Russia to build 6 nuclear subs with cruise missiles - GoFuckYourself.com

ZeroHero · 03-28-2009, 07:54 PM

MOSCOW, Russia (CNN) -- Russia will build at least six nuclear-powered submarines with long-range cruise missiles for its navy, a source in the Russian Defense Ministry told the Itar-Tass news agency.

The missiles can potentially carry low-capacity tactical warheads, the news agency reported Friday.

"These supersonic, highly maneuvering missiles are designed for strikes on aircraft carriers of the enemy if the latter poses a direct threat to Russia's security," the unnamed source told Itar-Tass. "The missiles can be launched at the most important coastal facilities."

The source added, "Despite the construction of a new nuclear submarine with new missiles, Russia intends to observe firmly international arms control agreements on equal terms with other countries."

The Severodvinsk-class submarines are being built at the Sevmash shipyard, the center of Russian nuclear submarine production, according to Global Security's Web site.

The new subs will be put into service for the Russian navy in 2011, the source told Itar-Tass.

Russia will finance the construction of the new submarine with long-range cruise missiles, First Deputy Chief of the Navy's General Staff, Vice-Admiral Oleg Burtsev told Itar-Tass.

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/as...ubs/index.html

RedGlamourStudio · 03-28-2009, 10:32 PM

Spring Sunday morning isn't good time for political debates... but If you trust that the anti-rockets in Poland and radar in Czechia will build against the Iranian rockets, you should trust that submarines will build against pirates of gulf of Aden

Why you used a red font? War will begin tonight?

DaddyHalbucks · 03-28-2009, 10:40 PM

How comforting.

Rakie · 03-28-2009, 10:43 PM

Russia already has more nuclear subs than any country in the world, as well as the largest ones in the world (Typhoon class) since the 80's..

They're 175 meters long, that's 575 feet (Rounded up)... They've got like, 40 of 'em.

The US and Russia have too many strong nuclear subs, ideally we should just stay friends LOL. Russian chicks can be pretty hot ! (Not the one's that eat their friends in front of their children though)

RedGlamourStudio · 03-28-2009, 10:45 PM

have spy photo of new submarine

DaddyHalbucks · 03-28-2009, 10:50 PM

By the way, if anyone doubts that the Russkis have an inferiority complex and are hostile to the USA, just re-read that above PR, especially the reference to the "enemy's aircraft carriers."

Only one country has a significant fleet of aircraft carriers.

BFT3K · 03-28-2009, 10:56 PM

I suppose the sub story is kinda scary, but how does it compare to this?...

http://www.break.com/geico/return-of-numa-numa-guy.html

Rochard · 03-28-2009, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rakie

Russia already has more nuclear subs than any country in the world, as well as the largest ones in the world (Typhoon class) since the 80's..

They're 175 meters long, that's 575 feet (Rounded up)... They've got like, 40 of 'em.

The US and Russia have too many strong nuclear subs, ideally we should just stay friends LOL. Russian chicks can be pretty hot ! (Not the one's that eat their friends in front of their children though)

Your correct about them being the largest in the world, but they never had forty. They had six, only one of which may or may not be in operation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoon_class_submarine

BTW.... The History channel recently had a show about decomissioning one of these bad boys. It was like a two year process where they put it in dry dock and stripped it down into pieces.

RedGlamourStudio · 03-28-2009, 11:10 PM

hmmmmm... Russia have 1 aircraft carrier only - "Admiral Kuznetsov", 1990

but have more lethal weapons

Rakie · 03-28-2009, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Your correct about them being the largest in the world, but they never had forty. They had six, only one of which may or may not be in operation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoon_class_submarine

BTW.... The History channel recently had a show about decomissioning one of these bad boys. It was like a two year process where they put it in dry dock and stripped it down into pieces.

haha, you're right, I was being sarcastic. They don't have many, but i do believe they have more nuclear subs in the world than any other country, many smaller ones not of the "Typhoon" class. They had footage of one of them that was being used in a documentary I saw, which i think was just about nuclear subs in general, not the Russians' subs.

I don't know if the new ones are going to be bigger than the typhoons though, I didn't read the whole story.

ultimatebbwdotcom · 03-29-2009, 12:18 AM

Id rather Russia dealt with their 100+ nuclear submarines that they need to decommission, rather than just letting them rot with their cargo of nuclear fuel.

2012 · 03-29-2009, 12:21 AM

uh oh, better cancel Christmas

SmokeyTheBear · 03-29-2009, 12:24 AM

papill0n · 03-29-2009, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedGlamourStudio

hmmmmm... Russia have 1 aircraft carrier only - "Admiral Kuznetsov", 1990

but have more lethal weapons

wow wtf are those things?!?!!?

Rangermoore · 03-29-2009, 12:31 AM

And where are they going to get the money for that?

