GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Obama would have won already if it wasn't for "Super" delegates... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=807089)

Shaze 02-12-2008 08:19 PM

Obama would have won already if it wasn't for "Super" delegates...
 
i don't see the reason for these "super" delegates. what makes them so "super" and important. they just need to let the people decide.

pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-12-2008 08:34 PM

yes he is cleaning up big time state after state

even won virginia

Obama is the truth plain and simple

.~. 02-12-2008 08:37 PM

I think Obama needs to stop wearing tight briefs to display his formidable schlong.

The last thing this country wants is a powerful black man with a formidable schlong.

Who knows who he will hook up with once he is president. SCARY@@@

GatorB 02-12-2008 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaze (Post 13772933)
i don't see the reason for these "super" delegates. what makes them so "super" and important. they just need to let the people decide.

You fail at math. Take away super delegates and he'd have LESS delegates. You sure are stupid. Try learning how the process works before spouting off about it.

StickyGreen 02-12-2008 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 13773011)
yes he is cleaning up big time state after state

even won virginia

Obama is the truth plain and simple

The truth? He's just another fucking CFR goon... no different from the rest...

Fat Panda 02-12-2008 08:41 PM

ya super delegates are bullshit

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-12-2008 08:42 PM

I think the Democrats are doing thier absolute best to lose this election year.

They are throwing the whole fucking thing away.

Repubs are hoping Obama win's, they are praying to god he win's.
they would love a naive non experienced Politician, Obama would be very easy to manipulate, thats assuming he can even come close to beating a Republican in the elections.

StickyGreen 02-12-2008 08:47 PM

You guys really believe that there would be significant differences between a McCain presidency and an Obama presidency? If you believe that then you really need to read up on these candidates and their affiliations. Start with the Council on Foreign Relations...

GatorB 02-12-2008 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAC (Post 13773050)
ya super delegates are bullshit

first of all it's been that way for years. NOW you complain? Second he's ahead in teh deleagte count so who cares? Be superdelgates are NOT set in stone until the convention. Any of Hillary's could support Obama and same for his. That's why in the OFFICAL delegate count they don't count super delegates until the convention. You people worry about shit that doesn't even fucking matter.

GatorB 02-12-2008 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ (Post 13773055)
I think the Democrats are doing thier absolute best to lose this election year.

They are throwing the whole fucking thing away.

Repubs are hoping Obama win's, they are praying to god he win's.
they would love a naive non experienced Politician, Obama would be very easy to manipulate, thats assuming he can even come close to beating a Republican in the elections.


Bush lovers wanted their man to win. They got their wish and we see the results. Sometime people need to get assraped before seeing the light. It took Bush lovers TWO times assraped to get it.

.~. 02-12-2008 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ (Post 13773055)
I think the Democrats are doing thier absolute best to lose this election year.

They are throwing the whole fucking thing away.

Repubs are hoping Obama win's, they are praying to god he win's.
they would love a naive non experienced Politician, Obama would be very easy to manipulate, thats assuming he can even come close to beating a Republican in the elections.


I can't imagine that Obama is smarter than George W. Bush. Obama doesn't have the military dodging experience that G W has. Obama hasn't destroyed a bunch of companies either. Obama appears to understand and express the English language (unlike G W Dummy). Oh wait, is that good?

IF GEORGE W. BUSH (the simple chimp) can be President of the United States of America - ANYONE CAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

StickyGreen 02-12-2008 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by .~. (Post 13773095)
I can't imagine that Obama is smarter than George W. Bush. Obama doesn't have the military dodging experience that G W has. Obama hasn't destroyed a bunch of companies either. Obama appears to understand and express the English language (unlike G W Dummy). Oh wait, is that good?

IF GEORGE W. BUSH (the simple chimp) can be President of the United States of America - ANYONE CAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Obama is the same as them. Wtf is wrong with you people lol...

Who wants to bet me that NOTHING will change in regards to the empirialistic nature of our foreign policy and our corrupt monetary system if Obama gets elected? I will bet you any amount of money...

McCain = Clinton = Obama

GatorB 02-12-2008 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 13773103)
Obama is the same as them. Wtf is wrong with you people lol...

Who wants to bet me that NOTHING will change in regards to the empirialistic nature of our foreign policy and our corrupt monetary system if Obama gets elected? I will bet you any amount of money...

McCain = Clinton = Obama

legislation get passed by CONGRESS the Presidnet can only signe it or veto it. Now if the OCngress is the bitch of the President like it was under Bush for 6 years, yes then things really get fucked up. If McCain is the prez and the Dems control congress then they'll have to fucking compromise to get anything done. If Obama is the prez and the republicans control Congress same thing. Notice how we got a surplus when the dems were in the whitehosue and the republicans controlled Congress? it's called checks and balances.

