Its funny your getting hated on for this as it would be a world equalizer to use one language. The fact is it is actually in the US's best interest to not do this as it limits free thought and world trade having so many fragmented languages.

it is ok i do not expect the average GFY member to have the capability to actually understand a topic other then pictures of boobs.

i wonder how much money americans spend on translators and educating imigrants to speak english?

or what premium is payed to those that can offer this service. or how many wars would be avoided because of a common tongue?

the phrase lost in translation is worldwide, i think it would help everyone in the end. imagine how much faster world travel would be also.

imagine how much faster world travel would be also.

The thing is, if everyone was taught English properly then there would be no Engrish which can be extremely amusing.

Wow

2 posts ago you make this statment

how the fuck can you enjoy something to it's "full extent" by removing one of it's foundations?

just fucking brilliant

no you are not fucking brilliant.

when i go and read a sign i dont give a fuck what language it is in i just want to be able to understand it.

language is more about communication then foundation, understand why language evolves? use your head.

get the point? grow a brain, i am tired of spoon feeding you people.

Trying making valid points instead of attempting to "spoon feed" bullshit.

You really need to work on your reading comprehension.

Language *IS* a foundation of culture. Otherwise put, a large part of a culture is it's language. They evolve together and neither would be the same without the other.

What you seem to be crying out for here is a stripping/dumbing down of all cultures to a form more easily digestible by someone with your (seemingly limited) education.

i already agreed with you it is apart of culture, did you come up with that yourself? wow you are amazing! that is why i quoted you in the firstplace you somehow think displaying your knowledge of obvious info as intelligent. again you are missing the entire point of the thread because you are to stupid and hard headed to think outside the box.

so what is language used more for? foundation or communication?
how can you understand anothers culture without communication?

please explain that to me. you are a tool please get out of my thread.

seriously i cannot believe the stupidity some of you display on a constant basis, i already told you get back in your straight line and follow the lead.

lets go back to your original post:
wow you are so amazing! you point out obvious info that any gr. 1 kid knows and you somehow think you are intelligent? LOL

again nexttime tell me 1+1=2, it equates with your post.

full
1. completely filled; containing all that can be held; filled to utmost capacity: a full cup.
2. complete; entire; maximum: a full supply of food for a three-day hike.
3. of the maximum size, amount, extent, volume, etc.: a full load of five tons; to receive full pay.
4. (of garments, drapery, etc.) wide, ample, or having ample folds.
5. abundant; well-supplied: a yard full of litter; a cabinet full of medicine.
6. filled or rounded out, as in form: a full bust.
7. engrossed; occupied (usually fol. by of): She was full of her own anxieties.
8. of the same parents: full brothers.
9. Music. ample and complete in volume or richness of sound.
10. (of wines) having considerable body.
11. Baseball.
a. (of the count on a batter) amounting to three balls and two strikes: He hit a slider for a homer on a full count.
b. having base runners at first, second, and third bases; loaded.
12. being slightly oversized, as a sheet of glass cut too large to fit into a frame.
13. Poker. of or pertaining to the three cards of the same denomination in a full house: He won the hand with a pair of kings and sixes full.
?adverb
14. exactly or directly: The blow struck him full in the face.
15. very: You know full well what I mean.
16. fully, completely, or entirely; quite; at least: The blow knocked him full around. It happened full 30 years ago.
?verb (used with object)
17. Sewing.
a. to make full, as by gathering or pleating.
b. to bring (the cloth) on one side of a seam to a little greater fullness than on the other by gathering or tucking very slightly.
?verb (used without object)
18. (of the moon) to become full.
?noun
19. the highest or fullest state, condition, or degree: The moon is at the full.
?Idioms
20. in full,
a. to or for the full or required amount.
b. without abridgment: The book was reprinted in full.
21. to the full, to the greatest extent; thoroughly: They enjoyed themselves to the full.



Go back to sleep.

