GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Just in - Max hardcore GUILTY on all charges (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=833089)

ChefJeff 06-05-2008 04:26 PM

Revolution? Who's with me? JK LOL. We can do it, it's in the declaration of independance...

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

Some Guy 06-05-2008 04:27 PM

Yeah, I'm thinking that an appeal is in order here. Good chance of this being overturned.

I'm not shocked by this verdict, though. Seems like in America, porn producers are always getting fucked... no pun intended.

I'm always getting screwed over by the legal system in my area because they know who I am, what I do, and look for every opportunity to mess with me. Last year the city decided to nail me with a "zoning law violation" for shooting nude models in the privacy of my own home and fined me $2,500.00.

Just earlier today I got a notice saying I'm being fined $270.00 for the weeds in my yard being higher than 6", which they're absolutely not (my front yard is way nice), yet all of my neighbor's yards are far worse.

Once the legal system knows who you are, it's all bad news. I feel really bad for Max Hardcore. Hopefully he can fight this verdict.

Hollywood Horwitz 06-05-2008 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChefJeff (Post 14285221)
Obscene to some, not to others. In any event, free speech is free speech, obscenity laws are unconstitutional.

But I guess in America, the government decides what we can and can't watch in the privacy of our own homes.

I agree Jeff! I may find it obscene(which I don't) but it doesn't give the right to invade peoples right to watch it. I'm sure the idea of peeing in someones mouth is totally gross(which it is) but different strokes..different folks..

Methodcash Rick 06-05-2008 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xentech (Post 14285205)
Why is everyone so surprised? The stuff on his site is disgusting in my opinion, and it is most definitely obscene! Why are you surprised that somebody distributing obscene material is getting found guilty on charges of distributing obscene content?

So I guess you're all for the 1st amendment, as long as what's being said or shown doesn't offend you?

eightmotives 06-05-2008 04:29 PM

Oh well, shit happens bitch nuts.

marketsmart 06-05-2008 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace (Post 14285264)
jesus, do you ever stop arguing about tedious shit just to argue?

as with everyone else, you know damn well what I meant

no, he does not.... he should be out shopping for towels, to wipe that egg off his face for going to bat for that banana chick....

ChefJeff 06-05-2008 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 14285277)
ruh roh -

why wasn't Jaded Video also charged?

They got immunity in exchange for testifying against Max. Even though they are the ones that actually shipped the videos in question. They didn't charge Max with shipping the videos to the distributor in CA, JadedVideo.com, they charged him with shipping the videos to FLA. Which he didn't do, Jaded did.

Miss Munki 06-05-2008 04:29 PM

:Oh crap:Oh crap:Oh crap:Oh crap

GatorB 06-05-2008 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honez (Post 14285224)
Because of this:
".....found guilty of 10 federal counts of distributing obscene materials over the Internet..."

That is going to affect all of us.

This wil be appealed and should go all the way to the supreme court. You can NOT use "community standards" when applied to the WORLD WIDE web. That means some DA in some backwater in Alabama can take Hugh Hefner to court over playboy.com for "obscenity" because in his "community" Playboy is obscene.

Some Guy 06-05-2008 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14285309)
This wil be appealed and should go all the way to the supreme court. You can NOT use "community standards" when applied to the WORLD WIDE web. That means some DA in some backwater in Alabama can take Hugh Hefner to court over playboy.com for "obscenity" because in his "community" Playboy is obscene.

Very well said.

:thumbsup

ChefJeff 06-05-2008 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Methodcash Rick (Post 14285293)
So I guess you're all for the 1st amendment, as long as what's being said or shown doesn't offend you?

That's why we have the first amendment, to protect unpopular speech.
It's the most extreme stuff that needs that protection.

But, I guess we have this great government that we all trust to tell us what is ok to watch. No, no, can't make up your mind for yourself... Oh, ok. then I guess we can just get rid of the first amendment now. We don't need it. The government has it all taken care of.

tony286 06-05-2008 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14285309)
This wil be appealed and should go all the way to the supreme court. You can NOT use "community standards" when applied to the WORLD WIDE web. That means some DA in some backwater in Alabama can take Hugh Hefner to court over playboy.com for "obscenity" because in his "community" Playboy is obscene.

