The check is in the mail shawcutie...

Luckily, my lawyer says Im allowed to only disclose the income the dorks here think I make...

So since I work for foodstamps, and traffic, I only make $500/mo...

So, I mailed you a check for $100, fair?

You lost, just crawl off with some dignity man... seriously, you're looking like a real chump here. :thumbsup

We all "work" for the fucking government whether we like it or not...

Right now
I am an anti-Christ
And I am an anarchist
Don't know what I want, but I know how get it
I want to destroy, possibly?

'Cause I want to be anarchy, no dog's body

Anarchy for the U.S.A.
It's coming sometime, it may be
I give a wrong time, stop a traffic light
Your future dream is a shopping spree

'Cause I want to be anarchy, in the city

Of many ways to get what you want
I use the best, I use the rest
I use the enemy
I use anarchy

'Cause I want to be anarchy, it's the only way to be

Is this the M.P.L.A.?
Is this the U.D.A.?
Is this the I.R.A.?
I thought it was the U.S.A., or just another country
And other hahahaha-like tendencies
'Cause I want to be anarchy, 'cause I want to be
Anarchy, you know what I mean?

'Cause I want to be anarchist, again I'm pissed

Destroy!

-/\/\

Will sombody end this by posting some beastie pics, Richards Simmons, gay anal fisting, or the Cop from Chip's please?

Failed hotlinking attempt?

Strange, it worked for me. =P

Wow... this thread is STILL going?

Did we ever determine if DrewKole is a pedophile? Or have we only determined that he is stubborn - especially when he is wrong?

DrewKole is, never has, nor never will be a pedofile...

I already admitted to being stubborn, but sorry, I'm right in this case, you can fight it all you want but...

Webster's Dictionary ownz j00

You can keep saying it, but that won't make it true... Kinda like the whole lottery thing. Although, I think you did finally admit to being wrong there and then went off with some other nonsense for a few pages.

Where is your defense for the other definition? YOu don't have one, rather you're here just trying to prove yourself.

The point is, THAT is the definition, I don't give a flying rats ass what you think it means, what everyone else thinks it means, thats the definition, and in a court of law, they'd hold that up. So technically, that is the right answer.

Jesus, you sure do have a hard on for me, fucking penis envy, get over it Tera. You're a fucking dork that is full of himself for some odd reason...

Like I said, go back to feeding off your referral cash, god knows your lame ass needs it. =)

Websters ownz j00, suck it up, stop being so stubborn, and admit that the dictionary just turned you back into a whiny little schoolgirl.

Make a good point, and maybe I'll help you pay your back taxes by signing up to one of your "mouseovered" ref links on your webmasters page.

DrewKole, don't you ever work?

No, how bout you?

I'll be darned if there's actually another DrewKole who's name I saw on Hustler's frontpage last year for having the best conversion ratio. Now, don't freak me out saying there's another one of you :Graucho

I'm back from honeymoon.. (wish i could go right back at it again) had a real good time :)

I was just wondering that myself.

I was also wondering what happened to the new and improved, nicer Drew. I knew this asshole version would be back :winkwink:

And for the record, Drew, I am FAR from "full of myself" - It just that I am finding myself constantly being annoyed by you.

I thought I already explained how you were misinterpreting all your definitions, but if I need to do it one more time, for you, go ahead and post one. I will then try to explain it to you.... It's not easy though. Teaching you simple concepts is like teaching newborns calculus.

Depends how you define work.

If I defined it here, with what the intelligent people at websters say work is...

We'd have terababes denying that fact... so its pointless. =P

Lets just say, right now, I'm enjoying some lunch, how about you?

although this thread isn't really worth reading or commenting on - I just had to make sure there was at least one post from me on it.

I'm working :winkwink:

Mommy didn't show you much attention as a child did she? =(

I can't be your mother Tera, I just can't... I'm sorry, I wish I could! But I cant... =(

I'm sorry, but I'm not misinterpreting jack shit... Its as clear as day, if you receive financial compensation, websters defines you as an employee. Yet again, websters just raped you.

Get over it... your mother hates you, websters hates you, and you're going to die alone.

