Nude photo emerges of 'High School Musical' star - GoFuckYourself.com

Zebra · 09-07-2007, 09:36 AM

OK, who has the goods?

http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/TV/0....ap/index.html

The Duck · 09-07-2007, 09:40 AM

Sig spotty

stev0 · 09-07-2007, 09:41 AM

http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/20...ens-naked.html

Enzyme · 09-07-2007, 09:43 AM

Apparently I can't post the link to the site because I don't have 30 posts.

It is located at

Quote:

websugarDOTcom/2007/09/07/vanessa-hudgens-naked.html

GooSearch · 09-07-2007, 09:43 AM

http://restricteddomain.com/2007/09/...musical-naked/

i guess there is a bunch of them out there

RawAlex · 09-07-2007, 09:47 AM

Interesting question for all those posting these things... how old is she now? How old was she then? She isn't even 19 at this point (december) so unless that picture was taken in the last 6 months, it is likely CP.

Dollarmansteve · 09-07-2007, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

Interesting question for all those posting these things... how old is she now? How old was she then? She isn't even 19 at this point (december) so unless that picture was taken in the last 6 months, it is likely CP.

unlikely. How long have you had your interweb police badge?

Enzyme · 09-07-2007, 09:51 AM

She's 18.

Brad · 09-07-2007, 09:52 AM

Seen it, sucks to be here. what a dumb ass she is for admitting that it was her in the picture.

RawAlex · 09-07-2007, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve

unlikely. How long have you had your interweb police badge?

How long have you been an asshole?

The question is there: new 2257 rules. Everyone is out there posting a nude picture of a girl who is just barely 18 now, and the picture was taken at some point in the past. Does anyone have any proof of age? model release? Date of production? With the new 2257 rules, it is all needed to support the image.

Brother Bilo · 09-07-2007, 09:53 AM

It's good for her. She's too hot for Disney channel anyways, not she'll be able to get her big girl on and start making real movies.

pornguy · 09-07-2007, 09:53 AM

Shes pretty cute.

Who is she?

selena · 09-07-2007, 09:55 AM

Damnit, I was hoping they were pics of the male lead in that movie.

BradM · 09-07-2007, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

How long have you been an asshole?

The question is there: new 2257 rules. Everyone is out there posting a nude picture of a girl who is just barely 18 now, and the picture was taken at some point in the past. Does anyone have any proof of age? model release? Date of production? With the new 2257 rules, it is all needed to support the image.

It's on 100,000 blogs now. Do you really think anyone cares?

jimthefiend · 09-07-2007, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

The question is there: new 2257 rules. Everyone is out there posting a nude picture of a girl who is just barely 18 now, and the picture was taken at some point in the past. Does anyone have any proof of age? model release? Date of production? With the new 2257 rules, it is all needed to support the image.

As much as I hate to, I am forced to agree with you on that. Imma laugh my ass off if she was 17 in that pic.

People who make $ off that kind of celeb shit are only a cunt hair less scummy than cp people imho anyway. I've always said that.

RawAlex · 09-07-2007, 09:59 AM

BradM, it's okay, all the Juggcash content is on the torrents, so I guess it's okay to steal.

Dollarmansteve · 09-07-2007, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

How long have you been an asshole?

The question is there: new 2257 rules. Everyone is out there posting a nude picture of a girl who is just barely 18 now, and the picture was taken at some point in the past. Does anyone have any proof of age? model release? Date of production? With the new 2257 rules, it is all needed to support the image.

Unless you work for the FBI, why do you care about other people's potential 2257 problems?

jimthefiend · 09-07-2007, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve

Unless you work for the FBI, why do you care about other people's potential 2257 problems?

Dude come on.

"Other peoples problems (sic)" are the reason we're slowly being legislated out of existence. We need MORE people minding each others business.

KimJI · 09-07-2007, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve

Unless you work for the FBI, why do you care about other people's potential 2257 problems?

Maybe because we are the only one that can keep this industry clean. And following the 2257 rules are one of the things that have to be done unless we want to be hit with something harder.

Dollarmansteve · 09-07-2007, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

Dude come on.

"Other peoples problems (sic)" are the reason we're slowly being legislated out of existence. We need MORE people minding each others business.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't 2257 apply to 'sexually explicit' content? How would this image be considered sexually explicit? A naked body is explicit? Is there a hidden dildo I'm not seeing?

