Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-12-2008, 08:19 PM   #1
Shaze
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 2,662
Obama would have won already if it wasn't for "Super" delegates...

i don't see the reason for these "super" delegates. what makes them so "super" and important. they just need to let the people decide.
Shaze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:34 PM   #2
pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: I convert perverts like catholic church!
Posts: 5,133
yes he is cleaning up big time state after state

even won virginia

Obama is the truth plain and simple
pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:37 PM   #3
.~.
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 396
I think Obama needs to stop wearing tight briefs to display his formidable schlong.

The last thing this country wants is a powerful black man with a formidable schlong.

Who knows who he will hook up with once he is president. SCARY@@@
.~. is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:37 PM   #4
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaze View Post
i don't see the reason for these "super" delegates. what makes them so "super" and important. they just need to let the people decide.
You fail at math. Take away super delegates and he'd have LESS delegates. You sure are stupid. Try learning how the process works before spouting off about it.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:40 PM   #5
StickyGreen
.
 
StickyGreen's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 13,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by pussyserver View Post
yes he is cleaning up big time state after state

even won virginia

Obama is the truth plain and simple
The truth? He's just another fucking CFR goon... no different from the rest...
StickyGreen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:41 PM   #6
Fat Panda
Porn is Dead. Move along.
 
Fat Panda's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,295
ya super delegates are bullshit
Fat Panda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:42 PM   #7
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
best designer on GFY
 
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384
Posts: 30,307
I think the Democrats are doing thier absolute best to lose this election year.

They are throwing the whole fucking thing away.

Repubs are hoping Obama win's, they are praying to god he win's.
they would love a naive non experienced Politician, Obama would be very easy to manipulate, thats assuming he can even come close to beating a Republican in the elections.

Last edited by AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE; 02-12-2008 at 08:43 PM..
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:47 PM   #8
StickyGreen
.
 
StickyGreen's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 13,076
You guys really believe that there would be significant differences between a McCain presidency and an Obama presidency? If you believe that then you really need to read up on these candidates and their affiliations. Start with the Council on Foreign Relations...
StickyGreen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:51 PM   #9
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAC View Post
ya super delegates are bullshit
first of all it's been that way for years. NOW you complain? Second he's ahead in teh deleagte count so who cares? Be superdelgates are NOT set in stone until the convention. Any of Hillary's could support Obama and same for his. That's why in the OFFICAL delegate count they don't count super delegates until the convention. You people worry about shit that doesn't even fucking matter.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:53 PM   #10
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienQ View Post
I think the Democrats are doing thier absolute best to lose this election year.

They are throwing the whole fucking thing away.

Repubs are hoping Obama win's, they are praying to god he win's.
they would love a naive non experienced Politician, Obama would be very easy to manipulate, thats assuming he can even come close to beating a Republican in the elections.

Bush lovers wanted their man to win. They got their wish and we see the results. Sometime people need to get assraped before seeing the light. It took Bush lovers TWO times assraped to get it.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:53 PM   #11
.~.
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 396
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienQ View Post
I think the Democrats are doing thier absolute best to lose this election year.

They are throwing the whole fucking thing away.

Repubs are hoping Obama win's, they are praying to god he win's.
they would love a naive non experienced Politician, Obama would be very easy to manipulate, thats assuming he can even come close to beating a Republican in the elections.

I can't imagine that Obama is smarter than George W. Bush. Obama doesn't have the military dodging experience that G W has. Obama hasn't destroyed a bunch of companies either. Obama appears to understand and express the English language (unlike G W Dummy). Oh wait, is that good?

IF GEORGE W. BUSH (the simple chimp) can be President of the United States of America - ANYONE CAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
.~. is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:56 PM   #12
StickyGreen
.
 
StickyGreen's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 13,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by .~. View Post
I can't imagine that Obama is smarter than George W. Bush. Obama doesn't have the military dodging experience that G W has. Obama hasn't destroyed a bunch of companies either. Obama appears to understand and express the English language (unlike G W Dummy). Oh wait, is that good?

IF GEORGE W. BUSH (the simple chimp) can be President of the United States of America - ANYONE CAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Obama is the same as them. Wtf is wrong with you people lol...

Who wants to bet me that NOTHING will change in regards to the empirialistic nature of our foreign policy and our corrupt monetary system if Obama gets elected? I will bet you any amount of money...

McCain = Clinton = Obama
StickyGreen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 09:01 PM   #13
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickyGreen View Post
Obama is the same as them. Wtf is wrong with you people lol...

Who wants to bet me that NOTHING will change in regards to the empirialistic nature of our foreign policy and our corrupt monetary system if Obama gets elected? I will bet you any amount of money...

McCain = Clinton = Obama
legislation get passed by CONGRESS the Presidnet can only signe it or veto it. Now if the OCngress is the bitch of the President like it was under Bush for 6 years, yes then things really get fucked up. If McCain is the prez and the Dems control congress then they'll have to fucking compromise to get anything done. If Obama is the prez and the republicans control Congress same thing. Notice how we got a surplus when the dems were in the whitehosue and the republicans controlled Congress? it's called checks and balances.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 09:03 PM   #14
StickyGreen
.
 
