North Korea and Condaliza Rice - GoFuckYourself.com

theking · 10-20-2002, 10:34 AM

This morning on CNN Condaliza Rice flatly stated that North Korea will not be allowed to persue a Nuclear Weapons program. War is not imminent because she says we have other leverages to use before military force would be considered.

theking · 10-20-2002, 11:04 AM

Two former National Security Advisers that appeared on CNN also agree that North Korea cannot be allowed to persue a Nuclear capability. If they do not cease and desist, guess who will be next after the Iraqi problem is dealt with?

Honeyslut · 10-20-2002, 11:05 AM

people suck

TDF · 10-20-2002, 11:08 AM

sluts suck

Webby · 10-20-2002, 02:42 PM

DUH?.. "Condaliza Rice flatly stated that North Korea will not be allowed to persue a Nuclear Weapons program" .. Excuse me, but Rice does have a big mouth, and not a diplomatic one. She does not govern North Korea, nor does the US. I see the Washington disease of arrogance and "assumed righteousness" is still in full swing.

North Korea is not the only country that needs the removal of arms, lets start off with the country who has more weapons of mass distruction than any on the planet - the US, then clean up the stuff rotting in Russia.

Folks that live in glasshouses have no credibility to comment on others doing the same as em - think that is called hypocritic?? This comment is just yet another crass statement from the US admin on a meaningless news channel (CNN) - who gives a fuck what Rice or the administation utter? Sadly the US is just another "rogue state" with "weapons of mass distruction" now.

theking · 10-20-2002, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webby
DUH?.. "Condaliza Rice flatly stated that North Korea will not be allowed to persue a Nuclear Weapons program" .. Excuse me, but Rice does have a big mouth, and not a diplomatic one. She does not govern North Korea, nor does the US. I see the Washington disease of arrogance and "assumed righteousness" is still in full swing.

North Korea is not the only country that needs the removal of arms, lets start off with the country who has more weapons of mass distruction than any on the planet - the US, then clean up the stuff rotting in Russia.

Folks that live in glasshouses have no credibility to comment on others doing the same as em - think that is called hypocritic?? This comment is just yet another crass statement from the US admin on a meaningless news channel (CNN) - who gives a fuck what Rice or the administation utter? Sadly the US is just another "rogue state" with "weapons of mass distruction" now.

If North Korea does not cease and desist, the USA will govern North Korea, as soon as we take care of Iraq. Learn to live with the fact that the USA is the biggest, baddest dog on the block. Those that don't do so may get bitten.

ChrisH · 10-20-2002, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

If North Korea does not cease and desist, the USA will govern North Korea, as soon as we take care of Iraq. Learn to live with the fact that the USA is the biggest, baddest dog on the block. Those that don't do so may get bitten.

mech · 10-20-2002, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
If North Korea does not cease and desist, the USA will govern North Korea, as soon as we take care of Iraq. Learn to live with the fact that the USA is the biggest, baddest dog on the block. Those that don't do so may get bitten.

Perhaps you overlooked some vital information, it's a little too late to disallow them to pursue Nuclear Weapons, they've already got them! America is going to pussy foot around them (unlike their gung-ho attitude with Iraq) because they know New York would be obliterated if they mount an attack.

America may be the 'baddest dog on the block' but the North Korean dog has one big bad bite.

archer · 10-20-2002, 06:42 PM

china might have a very different opinion on what the US can do in North Korea.

Webby · 10-20-2002, 07:05 PM

*USA is the biggest, baddest dog on the block*

Yea.. sure is getting that way - a "rogue state" that for some reason has this overblown opinion of itself. Sadly idiot behavior has a habit of bouncing back on the "baddest dog"...

Danny_C · 10-20-2002, 07:12 PM

The first step in getting others to disarm nukes it to disarm our own. I definitely agree about that. I'm not sure what good a nuclear war would do anybody.

On the other hand, I will say this... if I had to choose whether I'd rather the U.S. have nukes or North Korea, I'd have to go with the U.S... just because I know we would never strike first with them. I don't have the same confidence in North Korea.

theking · 10-20-2002, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mech
Perhaps you overlooked some vital information, it's a little too late to disallow them to pursue Nuclear Weapons, they've already got them! America is going to pussy foot around them (unlike their gung-ho attitude with Iraq) because they know New York would be obliterated if they mount an attack.

America may be the 'baddest dog on the block' but the North Korean dog has one big bad bite.

What makes you think that they already have Nuclear Weapons? What is your source of information? Even if they had Nukes, North Korea does not have ICBM's or long range bombers so New York should be safe for awhile longer.

theking · 10-20-2002, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by archer
china might have a very different opinion on what the US can do in North Korea.

I seriously doubt that China is willing to give up its MFN status over North Korea, they are not stupid people.

Honeyslut · 10-20-2002, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by toodamnfli
sluts suck

I would not know about that..

mech · 10-21-2002, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
What makes you think that they already have Nuclear Weapons? What is your source of information?...

My source is the American Government.
http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/top...149823,00.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/asi...ic/2337997.stm (BBC Article)

Shoplifter · 10-21-2002, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Two former National Security Advisers that appeared on CNN also agree that North Korea cannot be allowed to persue a Nuclear capability. If they do not cease and desist, guess who will be next after the Iraqi problem is dealt with?

