Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

View Poll Results: Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?
Pro-Life 19 19.59%
Pro-Choice 78 80.41%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2002, 04:53 AM   #101
Amputate Your Head
There can be only one
 
Amputate Your Head's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere else
Posts: 39,075
the short answer there is no. Law should default to abort if the two can't agree.
__________________
SIG TOO BIG
Amputate Your Head is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2002, 04:57 AM   #102
Amputate Your Head
There can be only one
 
Amputate Your Head's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere else
Posts: 39,075
I gotta crash... I'm falling asleep on my keyboard again....

great convo tit.... thanks....
__________________
SIG TOO BIG
Amputate Your Head is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2002, 05:25 AM   #103
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,592
Can't we just abort all the "ProLifers"?
hehehe
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2002, 05:30 AM   #104
Thomas N
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 973
Here's what I always wondered. Abortion is not considered murder by law. Technically it is not a life yet by law.

But if someone attacks a pregnant woman and kills her, he can be charged with 2 counts of murder, one for the woman and one for the unborn child. However we just established above that it is ok to kill an unborn child. But wait, only if the mother says so? So if a psycho stabs a pregnant woman in the stomach and kills the baby, is charged with murder, but then the woman comes forward and says its ok she was getting an abortion anyways, are the murder charges dropped? No. Why not?

If a pregnant woman has an abortion, all is fine and dandy. If a pregnant woman takes a knife and stabs herself in the stomach and kills the baby, she is charged with murder. Wherein lies the difference?
Thomas N is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2002, 05:34 AM   #105
Amputate Your Head
There can be only one
 
Amputate Your Head's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere else
Posts: 39,075
Quote:
Originally posted by SwordFish
Here's what I always wondered. Abortion is not considered murder by law. Technically it is not a life yet by law.

But if someone attacks a pregnant woman and kills her, he can be charged with 2 counts of murder, one for the woman and one for the unborn child. However we just established above that it is ok to kill an unborn child. But wait, only if the mother says so? So if a psycho stabs a pregnant woman in the stomach and kills the baby, is charged with murder, but then the woman comes forward and says its ok she was getting an abortion anyways, are the murder charges dropped? No. Why not?
in that case, because the guy that did the stabbing is clearly a lunatic that must be locked away from society. We can't just go around stabbing people now can we.

Quote:
Originally posted by SwordFish
If a pregnant woman has an abortion, all is fine and dandy. If a pregnant woman takes a knife and stabs herself in the stomach and kills the baby, she is charged with murder. Wherein lies the difference?
If a woman stabs herself in the stomach with a knife, she's probably dead.
__________________
SIG TOO BIG
Amputate Your Head is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2002, 05:42 AM   #106
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,592
Quote:
Originally posted by SwordFish
Here's what I always wondered. Abortion is not considered murder by law. Technically it is not a life yet by law.

But if someone attacks a pregnant woman and kills her, he can be charged with 2 counts of murder, one for the woman and one for the unborn child. However we just established above that it is ok to kill an unborn child. But wait, only if the mother says so? So if a psycho stabs a pregnant woman in the stomach and kills the baby, is charged with murder, but then the woman comes forward and says its ok she was getting an abortion anyways, are the murder charges dropped? No. Why not?

If a pregnant woman has an abortion, all is fine and dandy. If a pregnant woman takes a knife and stabs herself in the stomach and kills the baby, she is charged with murder. Wherein lies the difference?
Right! Now, let's make it confusing...
The attacker kills the pregnant woman... Yet the unborn child was unharmed... Let's say someone saw the attack, called 911, and they rushed the woman to the hospital. They deliver the baby prematurly, and put it on life support. The baby dies as it was removed from the womb too early, and the life support just wasn't enough to keep it alive.

Now, the attacker didn't kill the baby. It died of natural causes. However, if the attacker hadn't killed the mother, there was a good chance for the baby to be born normally.

Would the attacker be charged for that death?
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2002, 06:05 AM   #107
corvo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 253
it is an easy one, without having to resort to convoluted hyperthetical dilemmas.
it is a matter for the individual, there is no room there for others to impose their views.

one question a right to lifer should ask themselves is if it is right to force a JW to take blood transfusions to live.

it really is a simple matter
__________________
<a href="http://www.liondollars.com/"></a><br>
Corvo.....
corvo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.