Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2007, 04:01 AM   #51
Zester
Confirmed User
 
Zester's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeCreep View Post
Vista sucks camel wiener. Everyone knows that.
what he said
it will take me a lot to switch
__________________
* Mainstream ? $65 per sale
* new male contraception
Zester is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 05:20 AM   #52
Dirty F
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Dirty F's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zester View Post
what he said
it will take me a lot to switch
So you are saying you never tried it??
That would be kinda funny.
Dirty F is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 06:53 AM   #53
Enemator
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by aico View Post
Vista runs faster on a Mac than a PC, that's what is sad.
No it isn't. There's no such thing as a "Mac" anymore. It's all the same architecture now. So the base PC is the same.
__________________
I live in your nightmares. I make you dream you're getting bumfucked by a razor blade only to wake up and find I gave your wife an enema and tube-fed you her shit.
Enemator is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 07:06 AM   #54
[ScreaM]
Confirmed User
 
[ScreaM]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,664
Fucking Micro$oft can eat shit and die.
[ScreaM] is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 08:44 AM   #55
alby_persignup
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,119
think twice b4 using vista.
__________________
OnProbation Links Directory | OnProbation Design Services | OnProbation Cash
alby_persignup is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 10:00 AM   #56
jeffrey
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx View Post
Wrong. Vista and XP have the same limits of memory utilization:
1) WinXP 32 bit and Vista 32 bit both are unable to use 4Gb
1) WinXP 64 bit and Vista 64 bit both are able to use over 4Gb
First, anyone using the 32 bit version of any OS on a 64bit machine is just shooting themselves in the foot.
Vista 64 is able to handle 16gb of RAM.
XP64 runs SLOWER with 4gb of ram then with 2gb of ram. Trust me, I was mighty pissed when adding ram made the system slower.

Yes its true Vista uses more resources then XP, XP used more then 98, 98 used more then 95, 95 used more then windows 3.1.... Notice a trend?
Hardware is also getting cheaper and cheaper, there is no reason a computer that will render video or whatever all day wouldnt have 4gbor ram in it.
That silly test they ran on a computer with 1gb of ram... wtf, I cant even build that computer on the dell website with only 1gb or ram. So why did they do the test with only 1gb? couldnt possibly to skew the results could it....
__________________
Coming Soon!
jeffrey is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 10:11 AM   #57
legkulas
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8
I have an xp cd with service pack 3 but thanks for the link
__________________

Radical Cash CONVERTS!

All Original Content & $35 PPS
legkulas is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 10:12 AM   #58
just a punk
So fuckin' bored
 
just a punk's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrey View Post
First, anyone using the 32 bit version of any OS on a 64bit machine is just shooting themselves in the foot.
Why? At the current moment more than 90% of all useful Win software is 32bit. So is there a serious reason to use 64bit OS? I don't think so, because 32bit code runs a bit slower on 64bit OS because of thunking.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrey View Post
Vista 64 is able to handle 16gb of RAM.
Vista64 and XP64 are able to handle the same amount of RAM. Vista64 has no advantages over XP64 there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrey View Post
XP64 runs SLOWER with 4gb of ram then with 2gb of ram. Trust me, I was mighty pissed when adding ram made the system slower.
Sorry but I can't trust you because I know how exactly Windows uses memory Actually If you run some applications that utilize all the available memory (e.g. if you're rendering some complicated 3D scene, or just editing some high-res big-sized PSD files etc), the operating system will use swap file instead of RAM, and course it will work MUCH slower. So there is a simple rule: more RAM = higher system performance.
__________________
Obey the Cowgod
just a punk is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 10:14 AM   #59
NETbilling
Confirmed User
 
NETbilling's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 8,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enemator View Post
No it isn't. There's no such thing as a "Mac" anymore. It's all the same architecture now. So the base PC is the same.
Apple's machine run much more efficiently than most pieced together Dell or HP crap, and the operating system blows away Windows.

Mitch
__________________


Mitch Farber
CEO - NETbilling, Inc.
Email / Phone: 888-357-8166 / 661-252-2456
Transaction processing & 24/7 call center services with exceptional rates and flexibility, since 1998!
NETbilling is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 01:48 AM   #60
rvn
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ukraine/USA
Posts: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSenator View Post
I am not upgrading until Vista can outperform XP.

It is sad that Microsoft is putting deadlines on computer makers to install Vista on their machines.
It will never happen until you upgrade your hardware to Core Eight or something :-) I downloaded a tryout of Vista and was not able to find a driver for my ADSL modem. After that I wiped out Vista. Probably for good :-)
__________________
These things are good
rvn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 08:58 AM   #61
Zester
Confirmed User
 
Zester's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Franck View Post
So you are saying you never tried it??
That would be kinda funny.
yes I have.
but either my computer is not fast enough for it or I didn't tweak it well.
the main thing is, right now, XP is doing everything I need it to and I just to dont' see a good enough reason to switch.
we all know it time we WILL switch to Vista but I think now is not a good time.
__________________
* Mainstream ? $65 per sale
* new male contraception

Last edited by Zester; 11-30-2007 at 09:00 AM..
Zester is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.