Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-23-2008, 07:28 AM   #1
Fletch XXX
GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
 
Fletch XXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: that 504
Posts: 60,840
Is Stealing Paparazzi Photos for a paysite illegal?

Lets say I gather all the paris Hiton paparazzi photos I can, Angelina Jolie, etc, and make a pay site? Is that considered "stolen content?"

Considering paparazzi are copyright holders of their images and videos, I dont see how some can say it is not stolen content.

discuss
__________________

Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me
Fletch XXX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 07:40 AM   #2
Damian_Maxcash
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: MaxCash.com
Posts: 12,745
God knows how it works - MrSkin and others seem to get away with it so there must be a way to do it legally.
Damian_Maxcash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 07:46 AM   #3
Fletch XXX
GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
 
Fletch XXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: that 504
Posts: 60,840
Are they even based in the US? I doubt it.

But also, I am talking about paparazzi photos and videos, not movie clips from sex scenes. With half-ass commentary to make it seem not like content theft.

Paparazzi own copyright to their photos, there is no public domain as it is defined by no one holding copyrights to that particular image or video. We all know celeb photos like paris hilton pussy shots are OWNED by the perso who took them, so including them in your pay site would be wrong, no?

I just have to ask, folks are running around here bashing "stolen content" but then partnering up ad making money with paysites that steal copyright protected paparazzi images.

No matter what, you simply cannot collect 1000s of images you have no license for, and start a paysite.

however, some around here have their hands in them, but wat you to think they are against stolen content.

They should be made to defend that stance.

Im not really arguing "celeb" ste legalities, thats been done a million times... but sites that rip papazrazzi databases and add their photos are a little different.
__________________

Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me
Fletch XXX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 07:47 AM   #4
NinjaSteve
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,089
I've always thought there's some system because it seems that the paparazzi will sell the image and it'll appear in just one magazine.
__________________
...
NinjaSteve is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 07:48 AM   #5
Fletch XXX
GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
 
Fletch XXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: that 504
Posts: 60,840
My stance is simple and EASY to defend.

if you do not have the license for the content, you shouldnt be displaying it FOR PROFIT.
__________________

Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me
Fletch XXX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 07:48 AM   #6
Shaze
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 2,662
id think it's illegal...
Shaze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 07:49 AM   #7
Fletch XXX
GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
 
Fletch XXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: that 504
Posts: 60,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by NinjaSteve View Post
I've always thought there's some system because it seems that the paparazzi will sell the image and it'll appear in just one magazine.
right, because they LICENSE the image, thats why Ive stated, we should use "licensed or unlicensed content" as the terms instead of just "stolen"

But yes, paps own their photos, and license them for A LOT OF MONEY. Which by default claims copyright and EXCLUSIVE USE to display the work.
__________________

Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me
Fletch XXX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 08:15 AM   #8
Kelli58
Confirmed User
 
Kelli58's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,129
I don't know all the details but i know many of them work for established organizations like TMZ who in fact is owned my AOL Time Warner so be careful who you steal from because you could have a very big dog on your ass for it.
Kelli58 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 08:24 AM   #9
spacedog
Yes that IS me. Bitch.
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damian_Maxcash View Post
God knows how it works - MrSkin and others seem to get away with it so there must be a way to do it legally.
Paparazzi sell to anyone they can & rarely on an exclusive basis.. Theoretically I'd assume Mr Skin & others with a vested interest in their business ventures would safeguard against legal ramifications by having their bases covered
spacedog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 08:30 AM   #10
Dave PSC
Confirmed User
 
Dave PSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch XXX View Post
My stance is simple and EASY to defend.

if you do not have the license for the content, you shouldnt be displaying it FOR PROFIT.
It is simply black and white. It your's to use legally or it is not, there is no gray.
__________________

www.pinkstarcash.com
Our newest site!! www.glamurebabes.com
Dave ICQ: 434741855
Dave PSC is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.