bump for ron paul

uhhhh, you're an idiot, take a look at his profile, join date TWO THOUSAND AND TWO, i'm pretty sure him registering a year BEFORE you, was not so he can spam ron paul campaign shit all year... dumb fuck

I confess, it was all a plan, I joined 5 years ago to just to wait for this day to annoy RawAlex... :1orglaugh

jaysin, you know not what you talk about. I've been around for a long, long time... I long since got my 10 year service pin. :1orglaugh

But its OK to post pictures of shit floating in toilets and *******?

One of the things I have to laugh about here is how people aren't very good at critical reading skills. Consider the original post in the thread:

Now, I don't know how your reading skills are, but what I see is a solicitation to donate, not a discussion. Perhaps without the links it would be a discussion, but with the "to take part" link it is pretty much 100% a solicitation for funds.

That ain't cool.

it's an EVENT Alex, organized by grass roots supporters, that's all

a one off.

Were are of these posts "events"?

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=781828

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=781337

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...=781413&page=2

Your a fucking political shill, nothing more, nothing less.

I am voting for him for sure!!!! Keep this thread at the top!

hahaha.. you really have an agenda dont you...

of course I have plenty of posts where I dont mention Ron Paul, like, 500 odd..

Haven't you got the hint yet? Everyone in this thread wants you to fuck off, you annoying little shit. :321GFY

Hey guys lay off Alex, hes been around a long long time, he knows what hes talking about. In fact, he knows everything. Hes the porn webmaster worlds very own expert on all.

A guy that has the time he has to read every post ever submitted and reply to 90% of them obviously has the time to learn just about everything worth learning. And if you'd just take the time to listen to what he posts you too can learn something. For example, in this thread I learned Ron Paul is a dufus. Now before reading that I had always found the good doctor to be highly intelligent. So Alex, thank you for pointing that out me, and us all. I will continue, as always, to hang on your every word, all 50,000 you type each day.

buzzy, didn't you get the hint? Ron Paul's supporters are trying to use the board to solicit money for their campaign. They are the annoying shits. :321GFY

Bump for Ron Paul 2008.

PS...its not called spam when multiple people support his cause...it would be called a discussion.

Hey Doug, isn't it time for your McShift?

Also another note...Ron Paul is highly against regulating the internet... those in the adult business I would think would support such a cause seeing as how 2257 and Ashcroft was completely awesome.

EXACTLY! we're not organizing and coercively 'spamming' as RawAlex likes to claim, we're just discussing a political figure and his campaign, what is wrong with that?! :upsidedow

Agreed. Ron Paul really seems like the right guy for the job. I've always thought that presidential elections had become a matter of choosing the lesser of two evils, but Ron Paul really inspires the feeling, in my cynical heart of hearts, that there just might be an honest and upstanding politician out there who will do what's best for all Americans rather than just select groups.

I don't quite understand your stance, RawAlex, particularly because Ron Paul could be very good for the adult industry, especially in regard to the gripes we all complain about and to which you routinely comment.

If these Ron Paul posts are spam, then in my humble opinion they are quite possibly a good sort of spam. Just my :2 cents:.

1M in a day,that's huge. If he does well in NH, he'll have traction for the rest of the campaign.

congradu-fucking-lations doesn't stop the fact that you said he joined here just to spam ron paul, when in fact, he joined here a year before you did...

he WILL do well in New Hampshire, they love freedom there :thumbsup I am confident he will do well and he has just started spending his CASH and is moving up in the polls.

he might pull of a Buchanan or a McCain surprise, do not rule it out, half the voters in New Hampshire are INDEPENDENTs and they could throw a spanner in the works.

Excellent post Sands. no one defends the constitution as much as Ron Paul, he is highly relevant to this community, he was the ONLY Republican to vote against CDA/COPA in the House and caught flak for it from political opponents who tried to use it against him in his district but the voters saw through it and keep returning him to Congress..

Ron Paul is a politician. Politicians need consensus to get anything done, which includes appeasing assholes and idiots and the religious right and Presidents don't make laws.
:2 cents:

Ron Paul does not compromise, they have tried and failed.

Newt Gingrich exempted him from the Republican party whip in the House, no one else got an exemption because he does not compromise.

as Commander in Chief a President has enormous authority over Foreign Policy and Paul would change America's foreign policy from interventionist to non-intervenionist.

He wouldn't need to ask Congress to add to the national debt and authorize $300bn every year for Iraq for example, because he would be working on getting out of Iraq

Domestically, he will try and get his program through Congress and work with them but most importantly he has the Veto pen, which im sure he would happily use.

politics IS the art of compromise.

you don't even seem to understand how politics and government works.

a veto means nothing. there is such a thing as a veto over ride you know... happens quite often.

you can't be an effective leader if no one is following.

he can provide leadership and take his party with him

things he can do immediately, as commander in chief like ORDER an immediate withdrawal from Iraq and around the world from places like Korea, this would save the US taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars in a matter of months

ohh... just "ORDER" what he wants, without a political and/or popular consensus or support? so its ok when the nazi you want is in power acting unilaterally and without support... but not the current nazi?


makes even more sense.

the Congress did not declare war in Iraq so it is unconsitutional and Ron Paul would correct that

Ron Paul 2008. K, Thx!

sent in my money!

He supports the constitution and thats what lets us do the work we do!

I think what he's saying is that just because he's president doesn't mean that everything he wants to do can be done..

If he DID get elected.. and started trying to make too many radical changes, he'd scare people.. and congress would stop him in his tracks... no matter the party..

If he can break $5M today, it really would be something.

really?

and... what? no democrats thought about raising this point?

strange.

possibly because they almost all voted to authorize the use of military force... and repeatedly authorized the funding for it?

...just tossing ideas out there.

I realize that, there are a lot of big spenders in Congress!

But as President he can provide leadership, protect liberties (through the veto pen) and the one thing he can do right away is order troops home from undeclared wars.

*nod*
So fucking true.

LOL its seriously disturbing that anyone in this business, or ANY business that functions online isn't supporting Ron Paul.

NO OTHER CANDIDATE represents what WE need as far as free speech AND blocking new internet regulations.

We have some serious idiots here.

Anyways, I donated $100.

the authorization is not worth the paper it's written on, Article I of the constitution clearly says that Congress has the power to declare war not pass authorizations, war was not declared (like vietnam), the aims and objectives are unclear for example the regime has long been overthrown and Saddam executed but the troops are still there, why?

haha. i hope you are not typical of the average ron paul supporter.

this shit was straight spam.......


"what do you think of ron paul would be a discussion" :2 cents:

Which is EXACTLY why the democrats can use the excuse 'We voted to allow bush to use force, we didnt think he actually would'.

As opposed to declairing war, which is a clear statement that we're going to invade.