Breaking News! 9/11 Offical inquiry finds Government version Flawed! - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Rutopls · 09-14-2002, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Massivecock

Very good point!

I see your point.

Something more for us all to think about.

Thanks, look for my future report about the TRUE income of GFY residents... I have been speaking to several IRS agents that feel the other residents of GFY should know who is speaking the truth..... Do you think the-news.net will carry my report... it is an official federal report since I was a member of our military....

Massivecock · 09-14-2002, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PornoDoggy

Are YOU Col. Donn de Grand? You have done an official investigation into this? What resources have you put into this? Name some sources besides this bullshit piece in "the-news.net."

The enrollment of many of the hijackers in flight schools is falsified? Frankly - they've caught up to a certain number of flight schools - how many HAVEN'T they caught up with? How many folks took some $$ under the table and gave them some off the books flight training or midnight simultaor time? That blows your knowledge, training, and means right out of the water.

What "means" do you feel they lacked? Money? Obviously they were (and probably are) not lacking in that.

This is a crock of shit. I suggest you go back to watching for UFOs ... or inspecting your turds for alien life forms.

Im not doubting they were involved.
In fact my evidence shows some most definately were.

But they are not the source..

Meaning.. if i hire someone to kill my wife..
And the guy gets caught..
He is not the source.
i would be.

They needed government help to pull it off.
in a big way.

Bree · 09-14-2002, 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Sixpack
The American public are sheep. They believe everything the media and the government spoon feed them.

It's blanket statements like that really demonstrate a person's inability to see beyond stereotypes. Makes it simple to dismiss anything any American might have to say -- positive or negative.

Who's listening to hype?

Massivecock · 09-14-2002, 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rutopls

Thanks, look for my future report about the TRUE income of GFY residents... I have been speaking to several IRS agents that feel the other residents of GFY should know who is speaking the truth..... Do you think the-news.net will carry my report... it is an official federal report since I was a member of our military....

If you saw the same report on Cbs, Abc, Nbc or Cnn.
What would you honestly think?

You would be baised to the familiar correct?

Think about it.. for real.

Most american Subconsciously if not literal trust what the main stream media presents to them.

What if the mainstream media was controlled by a group that had its own interests at play.

Money, power, Greed, Ignorance for the masses.

Then we would all be fucked, duped, misled, tricked...etc...

Think about the possiblity of that being a reality..

Massivecock · 09-14-2002, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bree

It's blanket statements like that really demonstrate a person's inability to see beyond stereotypes. Makes it simple to dismiss anything any American might have to say -- positive or negative.

Who's listening to hype?

i agree...

Blanket statments like that.. do nothing but damage.

But if you like damage... then I guess your having fun.

Rochard · 09-14-2002, 09:28 PM

So a group of jackasses stay up for 72 hours - fucked up on coffee and what not - and have decided to condem the US GOV. for making up a lie?

And they have some great people to back this concept up - People with "twenty years of flying".... My ass! How many tens of thousands of people have flown jet airplanes for twenty years or more?

I have a guy who lives next door to me who flys for Southwest. Hell, he's been flying since before I was born. He tells me any moron would be able to fly from any airport on the East Coast, head east until they hit water, and then south towards NYC. Once near NYC it isn't too difficult to fine the WTC - They are (were) the tallest buildings in the damn city.

nocostporn · 09-14-2002, 09:36 PM

I don't believe the remote control theory but there is shit being covered up,if you don't think so you're just a sheep... I don't buy into conspiracies but behind every wacked out conspiracy there is truth SOMEWHERE.. Even something so simple as finding a passport of the hijacker in the WTC,how the fuck could that happen??They probably didnt even find one body in full contact but they found a passport? Simple shit like that gets covered up,but the simple shit adds up to a bigger plot... The government better hope they arent hiding something big because there are people that are going to dedicate the next 20 years of their lives digging for the truth .With newspapers/news shows showing wild stories, the government cant keep it under wraps....Something will come out

The onyl reason people dont step forward si two simple reasons,they get paid or they get threatened... I for one believe those people saying their relatives called them from hijacked planes were paid off...
Credible news shows cant report this,they would be taken off the air or worse.

