107,000 demand Wikipedia remove this image of Muhammad - GoFuckYourself.com

D Ghost · 02-08-2008, 01:02 AM

I guess some people just don't understand freedom of speech, and that censorship is ridiculous Link

D · 02-08-2008, 01:05 AM

Says Wikipedia:

"Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with the goal of representing all topics from a neutral point of view, Wikipedia is not censored for the benefit of any particular group."

Good for them.

cranki · 02-08-2008, 01:06 AM

stupid fundamentalists...

woj · 02-08-2008, 01:11 AM

wtf? there is nothing wrong with that pic...

Shoehorn! · 02-08-2008, 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D

Says Wikipedia:

"Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with the goal of representing all topics from a neutral point of view, Wikipedia is not censored for the benefit of any particular group."

Good for them.

CyberHustler · 02-08-2008, 01:14 AM

I'd hit it...

D Ghost · 02-08-2008, 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

wtf? there is nothing wrong with that pic...

I know haha, that's what I said!

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 02-08-2008, 02:16 AM

mAYBE WE SHOULD MAKE A PETITION THAT SUPPORTS THE IMAGE BEING THERE

jUST A THOUGHT.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 02-08-2008, 02:20 AM

this is funny from one of the comments

""Please remove these illustrations and respect the peaceful request by vote."
Or we will so fucking kill you."

AHhaha Made me laugh!

Antonio · 02-08-2008, 02:26 AM

haha, I remember when I posted this pic ^^^ at one of the Yahoo humour groups many years ago.

How the fuck was I supposed to know that this wasn't just a funny looking guy but some Muslim imam or whatever holding the Quran, I was verbally attacked by 605 Muslim guys there but then some Americans came to my defense and told them if they don't share the same sense of humour they might just fuck off, I think I almost started WW3 back then ;)

D Ghost · 02-08-2008, 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ

mAYBE WE SHOULD MAKE A PETITION THAT SUPPORTS THE IMAGE BEING THERE

jUST A THOUGHT.

Yes, we definitely should do this

papill0n · 02-08-2008, 02:50 AM

fuck that

JamesK · 02-08-2008, 02:53 AM

that's retarded

After Shock Media · 02-08-2008, 02:59 AM

I do not live near their offices so I am more than fine with that image staying up.

NinjaSteve · 02-08-2008, 03:09 AM

I don't think 107,000 people are enough considering the population of the world.

D Ghost · 02-08-2008, 03:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

I do not live near their offices so I am more than fine with that image staying up.

Hahahaha nice

Violetta · 02-08-2008, 04:45 AM

muhammed rocks... lol

mrthumbs · 02-08-2008, 04:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deejne

I guess some people just don't understand freedom of speech, and that censorship is ridiculous Link

They say "people just dont understand islam"

They simply value their religion as much as we value our freedom.. you cant blame them!

Ravage · 02-08-2008, 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

wtf? there is nothing wrong with that pic...

That's not the point of whether the picture if visually wrong or not.
Their religion states the Muhammad is not to be depicted in any type of visual display.

Drake · 02-08-2008, 07:17 AM

A religion that doesn't respect freedom of speech is incompatible with a free society.

BVF · 02-08-2008, 07:20 AM

Dude looks like Boneprone....Muhammad was Asian?

Drake · 02-08-2008, 07:22 AM

The problem with fundemtalists is that they're too true to their religion. They need to become pseudo-religious like modern day Christians. Then they'll discover that money is the one and only real God.

Blazed · 02-08-2008, 07:28 AM

Wiki removed it..

Lykos · 02-08-2008, 07:41 AM

idiots....

ServerGenius · 02-08-2008, 07:41 AM

No problem burn it

yys · 02-08-2008, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platinum ChrisM

That's not the point of whether the picture if visually wrong or not.
Their religion states the Muhammad is not to be depicted in any type of visual display.

Yet the picture was created by a Muslim

AtlantisCash · 02-08-2008, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platinum ChrisM

That's not the point of whether the picture if visually wrong or not.
Their religion states the Muhammad is not to be depicted in any type of visual display.

So true, thats nothing to do with freedom.

royaljelly2 · 02-08-2008, 08:04 AM

yeah im not sure what's wrong with it??

Pics Traffic · 02-08-2008, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platinum ChrisM

That's not the point of whether the picture if visually wrong or not.
Their religion states the Muhammad is not to be depicted in any type of visual display.

well don't look than. some christian donominations don't use the images of christ on the cross.

LiveDose · 02-08-2008, 08:15 AM

Fuck them.

TOURKNOOK · 02-08-2008, 08:24 AM

why they want it to remove, i dont see anything wrong in that pic of there prophet

D Ghost · 02-08-2008, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platinum ChrisM

That's not the point of whether the picture if visually wrong or not.
Their religion states the Muhammad is not to be depicted in any type of visual display.