You had to look up the meaning of full? you are a fucking idiot. :1orglaugh

Not at all, but it appeared as though you needed a refresher.

Again, try facts or valid counter points in lieu of insults.. unsubstantiated insults make you look like a retard.

let me break this right fucking down for you and make it real simple

if you "agree that language is part of culture" then how can everyone "enjoy every culture to it's *full* extent" by enforcing that everyone on earth should "speak ONLY english"

languages die out every year. Currently there are about 6,000. It's believed that in 100 years 90% of them will be gone.

The idea we'll all be speaking one, or possibly two, languages is not far-fetched.

Certainly language is a part of culture but seriously think of all the work to remake the culture lost? Is Beavis and Butthead as funny in French as it is in English? I doubt it. But we could make a new Beavis and Butthead speaking French or whatever world wide language we pick. Poetry we could just let die out as people don't really like it anyways. Point being culture would simply change not die out.

The other benefits would be enormous as when the budhists are chanting you would be able to follow along or you could sing with opera as you would know the words. How cool would some of this be?

Mate teach the latinos in US first to speak english and then join MetaMan for the world.

wow you have no idea how refreshing it is to read comments that actually go with the topic of a thread.

thank you, seriously.

imagine going to japan and sitting in a room full of japanese and you all spoke the same language. how much more you would learn. it is easy to read it in a book but first hand expierience is unmatched.

it is called LANGUAGE BARRIER for a reason, you would be able to learn so much more about cultures and people through being able to communicate with them right from the get go.

Sorry, still can't understand you.

I will try to explain without getting into the whole insulting thing.

The basic point is that different languages have different structures. This influences the way people think. For example, English language is more relaxed in grammar and structure, German is not. Have you been to Germany? Try driving with a german friend and making an illegal u-turn. Not only will you get bitched out but someone will probably write down your license plate and report you to the cops.

I wish it was as simple as having language to be only the barrier. If you'll remove a language, in a few generations you'll remove much of culture associated with it. I'm not saying it's a bad thing I'm just saying that this is what would happen.

Yes we are, just look at all those apes like you dancing on reggaeton.

.. you mean AMERICAN, right ...

I think I'd rather learn the official language of the US.... it's Spanish now, right?

How fucken ignorant are you!!!!fuck!

You and xroach have taken this thread way too seriously.

You've never imagined a world where you can fly to any destination, get off the plane, and just be able to speak to anyone and be understood? As it stands now you take a world tour and have to fumble through 30 different translation tomes trying to tell the person behind the counter what you want in your coffee. Wouldn't it be great if they understood you?

And yes, it's as simple as that. Definitely not more complicated. :D

with the way the world is turning spanish, french an russian will be what u need to know

Thank you CDLisp, i am glad some of us dont take everything so critical, sometimes people are like walls, i am someone who looks at possitives.

they already teach english in the majority of schools around the world i am pretty sure, imagine if that barrier worldwide was closed.

i am sure there would be less wars and everything, people would be quicker to understand eachother in every way.

No he means english. If you are Ausie, Canadian, British or American you each have different slang and culture but you can understand each other. This further proves that one language does not remove culture. It only creates the ability to communicate. It does not stop the ausies from eating vegimite or the candaians from saying eh.

This also the country without speed limits on some roads? You are over simplifying the relationship. Climate has to be as big or bigger factor than languge when it comes to the rigidness of a society.

being an American, I do not feel that our "culture" is all that important. I would think Chinese and Russians might fall into our boat too as they have had little of it over the last 100 years or so. The French speaking people would be allowed to keep their language obviously. No one would want to hear them whine about it.

:winkwink:

absolutley amazing post. :thumbsup
you explained it better than i could have ever.

Don't take him serious, He is just a fuckhead; comes here and makes tones of senseless posts and talking bullshit, He should be sent in a jail because of the air pollution that he reasoned
:1orglaugh

AHHH where would i be without the token MetaMan haters, i love you all! you are the reason i keep going. :thumbsup

Everyone should speak klingon!!