Let me go to bat for Massivecock on this one.You fools are believing what you are told on tv with absolutly NO facts! Not even an explanation!..At least some of these wacked out conspirist(sp?) have some kind of theory...
Bush hasnt answered any questions,wont let us hear any black boxes...theres no reasoning behid what we are being told

There is a conspiracy somewhere,big or small...Nixon wasnt the first and wont be the last to cover shit up and get caught

Rutopls · 09-14-2002, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Massivecock

If you saw the same report on Cbs, Abc, Nbc or Cnn.
What would you honestly think?

You would be baised to the familiar correct?

Think about it.. for real.

Most american Subconsciously if not literal trust what the main stream media presents to them.

What if the mainstream media was controlled by a group that had its own interests at play.

Money, power, Greed, Ignorance for the masses.

Then we would all be fucked, duped, misled, tricked...etc...

Think about the possiblity of that being a reality..

Actually no I wouldn't believe it just because it is on a mainstream media source as for years they have been biased and one sided, and when you look at monopolies it will only get worse with some of the FCC regulations they are looking to change.

As I have said I also have problems relying on information from a source that needs something to sell his books and from pure conspiracy sites, some of these people list the fact the moon landing never took place... do you believe that also?

Everyone makes decisions based on their own experiences, I for one know from first hand experience from my position in the military that the media never tells the whole story or that the govt puts its own spin on certain things. There are certain reasons for that bad and good, like all things in life.

The way you portrayed this report as a definitive source is a joke, and what I have a problem with in this post, and then you tried defending it 3 seperate times going from a congressional report, to a federal report, to finally conceding it had nothing to do with the US govt at all. So I either say you are just spinning your wheels or you have some massive reading comprehension problems based on your inability to collate where this report came from, that would call into question any other findings you have said to come across.

sexyavs · 09-14-2002, 09:57 PM

I knew that when I started to read the thread and it said World Trade Centre..

There was no more reason to read...

In the USA it is Center!

theking · 09-14-2002, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nocostporn

Let me go to bat for Massivecock on this one.You fools are believing what you are told on tv with absolutly NO facts! Not even an explanation!..At least some of these wacked out conspirist(sp?) have some kind of theory...
Bush hasnt answered any questions,wont let us hear any black boxes...theres no reasoning behid what we are being told

Just out of curiosity would you mind making a list of the things you would like answers to about 9/11, that have not already been provided?

Massivecock · 09-14-2002, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rutopls

Actually no I wouldn't believe it just because it is on a mainstream media source as for years they have been biased and one sided, and when you look at monopolies it will only get worse with some of the FCC regulations they are looking to change.

As I have said I also have problems relying on information from a source that needs something to sell his books and from pure conspiracy sites, some of these people list the fact the moon landing never took place... do you believe that also?

Everyone makes decisions based on their own experiences, I for one know from first hand experience from my position in the military that the media never tells the whole story or that the govt puts its own spin on certain things. There are certain reasons for that bad and good, like all things in life.

The way you portrayed this report as a definitive source is a joke, and what I have a problem with in this post, and then you tried defending it 3 seperate times going from a congressional report, to a federal report, to finally conceding it had nothing to do with the US govt at all. So I either say you are just spinning your wheels or you have some massive reading comprehension problems based on your inability to collate where this report came from, that would call into question any other findings you have said to come across.

I do admit the oversite, on the congressional matter.
I still precieve it as a Federal matter though.
I believe that those who are in the Military postion have a great deal more responsiblity of sensitive information to deal with and resources to gather from contacts, authority, knowledge etc...
Based on that I percieve it as federal.

There is a very defined limit as to how far a civilain can go when investigating something of that magnitude.

I never said I agreed it was not federal.

I never conceded it had nothing to do with the Us Gov.

Independant does not mean its not Federal.
---

Obviously these persons are drawing from their experiences
while holding duty on a federal level, with federal knowledge,
federal contacts, federal authority ( In what capacity is unknown though) and clearance to certain classified materials.