TrainWreckContent · 03-29-2009, 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K

I suppose the sub story is kinda scary, but how does it compare to this?...

http://www.break.com/geico/return-of-numa-numa-guy.html

crazy times we live in

RedGlamourStudio · 03-29-2009, 01:08 AM

Peace to Peace!
Smile and have nice spring day!

kmanrox · 03-29-2009, 01:14 AM

am i the only one who foresees a chinese, russian, iranian, n.korean, venezuelan gangbang of the USA in the future?

Rakie · 03-29-2009, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmanrox

am i the only one who foresees a chinese, russian, iranian, n.korean, venezuelan gangbang of the USA in the future?

Nope.

It can happen, and it may. Hopefully Japan's super robot soldier's will be ready and they stay on our side this time.

JD · 03-29-2009, 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmanrox

am i the only one who foresees a chinese, russian, iranian, n.korean, venezuelan gangbang of the USA in the future?

i'll be boning the fuck out at even the hint of that happening

wizzart · 03-29-2009, 02:23 AM

USA still have more nuclears then all rest together

kmanrox · 03-29-2009, 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmanrox

am i the only one who foresees a chinese, russian, iranian, n.korean, venezuelan gangbang of the USA in the future?

oh i forgot cuba and pakistan!

Rakie · 03-29-2009, 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wizzart

USA still have more nuclears then all rest together

You're probably right in the broad scope of all nuclear ballistics. I just know russia has WAY too many damn subs, lol.

RedGlamourStudio · 03-29-2009, 04:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmanrox

am i the only one who foresees a chinese, russian, iranian, n.korean, venezuelan gangbang of the USA in the future?

ufffffff... now you can exclude Grenada from top of main evil enemy
http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq95-1.htm

ZeroHero · 03-29-2009, 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedGlamourStudio

hmmmmm... Russia have 1 aircraft carrier only - "Admiral Kuznetsov", 1990

but have more lethal weapons

WhAT is that ?????????

cykoe6 · 03-29-2009, 07:48 AM

I see nothing wrong with Russia trying to counterbalance the US's overwhelming naval military superiority. Balance of forces leads to stability while imbalance leads to conflict. Additionally Russia's rising strength can also serve as a counterbalance to China. A unipolar world has shown itself to be unworkable since the fall of the USSR. Failed terrorist states like Somalia and Afghanistan are the result of this power vacuum. Iran would not be going nuclear in Russia's backyard if they had proper respect for Russian power.

Phil · 03-29-2009, 07:53 AM

good for russians.

halfpint · 03-29-2009, 08:00 AM

We in the UK will come to The USA'S help with our bow and arrows....I will smother those dam ruskys with my panties

xx354xx · 03-29-2009, 08:17 AM

You knew it was going to happen sooner or later. And watch China next.

The Seduction of Art · 03-29-2009, 08:28 AM

Yeah, but we've still got JAMES BOND

Malicious Biz · 03-29-2009, 08:32 AM

the red menace rises once again

CaptainHowdy · 03-29-2009, 08:33 AM

Damm I wish the Cold War is back...

slapass · 03-29-2009, 08:37 AM

Why would we care? They already have enough nukes to do us in. Let em build more with their oil money. The world has definitely moved to trade as the weapon of choice not subs.

RedGlamourStudio · 03-29-2009, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Seduction of Art

Yeah, but we've still got JAMES BOND

but Rambo for russians now!

oil money, хули...

crockett · 03-29-2009, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RageCash-Ben

wow wtf are those things?!?!!?

Well the second one with the tank is from the US.. It's some sort of testing set up. The tank fires into it. The other thing, is obviously something some crazy drunk Ruisan came up with.

As for the subs.. It seems Russia never grows tired of placing new reefs on the ocean floor.. They don't have a very good track record with subs, that's for damn sure..

ZeroHero · 03-29-2009, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malicious Biz

the red menace rises once again

btw i like your avatar

DaddyHalbucks · 03-29-2009, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedGlamourStudio

hmmmmm... Russia have 1 aircraft carrier only - "Admiral Kuznetsov", 1990

but have more lethal weapons

The first image, of the flying battleship, is fake.

I think the second image is a German tank silencer, if I recall correctly.

03-28-2009, 07:54 PM	#1
ZeroHero So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Westbahnhof Posts: 15,336	Russia to build 6 nuclear subs with cruise missiles MOSCOW, Russia (CNN) -- Russia will build at least six nuclear-powered submarines with long-range cruise missiles for its navy, a source in the Russian Defense Ministry told the Itar-Tass news agency. The missiles can potentially carry low-capacity tactical warheads, the news agency reported Friday. "These supersonic, highly maneuvering missiles are designed for strikes on aircraft carriers of the enemy if the latter poses a direct threat to Russia's security," the unnamed source told Itar-Tass. "The missiles can be launched at the most important coastal facilities." The source added, "Despite the construction of a new nuclear submarine with new missiles, Russia intends to observe firmly international arms control agreements on equal terms with other countries." The Severodvinsk-class submarines are being built at the Sevmash shipyard, the center of Russian nuclear submarine production, according to Global Security's Web site. The new subs will be put into service for the Russian navy in 2011, the source told Itar-Tass. Russia will finance the construction of the new submarine with long-range cruise missiles, First Deputy Chief of the Navy's General Staff, Vice-Admiral Oleg Burtsev told Itar-Tass. http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/as...ubs/index.html

