GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Max Hardcore (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=884490)

C_U_Next_Tuesday 01-29-2009 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nation-x (Post 15409085)
My thoughts exactly... Max is no martyr... he is a fucking dumbass who made his money catering to sick fucks. There is plenty of money to go around... he chose his own path. Nice guy my ass.


Bye Bye Max Dumbass :1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh :thumbsup

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 01-29-2009 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donnylong (Post 15409423)
respect and dignity???????? WTF planet are you on? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh
my whole office is on the floor dieing laughing :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

They threw there dignity right the fuck out the window when they walked into this business with there legs spread.

Thats awright... I was laughing pretty hard at you as well when I heard you couldnt get it up and someone was standing outside the studio waiting beat your face in.:1orglaugh

Now that shit was funnnnnny!

I do not think you know what funny is unless you saw how hard I laughed when that shit went down.

C_U_Next_Tuesday 01-29-2009 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donnylong (Post 15409423)
respect and dignity???????? WTF planet are you on? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh
my whole office is on the floor dieing laughing :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

They threw there dignity right the fuck out the window when they walked into this business with there legs spread.

Many people think of you, that produce porn and take advantage to make money off of those you think are lesser than yourself..the whores as you call them , as complete scum of the society. Dont worry, you are hated by others as much as you hate on your whores that make you money.

I find it sad that some of you think so highly of yourself and above the rest of the world.

We are all human beings..

GregE 01-29-2009 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donnylong (Post 15409423)
respect and dignity???????? WTF planet are you on? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh
my whole office is on the floor dieing laughing :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

They threw there dignity right the fuck out the window when they walked into this business with there legs spread.

Far and few between are the days that I'm mistaken for a captain save-a-ho, but I gotta ask...

When it comes to dignity and such; what's the difference between the "whores" who get fucked in your movies and the guy who fucks them?

YellowDude 01-29-2009 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donnylong (Post 15406135)
As a content producer that gives clients and fans what they want to see or own, and doing so inside of the law, I have many thoughts about the whole Max Hardcore issue.

I do not like his content personally but i am sure there are fans out there that do. The way I look at it is max took a niche that clients and or fans wanted to see or purchase and he produced it and sold it without breaking the law and got fucked and made a exsample out of all because of a closet whore.

If a female is over the age of 18 and wants to get pissed on called a whore that she is, and or have a screwdriver shoved up her twat to make a buck then thats her choice "Freedom of Speech" right?

The government has turned on us as a whole being united states citizens and now its just all about taking your money. Look at how much we all pay in taxes every year and what happen with gas prices. Some stupid closet whore didnt like seeing a girl getting degraded by max and max got fucked. What people seem to forget is whores sign up to get this shit done to them everyday and like it. Even the ones that dont like it still sign up to do it to pay there rent.

Do you have any idea how many whores call me saying i will do anal now because i am broke or i will do a black man now even though i hate them because i need the money. Sometimes they dont like anal and its hurts them but they dont care about anything more than that check because maybe sugar daddy for the week dumped her, who knows.

I look at this no different than a whore saying i will go to my non porn job today and make 8 bucks an hour doing whatever it might be that she does and might put her in pain and or make her do something that she doesnt want to do but she will because she needs the money. THATS LIFE PEOPLE!

I heard that the judge in max's case was a FUCKING FEMALE not sure about this but I wouldnt be surprised because i dont see a man doing this to a pornographer:2 cents:

I just found that the judge that denied Max Hardcore to Delay Prison Sentence till the appeal was a FEMALE. http://avnmag.avn.com/articles/33028.html That is 100% of the problem right there "FEMALE". I think he should have a miss trail just because of that
:2 cents:

I use to talk to this cunt that got paid like 10k a shoot and a million a year under a contract and she was a mainstream magazine model and she drove a Bentley and walked around like she was a god. We had a argument about how she is no better than a girl that makes money adult modeling or doing porn that her ass is still a piece off meet when she goes to work and puts that thong on for those pictures and bends over with her cleavage hanging out. MAYBE THATS WHY SHE DONT TALK TO ME ANYMORE :1orglaugh

I love it how its okay for big companies that have tons of money get away with putting a 15 or 16 year old on the front cover of a magazine in a bra and panties posing all sexy looking, with tons of whore makeup on as well like victoria secret did and thats ok but when a girl over the age of 18 asked to be pissed on and called a whore and a screwdriver put up her cunt to pay HER bills then thats not ok. :2 cents:

So you know why max got fucked?

