After Shock Media

For what?
You did skip my question earlier didnt you?

__________________

collegeboobies

The truth is only known by 10-20 people in the world probably. You cant argue because NOT one of us has ALL the facts

Libertine

Here's a simple explanation that makes infinitely more sense than all news agencies and journalists having received pre-written press releases beforehand:

Someone said "It looks like it's going to collapse". Someone else heard the word "collapse", and told yet someone else. A journalist was told by someone that the building had collapsed, and immediately sent out the news to the station, which broadcast it, after which all other media immediately picked it up.

Ever heard of the "Chinese whispers" game? With the news, it often works the same way. Especially during times of crisis, when lots of rumors are going around, nobody knows for sure what the entire situation is and there is no time to verify stories.

Since the building did collapse, it's quite likely that half an hour beforehand, it was already on the verge of collapse. Someone probably noticed that, or simply made a wild speculation about it which turned out to be right. After that, the news traveled and got warped.

__________________
/(bb|[^b]{2})/

Rochard

In simple English, they didn't fucking know. The newscaster said "We are getting reports that building seven is on fire, and may have collapsed". He didn't say "It's going to fall down" or "It did fall down".

He said the same exact fucking thing that any ten year old with two eyes would have said - - The building is on fire and might collapse". Doesn't take a fucking rocket scientist to figure that out.

My god, people are idiots. How many millions of tons of iron, concrete, and what not shifted at that site on that day, and how many tons of crap of physically pushed building seven off of it's foundation on that day?

__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

Cuteshooter

It may already be...

__________________

The Duck

So before 911, if a building was on fire you would immediately assume it would collapse because that is what buildings on fire do. And why was wtc 7 the only building to collapse when other building had huge metal beams that was ejected from the wtc 1 and 2 explosions lodged in them. I am sorry, it does not make any sense.

Again, look at the perfect collapse, like something out of a demolition documentary on discovery. Why was the collapse of wtc 1 and 2 violent explosions and wtc 7 perfect implosion? It does not make sense since the official story claims both towers structural integrity where weakened due to fire.

Why did the 911 commision report completely ommit the wtc 7 collapse?

__________________
Skype Horusmaia
ICQ 41555245
Email [email protected]

The Duck

You can take to the streets and make your voice heard (imagine if millions did it, people would bloddy well have to listen), stop paying taxes, talk to people about this without fear of being ridiculed. There are lots of ways to excercise civil disobedience and when the brown stuff hits the spinning propeller, load your guns.

To change everything we just have to stop playing the game they have deviced for us.

__________________
Skype Horusmaia
ICQ 41555245
Email [email protected]

Cuteshooter

And since the game is in flux at this time, it makes sense to be a shrewd player.

__________________

jmcb420

Also, check out this video guys. : http://ilsgcash.com/fortruth/WTC911/wtc2_south_below[1].mpeg

pause the video and take a real good look at the first 2 seconds. the white smoke pouring out of the bottom of the south tower must be normal.

Your all fucking crazy. There was no 9/11 cover up. They didn't cover shit.

If anyone has access to 9/11 footage (not the conspiracy shit, but the real deal) or photos, lemmie know. I have a great interest in this subject and am an avid collector of the evidence.

I do have an opinion on 9/11, a very unpopular one, but.......thats for another time.

__________________

jmcb420

Also, it is true that in the history of steel construction only 3 steel towers have ever fallen due to fire.

The only reason it happened in New York all 3 times on the same day is because on that day mars and venus were lined up directly above the WTC complex and the inner-stellar gravity caused them all to fall, its that simple.

I pray to god Obama has the balls to get dirty with this shit. Thats why I didn't want McCain. Any existing coverup would obviously continue under his watch.

I'm not saying there's a cover up though. That would be unamerican of me.

__________________

jmcb420

Maybe a 10 year old rocket scientist might say that, but all the grown up ones will tell you it dosen't matter how much steel fell on or around the building. Same with the fire, that fucking building could have burned for weeks.

Try this: instead of telling everyone your opinion on building 7 coming down, ask yourself WHY DID IT HAVE TO FALL? Look at any building plan for the wtc complex, building 7 was not at all in any danger from debris, if anything one might expect 6WTC to be in bad shape, but it was fine. Here's a layout pic:



Makes sence to me that wtc7 fell because it had to.

I just wonder why it had to? (I already know why)

The CIA knew it was going to happen. The FBI was told to back the fuck off by you-know-who.

On september 11, 2001, NORAD was under the control of Chaney the VP. Just so happens to be the first time ever that someone other then the military was in charge there.

4 planes with 4 routes that were ALWAYS packed to at least 80% compasity with passengers suddenly only have 20% of those passengers on that one day.

Government officals were told to not fly to new york that week, and told to stay off commercial airliners altogether on 9/11.

Otis birds were scrambled, then sent in the wrong direction. If they were on time as the crow flies from Otis AFB scrambled and sent in the correct direction they would have beat the second plane to the tower with enough time to do a shoot down OUTSIDE of NYC airspace.

I could write a fucking book.
to much shit............not much adds up.

__________________

bushwacker

nevermind the planes that hit the buildings.

jmcb420

yeah, those planes..........those engine propelled hollow aluminum tubes with fuel filled wings..........
Those planes that hit steel-core buildings and had over 90% of their fule burn up instantly on impact.

please.

If the planes themselves were enough to knock those buildings down, then why didn't they?

Study how those towers were build, man. Those planes were like penciles being pushed through a screen door. They were gonna leave a hole, but they didn't bring those buildings down. neither did the fire, or the fuel. Only 1 thing known to mankind could have done that.

__________________

The Duck

I dont think they tried to cover up anything but the most obvious parts. It doesnt appear they care if we know, quite the opposite. They trust human stupidity and gullibility.

__________________
Skype Horusmaia
ICQ 41555245
Email [email protected]

dav3

Just look at how easily the Empire State Building collapsed when an Army B-25 bomber smashed into and exploded in the middle of the structure in 1945.
http://history1900s.about.com/od/194...mpirecrash.htm

Oh wait... No it didn't, because sky scrapers are build to withstand plane impacts.

__________________