The rest of us appeared here and agreed that the USA cannot be allowed to pursue a Nuclear capability.

theking · 10-21-2002, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mech
My source is the American Government.
http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/top...149823,00.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/asi...ic/2337997.stm (BBC Article)

I just watched the video of the press conference given by Secretary Rumsfeld and General Myers. What the Secretary said was "they may have" Nuclear Weapons. That possibility has to be considered, just as the possibility that Iraq has Nuclear Weapons has to be considered. We do know for a fact that Iraq and North Korea has not done any Nuclear Weapons testing.

Terenzo · 10-21-2002, 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Danny_C

On the other hand, I will say this... if I had to choose whether I'd rather the U.S. have nukes or North Korea, I'd have to go with the U.S... just because I know we would never strike first with them. I don't have the same confidence in North Korea.

The USA already did.... North Korea never did.

.:Frog:. · 10-21-2002, 05:05 AM

I love how a country with at least 12,000 nukes is telling a country with 0-1 nukes not to have any. LOL

Its also funny how the US is more then happy to fight/bully/threaten non-nuclear countries but is scared to do the same with a nuclear armed country.
The world sees America this way, as cowards afraid to stand up to strong countries, but bullies the weak.

I saw 5 minutes of SNL (the news part) and they were joking about this as well.

.:Frog:. · 10-21-2002, 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Danny_C
On the other hand, I will say this... if I had to choose whether I'd rather the U.S. have nukes or North Korea, I'd have to go with the U.S... just because I know we would never strike first with them. I don't have the same confidence in North Korea.

The US is the only country in history to ever use Nuclear weapons against people.

10-20-2002, 10:34 AM	#1
theking Nice Kitty Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The good old USA!!! Posts: 21,053	North Korea and Condaliza Rice This morning on CNN Condaliza Rice flatly stated that North Korea will not be allowed to persue a Nuclear Weapons program. War is not imminent because she says we have other leverages to use before military force would be considered. __________________ When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me! FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

10-20-2002, 11:04 AM	#2
theking Nice Kitty Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The good old USA!!! Posts: 21,053	Two former National Security Advisers that appeared on CNN also agree that North Korea cannot be allowed to persue a Nuclear capability. If they do not cease and desist, guess who will be next after the Iraqi problem is dealt with? __________________ When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me! FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

10-20-2002, 11:05 AM	#3
Honeyslut Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ass Valley, Ca Posts: 6,436	people suck __________________ http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !

10-20-2002, 11:08 AM	#4
TDF Triple OG nigga on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: in the BP4L family compound Posts: 27,296	sluts suck __________________ Sig heil

10-20-2002, 06:42 PM	#9
archer Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 1,721	china might have a very different opinion on what the US can do in North Korea. __________________ Looking to promote uncut cock? Check out Uncut Cash. It rocks.

10-20-2002, 02:42 PM	#5
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	DUH?.. "Condaliza Rice flatly stated that North Korea will not be allowed to persue a Nuclear Weapons program" .. Excuse me, but Rice does have a big mouth, and not a diplomatic one. She does not govern North Korea, nor does the US. I see the Washington disease of arrogance and "assumed righteousness" is still in full swing. North Korea is not the only country that needs the removal of arms, lets start off with the country who has more weapons of mass distruction than any on the planet - the US, then clean up the stuff rotting in Russia. Folks that live in glasshouses have no credibility to comment on others doing the same as em - think that is called hypocritic?? This comment is just yet another crass statement from the US admin on a meaningless news channel (CNN) - who gives a fuck what Rice or the administation utter? Sadly the US is just another "rogue state" with "weapons of mass distruction" now.

10-20-2002, 07:05 PM	#10
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	USA is the biggest, baddest dog on the block Yea.. sure is getting that way - a "rogue state" that for some reason has this overblown opinion of itself. Sadly idiot behavior has a habit of bouncing back on the "baddest dog"...

10-20-2002, 07:12 PM	#11
Danny_C Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Philadelphia, PA Posts: 2,160	The first step in getting others to disarm nukes it to disarm our own. I definitely agree about that. I'm not sure what good a nuclear war would do anybody. On the other hand, I will say this... if I had to choose whether I'd rather the U.S. have nukes or North Korea, I'd have to go with the U.S... just because I know we would never strike first with them. I don't have the same confidence in North Korea.

10-21-2002, 05:05 AM	#19
.:Frog:. Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: ~ C A N A D A ~ Posts: 2,123	I love how a country with at least 12,000 nukes is telling a country with 0-1 nukes not to have any. LOL Its also funny how the US is more then happy to fight/bully/threaten non-nuclear countries but is scared to do the same with a nuclear armed country. The world sees America this way, as cowards afraid to stand up to strong countries, but bullies the weak. I saw 5 minutes of SNL (the news part) and they were joking about this as well. __________________ <a href="http://www.pornopayouts.com/?rid=pp3076">PornoPayouts</a> Tons of Hosted Galleries. Last edited by .:Frog:.; 10-21-2002 at 05:06 AM..