Because of whores and money the 2 roots of all evil and with that said check out

http://ihatewhores.com/

:helpme:helpme:helpme:helpme:helpme

Also as a producer I can not more then agree with this. Have the same requests. If they need there dope they do it all.

tony286 01-29-2009 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YellowDude (Post 15409618)
Also as a producer I can not more then agree with this. Have the same requests. If they need there dope they do it all.

How about the stories and there are many the girl comes to LA dreams of being the next Jenna. The agent who doesn't really give a fuck about her, tells her its a simple boygirl shoot and surprise she walks in to a very different shoot. She is scared and doesnt want to ruin her chances of becoming a star. She is told if you dont do this you wont work again ,I will tell the whole industry about how unprofessional you are. Is it the models fault in those cases? 18 is legal but its not always an adult.
I dont think in that case Max got fucked over.

Carmine Raguso 01-29-2009 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 15408267)
my guess is you are not american.
free speech is one of the most and highly protected american rights, similar to the rights to bear arms.
free speech is free speech is free speech end of story..

America or not, guidelines. Not laws, GUIDELINES.

Quote:

On Jan. 18, 2001, Adult Video News reported on the so-called "Cambria List." Paul Cambria, a longtime attorney for the porn industry, was involved in the list's preparation. The list is controversial within the industry and interpretations differ on how it was meant to be applied. Some in the industry say it represents guidelines for the box-covers of adult videos, not for the sex acts they depict. Nevertheless, there is wide agreement that the Cambria List shows how the adult industry is seeking to be more careful, fearing a potential crackdown on pornography by the Bush administration.


The Cambria List:

Box-Cover Guidelines/Movie Production Guidelines

Before selecting a chrome please check facial expression. Do not use any shots that depict any unhappiness or pain.


Do not include any of the following:

No shots with appearance of pain or degradation

No facials (bodyshots are OK if shot is not nasty)

No bukakke

No spitting or saliva mouth to mouth

No food used as sex object

No peeing unless in a natural setting, e.g., field, roadside

No coffins

No blindfolds

No wax dripping

No two dicks in/near one mouth

No shot of stretching pussy

No fisting

No squirting

No bondage-type toys or gear unless very light

No girls sharing same dildo (in mouth or pussy)

Toys are OK if shot is not nasty

No hands from 2 different people fingering same girl

No male/male penetration

No transsexuals

No bi-sex

No degrading dialogue, e.g., "Suck this cock, bitch" while slapping her face with a penis

No menstruation topics

No incest topics

No forced sex, rape themes, etc.

No black men-white women themes

Anything inside of those? ^

You are risking it inside the US :2 cents:

Max broke them all. Like it or lump it.

Good luck.

tony286 01-29-2009 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15409656)
How about the stories and there are many the girl comes to LA dreams of being the next Jenna. The agent who doesn't really give a fuck about her, tells her its a simple boygirl shoot and surprise she walks in to a very different shoot. She is scared and doesnt want to ruin her chances of becoming a star. She is told if you dont do this you wont work again ,I will tell the whole industry about how unprofessional you are. Is it the models fault in those cases? 18 is legal but its not always an adult.
I dont think in that case Max got fucked over.

i correct myself i meant i do think,its been a long day.

ModelPerfect 01-29-2009 05:19 PM

I'd probably feel better about the original post, if the proposed banner wasn't advertising his site and asking for money.

latinasojourn 01-29-2009 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 15408835)
jury found him guilty, not a judge. fyi

probably the most important concept here, that most do not comprehend.

in the USA what is "obscene" is decided by a small group of people in a given case.

it is no surprise what happened.

Ayla_SquareTurtle 01-29-2009 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 15408835)
jury found him guilty, not a judge. fyi

Well don't come in here with facts or anything. You don't want to mess up Shitty Ass Boy's Whore Roast.

MrMaxwell 01-30-2009 01:20 AM

Shit.
I don't give a fuck about what any one else does.
If these women accepted money to do what they did and were 100% willing to do it I say leave the guy alone. Even though what I've seen of his videos really made me mad and angry like Al Capone. Just because I hate it doesn't mean that they don't have the right to make it as two consenting adults, UNLESS, it violates obscenity standards.. that's the whole ballgame. All that matters is WHO and/or WHAT defines THAT.

I also don't like some guy bringing down heat on the more relaxed content producers who just simply make hot dirty films. ALOT of religious and sexually oppressed people exist here in the states, and, to them when they hear about what this guy did "we all do that stuff"... He brought heat onto us ALL and not just HIMSELF. I don't appreciate that and neither should YOU.

What ever they come up with to fuck with him don't you ever think they won't turn around and try to use it on YOU. A frontrunner, for, WHAT WAS IT AGAIN?

Brujah 01-30-2009 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carmine Raguso (Post 15409663)
America or not, guidelines. Not laws, GUIDELINES.



Anything inside of those? ^

You are risking it inside the US :2 cents:

Max broke them all. Like it or lump it.

Good luck.

By that (Cambria) list, quite a few sponsors are guilty and risking prosecution.

MrMaxwell 01-30-2009 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 15410899)
By that (Cambria) list, quite a few sponsors are guilty and risking prosecution.


I believe it to be more of a list of what is most likely to piss the anti-adult crowd off. Some times it's not so much about what you do, but more about being unlucky enough for some powerful person who doesn't like what you to do end up seeing you doing what you're doing. See. :warning

donnylong 01-30-2009 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ (Post 15409515)
Thats awright... I was laughing pretty hard at you as well when I heard you couldnt get it up and someone was standing outside the studio waiting beat your face in.:1orglaugh

Now that shit was funnnnnny!

I do not think you know what funny is unless you saw how hard I laughed when that shit went down.

you keep dreaming about me ever being scared of a faggot like yourself.That just shows how stupid you really are. You have big mental issues so i am going to ignore you now.

donnylong 01-30-2009 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregE (Post 15409547)
Far and few between are the days that I'm mistaken for a captain save-a-ho, but I gotta ask...

When it comes to dignity and such; what's the difference between the "whores" who get fucked in your movies and the guy who fucks them?

that guy would be myself!

donnylong 01-30-2009 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15409656)
How about the stories and there are many the girl comes to LA dreams of being the next Jenna. The agent who doesn't really give a fuck about her, tells her its a simple boygirl shoot and surprise she walks in to a very different shoot. She is scared and doesnt want to ruin her chances of becoming a star. She is told if you dont do this you wont work again ,I will tell the whole industry about how unprofessional you are. Is it the models fault in those cases? 18 is legal but its not always an adult.
I dont think in that case Max got fucked over.

agents dont take girls to max without telling them fully whats going to happen and sometimes even showing them.

DAMNMAN 01-30-2009 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 15405169)
good luck to max. everyone takes their own risks. i don't approve of his content, but i think he has a right to do it if its consensual and does not cause pain. if they wanted us all silenced, it would be done already. all the PPV on cable broadcast would be shuttered, all the adult video stores would be raided and locked up. they don't want all of us, just the ones who they can pick off easily using their bland, uninterpretable wishy washy laws. obscenity can never be defined under the guidelines that are set as of now. there is no written black and white. its all left to interpretation. therefore, efforts should be enacted to define obscenity and influence the laws to be clarified. otherwise everyone is a target of selective interpretation at any given time.


Agree with that 100% Define the law if necessary. Obscenity is a crime you can commit without knowing you did it the way it is currwntly written. (Yes, Max new he was on the other side of the imaginary line.) But that's just it, it is imaginary untill the government makes it real.

kane 01-30-2009 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAMNMAN (Post 15412538)
Agree with that 100% Define the law if necessary. Obscenity is a crime you can commit without knowing you did it the way it is currwntly written. (Yes, Max new he was on the other side of the imaginary line.) But that's just it, it is imaginary untill the government makes it real.

Because of the community standard rule they will never define the law. This way people in individual communities can define for themselves what they consider obscene. This isn't a terrible thing. If someone wants to live in a sanitized, perfect little town where nobody swears, the milk man delivers milk in a glass bottle every morning and nobody has sex that should be up to them to do. But if they leave that town they should understand that they may see things that could offend them and that their morality shouldn't be forced on the rest of the country.

If the internet convictions stand for Max it would essentially say that at any given time any small community in the country could define for the entire internet what they should and should not be able to watch and they can base that finding and definition on a 20 second video clip.

The community standard rule in general is good thing. When it is applied to anything that does not effect your community it is a terrible thing.

AaliyahLove 01-30-2009 05:35 PM

don't post this @ netpondscum or they might post pictures of you with a noose around your neck like they did for me LOL

AaliyahLove 01-30-2009 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 15407086)
with your "hate for whores" aside, blaming this on talent is another stretch of the truth. what max did, he did alone, do not try and blame the talent. ive known many girls whove done shoots for him... and talked to them about their experience. blaming them for his legal troubles is hilarious.

actually, I could be wrong so correct me if I am, but I heard not ONE of the models testified against him. Some of them were quoted saying things like how bad the shoots were or whatever, but girls complain about shoots all of the time.

AaliyahLove 01-30-2009 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nation-x (Post 15409085)
My thoughts exactly... Max is no martyr... he is a fucking dumbass who made his money catering to sick fucks. There is plenty of money to go around... he chose his own path. Nice guy my ass.

How many of you on this board "MAKE MONEY BY CATERING TO SICK FUCKS"?
I certainly do. ;)

dyna mo 01-30-2009 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaliyahLove (Post 15413847)
actually, I could be wrong so correct me if I am, but I heard not ONE of the models testified against him. Some of them were quoted saying things like how bad the shoots were or whatever, but girls complain about shoots all of the time.

it was an obscenity trial, not max is an asshole trial.

AaliyahLove 01-30-2009 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 15413890)
it was an obscenity trial, not max is an asshole trial.

well obscenity is in the eyes of the beholder isn't it?

I get emails almost daily from Jesus freaks telling me my little solo girl site is just as OBSCENE as beastiality or prostitution and that I am going STRAIGHT TO HELL! I'm sure if some of these fuckers had their way, I'd be in jail too.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 01-30-2009 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaliyahLove (Post 15413900)
well obscenity is in the eyes of the beholder isn't it?

I get emails almost daily from Jesus freaks telling me my little solo girl site is just as OBSCENE as beastiality or prostitution and that I am going STRAIGHT TO HELL! I'm sure if some of these fuckers had their way, I'd be in jail too.

Hell has alot of layers:)
You just goto decide which one is most comfortable for you:thumbsup

dyna mo 01-30-2009 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaliyahLove (Post 15413900)
well obscenity is in the eyes of the beholder isn't it?

I get emails almost daily from Jesus freaks telling me my little solo girl site is just as OBSCENE as beastiality or prostitution and that I am going STRAIGHT TO HELL! I'm sure if some of these fuckers had their way, I'd be in jail too.

obscenity has nothing to do with what a model thinks, hell, models will drink each other's vomit for cash or slurp on a johnson fresh out of some stranger's butthole.

it's what the jury thinks, and in the eyes of that beholder, he was found guilty.

donnylong 01-30-2009 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaliyahLove (Post 15413847)
actually, I could be wrong so correct me if I am, but I heard not ONE of the models testified against him. Some of them were quoted saying things like how bad the shoots were or whatever, but girls complain about shoots all of the time.

you are not wrong, you are 100% correct, and like I said before if it was up to a group of men or even women who were not closet whores that are against porn max wouldn't be in jail! :2 cents:

donnylong 01-30-2009 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 15413928)
obscenity has nothing to do with what a model thinks, hell, models will drink each other's vomit for cash or slurp on a johnson fresh out of some stranger's butthole.

it's what the jury thinks, and in the eyes of that beholder, he was found guilty.

right here you can read that a fucking WOMEN aka judge didn't want to hear shit other than max is wrong when the attorneys try to ask her questions that pertain to the case.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/...icle607836.ece

dyna mo 01-30-2009 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donnylong (Post 15413993)
right here you can read that a fucking WOMEN aka judge didn't want to hear shit other than max is wrong when the attorneys try to ask her questions that pertain to the case.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/...icle607836.ece

the only thing that resembles what you are talking about in that article is the judge telling the jury to use their common sense in regards to the terms
Quote:

"morbid and degraded," "unhealthy interest in sex," and "candid interest in sex."
i don't see a problem with that. i wasn't there but i don't see how that would sway a jury in the slightest.