Now go back to bragging to your friends, about how you "schooled" Drew, and how your life is so awesome because you're a self employed webmaster who doesn't even have to work, because his rent is paid by his mother, and he just cashs those PHAT referral checks every 2 weeks.

I will be in approx... 31 minutes. :thumbsup

*sigh* How truly sad you are, little man.

Hey, I just had a GREAT IDEA! Damn, why didn't I think of this a long time ago?

I am now officially ignoring DrewKole. Ahhhhh. how sweet it is.

Ignorance is bliss. Don't believe me? Just ask Drew :winkwink:

Right now I am picking my nose....thats what I do here at Shaw Internet....since I have no schooling all I do is sit here and wait for Kimmy to throw me a bone :1orglaugh

Hey Drew....when you gonna let me out from under your desk....you cant keep me here forever....

:Graucho :Graucho

DrewKole interpretes Webster exactly like those guys interpret the Bible who end up committing a group suicide when they found out Judgment Day didn't come after all

And who says that English class at the american embassy didn't pay off!

Drew

Take your info from more than one source...

employee n.

(US employe) a person employed for wages or salary, esp. at non-executive level.

The Oxford English Reference Dictionary, ? Oxford University Press 1996


Or this one...

employer and employee

The relationship between the parties to a contract of employment. (It was formerly known as master and servant.) The relationship is governed by the express and implied terms of the contract and by statutory rules that the contract cannot exclude. These relate, for example, to unfair dismissal, redundancy, maternity rights, trade union membership and activity, and health and safety at work. On the principle of vicarious liability, third parties may hold an employer responsible for certain wrongs committed by his employee in the course of his employment.

Dictionary of Law, Oxford University Press ? Market House Books Ltd 1997


Peronsally I would go with the LEGAL definition of this.... or get someone at Websters to acutally learn English/American before they even attempt to write an updated version.

Good post Dave, though it could still be argued with the 2nd or first definition.

Implicitly, the "terms" that a webmaster agrees too can be considered a contract, and the actions of said webmaster can be held against the employer, as well.

Just look at candidclicks, that is an extreme case, but still proves the point...

An affiliate can still be considered an "employee" under law, by the fact they have to agree to said terms, and agree to promote under certain guidelines.

I'd suppose that if someone wasn't an employee, they could send traffic however they please, and not have clauses for payment or termination...

Thanks for the quote, it would be curious to see how it would turn out... I'm still in favor of the common sense employee mindset, but... I like pointing out the other side too...

Not only to see everyone with their ego's a flutter, but to get some valid input on it.

That would be a great mistake.

When you do scientific research, or write a decent book, or define a specific word (!), you only have to use one source. This will confirm the coherency of your own research ,ideas or opinions

(Drew may not notice the sarcasm here)

Hi Drew

Lol, nice slant on the wording...

No...

You are talking about two different relationships here

One is Contractl Law - (which I actaully studied a few years ago) and the other is Emplyee's Rights.

A contrator can sign a legal Contract with another Company for services and be bound by those terms. This is what an affiliate does. His/her only protection is within the terms of the said contract he/she has agreed to. No master/serverant - Employer/Employee relationship is formed. Such an entity would be responsible arranging their own holiday pay and pensions and have course, have no redundancy protection.

An Employer has far more responsibility. Yes, there is also a contract an employee usually signs but this normally outlines the specific role of employment. The employee is bound by other legal requirements, usually redundancy, holiday pay, and a fixed salary.

You many also note that many sites, including our own make use of this in our terms and conditions -

"NO PARTNERSHIP OR AGENCY CREATED: Both parties agree that this Agreement shall not constitute or be construed to constitute or tending to create an agency, partnership, joint venture, master-servant or employer-employee relationship between Company and You, in any respect, any other provision of this Agreement notwithstanding. "


Have a good un,

Dave

Right, but not all sites have that clause, that no agency is created.

I still think a contract is formed when the terms are agreed to, on both sides of the interaction.

All the definitions posted still give way to interpretation.

Plus, I don't feel right trusting English Law. :1orglaugh

:thumbsup Dave

Drew

:1orglaugh

Neither do do I.....:Graucho

Dave

Lol, good man. :1orglaugh