Yeah, but others have the right to visually depict him. People who dont follow that religion. The people that follow it dont need to visually depict him. And what does that tell you about religions, a 'rule' like that?

DaddyHalbucks · 02-08-2008, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antonio

haha, I remember when I posted this pic ^^^ at one of the Yahoo humour groups many years ago.

How the fuck was I supposed to know that this wasn't just a funny looking guy but some Muslim imam or whatever holding the Quran, I was verbally attacked by 605 Muslim guys there but then some Americans came to my defense and told them if they don't share the same sense of humour they might just fuck off, I think I almost started WW3 back then ;)

Cool pic. My first thought was breakfast at Tiffany's (Riyadh branch).

Vendot · 02-08-2008, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platinum ChrisM

That's not the point of whether the picture if visually wrong or not.
Their religion states the Muhammad is not to be depicted in any type of visual display.

If so many fucking people are being offended by it.... why dont they just take it fucking off the site? Big fucking deal.

Some people should try and understand other people's religions.

Useless Warrior · 02-08-2008, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ

this is funny from one of the comments

""Please remove these illustrations and respect the peaceful request by vote."
Or we will so fucking kill you."

AHhaha Made me laugh!

You know, I usually hate reading the comments on blogs and news sites, though I am magically drawn to them. Readers tend to say the most ignorant things in their comments. But the comments on that site are fucking wonderful. That guy has some funny readers.

L-Pink · 02-08-2008, 10:16 AM

Replace "Shaft" with "Muhammad"

Who's the crazy dude.
That's a sex machine to all the chicks?
SHAFT!
Ya damn right!

Who is the man that would risk his neck
For his brother man?
SHAFT!
Can you dig it?

Who's the cat that won't cop out
When there's danger all about?
SHAFT!
Right On!

They say this cat Shaft is a bad mother
SHUT YOUR MOUTH!
I'm talkin' 'bout Shaft.
THEN WE CAN DIG IT!

He's a complicated man
But no one understands him but his woman
SHAFT!

SmokeyTheBear · 02-08-2008, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vendot

If so many fucking people are being offended by it.... why dont they just take it fucking off the site? Big fucking deal.

Some people should try and understand other people's religions.

the problem is its not us who don't understand their religion , they dont understand their own religion, the whole point behind not displaying the picture is so people don't get all fanatic about a silly picture, that they are supposed to focus on the ideas he represents not the picture. When they made the rule, they likely thought if nobody drew his picture then people wouldnt pretend to do things just because of a picture, they would have to use their brains , not follow the crowd. Instead they are doing the exact opposite.

Brother Bilo · 02-08-2008, 10:29 AM

I don't get it. That pic doesn't seem to portray Muhammad in a bad light or anything. Seems like your run of the mill biblical era pic to me.

Ayla_SquareTurtle · 02-08-2008, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Bilo

I don't get it. That pic doesn't seem to portray Muhammad in a bad light or anything. Seems like your run of the mill biblical era pic to me.

I might have misunderstood, but it was explained to me once that they do not allow pictures of "the prophet" at all. No representation of him whatsoever. So that's why they are pissed as far as I know.

But good for wiki for not caving to the pressure.

D Ghost · 02-08-2008, 11:43 AM

When someone's religion starts invading on other peoples rights (Like not having any religion), thats where religion goes wrong.

FelixFlow · 02-08-2008, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ayla_SquareTurtle

I might have misunderstood, but it was explained to me once that they do not allow pictures of "the prophet" at all. No representation of him whatsoever. So that's why they are pissed as far as I know.

But good for wiki for not caving to the pressure.

there's supposed to be no images of Prophet Muhammed's face....when you do see pictures, its usually with a white veil over the face

the reasoning is they don't want Prophet Muhammed to become a symbol of worship, such as how the Christians have done with images of Jesus, Mary, etc

D Ghost · 02-11-2008, 09:12 AM

the whole thing is retarded

Davy · 02-11-2008, 09:43 AM

Those arabs are all fucking freaks.

