?

what about taking a shotgun, shooting the person, and walking away.

if no one sees you go there, and you drop no dna... think about this


shotgun leaves no riffling to trace the bullets.

ensure clean clothing/shoes and leave no dna



come down to prove it or confess.................


so tell me - where are the holes in this plan? could they really prove this?

Sorry, trade secret.

legal disclaimer - researching ideas for a book i may write someday

no more ideas?

I would first ask myself -- How do professionals do it? On TV and in movies they always wear gloves, use a silenced handgun, leave no witnesses or evidence. That means doing it somewhere where no one else is around, and they dig out the bullets afterwards.

They either rob the victim (money, watch, jewelry etc) to make it look like that was the motivation, or else do the hit so precisely and cleanly as to make it look like an execution-style professional hit (something you yourself shouldn't be capeable of to people who know you), OR they're good enough to scare the victim into making a fatal mistake while attempting to escape that ends their life via a fall or drowning so that bullets and bullet holes aren't even needed.

Hey, we have a pretty dangerous fast-moving river here in the 'peg... and there's already been some drownings in it lately. I'm a strong swimmer but someone would have to pay my family a few mill before I'd even consider trying to cross it. There you go, ready made alibi.

Of course you know I'll be watching the news, and will turn you in for the crimestoppers reward in a heartbeat. :D

just kill yourself after you shot the person. that way you definitely get away with it.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Get married. It's a slow and torturous death

1. remove motive
2. remove body
3. remove evidence
4. remove suspicion

2a. remove teeth
:thumbsup

It's rumored that Brick Top's favorite means of dispatch involves a stun gun, a plastic bag, a roll of tape, and a pack of hungry pigs.

Having watched tons of episodes of American Justice and City Confidential in the past, I probably know more than I should. Some ingenius methods used and sometimes only the smallest screw up allowed authorities to catch the perp. It's no wonder so many murders go unsolved.

make them read gfy everyday , maybe they will go insane and kill themselves

Actually, its disconcerting how "circumstantial evidence" can lead prosecutors/judge/jury astray - particularly if you look closely at the Baltovich case. But you're right...there's been several 'slipped-thru-the-cracks' cases like that.

I put that one out as an example since it was the most blatant no-body instance I could think of - plus it was fairly local to me.

There are some way to detailed answers in this thread.

First you should post about it on a message board.

I thought that, too.

But its nothin' you can't see/hear on any of the crime shows (or books) these days.

The wife and I watch Criminal Minds and L&O fairly religiously...and sometimes I wonder do the investigators always use all those scientific resources at their disposal for every case? Or just certain cases?

my weapon of choice would be: poison
here are some interesting links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thallium
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0115033/

I watch all that shit too and could no where near provide as detailed answers as some here.

get to work like police agent working on murders, kill that person, and investigate that person death.