Which is investigating from a federally privileged starting point.
In my opinion.

nocostporn · 09-14-2002, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

Just out of curiosity would you mind making a list of the things you would like answers to about 9/11, that have not already been provided?

black boxes,lets hear them
who did it,with some actual proof
How did a plane,that was known to be hijacked,hit the Pentagon?
How did they come to the conclusion the planes were hijacked with knives unless it was on the blackbox recording

Those are just off the top if my head,I have a lot of good ones that make more sense but I'm fucked up at the moment so ill get back ot this one tomorrow

Massivecock · 09-14-2002, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nocostporn

black boxes,lets hear them
who did it,with some actual proof
How did a plane,that was known to be hijacked,hit the Pentagon?
How did they come to the conclusion the planes were hijacked with knives unless it was on the blackbox recording

Those are just off the top if my head,I have a lot of good ones that make more sense but I'm fucked up at the moment so ill get back ot this one tomorrow

Nice one..
got one more..

For the Lady who says her husband called saying " He and others
were planning on fighting the highjackers "
No phone records were ever produced..
-Not by the Cell phone company
-Not by the Local Lan Line Company
-Not by anyone proving that.

Massivecock · 09-14-2002, 10:18 PM

oops
pressed wrong button

Chris R · 09-14-2002, 11:05 PM

Don't confuse gov't paranoia with conspiracy.

The gov't has said they don't want to release the black box because it contains "evidence" that might be used in upcoming trials.

The gov't often doesn't like to release stuff - in this case - it is most likely not due to any conspiracy - as they WILL release it after any trials.

The gov't often does stuff like this - and it just makes people more suspicious. I did FOIA requests with the CIA on the JFK assassignation for school. They responded to all of them - and I found most of the documents they had originally classified and now declassified - were just newspaper articles and totlally innocent documents that had a name or two that should have just been blacked out.

No evidence of a conspiracy - just a gov't agency that doesn't like to give out info.

Don't confuse gov't STUPIDITY with gov't CONSPIRACY. They look the same a lot of them time - but they are different.

You simply can not hide the type of conspiracy you are suggesting.

Chris R · 09-14-2002, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nocostporn

black boxes,lets hear them
who did it,with some actual proof
How did a plane,that was known to be hijacked,hit the Pentagon?
How did they come to the conclusion the planes were hijacked with knives unless it was on the blackbox recording

Have you ever seen them reconstruct planes and stuff that have crashed?

A lot more evidence is left over then you seem to think.

They found one woman with her throat cut and people were clalling with stories about what happened - that is how they know.

theking · 09-14-2002, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nocostporn

black boxes,lets hear them
who did it,with some actual proof
How did a plane,that was known to be hijacked,hit the Pentagon?
How did they come to the conclusion the planes were hijacked with knives unless it was on the blackbox recording

Those are just off the top if my head,I have a lot of good ones that make more sense but I'm fucked up at the moment so ill get back ot this one tomorrow

I will try to answer some of these off of the top of my head. I don't know what the status is of the black boxes. I don't know if all of them were recovered. I don't know if they were damaged beyond use. The black boxes would only provide information about the status of the aircraft. I do not know if all of the flight recorders were recovered. I do not know if they were damaged beyond use. In the case of flight 93, it is my understanding that the flight recorder was recovered and the families and some others were allowed to listen to the tape. I seriously doubt that the flight recorders from the WTC and Pentagon, assuming they may have been recovered, would be of any use, as I would suspect the damage to them would be severe.

OBL was on tape incriminating himself, so he was definitely one of the culprits. As to why the Petagon was hit. The militarys radar is not arrayed to track commercial flights. It was not until sometime into the event that someone from the FAA informed the military what was going on, but the scrambled aircraft were twelve minutes behind the impact into the Pentagon. Multiple people using cell phones called home, and called 911, from both the flight 93 and the flight that impacted the Pentagon and this is one way they new about what weapons the Hijackers had.

Chris R · 09-14-2002, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

I will try to answer some of these off of the top of my head. I don't know what the status is of the black boxes. I don't know if all of them were recovered. I don't know if they were damaged beyond use. The black boxes would only provide information about the status of the aircraft. I do not know if all of the flight recorders were recovered. I do not know if they were damaged beyond use. In the case of flight 93, it is my understanding that the flight recorder was recovered and the families and some others were allowed to listen to the tape. I seriously doubt that the flight recorders from the WTC and Pentagon, assuming they may have been recovered, would be of any use, as I would suspect the damage to them would be severe.