MsCheyenne 01-30-2009 06:38 PM

Originally Posted by Brujah
Does anyone have the actual video footage that got him in trouble? I'd like to actually see it for myself before I make any judgement like most people in this thread are probably doing.


From what people who were at the trial have said, a scene in which a young woman was beaten by man was played. The man told her something to the effect of "this is why you shouldn't talk to strangers." The jury was said to have looked particularly uncomfortable during a scene that showed the woman vomiting and the man continuing to beat her. At least this is what I have heard from a few people who were present at the trial.

Cheyenne

JP-pornshooter 01-30-2009 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 15413928)
obscenity has nothing to do with what a model thinks, hell, models will drink each other's vomit for cash or slurp on a johnson fresh out of some stranger's butthole.

it's what the jury thinks, and in the eyes of that beholder, he was found guilty.

are you really so dumb to think that there is not a reason the content was shipped to a county in florida, a county which is one or possible the most conservative and religious views on porn (ie community standards), a county where all distributors will absolutely not ship any content to, a county which max himself had informed anyone NOT to ship anything to, and yet jaded video did ship content to this county and they did plea bargain themselves in exchange for full collaboration with the prosecutors.
By shipping the content they were able to have the hearings and pull the jurors from this county and the result is evident... had they had this court trial in almost any other county max could easily have walked away from it..

dyna mo 01-30-2009 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 15414161)
are you really so dumb to think that there is not a reason the content was shipped to a county in florida, a county which is one or possible the most conservative and religious views on porn (ie community standards), a county where all distributors will absolutely not ship any content to, a county which max himself had informed anyone NOT to ship anything to, and yet jaded video did ship content to this county and they did plea bargain themselves in exchange for full collaboration with the prosecutors.
By shipping the content they were able to have the hearings and pull the jurors from this county and the result is evident... had they had this court trial in almost any other county max could easily have walked away from it..

there's really no reason to refer to me in this manner. if you want to have an adult discussion about an adult topic then you need to realize that you are speaking to adults and to maintain some modicum of respect.

nevertheless, i assume you are unaware that john stagliano's obscenity trial is being held in the disctrict of columbia. i'll trust you can sort through why i am letting you know this.

donnylong 01-30-2009 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MsCheyenne (Post 15414121)
Originally Posted by Brujah
Does anyone have the actual video footage that got him in trouble? I'd like to actually see it for myself before I make any judgement like most people in this thread are probably doing.


From what people who were at the trial have said, a scene in which a young woman was beaten by man was played. The man told her something to the effect of "this is why you shouldn't talk to strangers." The jury was said to have looked particularly uncomfortable during a scene that showed the woman vomiting and the man continuing to beat her. At least this is what I have heard from a few people who were present at the trial.

Cheyenne

Even if that was the case what makes that any worse than fear factor and or tons of movies and TV shows with violence????

Shit I have seen worse shit on cable in mainstream than what max produces . This is a matter of women that don't like porn and wanted to nail max to the wall for exposing how far women will go for a buck and that's bullshit. When some whore vomits covered in worms or spiders that they made her eat of cable TV or when you see a rape scene in a movie in the theater you dont see them going to prison WTF :Oh crap

DatingGold 01-30-2009 07:48 PM

when you shoot porn and girls run to the cops saying you raped them.. things might turn bad.

donnylong 01-30-2009 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DatingGold (Post 15414320)
when you shoot porn and girls run to the cops saying you raped them.. things might turn bad.

that never happened so i dont see how that has anything to do with what we are talking about? Also if a girl did cry rape it would be pointless be there are records on paper and video of her consenting to wanting to do a porn scene for money.

fuzebox 01-30-2009 08:30 PM

Obscenity is the only law you do not know you've broken until you're in jail.

