![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,539
|
RAID backup systems (price, etc.)
I have been pricing a new server and the price with RAID 1 or RAID 5 systems is 2 to 3 times more expensive than a system without it (leasing, not buying). I could not believe RAID cost so much.
Do any of you have a RAID system? How much did it set you back? Please help me get a feel for RAIDs. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,070
|
RAID is nice. RAID costs more because you're buying lots of drives. RAID5 you're buying at least 1 more drive than you'll get to use as far as capacity is concerned.
it's worth it, though. SCSI RAID is really quite nice. i've heard 3Ware makes a good IDE RAID card, but i haven't had a chance to play with it myself.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 199
|
When I was buying servers for my old company we would determine what we needed based on what we are going to be using the server for. A database server would get a different RAID setup then just a file server. If you are unsure of the pros and cons of RAID check out this link it may help:
RAID.edu |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ICQ: 25285313
Posts: 993
|
If it's for a webserver, just throw in a 3ware card and a couple matching UDMA drives, and run RAID 1.
figure $150 extra for the drives, and $250 for the card. Better performance than a 2 disk SCSI RAID1 mirror. no matter what people will try to tell you. SCSI is starting to offer no real advantages other than disk density (i.e. 15 drives per controller) and very fast random access speeds (15k rpm drives). For small RAID setups, all you get is set back some in cost, for most likely less performance. I used to be a die-hard SCSI fanboy too. ![]() Of course, there are times that SCSI makes very good sense. -Phil |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cat Detector Van
Posts: 1,600
|
SCSI is VERY good if your system is doing a lot of very intense disk access.. Even the biggest, baddest mofo of an IDE system will be brought to it's knees by certain tasks (usually involving high bandwidth file transfer, copying etc..)
I unfortunately see it happen all the time.. Your cpu is hardly being used, but the computer is almost non-responsive due to way too much disk load.. IDE isn't good at that. It's better at one thing at a time.. That said - I am talking about desktop.. For most servers, IDE is all you need.. And IDE raid is even better. Cheers, Backov
__________________
<embed src="http://banners.spotbrokers.com/button.swf" FlashVars="clickURL=http://banners.spotbrokers.com" quality=high pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="120" height="60"></embed> |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,539
|
This is for a webserver that handles websites, all with traffic trading scripts on them.
Check out the prices here at Rackspace: http://www.rackspace.com/dedicated/r...rver_linux.php Hardware Single AMD 1.3 GHz Processor 256MB DDR RAM 20GB EIDE Drive 30GB (30GB incld.) Burstable Bandwidth Services 24x7 Support RedHat Linux 7.2 Preinstalled RackWatch Basic Monthly $250.00 Hardware Single AMD 1.53 GHz Processor 256MB DDR RAM SCSI RAID Controller 18GB SCSI Drive 18GB SCSI Drive AIT 1 35gig Tape Drive 30GB (30GB incld.) Burstable Bandwidth Services 24x7 Support RedHat Linux 7.2 Preinstalled RackWatch Basic Weekly Backup w/Email Notification Monthly $839.00 Hardware Dual AMD 1.53 GHz Processor 1GB DDR RAM SCSI RAID Controller Drive 18GB SCSI Drive 18GB SCSI Drive 18GB SCSI Drive AIT 2 50gig Tape Drive 30GB (30GB incld.) Burstable Bandwidth Services 24x7 Support RedHat Linux 7.2 Preinstalled RackWatch Gold Weekly Backup w/Email Notification Monthly $1369.00 And no, I do not work for Rackspace, but I do host with them and I want some advice on what server configuration I should upgrade to. I was going to go RAID, but look at the steep increase in monthly fees as soon as you hit a RAID setup (most notably from the 1st server I listed to the 2nd.) |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,738
|
HQ -
Buy your own hardware and save yourself a ton. * got prices from pricewatch.com MB = Tyan S2518UGN $472.75 CPU = 2 x Piii 1.2 $220.00 Ram = 4 x 512MB p133 $128.00 Case = Chenbro RM1U11300 $820 drive = 4 x Hitachi HIDK32DJ-72ME $1340 Total cost $2980.75 Just under $250/mn if you only use it for a year. Gives you around 160GB of raid5 usable webspace once you have all the OS and such loaded, or you can go raid 1+0 and get speed and backup and have around 100GB of space. The case is a bit high, but it has the 4 drives as hot swap, you could get a cheaper case and just have some downtime for drive replacement, you could also go with a cheaper motherboard if you don't want dual CPU's. Likewise if your not going to need the drivespace then downgrade the drives. Then there is the IDE option * got prices from pricewatch.com MB = Tyan Tiger 200T $210 CPU = 2 x Piii 1.2 $220.00 Ram = 3 x 512MB p133 $105.00 Case = Chenbro RM1U3111 $425 drive = 2 x WD1200J 120GB 8MB cache $320 Total Cost $1280 Which works out to just over $100 a month for a 1 year use ![]() Tim ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,539
|
Yes I would save a ton. It appears that Rackspace makes their money on the high-end systems where you are almost paying for a whole new computer each month.
If I bought my own, where would I host it? I would have to go 'colo'. I want to stay with Rackspace if possible as they handle almost everything for me. It is very nice to know that you can get support within minutes. After hearing all these horrible Rackshack (not Rackspace) stories, I'm scared to move away from Rackspace and thier incredible support. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Drunk and Unruly
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 22,712
|
Rackspace is one of the top 5 business hosts now as far as marketshare so I'd be an idiot to say anything bad about them except for the price. Why don't you give one of the many good adult hosts a try. They are the ones that give the better B/W deals and some give comparable levels of service. With the money you save it would justify you buying your own fully loaded box for a colo setup.
__________________
I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade... Webair, bitches. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,539
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |