Linkster |
11-06-2007 04:22 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by will76
(Post 13336989)
I don't think you are on the same page with what he is saying. He will not accept zango traffic, therefore when his affiliates send traffic to epiccams the people with zango on their pc will be redirected to another site like cams.com for example. His affiliate loses sales, he loses sales.
The only way he can control what happens on his end is to detect zango traffic and block it. He still loses the sale though, conversions and RIO for people promoting his site will still be affected badly, the only thing that does is stop the people who are trying to steal profit from getting his traffic. In that case no one gets it. Thats all he can do short of sueing zango.
BTW, FunWebProducts (from everything I have read) is not related to zango.
|
You are correct - I missed that he is redirecting zango traffic - but I was generalizing about sponsors - most dont do that.
The other problem with this approach is that looking for the user-agent zango and the other three he mentioned - misses about 80% of the similar programs like simbar, funwebproducts(I didnt mean to connect them company-wise - they are just the same type of product), claria,spamblockerutility,powersearch,mywebsearch, trustyhound and hundreds more user-agents - which all do exactly the same thing.
Please dont get me wrong - if he is blocking zango traffic - Im all for it and think all sponsors should do it - take the hit to sales for a month - as it is the only way to get them to stop since it then affects their bottom line as advertisers wont want to buy the traffic
Far-L - didnt mean to generalize too much - I knew that one or two sponsors were doing something about it - but I think you will find that most dont even care one way or the other
|