OBL was on tape incriminating himself, so he was definitely one of the culprits. As to why the Petagon was hit. The militarys radar is not arrayed to track commercial flights. It was not until sometime into the event that someone from the FAA informed the military what was going on, but the scrambled aircraft were twelve minutes behind the impact into the Pentagon. Multiple people using cell phones called home, and called 911, from both the flight 93 and the flight that impacted the Pentagon and this is one way they new about what weapons the Hijackers had.

A voice of reason

I have to go to bed - so keep it up

nocostporn · 09-14-2002, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

I will try to answer some of these off of the top of my head. I don't know what the status is of the black boxes. I don't know if all of them were recovered. I don't know if they were damaged beyond use. The black boxes would only provide information about the status of the aircraft. I do not know if all of the flight recorders were recovered. I do not know if they were damaged beyond use. In the case of flight 93, it is my understanding that the flight recorder was recovered and the families and some others were allowed to listen to the tape. I seriously doubt that the flight recorders from the WTC and Pentagon, assuming they may have been recovered, would be of any use, as I would suspect the damage to them would be severe.

OBL was on tape incriminating himself, so he was definitely one of the culprits. As to why the Petagon was hit. The militarys radar is not arrayed to track commercial flights. It was not until sometime into the event that someone from the FAA informed the military what was going on, but the scrambled aircraft were twelve minutes behind the impact into the Pentagon. Multiple people using cell phones called home, and called 911, from both the flight 93 and the flight that impacted the Pentagon and this is one way they new about what weapons the Hijackers had.

exactly,flight 93 was recovered and only the families could listen to it? what kind of sense does that make? If they were able to find a passport of the hijacker in complete contact in the WTC and they can't find the black box there is a problem.
How far apart was the first WTC attack and the Pentagon? Like 45 minutes right? They didn't have the pentagon as one of their top priorities to secure once they knew planes were being hijacked? Hard to believe
I saw no wreckage at the Pentagon and no wreckage of flight 93...but even after two of the biggest buildings in NYC collapse you still find and saw plane pieces on tv! but none in the other two crashes? once again,hard to believe

Why doesn't the government make a 2 hour tape explaining the events? Take a few months,research the event and make a tape explaining everything in detail,maybe putting peoples minds at ease... If people can go so far out of their way to prove the government wrong,why cant the government do the same to prove themselves right? I want to know everything GW knows.National Security?? Didnt that vanish once he let us get attacked?

Massivecock · 09-14-2002, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

I will try to answer some of these off of the top of my head. I don't know what the status is of the black boxes. I don't know if all of them were recovered. I don't know if they were damaged beyond use. The black boxes would only provide information about the status of the aircraft. I do not know if all of the flight recorders were recovered. I do not know if they were damaged beyond use. In the case of flight 93, it is my understanding that the flight recorder was recovered and the families and some others were allowed to listen to the tape. I seriously doubt that the flight recorders from the WTC and Pentagon, assuming they may have been recovered, would be of any use, as I would suspect the damage to them would be severe.

OBL was on tape incriminating himself, so he was definitely one of the culprits. As to why the Petagon was hit. The militarys radar is not arrayed to track commercial flights. It was not until sometime into the event that someone from the FAA informed the military what was going on, but the scrambled aircraft were twelve minutes behind the impact into the Pentagon. Multiple people using cell phones called home, and called 911, from both the flight 93 and the flight that impacted the Pentagon and this is one way they new about what weapons the Hijackers had.

Dont fool yourself on the pentagon issue.
The Pentagon is the Most guarded airspace in the world!
they have a military base 10 miles from it.
Takes 3 mins to get a jet from there to the pentagon.
1,000,000,000 a day on defense!
Thats 1 billion dollars folks a day folks!
i couldn't spend a billion dollars in a lifetime if i wanted to.
Again..
Pentagon has Radar up the ass.
The militarys radar is not arrayed to track commercial flights??
What!!!!!!!??
I dont know where you heard that crap.
that is absurd!
Military tracks every single shred or airborne matter on this planet.
Satellites, Gps, Radar, Low & high reverberated frequency sound waves track everything!
Make no mistake about that.