JP-pornshooter 01-31-2009 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 15414238)
there's really no reason to refer to me in this manner. if you want to have an adult discussion about an adult topic then you need to realize that you are speaking to adults and to maintain some modicum of respect.

nevertheless, i assume you are unaware that john stagliano's obscenity trial is being held in the disctrict of columbia. i'll trust you can sort through why i am letting you know this.

i was not aware of this, but why is important for you to mention? most likely in DC people (jurors) are much more "urban" and can distinguish between obscenity and freedom of speech. i doubt he would be found guilty by a juror but if he is, then the DOJ will have succeeded in "scaring" most pornographers away from producing/distributing as no one will feel "safe"...

kmanrox 01-31-2009 01:02 AM

you'd think Larry Flynt would intervene on something like this..

Paul Markham 01-31-2009 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 15405217)
And I will disagree with you.
Clear cut rules can easily be fought and have shit stopped before you loose every penny you own fighting it. Vague ones just allow them to fuck with you for as long as they wish.

We agree on something. :thumbsup

Clearly defined rules are easy to stay within and if you cross them you know the risks. Also banning sites that cross those lines is also a good thing to protect those who stay on the right side of the law. The US does what China does and blocks the domain, the financial pressure will force people to conform or lose the US market.

Also unless you stop men from jerking off there will always be a porn business. When the line was drawn at exposed nipples guys jerked off to that. When it was redrawn it was moved up. You don't need to show extreme porn to get a guy to buy material to jerk off. If this were not true Playboy would never had sold. This can apply to the Playboy end of the market and the Amateur end.

As for Paul Little. I met him in a shooting environment in the early 90s and long before he could do what he was doing 10 years later on film. I also spoke to him and models who worked for him. He did not do what he did for free speech or profit. IMO he did it because he likes abusing girls. He is no champion for free speech.

Paul Markham 01-31-2009 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 15405402)
Here is the big problem with Max's conviction.

You can argue that Max pushed the enveloped, fucked with the bull and got the horns. I personally don't like his content, but in that area I find most hardcore stuff kind of nasty and prefer the more softcore stuff. Call me old fashioned, but jerking off to a hot naked girl is fine by me. If it is hardcore I want at least the illusion that she is having a good time.

But this isn't about what I want to jerk off to.

Some of the things Max got convicted for were videos of his that were on the internet. Those videos were also simply trailers for other full length videos. Now the law says to find something obscene you have to take in the work as a whole, not just small pieces of it. That didn't happen here. They saw a very short trailer and used that to make their decision and toss him in jail.

COPA is gone, but some of the rulings of COPA linger. One of those rulings by the US Supreme Court is that you can use local standards when judging something that is on the internet. What this means is that if the convictions Max received for the movie trailers on his website are not overturned during his appeal any small conservative town in the nation can go to any MPG gallery you may post, watch your 30 second video clip and drag your ass into court, get a conviction and lock you away.

That is wrong.
The US Supreme Court was wrong with their ruling. Local community standards should not apply to the internet.
The court that handed Max convictions based on his movie trailers was wrong as well.

If those convictions are left to stand it could open a can of worms that could make things very ugly for this industry.

Love or hate Max. Love or hate his content, this is something everyone in this business should be paying close attention to.

Very true they bent the law to get a conviction on a guy who was well warned and chose to ignore it. I would bet a cent to a dollar that after he got off the previous charge his lawyer warned him to keep inside the boundaries.

As for the Internet crossing country, State and county lines and showing illegal material for that region. If I set up a shop in a town in Tennessee, or any other Conservative State, selling Scat videos and end up in prison who's fault is it?

Do we have the ability to look at States and block them ourselves? AFF seem to know exactly where I am. Or is it because we are on the Internet we can ignore any law Tennessee decides to pass?

The voters of Tennessee have a freedom to vote for the local Government and laws they want. Where does our freedom impinge on theirs?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123