MrGuy |
09-30-2009 03:20 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by NinjaSteve
(Post 16372840)
If VC wasn't a real company, what company was working with the banks? And is MrGuy saying Chio owes 6x of what was in the bank at one moment time and he took the rest before? MrGuy why don't you make this more interesting and tell us how much $ is involved or total lost or total owed. And how does one person go from doing this to working in the financial industry afterward? And what is this 'new thing' he's working on in the financial sector? Is he planning to pull the same thing in non adult processing?
Losing money is no laughing matter, or having it stolen.
|
Under $100K from my understanding was owed at the end. I know there was 10-20k left, of which I've no idea if any went back to customers. Without being 100% accurate I believe circa $70K was owed with $15k in the account.
Working doing personal trading now on financial markets and developing systems for them - not any service-based ones where he'll be pirating your money.
Business that was working with bank was an old incorporated business from the AVS days. It was a legal incorporated entity, but not Verified Charge, Inc.
Anyone who couldn't be bothered to read it, thinks I wrote too much - then the post probably wasn't for you. Perhaps if I'd written it in the form of an erotic story with Chio's lucious lips running over your cash it would have been better... If you did lose money or were involved and still couldn't be bothered to read it - fair enough. If you don't like my sarcastic witty wonderful sense of humour or love of cheeseburgers then I'm really that that fussed :)
PocketKangaroo - I guess what I meant by that paragraph was there was never any man intentions to run away with money or to "do an iBill", and had it not been for one or two truly abysmal decisions twinned with time recession took a plunge last Oct then VC would have muddled through and continued to pay everyone until it all got sorted. I whole heartedly agree on all your points but was merely trying to show it wasn't part of some calculated evil plan, more lack of foresight.... which I agree is absolutely inexcusable when dealing with other peoples money - hence a desire from my part to clarify this.
Guy
|