--
Mis-information is the Governments Business.
Trust Me..
They are good at it.

theking · 09-14-2002, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Massivecock

Dont fool yourself on the pentagon issue.
The Pentagon is the Most guarded airspace in the world!
they have a military base 10 miles from it.
Takes 3 mins to get a jet from there to the pentagon.
1,000,000,000 a day on defense!
again..
Pentagon has Radar up the ass.
The militarys radar is not arrayed to track commercial flights??
What!!!!!!!??
I dont know where you heard that crap.
that is absurd!
Military tracks every single shred or airborne matter on this planet.
Satellites, Gps, Radar, Low & high reverberated frequency sound waves track everything!
Make no mistake about that.

There was an hour program on TV about the events of that day covering every known aspect of the flight controllers, the FAA, the military and their respective actions. Military personell during that program explained about how their radar functions and is arrayed and the fact that it was arrayed during the cold war to be outward looking and that they do not normally track commercial flights. Needless to say they are making some changes. They also explained that on 9/11 there were only ten aircraft on alert 24/7 and where they were located, which I don't recall. Since 9/11 there are 100 aircraft on alert 24/7 scattered across the nation. They were not notified by the FAA until well into the events of that day. I do not recall the times lines involved, or all of the details, but it was a very detailed account of the events of that day including cell phone calls made by some of the passengers and their time line.

Massivecock · 09-14-2002, 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

There was an hour program on TV about the events of that day covering every known aspect of the flight controllers, the FAA, the military and their respective actions. Military personell during that program explained about how their radar functions and is arrayed and the fact that it was arrayed during the cold war to be outward looking and that they do not normally track commercial flights. Needless to say they are making some changes. They also explained that on 9/11 there were only ten aircraft on alert 24/7 and where they were located, which I don't recall. Since 9/11 there are 100 aircraft on alert 24/7 scattered across the nation. They were not notified by the FAA until well into the events of that day. I do not recall the times lines involved, or all of the details, but it was a very detailed account of the events of that day including cell phone calls made by some of the passengers and their time line.

I believe you that the television program played on the air and existed, absolutely.

That dont mean its true though

and im not saying you believe those version of events.

i believe its a white wash.. a lie, a cover up.
Im not the only one/
There are millions who beleive its a cover up.
Including Fbi, Cia, Air controllers and other Gov officials who have come forward.

This is much Bigger than you or I could ever imagine my friend.

Rutopls · 09-15-2002, 12:04 AM

I love how everyone wants to know why the govt didnt make split second decisions. Govt agency and the military are huge institutions and have issues with interoffice communications. They are also loathe to break chain of command and while for the military there is usually someone who can make some kind of decision there isnt always a civilian counterpart willing to do so. Also there has never been a precedent for this massive of a scale. Civilian aircraft would be tracked but for the most part are not coordinated by the military from what I have been reading. When they need airspace they relay it to civilian controllers who clear the civilian aircraft out of the way.

I am suprised you even think a plane hit the Pentagon, I thought the favorite conspiracy theory was that it was a truck bomb?

Massivecock · 09-15-2002, 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rutopls
I love how everyone wants to know why the govt didnt make split second decisions. Govt agency and the military are huge institutions and have issues with interoffice communications. They are also loathe to break chain of command and while for the military there is usually someone who can make some kind of decision there isnt always a civilian counterpart willing to do so. Also there has never been a precedent for this massive of a scale. Civilian aircraft would be tracked but for the most part are not coordinated by the military from what I have been reading. When they need airspace they relay it to civilian controllers who clear the civilian aircraft out of the way.

I am suprised you even think a plane hit the Pentagon, I thought the favorite conspiracy theory was that it was a truck bomb?

I dont think a plane hit the pentagon.
There was no plane!