StickyGreen 02-12-2008 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 13773118)
legislation get passed by CONGRESS the Presidnet can only signe it or veto it. Now if the OCngress is the bitch of the President like it was under Bush for 6 years, yes then things really get fucked up. If McCain is the prez and the Dems control congress then they'll have to fucking compromise to get anything done. If Obama is the prez and the republicans control Congress same thing. Notice how we got a surplus when the dems were in the whitehosue and the republicans controlled Congress? it's called checks and balances.

They all have the same agenda dumbass...

They might differ on petty subjects like how much health care to provide and shit like that, but the overall flight plan does not change...

ninavain 02-12-2008 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ (Post 13773055)
I think the Democrats are doing thier absolute best to lose this election year.

They are throwing the whole fucking thing away.

Repubs are hoping Obama win's, they are praying to god he win's.
they would love a naive non experienced Politician, Obama would be very easy to manipulate, thats assuming he can even come close to beating a Republican in the elections.

u r blind aren't you. Dems are voting 2 sometimes 3 to 1 over those old crows in the GOP. Get with today

notoldschool 02-12-2008 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 13773103)
Obama is the same as them. Wtf is wrong with you people lol...

Who wants to bet me that NOTHING will change in regards to the empirialistic nature of our foreign policy and our corrupt monetary system if Obama gets elected? I will bet you any amount of money...

McCain = Clinton = Obama

Dude stfu. Your wrong. Mccain wants to regulate the internet at ISP level and Clinton & Obama are for internet neutraility. Period. That alone stands to make or lose every real webmaster on this boards lively hood and financial future. Plus Mccain has butter teeth. :1orglaugh

StickyGreen 02-12-2008 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool (Post 13773343)
Dude stfu. Your wrong. Mccain wants to regulate the internet at ISP level and Clinton & Obama are for internet neutraility. Period. That alone stands to make or lose every real webmaster on this boards lively hood and financial future. Plus Mccain has butter teeth. :1orglaugh

That is one of the "petty" issues I mentioned. Our imperialistic foreign policy will continue and the financial destruction will continue...

notoldschool 02-12-2008 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 13773356)
That is one of the "petty" issues I mentioned. Our imperialistic foreign policy will continue and the financial destruction will continue...

Not so petty in my book. If you havent noticed a shit load of people base their whole lives around the internet. If you depend on the internet for your livelyhood like millions of people do, I would bet that you wouldnt think it was so petty. I would say that Obama is much more likely to turn around the Iraq debacle than that crazy old mentally and physically abused emotionally broken man Mccain. That guy is a fucking puppet traitor to our soldiers IMO. We cannot afford to fight over there for 10 more years let alone 100. I have never heard Obama run on the war ticket defying all reality with his demented almost mentally retarded beliefs.

StickyGreen 02-12-2008 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool (Post 13773386)
Not so petty in my book. If you havent noticed a shit load of people base their whole lives around the internet. If you depend on the internet for your livelyhood like millions of people do, I would bet that you wouldnt think it was so petty. I would say that Obama is much more likely to turn around the Iraq debacle than that crazy old mentally and physically abused emotionally broken man Mccain. That guy is a fucking puppet traitor to our soldiers IMO. We cannot afford to fight over there for 10 more years let alone 100. I have never heard Obama run on the war ticket defying all reality with his demented almost mentally retarded beliefs.

Obama is much more likely to turn around Iraq? LOL. He is on the CFR with McCain and the rest of them... they are all going along with the same schedule.

You never heard Obama run on the war ticket? So what? Didn't George W. Bush run on a non-interventionist policy? Look what he ended up doing! lol... Why would you believe what any politician has to say in the first place? Just because Obama is claiming to be against the war does not mean he will act on it once in office...

notoldschool 02-12-2008 10:19 PM

if this is true, then thats all the reason more to vote for Obama, because atleast hes for net neutrality. THat makes that a much larger issue then now doesnt it.

StickyGreen 02-12-2008 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool (Post 13773410)
if this is true, then thats all the reason more to vote for Obama, because atleast hes for net neutrality. THat makes that a much larger issue then now doesnt it.

Well if you want to vote for a candidate based solely on their Internet stance then fine... just don't expect us to pull out of the middle east and to stop printing money out of thin air...

Shaze 02-13-2008 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 13773414)
Well if you want to vote for a candidate based solely on their Internet stance then fine... just don't expect us to pull out of the middle east and to stop printing money out of thin air...

you've got everything mixed up my friend. none of those have any reason why i'm voting for obama.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123