Have you seen the makeup of the supreme court lately?

FreeHugeMovies 06-05-2008 04:34 PM

I may not agree with what he does but it's his right to do what he does.

ChefJeff 06-05-2008 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14285324)
Have you seen the makeup of the supreme court lately?

It's stacked with right wing nuts, nuts I tell you.

Nixon stacked the court in the 70's too. And they went after porn.

It's the same culture war that's being fueled by the religiuous right wingers in high places. The ones that don't know how to feel about their own sexuality, so, like all crazies, they point the blame at an easy target.

Gosh. This is a sad day in America. Sad.

Besides being an idiot, the President is a liar too
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60

tony286 06-05-2008 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChefJeff (Post 14285318)
That's why we have the first amendment, to protect unpopular speech.
It's the most extreme stuff that needs that protection.

But, I guess we have this great government that we all trust to tell us what is ok to watch. No, no, can't make up your mind for yourself... Oh, ok. then I guess we can just get rid of the first amendment now. We don't need it. The government has it all taken care of.

Read pleasurepays he makes some sense,its the hard truth:

If people in this biz weren’t totally retarded, totally disorganized and actually had some guidelines and standards to work and live by this industry wouldn’t have many real legal problems. How about not pushing? how about setting some clear, defensible boundaries and staying within them… rather than always challenging the world to shut you down?

There is a difference between drawing the line in the sand, one which you know can be defended and staying behind it and the totally incorrect assumption that anything and everything you do is somehow Constitutionally protected and to keep pushing the most influential groups in this country to shut you down by making sure they always have the ammo they need to keep firing at you until they hit something.

Right now many of you US idiots want to make the argument that shitting on, pissing on, vomiting on, pissing in girls mouths until they choke and cry etc isn’t “obscene” or isn’t obscene in GodsVillage, Indiana… and most of you then go further to suggest that what he is going through is unfair as if no one really knew that you can’t just mail out totally over the top porn with some old wrinkly fuck pissing into a girls mouth until she starts to choke and cry to any state, county and city in the country without a serious risk of being prosecuted.

Really?

The biggest problem with this industry is that it is full of anti-social idiots with a strong resentment for authority. Thats all fine and well when you are rebelling against your alcoholic father who frequently tried to kiss you or watch you take a bath… but it’s not hardly a winning formula for the long term success of a controversial industry whose greatest enemies are infinitely more organized, deep pocketed and focused on the simple goal of stopping you and that usually have the public and federal government behind them to do it.

The “rights” you many of you seem to think you have in the US are an illusion. People make the laws. People make the laws against people like you. They can because they know you are weak. You are the low hanging fruit of society. They will attack you because they know no one is going to defend you… because you can’t defend yourselves. They will continue to attack you because they can always rely on the fact that you will constantly be throwing whatever offensive thing you do right in their face and daring them to do something about it. And they are fucking you over right now. They are arguing that each one of you is a Max Hardcore,.. no better. A disease in society. Eventually, they will win and you will lose and it will be your fault, because far too many people in this industry are irretrievably damaged, self destructive fuck ups… and because no one will separate you and what you do from the absolute worst of the worst in this biz.

The public doesn’t see (and never will see) “good” and “bad” pornographers. They just see “pornographers” and the public perception of you will never be any better than the publics perception of Max Hardcore and some old guy shitting on an 18 year old runaway while she cries. And its not the publics fault. It’s your fault. You repeatedly make the choice to defend the worst of the worst in a political and social climate where you will eventually lose. You don’t even have the sense to pick and choose battles and choose battles you can win. Instead, you let the worst of the worst in this industry pick a fight on your behalf. Brilliant! Are you fucking kidding me? Eventually you will lose these fights… And once you finally lose… you will lose big because the fight against you will never stop and you don’t have the brains or foresight to organize and defend yourselves, set standards and police yourselves. Instead… you are happy doing lines of cocaine off a strippers ass while complaining about who is President and how unfair life is and will just let the Christian Right do it for you.