09-14-2002, 09:28 PM	#56
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 74,501	So a group of jackasses stay up for 72 hours - fucked up on coffee and what not - and have decided to condem the US GOV. for making up a lie? And they have some great people to back this concept up - People with "twenty years of flying".... My ass! How many tens of thousands of people have flown jet airplanes for twenty years or more? I have a guy who lives next door to me who flys for Southwest. Hell, he's been flying since before I was born. He tells me any moron would be able to fly from any airport on the East Coast, head east until they hit water, and then south towards NYC. Once near NYC it isn't too difficult to fine the WTC - They are (were) the tallest buildings in the damn city. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

09-14-2002, 09:36 PM	#57
nocostporn Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Maryland Posts: 5,228	I don't believe the remote control theory but there is shit being covered up,if you don't think so you're just a sheep... I don't buy into conspiracies but behind every wacked out conspiracy there is truth SOMEWHERE.. Even something so simple as finding a passport of the hijacker in the WTC,how the fuck could that happen??They probably didnt even find one body in full contact but they found a passport? Simple shit like that gets covered up,but the simple shit adds up to a bigger plot... The government better hope they arent hiding something big because there are people that are going to dedicate the next 20 years of their lives digging for the truth .With newspapers/news shows showing wild stories, the government cant keep it under wraps....Something will come out The onyl reason people dont step forward si two simple reasons,they get paid or they get threatened... I for one believe those people saying their relatives called them from hijacked planes were paid off... Credible news shows cant report this,they would be taken off the air or worse. Let me go to bat for Massivecock on this one.You fools are believing what you are told on tv with absolutly NO facts! Not even an explanation!..At least some of these wacked out conspirist(sp?) have some kind of theory... Bush hasnt answered any questions,wont let us hear any black boxes...theres no reasoning behid what we are being told There is a conspiracy somewhere,big or small...Nixon wasnt the first and wont be the last to cover shit up and get caught __________________ CashTheChecks.com -coming soon- "Exclusive sites for Exclusive Webmasters" ICQ-119966868,add me first don't message

09-14-2002, 09:57 PM	#59
sexyavs Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 615	I knew that when I started to read the thread and it said World Trade Centre.. There was no more reason to read... In the USA it is Center! __________________ <br> <a href="http://www.sexypassport.com/webmaster/webmaster.php?siteid=752359">Join the Highest Paying FREE AVS. </a><br> <a href="http://nakedpass.com/webmaster/webmaster.php">Naked Pass New FREE Avs Also Pays $20.00 Per FREE Signup!! </a><br> Have you checked out <a href="http://makefuckingmoney.com">Make Fucking Money!</a> Get Paid on FREE Memberships!

09-14-2002, 10:18 PM	#64
Massivecock Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 800	oops pressed wrong button

09-14-2002, 11:05 PM	#65
Chris R Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Location: Baltimore, MD USA Posts: 1,151	Don't confuse gov't paranoia with conspiracy. The gov't has said they don't want to release the black box because it contains "evidence" that might be used in upcoming trials. The gov't often doesn't like to release stuff - in this case - it is most likely not due to any conspiracy - as they WILL release it after any trials. The gov't often does stuff like this - and it just makes people more suspicious. I did FOIA requests with the CIA on the JFK assassignation for school. They responded to all of them - and I found most of the documents they had originally classified and now declassified - were just newspaper articles and totlally innocent documents that had a name or two that should have just been blacked out. No evidence of a conspiracy - just a gov't agency that doesn't like to give out info. Don't confuse gov't STUPIDITY with gov't CONSPIRACY. They look the same a lot of them time - but they are different. You simply can not hide the type of conspiracy you are suggesting.

09-15-2002, 12:04 AM	#73
Rutopls Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 199	I love how everyone wants to know why the govt didnt make split second decisions. Govt agency and the military are huge institutions and have issues with interoffice communications. They are also loathe to break chain of command and while for the military there is usually someone who can make some kind of decision there isnt always a civilian counterpart willing to do so. Also there has never been a precedent for this massive of a scale. Civilian aircraft would be tracked but for the most part are not coordinated by the military from what I have been reading. When they need airspace they relay it to civilian controllers who clear the civilian aircraft out of the way. I am suprised you even think a plane hit the Pentagon, I thought the favorite conspiracy theory was that it was a truck bomb?