02-08-2008, 01:02 AM	#1
D Ghost null Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 9,820	107,000 demand Wikipedia remove this image of Muhammad I guess some people just don't understand freedom of speech, and that censorship is ridiculous Link

02-08-2008, 01:05 AM	#2
D Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: The Valley Posts: 7,412	Says Wikipedia: "Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with the goal of representing all topics from a neutral point of view, Wikipedia is not censored for the benefit of any particular group." Good for them. __________________ -D. ICQ: 202-96-31

02-08-2008, 01:11 AM	#4
woj <&(©¿©)&> Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago Posts: 47,882	wtf? there is nothing wrong with that pic... __________________ Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000 Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

02-08-2008, 02:16 AM	#8
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	mAYBE WE SHOULD MAKE A PETITION THAT SUPPORTS THE IMAGE BEING THERE jUST A THOUGHT. __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

02-08-2008, 02:20 AM	#9
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	this is funny from one of the comments ""Please remove these illustrations and respect the peaceful request by vote." Or we will so fucking kill you." AHhaha Made me laugh! __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

02-08-2008, 01:06 AM	#3
cranki Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Café del Mar Posts: 5,162	stupid fundamentalists...

02-08-2008, 01:14 AM	#6
CyberHustler Masterbaiter Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 26,645	I'd hit it...

02-08-2008, 02:26 AM	#10
Antonio Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Spartaaaaaaaaa Posts: 14,136	haha, I remember when I posted this pic ^^^ at one of the Yahoo humour groups many years ago. How the fuck was I supposed to know that this wasn't just a funny looking guy but some Muslim imam or whatever holding the Quran, I was verbally attacked by 605 Muslim guys there but then some Americans came to my defense and told them if they don't share the same sense of humour they might just fuck off, I think I almost started WW3 back then ;)

02-08-2008, 02:50 AM	#12
papill0n Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 15,547	fuck that

02-08-2008, 02:53 AM	#13
JamesK hi Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 16,731	that's retarded __________________ M3Server - NATS Hosting

02-08-2008, 02:59 AM	#14
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	I do not live near their offices so I am more than fine with that image staying up. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

02-08-2008, 03:09 AM	#15
NinjaSteve Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 11,089	I don't think 107,000 people are enough considering the population of the world. __________________ ...

02-08-2008, 04:45 AM	#17
Violetta Affiliate Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 28,735	muhammed rocks... lol __________________ M&A Queen

02-08-2008, 07:17 AM	#20
Drake Hello world! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 12,508	A religion that doesn't respect freedom of speech is incompatible with a free society.

02-08-2008, 07:20 AM	#21
BVF Black Vagina Finder Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: The Midwest Posts: 13,975	Dude looks like Boneprone....Muhammad was Asian? __________________ Black Pussy Click On Mr Cosby..CCbill, 60/40, 136 FHG's....The Cos Loves Black Ghetto Pussy!!

02-08-2008, 07:22 AM	#22
Drake Hello world! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 12,508	The problem with fundemtalists is that they're too true to their religion. They need to become pseudo-religious like modern day Christians. Then they'll discover that money is the one and only real God.

02-08-2008, 07:28 AM	#23
Blazed Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: London Posts: 1,701	Wiki removed it.. __________________ ☻

02-08-2008, 07:41 AM	#24
Lykos Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: World Posts: 31,027	idiots.... __________________

02-08-2008, 07:41 AM	#25
ServerGenius Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 9,377	No problem burn it __________________ \| http://www.sinnerscash.com/ \| ICQ: 370820 \| Skype: SinnersCash \| AdultWhosWho \|

02-08-2008, 08:04 AM	#28
royaljelly2 Confirmed User Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 1,034	yeah im not sure what's wrong with it??

02-08-2008, 08:15 AM	#30
LiveDose Show Yer Tits! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Somewhere Out there... Posts: 25,792	Fuck them. __________________ Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal

02-08-2008, 08:24 AM	#31
TOURKNOOK Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 173	why they want it to remove, i dont see anything wrong in that pic of there prophet __________________ You may contact me thru my email at [email protected], ym=burnneck69, skype=j..nard or icq= 565445189

02-08-2008, 10:16 AM	#36
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,151	Replace "Shaft" with "Muhammad" Who's the crazy dude. That's a sex machine to all the chicks? SHAFT! Ya damn right! Who is the man that would risk his neck For his brother man? SHAFT! Can you dig it? Who's the cat that won't cop out When there's danger all about? SHAFT! Right On! They say this cat Shaft is a bad mother SHUT YOUR MOUTH! I'm talkin' 'bout Shaft. THEN WE CAN DIG IT! He's a complicated man But no one understands him but his woman SHAFT!

02-08-2008, 10:29 AM	#38
Brother Bilo Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: I live in cage Posts: 4,193	I don't get it. That pic doesn't seem to portray Muhammad in a bad light or anything. Seems like your run of the mill biblical era pic to me. __________________

02-08-2008, 11:43 AM	#40
D Ghost null Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 9,820	When someone's religion starts invading on other peoples rights (Like not having any religion), thats where religion goes wrong.

02-11-2008, 09:12 AM	#42
D Ghost null Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 9,820	the whole thing is retarded

02-11-2008, 09:43 AM	#43
Davy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Germany Posts: 4,323	Those arabs are all fucking freaks.