How will the government restrict your business because you didn’t have the brains, foresight and organizational skills to put yourself in a defensible position first? Because in the most important fights, you choose to not have a strong defensive plan or even an offense?

This industry is like a really big, cocky, heavy weight fighter with a glass jaw. Eventually, its going to catch one on the chin and it will be lights out for all. It’s not a question of “if”… only “when” …. and why? because most of you stupid assholes prefer to think its your “right” and will keep doing that until its finally decided to take that “right” away because you just can’t and won’t see the bigger picture.

GatorB 06-05-2008 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14285324)
Have you seen the makeup of the supreme court lately?

So it might take years before the SC hears the case.

ChefJeff 06-05-2008 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FreeHugeMovies (Post 14285335)
but it's his right to do what he does.

Not anymore it's not. Not ours either.

eightmotives 06-05-2008 04:39 PM

I would laugh my ass off if a few of the members from the jury beat off to watching the evidence. :)

GetSCORECash 06-05-2008 04:41 PM

This is really going to cost Max allot of money! I'm sure he will get off on appeal.

WiredGuy 06-05-2008 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14285309)
This wil be appealed and should go all the way to the supreme court. You can NOT use "community standards" when applied to the WORLD WIDE web. That means some DA in some backwater in Alabama can take Hugh Hefner to court over playboy.com for "obscenity" because in his "community" Playboy is obscene.

While it does seem extreme, I believe that is the law and it really needs to be changed to redefine community standards. The three part test for determination of obscenity as defined by Miller Vs. California was made in the 1970's. It really needs to be updated to redefine community standards for the internet era.
WG

brandonstills 06-05-2008 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChefJeff (Post 14285280)
Revolution? Who's with me? JK LOL. We can do it, it's in the declaration of independance...

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

Consent of the governed? The opinions of the vox populi are the reason Max is in trouble in the first place. The majority of the governed could care less about this trial and a huge number of self-righteous people I'm sure support the decision.

tony286 06-05-2008 04:42 PM

its sucks for Max but I have no doubt he knew this day was coming and has planned for it. So he has the resources for multiple rounds.

GatorB 06-05-2008 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14285364)
The public doesn?t see (and never will see) ?good? and ?bad? pornographers. They just see ?pornographers? and the public perception of you will never be any better than the publics perception of Max Hardcore and some old guy shitting on an 18 year old runaway while she cries. .

This is the same public which in the majority have all watch porn in thier lives and enjoyed it. The same public by the MILLIONS that go the the local porn shop, look on the internet order on PPV or enjoy at the hotel when on vacation. So yes public, see us as evil and don't defned us and one day when you go searching for your porn and it can't be found you have yourself to blame.

DixieDash 06-05-2008 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14285309)
This wil be appealed and should go all the way to the supreme court. You can NOT use "community standards" when applied to the WORLD WIDE web. That means some DA in some backwater in Alabama can take Hugh Hefner to court over playboy.com for "obscenity" because in his "community" Playboy is obscene.

That's right. If an idiot took someone to court everytime they found something obscene it would be ridicululous. If they don't like Max Hardcore's work then don't friggin look at it. Some people just like to make court and lawsuits their hobby. I think all of the simple minded omish acting people should start a colony somewhere and allow only what they want into it that way they can stay out of the real world. They need to find a new hobby. :321GFY

GatorB 06-05-2008 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy (Post 14285386)
While it does seem extreme, I believe that is the law and it really needs to be changed to redefine community standards. The three part test for determination of obscenity as defined by Miller Vs. California was made in the 1970's. It really needs to be updated to redefine community standards for the internet era.
WG

And even a conservative SC will not agree with the fact that some backwater community standards should apply tot eh internet. A porn shop is a real building that is in the community. The internet is something that each individual let's or not into his own home. No SC will agree with the fact that your neighbors can dictate what you watch on TV or your computer in the privacy of your own home.

tony286 06-05-2008 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14285400)
This is the same public which in the majority have all watch porn in thier lives and enjoyed it. The same public by the MILLIONS that go the the local porn shop, look on the internet order on PPV or enjoy at the hotel when on vacation. So yes public, see us as evil and don't defned us and one day when you go searching for your porn and it can't be found you have yourself to blame.

Those aren't my words but he brings up strong points. The motion picture industry stopped government censorship by policing themselves.

CDSmith 06-05-2008 04:49 PM

Appeal coming for sure. Watch for it.

Give em hell Max. I don't care for your brand of crappola but I'll defend your right to produce it. I've never heard of one model complaining about working with you. Ever.

C H R I S 06-05-2008 04:50 PM

AVN Story:

Max Hardcore Found Guilty in Obscenity Trial
Jurors find Max and his company guilty on all counts
By: David Sullivan

Posted: 06/05/2008

TAMPA - Producer Max Hardcore (a.k.a. Paul Little) was found guilty of 10 federal counts of distributing obscene materials over the Internet and through the mail.

Little's company Maxworld Entertainment was also found guilty on 10 related charges.

Earlier today, jurors asked U.S. District Judge Susan Bucklew for guidance as the jury was having trouble reaching a unanimous decision.

Full Story

GatorB 06-05-2008 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14285423)
Those aren't my words but he brings up strong points. The motion picture industry stopped government censorship by policing themselves.

My point is people in my area would look down on me for making a living the way I do. Yet these same people are gleefully jacking thier dicks and diddling their pussies to the very same material that I am some sort of "scumbag" for pushing.

Elli 06-05-2008 04:51 PM

Jurors need to be told there's a difference between "distasteful" and "unlawful." Just because the material isn't your personal preference does not make it obscene.

Helix 06-05-2008 04:53 PM

so......where were the Free Speech Coalition peeps during this? hmmmm

DixieDash 06-05-2008 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14285417)
And even a conservative SC will not agree with the fact that some backwater community standards should apply tot eh internet. A porn shop is a real building that is in the community. The internet is something that each individual let's or not into his own home. No SC will agree with the fact that your neighbors can dictate what you watch on TV or your computer in the privacy of your own home.

F'ing nosy neighbors. It's our right to decide what we watch and what we do as long as it falls within the law, and even out of the law sometimes I believe. I believe Max was within the lines and it's shitty that a jury and a judge whom apparently didn't care much for porn made a biased decision. It's not like his models did it without consent. And because his work is a little more controversial, you know he keeps all of his paperwork handy. I hope he beats this because I think the whole thing is stupid. Why don't they go after child pornographers and molesters instead.

C H R I S 06-05-2008 04:55 PM

More anlalysis from our legal team should come tomorrow....

Some Guy 06-05-2008 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14285364)
Read pleasurepays he makes some sense,its the hard truth:

If people in this biz weren?t totally retarded, totally disorganized and actually had some guidelines and standards to work and live by this industry wouldn?t have many real legal problems. How about not pushing? how about setting some clear, defensible boundaries and staying within them? rather than always challenging the world to shut you down?

There is a difference between drawing the line in the sand, one which you know can be defended and staying behind it and the totally incorrect assumption that anything and everything you do is somehow Constitutionally protected and to keep pushing the most influential groups in this country to shut you down by making sure they always have the ammo they need to keep firing at you until they hit something.

Right now many of you US idiots want to make the argument that shitting on, pissing on, vomiting on, pissing in girls mouths until they choke and cry etc isn?t ?obscene? or isn?t obscene in GodsVillage, Indiana? and most of you then go further to suggest that what he is going through is unfair as if no one really knew that you can?t just mail out totally over the top porn with some old wrinkly fuck pissing into a girls mouth until she starts to choke and cry to any state, county and city in the country without a serious risk of being prosecuted.

Really?

The biggest problem with this industry is that it is full of anti-social idiots with a strong resentment for authority. Thats all fine and well when you are rebelling against your alcoholic father who frequently tried to kiss you or watch you take a bath? but it?s not hardly a winning formula for the long term success of a controversial industry whose greatest enemies are infinitely more organized, deep pocketed and focused on the simple goal of stopping you and that usually have the public and federal government behind them to do it.

The ?rights? you many of you seem to think you have in the US are an illusion. People make the laws. People make the laws against people like you. They can because they know you are weak. You are the low hanging fruit of society. They will attack you because they know no one is going to defend you? because you can?t defend yourselves. They will continue to attack you because they can always rely on the fact that you will constantly be throwing whatever offensive thing you do right in their face and daring them to do something about it. And they are fucking you over right now. They are arguing that each one of you is a Max Hardcore,.. no better. A disease in society. Eventually, they will win and you will lose and it will be your fault, because far too many people in this industry are irretrievably damaged, self destructive fuck ups? and because no one will separate you and what you do from the absolute worst of the worst in this biz.

The public doesn?t see (and never will see) ?good? and ?bad? pornographers. They just see ?pornographers? and the public perception of you will never be any better than the publics perception of Max Hardcore and some old guy shitting on an 18 year old runaway while she cries. And its not the publics fault. It?s your fault. You repeatedly make the choice to defend the worst of the worst in a political and social climate where you will eventually lose. You don?t even have the sense to pick and choose battles and choose battles you can win. Instead, you let the worst of the worst in this industry pick a fight on your behalf. Brilliant! Are you fucking kidding me? Eventually you will lose these fights? And once you finally lose? you will lose big because the fight against you will never stop and you don?t have the brains or foresight to organize and defend yourselves, set standards and police yourselves. Instead? you are happy doing lines of cocaine off a strippers ass while complaining about who is President and how unfair life is and will just let the Christian Right do it for you.

How will the government restrict your business because you didn?t have the brains, foresight and organizational skills to put yourself in a defensible position first? Because in the most important fights, you choose to not have a strong defensive plan or even an offense?

This industry is like a really big, cocky, heavy weight fighter with a glass jaw. Eventually, its going to catch one on the chin and it will be lights out for all. It?s not a question of ?if?? only ?when? ?. and why? because most of you stupid assholes prefer to think its your ?right? and will keep doing that until its finally decided to take that ?right? away because you just can?t and won?t see the bigger picture.

One of, if not the, best posts I've ever read here.

:thumbsup

After Shock Media 06-05-2008 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14285423)
Those aren't my words but he brings up strong points. The motion picture industry stopped government censorship by policing themselves.

Please do not go there Tony, I do agree with much of what you say however the MPAA is much worse than anything the Government could legally come up with as guidelines. Hell even the CCA is fucking insane if you look over its history starting in 54.

tony286 06-05-2008 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14285441)
My point is people in my area would look down on me for making a living the way I do. Yet these same people are gleefully jacking thier dicks and diddling their pussies to the very same material that I am some sort of "scumbag" for pushing.

oh your preaching to the choir, ever realize the more righteous the political scumbag then they find out he is trying bang page boys or the minister buying gay whores smoking meth.

tony286 06-05-2008 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 14285488)
Please do not go there Tony, I do agree with much of what you say however the MPAA is much worse than anything the Government could legally come up with as guidelines. Hell even the CCA is fucking insane if you look over its history starting in 54.

your right, watched a documentary on them but you dont see people going to jail for making a movie.

After Shock Media 06-05-2008 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 14285461)
so......where were the Free Speech Coalition peeps during this? hmmmm

Max would not of needed any legal help and honestly the FSC would just bungle things otherwise. Reality would say that they need to change their name and sell off the 2 phones and whatever office furniture they have.

Mutt 06-05-2008 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Some Guy (Post 14285486)
One of, if not the, best posts I've ever read here.

:thumbsup

that was written by PleasurePays - the best poster on any adult board EVER!

ChefJeff 06-05-2008 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy (Post 14285386)
While it does seem extreme, I believe that is the law and it really needs to be changed to redefine community standards. The three part test for determination of obscenity as defined by Miller Vs. California was made in the 1970's. It really needs to be updated to redefine community standards for the internet era.
WG

Yes, yes and yes. Well said.

The Miller Test is not a very good way to define obscenity. It's plain aweful and overly vague. The way it's written ANY work is subject to an indictement.

Watch the documentary "Inside Deep Throat" it is very educational about how all the obscenity prosections were started by Nixon and the religious right. Crooks.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123