StickyGreen's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 13,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
legislation get passed by CONGRESS the Presidnet can only signe it or veto it. Now if the OCngress is the bitch of the President like it was under Bush for 6 years, yes then things really get fucked up. If McCain is the prez and the Dems control congress then they'll have to fucking compromise to get anything done. If Obama is the prez and the republicans control Congress same thing. Notice how we got a surplus when the dems were in the whitehosue and the republicans controlled Congress? it's called checks and balances.
They all have the same agenda dumbass...

They might differ on petty subjects like how much health care to provide and shit like that, but the overall flight plan does not change...
StickyGreen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:01 PM   #15
ninavain
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienQ View Post
I think the Democrats are doing thier absolute best to lose this election year.

They are throwing the whole fucking thing away.

Repubs are hoping Obama win's, they are praying to god he win's.
they would love a naive non experienced Politician, Obama would be very easy to manipulate, thats assuming he can even come close to beating a Republican in the elections.
u r blind aren't you. Dems are voting 2 sometimes 3 to 1 over those old crows in the GOP. Get with today
ninavain is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:02 PM   #16
notoldschool
Confirmed User
 
notoldschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickyGreen View Post
Obama is the same as them. Wtf is wrong with you people lol...

Who wants to bet me that NOTHING will change in regards to the empirialistic nature of our foreign policy and our corrupt monetary system if Obama gets elected? I will bet you any amount of money...

McCain = Clinton = Obama
Dude stfu. Your wrong. Mccain wants to regulate the internet at ISP level and Clinton & Obama are for internet neutraility. Period. That alone stands to make or lose every real webmaster on this boards lively hood and financial future. Plus Mccain has butter teeth.
__________________
No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture.
-- Learned Hand

http://www.bjpenn.com
notoldschool is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:05 PM   #17
StickyGreen
.
 
StickyGreen's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 13,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by notoldschool View Post
Dude stfu. Your wrong. Mccain wants to regulate the internet at ISP level and Clinton & Obama are for internet neutraility. Period. That alone stands to make or lose every real webmaster on this boards lively hood and financial future. Plus Mccain has butter teeth.
That is one of the "petty" issues I mentioned. Our imperialistic foreign policy will continue and the financial destruction will continue...
StickyGreen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:11 PM   #18
notoldschool
Confirmed User
 
notoldschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickyGreen View Post
That is one of the "petty" issues I mentioned. Our imperialistic foreign policy will continue and the financial destruction will continue...
Not so petty in my book. If you havent noticed a shit load of people base their whole lives around the internet. If you depend on the internet for your livelyhood like millions of people do, I would bet that you wouldnt think it was so petty. I would say that Obama is much more likely to turn around the Iraq debacle than that crazy old mentally and physically abused emotionally broken man Mccain. That guy is a fucking puppet traitor to our soldiers IMO. We cannot afford to fight over there for 10 more years let alone 100. I have never heard Obama run on the war ticket defying all reality with his demented almost mentally retarded beliefs.
__________________
No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture.
-- Learned Hand

http://www.bjpenn.com
notoldschool is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:16 PM   #19
StickyGreen
.
 
StickyGreen's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 13,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by notoldschool View Post
Not so petty in my book. If you havent noticed a shit load of people base their whole lives around the internet. If you depend on the internet for your livelyhood like millions of people do, I would bet that you wouldnt think it was so petty. I would say that Obama is much more likely to turn around the Iraq debacle than that crazy old mentally and physically abused emotionally broken man Mccain. That guy is a fucking puppet traitor to our soldiers IMO. We cannot afford to fight over there for 10 more years let alone 100. I have never heard Obama run on the war ticket defying all reality with his demented almost mentally retarded beliefs.
Obama is much more likely to turn around Iraq? LOL. He is on the CFR with McCain and the rest of them... they are all going along with the same schedule.

You never heard Obama run on the war ticket? So what? Didn't George W. Bush run on a non-interventionist policy? Look what he ended up doing! lol... Why would you believe what any politician has to say in the first place? Just because Obama is claiming to be against the war does not mean he will act on it once in office...
StickyGreen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:19 PM   #20
notoldschool
Confirmed User
 
notoldschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,687
if this is true, then thats all the reason more to vote for Obama, because atleast hes for net neutrality. THat makes that a much larger issue then now doesnt it.
__________________
No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture.
-- Learned Hand

http://www.bjpenn.com
notoldschool is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:20 PM   #21
StickyGreen
.
 
StickyGreen's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 13,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by notoldschool View Post
if this is true, then thats all the reason more to vote for Obama, because atleast hes for net neutrality. THat makes that a much larger issue then now doesnt it.
Well if you want to vote for a candidate based solely on their Internet stance then fine... just don't expect us to pull out of the middle east and to stop printing money out of thin air...
StickyGreen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 02:29 AM   #22
Shaze
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 2,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickyGreen View Post
Well if you want to vote for a candidate based solely on their Internet stance then fine... just don't expect us to pull out of the middle east and to stop printing money out of thin air...
you've got everything mixed up my friend. none of those have any reason why i'm voting for obama.
Shaze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.