JuggCash, about that AssesInPublic website - GoFuckYourself.com

biskoppen · 01-08-2008, 06:58 AM

What a fucking nice site!!!

But... the top JPG on the tour is a 500kb monster which is fucked up.. the job of a lazy designer for sure...

wizzart · 01-08-2008, 09:05 AM

Yes, on all brazzers sites JPG in header is too fucking much Kb and lot of dial-up surfers can't wait to load 500+ Kb ... If optimise that JPG to 79% it will be less then 200 Kb and still good quaility!

Brazzer · 01-08-2008, 09:24 AM

Thanks for the good comments about the sites ! We gather lots of data before building our sites, losing quality in the main header of the tour is not an option....our target customer base is not dial-up users, they represent less than 5% of buyers in this day of age. We need to cater to the people that are most likely to buy.

Brazzer · 01-08-2008, 09:25 AM

That being said , we will do our best to make it load faster and thanks for pointing this out!

Martin · 01-08-2008, 09:32 AM

AssesInPublic isn't under your network on Juggcash.Com?

I'm looking for new sites to promote, that sounds interesting.

Bassab · 01-08-2008, 09:33 AM

Will reduce it to 80% .. should keep the same quality anyways..

Comments and feedbacks about this site are more then welcome.

Pls keep them coming, we wanna know what you guys think

Best, Bassab

Bassab · 01-08-2008, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin

AssesInPublic isn't under your network on Juggcash.Com?

I'm looking for new sites to promote, that sounds interesting.

It's under the brazzers network yes. (brazzersnetwork.com)

Hit up cheeks 225135363 .. he'll be more than glad to help you out

Best, Bassab

Oracle Porn · 01-08-2008, 09:52 AM

the join page header is even worse 650k

Brazzer · 01-08-2008, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oracle Porn

the join page header is even worse 650k

We'll fix that aswell, thanks for the input !

Martin · 01-08-2008, 10:03 AM

Posted this in the other thread too.. What kind of niche does this fall under? Voyeur? I'm going to crank out a few free sites in the coming weeks. Want to know what category it would be best to submit under?

tranza · 01-08-2008, 10:08 AM

Good catch..

Ross · 01-08-2008, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin

Posted this in the other thread too.. What kind of niche does this fall under? Voyeur? I'm going to crank out a few free sites in the coming weeks. Want to know what category it would be best to submit under?

Public would fit best. A lot of sites have that category these days.

Martin · 01-08-2008, 10:56 AM

Thanks Ross..

The Other Steve · 01-08-2008, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brazzer

...our target customer base is not dial-up users, they represent less than 5% of buyers in this day of age. We need to cater to the people that are most likely to buy.

I'm not trying to be smart here but can you actually point to any research that actually supports that assertion? If you can I would definitely like to see it.

Bassab · 01-08-2008, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin

Posted this in the other thread too.. What kind of niche does this fall under? Voyeur? I'm going to crank out a few free sites in the coming weeks. Want to know what category it would be best to submit under?

Hi Martin,

If it does not support the public or outdoor niche .. then this site can fall under the ass niche or general (it;s designed to convert curiosity into $).

Best, Bassab

Bassab · 01-08-2008, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Other Steve

I'm not trying to be smart here but can you actually point to any research that actually supports that assertion? If you can I would definitely like to see it.

We've done some of our own research to get to those conclusions including polls and other statictical tools..

But if you just put google analytics on your site, you'll get similar results.

Best, Bassab

The Other Steve · 01-08-2008, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bassab

We've done some of our own research to get to those conclusions including polls and other statictical tools..

But if you just put google analytics on your site, you'll get similar results.

Best, Bassab

Now I will be a smart ass - of course if you run a site that features huge file sizes you're only going to get sales from people on broadband and of course your statistics are going to show that people on dial up aren't buying.

