![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: talkin dirty on the phone
Posts: 1,026
|
opinions on css stylesheets?
What's your opinion on using css stylesheets for the layout of a paysite? Is it too much of a risk, since some visitors probably have browsers that can't handle css, and will get an ugly, totally unformatted page instead of the nice, clean one you designed? I like some of the options css can give you design-wise, but I'm also wary of turning off the surfer/prospective customer. Anyone here use stylesheets for their paysite? If you don't, hy not?
__________________
<font size="1" font color="black"><i><b>"No pleasure, no rapture, no exquisite sin greater...than central air."</i> -- Dogma</b> ICQ#169.839.131</font> |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,592
|
I use style sheets for global theme attributes. Mostly link colors, scrollbars, etc... As far as layout goes, I'd recommend staying away from it.
Just my ![]()
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1." |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 34,431
|
over 90% of people now have browsers that can handle most
CSS. Most people/designers are saying fuck it now to old browsers, just too much hassle trying to please everybody. The biggest hassle is the problem with Netscape tiling background images in nested table cells. That is fugly. But i see most people saying fuck it and using them. I wouldn't use them on a paysite, you don't want to waste a single surfer. You could use a Javascript sniffer to detect what browser the surfer is using and feed them different pages or CSS stylesheets.
__________________
I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 2,680
|
i'm a highly trained sniffer @ $25/hr
can sniff out most anything
__________________
Im fuckin retired ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 131
|
If you do the css properly, and you don't go overboard, its good in lots of servers. When I had a non-adult site with css, I had a lot of browsers working. Opera threw a fit about css, but eh.
__________________
- Becca |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,531
|
One thing I use CSS for is to resize the H1 tag for SE's. I know some people say the relevance of it has dropped, but it's still worth using. Especially since it's one line of code.
CSS makes it useable in a simple but eye-catching design.
__________________
This Space for Rent |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,217
|
Make it work with and without CSS. The people that are able to view CSS (which is like what, 98% in the first place) will get a better looking page and the couple Netscape 2.0-ers will get the same page you'd have when you'd design it without CSS ;)
Easy |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |