If the FBI didn't exist, some degenerate would blow up your local Wal-Mart superstore with your entire family inside.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...at&btnG=Search

Ahh...didn't Germany invade Europe and the U.S.A...Britain...along with other allies liberate Europe from Germany? The USSR kept control of the countries that it "liberated".

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...of_Liberty.jpg

Ok? What does that have to do with Iraq?

First, I didn?t add or subtract anything, I didn?t do the companion or come up with any of the numbers. I posted what was generated by CRS and congress approved. You can find detailed numbers on Defense Link if you wish to criticize them and email them about the discrepance. And if you want it broke down even further you can go to icasualties.org where I obtained that list.

The numbers are/where listed as a direct comparison between the Iraq War/conflict vs. Major Battles Since WWII. Once again not my numbers.

You are not comprehending. When you posted stats on deaths under Clinton, you included all deaths including suicide, illness, and accidents. Under Bush, you didn't include these numbers. These numbers are listed on page 11 of the report you linked to. You simply left them out when you posted them.

I don't see why this is hard to understand. Just go to page 11 of that report that you cited.

TERRORISM.

Sunni terrorists don't fight "occupation", they want control of the country back. Sunnis are a religious minority in Iraq, Arab nationalists who dominated Iraq under Saddam Hussein.

The invasion of Iraq had/has multiple strategic purposes...WMD...was just the drumbeat used by the Administration...but was never the primary reason for the invasion...and only shortsigted people would think that it was for any reasons other than long term strategic purposes.

So you're basically saying they lied to the entire country, congress and United Nations? In other words, you're government is corrupt?

There wasn't much terrorism in Iraq before we got there. And zero terrorism directed at the United States. Still, what does this have to do with my local Wal-Mart?

U.S. soldiers are heroes. Period.

BTW, what's your dirty little secret? You obviously don't care about the U.S. Army or Arabs, so......

You're obviously a victim of the Fox News syndrome, which leads to paranoia, lack of objective thinking and plain stupidity.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Whatever you say.

I agree. Never argued otherwise. They are put in a shitty spot and handle it the best they can.

I don't care about the U.S. Army because I posted the actual number of deaths? So not wanting them to die makes me anti-US Army? That makes no sense.

I'm not the one wanting them giving up their lives in a pointless war and then lying about the number of deaths on a message board.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/grap...16/wtort16.jpg

They did not lie about WMD's as the consensus of all of our fifteen intel agencies...as well as all of the major intel agencies in the world...including the UN...was that Iraq possesed unaccounted for WMD's and was trying to build more. The consensus was wrong but was not a lie and certainly was not the first time that intel has been wrong in a major way...and will not be the last time. The Administration thought that using WMD's as the drumbeat to invasion would fly better than telling the world as well as the American people that we were going to take preemptive control of a country for long term strategic purposes. Every President that I have lived under has lied to the American people and the world about multiple things...including the reasons for the use of the military...but it is common for governments to lie about one thing or another.

Another Pussyserver-like GFY self-declared genius.
Who the fuck are you? A rocket scientist? You speaking as a counterterrorism specialist?
Please give me a break.

doesn't mean they are not dying in vain over lies. Every guy who died in Viet Nam died in vain.

So maybe Blacks are criminals because 5% to 10% of Black adults are behind bars at any given time?

When did I declare my self a genius at anything? You're the one speaking out you're ass. :2 cents:

Guys like you and ther other neo-con dipshits love war, but funny how you are posting here and not over there walking the walk. Easy to support something when it's not YOUR ass in the line of fire. Every Bush cock sucking monther fucker needs to join the military and ask to be sent to Iraq or STFU already. PERIOD.

The double standards of pseudo-pacifists and terrorist sympathizers are incredible.
But what could you expect from people who identify with terrorists from a remote desert?

http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/6...gelousyqd8.jpg

No one in this thread sympathizes with terrorists. They've just stated that the Iraq war is dumb and that American men and women are dying in vain. The terrorists were not in Iraq till we got there.

The terrorists were not in Iraq? Ask the Kurds or Kuwaitis.

fuck you turd. I don't have double standards and I don't sympathize with anyone. if it's anyone that sides with terrorists adnd dictators it's YOU. But you're to fucking retarded to see that. You're a fucking coward. Your mother should have used a coathanger and aborted you before you oozed your way out of her nasty STD infected whore hole.

I am not a Kurd or a Kuwaiti. I was more concerned with the ones that attacked us.

http://www.boston.com/news/world/mid...tis_uncovered/
"The bodies of 41 Kuwaitis believed killed during the 1991 Persian Gulf war have been unearthed in southern Iraq, one of 295 mass graves containing thousands of Saddam Hussein's victims."

YOU = RETARD.

Seriously, you just proven yourself a retard.

And that has what to do with terrorists?

He is a member of the 101st Fighting Keyboardists. Don't discredit his great service.

I'm uncertain as to what the death of Kuwait people back in 1991 during a war has to do with terrorism in my country.

The Middle East is the most vital region for the world economy and its importance is increasing by the day.

you really are a sick puppy ....

Strong argument. :1orglaugh

I comprehended what you said just fine, that?s why I clearly said in my last post that "The numbers are/where listed as a direct comparison between the Iraq War/conflict vs. Major Battles Since WWII."

According to the Department of Defense military casualty information those numbers are correct and include Non-hostile deaths and include those caused by accident, illness, homicide, suicide, terrorist attack, or other undetermined causes.

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/casualty.pdf

Hers a complete list including all Non-hostile deaths.

http://icasualties.org/oif/BY_DOD.aspx

Looks like the numbers are correct.

Boycott oil companies.

You all make me laugh. Ungrateful bitches living the good life at the expensive of the rest of the world, and complaining about the ones that make it possible, business leaders, polticians, the us military.

It's so hypocrite. :1orglaugh

http://www.jsd.k12.ca.us/bf/teachers...rying_baby.jpg

I'm talking about your numbers under Clinton and numbers under Bush. There was only 1 hostile death recorded under Clinton. I'm not talking about the numbers during WW2, etc.

I have respect for one American far left terrorist, Theodore Kaczynski, for exposing this fraud called "leftism".

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Indust...and_Its_Future

You all speak non-sense, emotion, pussy crap. Business, political, military leaders use their brain.

I'm done for now, bye bye the frustrated losers.

Despite the costs, it was still the right thing to do, and time will prove that to be true. A brutal dictator is gone, and the nation is rebuilding. It won't be easy though.

Then why did you not fight in it?