Originally Posted by Quagmire (Post 15632532)

If you re-read my post it covers your first question.

If VS had any business ethics they would have kicked the 'studio' in Toronto to the curb. There is absolutely no possible way to excuse the actions of that 'studio' from a professional standpoint. He took advantage of a situation that he had purely because of representing them. Had he not been representing them he would never have had her personal information.

Of course the clueless jerkoffs at VS don't seem to be able to grasp this concept.

Originally Posted by miss_bellabellini (Post 15632531)

That's right Aaliyah, I've mentioned this a few times already but since it is being brought up again I have to say that it was resolved 100% to my satisfaction.

VS responded to me immediately when I spoke with them directly and sorted out the situation much faster than I anticipated. There will be problems in ANY company, what matters is how the company responds and solves the problems.

Originally Posted by thehand (Post 15632734)

Unfortunately the "ignore list" doesn't work when you are quoted but now that I see it - Strait from the models mouth one post before you:

Originally Posted by Quagmire (Post 15632759)

You truly are a dumbass, aren't you? At first I thought it was arrogance, but it actually is stupidity.

The issue is ethics, not the model you fucking retard.

Someone do me a favor and quote this so the retard can see it, since he has me on ignore. Pooooor baby. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 15632643)

lol best "i didnt read the thread at all " response

p.s. the link isn't in the iframe :winkwink:

Originally Posted by Jdoughs (Post 15632640)

Can't or doesn't? May want to be more specific and factual if you are going to call someone stupid.

Originally Posted by pr0 (Post 15565801)

I've posted my stats.....& they are verified. 2 diff programs now....

Lets see one of your sponsor payments.

Something tells me you live off the $1000 a month your sig makes ya

Lets see how much longer that sig $ sticks around :winkwink:

Peace

Originally Posted by Davey Jones (Post 15565921)

Don't really matter if I run any sites or not.

What matters is that pr0 is wrong about there being no PR leakage.

That iframe makes you link to 2 pages: first link is model page that tracks your sales and second link is webcams.com index page that doesn't track your sales. Google counts the outgoing links to these pages as separate links, thus PR leak.

Also, webcams.com know what they are doing, because they even set up a title tag for that link, to maximize SEO effect.

:2 cents:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies (Post 15633548)

I know for a fact one sponsor has given you false stats to post here.

Originally Posted by collegeboobies (Post 15633548)

I know for a fact one sponsor has given you false stats to post here.

Originally Posted by Quagmire (Post 15632759)

You truly are a dumbass, aren't you? At first I thought it was arrogance, but it actually is stupidity.

The issue is ethics, not the model you fucking retard.

Someone do me a favor and quote this so the retard can see it, since he has me on ignore. Pooooor baby. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by collegeboobies (Post 15633548)

I know for a fact one sponsor has given you false stats to post here.