Thanks for sharing though

Bassab · 01-08-2008, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Other Steve

Now I will be a smart ass - of course if you run a site that features huge file sizes you're only going to get sales from people on broadband and of course your statistics are going to show that people on dial up aren't buying.

Thanks for sharing though

I was not referring to our members area.

Best, Bassab

Supz · 01-08-2008, 12:48 PM

great content

TheSenator · 01-08-2008, 01:50 PM

500k to 650k is way too big even for your ultra high-end porn surfers with 22" dual monitors. They would never know the difference at 85% JPEG compare to the 100% JPEG you are using now.

Your members' area photos should be bigger. The video is just a perfect size. The one minutes clip are perfect for finding the right jerking material to blow your load to.

pip · 01-08-2008, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brazzer

Thanks for the good comments about the sites ! We gather lots of data before building our sites, losing quality in the main header of the tour is not an option....our target customer base is not dial-up users, they represent less than 5% of buyers in this day of age. We need to cater to the people that are most likely to buy.

Curious if you guys are looking for link trades for pornhub?

01-08-2008, 06:58 AM	#1
biskoppen Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Very small penis Posts: 5,809	JuggCash, about that AssesInPublic website What a fucking nice site!!! But... the top JPG on the tour is a 500kb monster which is fucked up.. the job of a lazy designer for sure...

01-08-2008, 09:24 AM	#3
Brazzer Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 400	Thanks for the good comments about the sites ! We gather lots of data before building our sites, losing quality in the main header of the tour is not an option....our target customer base is not dial-up users, they represent less than 5% of buyers in this day of age. We need to cater to the people that are most likely to buy. __________________ Brazzer icq: 255-069-099 webmaster(at)juggcash(dot)com

01-08-2008, 09:25 AM	#4
Brazzer Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 400	That being said , we will do our best to make it load faster and thanks for pointing this out! __________________ Brazzer icq: 255-069-099 webmaster(at)juggcash(dot)com

01-08-2008, 09:32 AM	#5
Martin "Assassins" Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: At home Posts: 17,277	AssesInPublic isn't under your network on Juggcash.Com? I'm looking for new sites to promote, that sounds interesting. __________________

01-08-2008, 09:33 AM	#6
Bassab Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 405	Will reduce it to 80% .. should keep the same quality anyways.. Comments and feedbacks about this site are more then welcome. Pls keep them coming, we wanna know what you guys think Best, Bassab __________________ Paysites President - Brazzers Icq: 292041159 Email: [email protected]

01-08-2008, 09:05 AM	#2
wizzart scriptmaster Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Location: Serbia Posts: 5,237	Yes, on all brazzers sites JPG in header is too fucking much Kb and lot of dial-up surfers can't wait to load 500+ Kb ... If optimise that JPG to 79% it will be less then 200 Kb and still good quaility!

01-08-2008, 09:52 AM	#8
Oracle Porn Affiliate Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Icq: 94-399-723 Posts: 24,433	the join page header is even worse 650k __________________

01-08-2008, 10:03 AM	#10
Martin "Assassins" Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: At home Posts: 17,277	Posted this in the other thread too.. What kind of niche does this fall under? Voyeur? I'm going to crank out a few free sites in the coming weeks. Want to know what category it would be best to submit under? __________________

01-08-2008, 10:08 AM	#11
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	Good catch.. __________________ I'm just a newbie.

01-08-2008, 10:56 AM	#13
Martin "Assassins" Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: At home Posts: 17,277	Thanks Ross.. __________________

01-08-2008, 12:48 PM	#19
Supz Arthur Flegenheimer Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: New York City Posts: 11,056	great content

01-08-2008, 01:50 PM	#20
TheSenator Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: NJ Posts: 13,337	500k to 650k is way too big even for your ultra high-end porn surfers with 22" dual monitors. They would never know the difference at 85% JPEG compare to the 100% JPEG you are using now. Your members' area photos should be bigger. The video is just a perfect size. The one minutes clip are perfect for finding the right jerking material to blow your load to. __________________ ISeekGirls.com since 2005