Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-04-2008, 04:01 AM   #1
Sarah_Jayne
Now with more Jayne
 
Sarah_Jayne's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 40,077
Yahoo may consider Google alliance, source says

Yahoo may consider Google alliance, source says

SAN FRANCISCO/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Yahoo Inc would consider a business alliance with Google Inc as one way to rebuff a $44.6 billion takeover proposal by Microsoft, a source familiar with Yahoo's strategy said on Sunday.

Yahoo management is considering revisiting talks it held with Google several months ago on an alliance as an alternative to Microsoft's bid, that source said. At $31 a share, Yahoo believes the bid undervalues the company, two sources said.

A second source close to Yahoo said it had received a procession of preliminary contacts by media, technology, telephone and financial companies. But the source said they were unaware whether any alternative bid was in the offing.

In a memo to Yahoo employees on Friday, which was obtained by Reuters on Sunday, Yahoo leaders wrote: "We want to emphasize that absolutely no decisions have been made -- and, despite what some people have tried to suggest, there's certainly no integration process underway."

Few natural bidders exist besides Google that could engage in a bidding war, and Google would be unlikely to win approval from antitrust regulators, some Wall Street analysts said on Friday.

The Wall Street Journal reported on its Web site on Sunday that Google's chief executive Eric Schmidt called Yahoo's chief executive Jerry Yang to offer his company's help in any effort to thwart Microsoft's bid.

Spokesmen for Yahoo and Google declined comment. Google was not immediately available for comment on the WSJ story.

Yahoo's efforts to find an alternative bidder could simply be a measure to pressure Microsoft to boost its bid, which valued Yahoo at $44.6 billion when first announced on Friday.

Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Jeffrey Lindsay wrote in a research note that "the Microsoft bid of $31 is very astute" because it puts pressure on Yahoo management to take actions that could unlock the underlying value of Yahoo assets, which he estimates are worth upward of $39-$45 a share.

The bid gave a boost to markets in Asia when they opened on Monday. Shares in Softbank Corp soared as much as 16 percent and Yahoo Japan was untraded due to a flood of buy orders on Monday, on hopes a potential deal between Microsoft and Yahoo would boost the Japanese firms' competitiveness. Softbank holds a 3.9 percent stake in Yahoo Inc in terms of voting rights.

The benchmark Nikkei average ended the morning up 2.4 percent while indexes in Shanghai, Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore also gained.

COMPETITION CONCERNS

Separately, Google fired back on Sunday at Microsoft Corp's bid to acquire Yahoo, accusing Microsoft of seeking to extend its computer software monopoly deeper into the Internet realm.

David Drummond, a Google chief legal officer, said in a blog post that the combination of Microsoft and Yahoo could undermine competition on the Web and called on policy makers to challenge the combination.

Microsoft responded to Google's arguments by saying that a merger with Yahoo would create a "compelling number two competitor for Internet search and online advertising" to market leader Google.

"The alternative scenarios only lead to less competition on the Internet," Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith said in a statement.

Drummond argued that Microsoft's power stems from decades- old monopolies in Windows -- the software operating system used to control most personal computers -- and Internet Explorer, which is the dominant browser consumers used to view the Web.

Microsoft's proposed merger with Yahoo would combine the No. 1 and No. 2 suppliers of Web-based e-mail, instant messaging (IM) and portals, which act as starting points for hundreds of millions of users seeking information on the Web.

"Could a combination of the two take advantage of a PC software monopoly to unfairly limit the ability of consumers to freely access competitors' email, IM, and Web-based services?" Drummond said in a blog at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/.

In making its case for the deal during a conference call on Friday, Microsoft executives said Google -- not Microsoft -- was the one company antitrust regulators were likely to bar from buying Yahoo, based on Google's dominance in Web search.

Microsoft executives cited industry data showing Google has a 75 percent share of worldwide Web search revenue. Collectively, Yahoo and Microsoft attract around 20 percent of Web searches, Internet measurement firms show.

"Today, Google is the dominant search engine and advertising company on the Web," Smith said in replying to Google on Sunday. "Google has amassed about 75 percent of paid search revenues worldwide and its share continues to grow."

A person familiar with Google's thinking said the company believes Microsoft is using the same playbook it did in the 1990s to switch Windows users away from Web browser pioneer Netscape Communications to its own Internet Explorer.

"It is the same old story," the source said.
Sarah_Jayne is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 04:13 AM   #2
Bojangles
Confirmed User
 
Bojangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,419
Hmmm.....
Bojangles is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 04:17 AM   #3
cheekycherry
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,703
cool.....
cheekycherry is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 04:21 AM   #4
martinsc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 27,047
this could get dirty....
__________________
Make Money
martinsc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 04:29 AM   #5
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
best designer on GFY
 
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384
Posts: 30,307
Just read that

I am betting this deal goes through within 4 months.
Mark my words it will happen.
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 05:21 AM   #6
KILL_FRENZY
Confirmed User
 
KILL_FRENZY's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,184
that's cool
__________________

BOOST YOUR SALES!
WordPress Templates | Joomla Templates | TGP Templates | Cartoons | Custom Design
Contact: ICQ - 240130421 | Email - [email protected]
KILL_FRENZY is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 06:22 AM   #7
Damian_Maxcash
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: MaxCash.com
Posts: 12,745
Can it go through if other areas block it?

I mean, Europe are very anti monopoly and could try to block it,,,, plus they are pretty anti MS anyway.

I wonder if they (Europe) could make enough of a fuss that it cant happen at all.
Damian_Maxcash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 07:45 AM   #8
Doctor Dre
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Doctor Dre's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 51,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienQ View Post
Just read that

I am betting this deal goes through within 4 months.
Mark my words it will happen.
Wich one ? alliance with google or sale to microsoft ?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayadp05 View Post
I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
Doctor Dre is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 02:12 PM   #9
Sarah_Jayne
Now with more Jayne
 
Sarah_Jayne's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 40,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinsc View Post
this could get dirty....
Yup, it does rather sound like it.
Sarah_Jayne is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 02:26 PM   #10
tiger
Confirmed User
 
tiger's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,986
Interesting. Yahoo is in a good spot it seems. Either way I don't think this will be a good thing for all us normal folks. Less competition.
__________________

tiger is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 03:45 PM   #11
roly
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damian_Maxcash View Post
Can it go through if other areas block it?

I mean, Europe are very anti monopoly and could try to block it,,,, plus they are pretty anti MS anyway.

I wonder if they (Europe) could make enough of a fuss that it cant happen at all.

you're right, if an "alliance" with google, means a merger or takeover there's no way it would be allowed to go through in europe. although i would have thought MS may be ok as they're relatively small on the search side of thing compared to google.
roly is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 03:46 PM   #12
crockett
in a van by the river
 
crockett's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 76,806
So it's anti trust BS if it's Microsoft.. with Google being the ones complaining about it.. Yet then Google steps in trying to do the exact same thing M$ was trying to do. Talk about the hyprocacy.
__________________
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
crockett is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 04:31 PM   #13
Vick!
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 20 00'24.00" N, 75 09'00.00 W
Posts: 6,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett View Post
So it's anti trust BS if it's Microsoft.. with Google being the ones complaining about it.. Yet then Google steps in trying to do the exact same thing M$ was trying to do. Talk about the hyprocacy.


but Google cannot use monopoly and unfair means to limit its users .. its MS which can do the shit and they will. I am sure.
__________________
Affordable Quality Web Hosting
Vick! is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.