03-28-2009, 10:40 PM	#3
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	How comforting. __________________ Boner Money

03-28-2009, 10:43 PM	#4
Rakie Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Southern California. Posts: 147	Russia already has more nuclear subs than any country in the world, as well as the largest ones in the world (Typhoon class) since the 80's.. They're 175 meters long, that's 575 feet (Rounded up)... They've got like, 40 of 'em. The US and Russia have too many strong nuclear subs, ideally we should just stay friends LOL. Russian chicks can be pretty hot ! (Not the one's that eat their friends in front of their children though) __________________ Sound Engineer ~ Graduate of Musicians Institute in Hollywood, California.

03-28-2009, 10:50 PM	#6
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	By the way, if anyone doubts that the Russkis have an inferiority complex and are hostile to the USA, just re-read that above PR, especially the reference to the "enemy's aircraft carriers." Only one country has a significant fleet of aircraft carriers. __________________ Boner Money

03-29-2009, 12:18 AM	#11
ultimatebbwdotcom Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 591	Id rather Russia dealt with their 100+ nuclear submarines that they need to decommission, rather than just letting them rot with their cargo of nuclear fuel. __________________ Ultimatebbw.com Dangerouscurvesdesign.com

03-28-2009, 10:32 PM	#2
RedGlamourStudio Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,371	Spring Sunday morning isn't good time for political debates... but If you trust that the anti-rockets in Poland and radar in Czechia will build against the Iranian rockets, you should trust that submarines will build against pirates of gulf of Aden Why you used a red font? War will begin tonight?

03-28-2009, 10:45 PM	#5
RedGlamourStudio Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,371	have spy photo of new submarine

03-28-2009, 10:56 PM	#7
BFT3K Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Narnia Posts: 10,764	I suppose the sub story is kinda scary, but how does it compare to this?... http://www.break.com/geico/return-of-numa-numa-guy.html

03-28-2009, 11:10 PM	#9
RedGlamourStudio Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,371	hmmmmm... Russia have 1 aircraft carrier only - "Admiral Kuznetsov", 1990 but have more lethal weapons

03-29-2009, 12:21 AM	#12
2012 So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 17,189	uh oh, better cancel Christmas

03-29-2009, 12:24 AM	#13
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	__________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

03-29-2009, 12:31 AM	#15
Rangermoore Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: EVERYWHERE Posts: 1,541	And where are they going to get the money for that? __________________

03-29-2009, 01:08 AM	#17
RedGlamourStudio Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,371	Peace to Peace! Smile and have nice spring day!

03-29-2009, 01:14 AM	#18
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,295	am i the only one who foresees a chinese, russian, iranian, n.korean, venezuelan gangbang of the USA in the future? __________________ Crypto HODLr Crypto mining Angel investor

03-29-2009, 02:23 AM	#21
wizzart scriptmaster Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Location: Serbia Posts: 5,238	USA still have more nuclears then all rest together __________________ BimboZone

03-29-2009, 07:48 AM	#26
cykoe6 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vegas Posts: 4,499	I see nothing wrong with Russia trying to counterbalance the US's overwhelming naval military superiority. Balance of forces leads to stability while imbalance leads to conflict. Additionally Russia's rising strength can also serve as a counterbalance to China. A unipolar world has shown itself to be unworkable since the fall of the USSR. Failed terrorist states like Somalia and Afghanistan are the result of this power vacuum. Iran would not be going nuclear in Russia's backyard if they had proper respect for Russian power. __________________ бабки, шлюхи, сила

03-29-2009, 07:53 AM	#27
Phil Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 7,659	good for russians. __________________ Ask Phil

03-29-2009, 08:00 AM	#28
halfpint GFY's Halfpint Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: UK Posts: 15,223	We in the UK will come to The USA'S help with our bow and arrows....I will smother those dam ruskys with my panties __________________ Get FREE website listings on Cryptocoinshops.net Last edited by halfpint; 03-29-2009 at 08:01 AM..

03-29-2009, 08:17 AM	#29
xx354xx Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: NYC Posts: 118	You knew it was going to happen sooner or later. And watch China next. __________________ ICQ#:476-690-539

03-29-2009, 08:28 AM	#30
The Seduction of Art Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 416	Yeah, but we've still got JAMES BOND __________________ Custom adult artwork for your business from a veteran artist. Click below or ICQ# 488024725

03-29-2009, 08:32 AM	#31
Malicious Biz So Fucking Banned Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Put Shoe On Head Plz Posts: 4,575	the red menace rises once again

03-29-2009, 08:33 AM	#32
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 94,130	Damm I wish the Cold War is back... __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.

03-29-2009, 08:37 AM	#33
slapass Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Earth Posts: 14,625	Why would we care? They already have enough nukes to do us in. Let em build more with their oil money. The world has definitely moved to trade as the weapon of choice not subs.