Dollarmansteve · 09-07-2007, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KimJI

Maybe because we are the only one that can keep this industry clean. And following the 2257 rules are one of the things that have to be done unless we want to be hit with something harder.

I agree with what you're saying, but I think the discussion in misplaced with regards to this particular image.

jimthefiend · 09-07-2007, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't 2257 apply to 'sexually explicit' content? How would this image be considered sexually explicit? A naked body is explicit? Is there a hidden dildo I'm not seeing?

**sigh**

Dollarmansteve · 09-07-2007, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

**sigh**

double **sigh** . see my post above.

jimthefiend · 09-07-2007, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve

double **sigh** . see my post above.

How long have you been in this fucking industry again?

(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), ?sexually explicit conduct? means actual or simulated?
(i) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
(ii) bestiality;
(iii) masturbation;
(iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(v) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

WarChild · 09-07-2007, 10:19 AM

Does Raw Alex +EVER+ shut up or is it just a constant storm of tears from that guy?

Dollarmansteve · 09-07-2007, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

How long have you been in this fucking industry again?

(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), ?sexually explicit conduct? means actual or simulated?
(i) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
(ii) bestiality;
(iii) masturbation;
(iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(v) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

lascivious

1. inclined to lustfulness; wanton; lewd: a lascivious, girl-chasing old man.
2. arousing sexual desire: lascivious photographs.
3. indicating sexual interest or expressive of lust or lewdness: a lascivious gesture.

Debatable. Anyway - like I said above, I think this is a misplaced discussion. Everytime Lindsay Lohan flashes her tits or hoo-ha there's gonna be 2257 docs? please.

Let's police our industry - the porn industry - and not every single nude celebrity image in the internet.

jimthefiend · 09-07-2007, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

Does Raw Alex +EVER+ shut up or is it just a constant storm of tears from that guy?

I fucking LOATHE Alex, but he brought up a valid point.

KimJI · 09-07-2007, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve

I agree with what you're saying, but I think the discussion in misplaced with regards to this particular image.

I don't think so. If it was up to me, people that post other peoples nude pictures online should be prosecuted for posting content with no license and slander.

Imagine what it does to a 18 year old girl, to have her nude pictures distributed worldwide. Why is that OK? Just because she is a star, why do people think its OK to try and ruin her like this?

If she was a porn star it could be defended, but this is a 18 year old girl that preform on the Disney Channel. This is just plain WRONG.

jimthefiend · 09-07-2007, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve

lascivious

Debatable. Anyway - like I said above, I think this is a misplaced discussion. Everytime Lindsay Lohan flashes her tits or hoo-ha there's gonna be 2257 docs? please.

You're preaching to the choir, I'm just making the point. And yes, if you follow the letter of the law: If Lohan does it deliberately with the intent to arouse or gain attention of a sexual nature from it, anyone who hosts the image needs docs.

It's that simple man.

Dollarmansteve · 09-07-2007, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

You're preaching to the choir, I'm just making the point. And yes, if you follow the letter of the law: If Lohan does it deliberately with the intent to arouse or gain attention of a sexual nature from it, anyone who hosts the image needs docs.

It's that simple man.

The letter of the law is only valid in so much as it is enforced. If the FBI starts enforcing 2257 on paparazzi photos and bloggers, then I would say that the FBI has some fucked up priorities

I'll re-iterate my statement that a 2257 discussion in this thread, about this photo, is misplaced and a waste of time and energy. We all know RawAlex just likes to stick his nose in and make know-it-all, internet-police type comments whenever he can.

jimthefiend · 09-07-2007, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve

We all know RawAlex just likes to stick his nose in and make know-it-all, internet-police type comments whenever he can.

I agree with you on that at any rate.

jimthefiend · 09-07-2007, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KimJI

If she was a porn star it could be defended, but this is a 18 year old girl that preform on the Disney Channel. This is just plain WRONG.

Exactly. Whoever leaked that needs to be shot.

JP-pornshooter · 09-07-2007, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GooSearch

http://restricteddomain.com/2007/09/...musical-naked/

i guess there is a bunch of them out there

nice.. looks like she took it herself, i wonder why ? she has a little bush going on, i wonder if that is making a come back amongst the young ones..
quality looks like phone camera..and it is def not sexual explicit so no worry on 2257.

jimthefiend · 09-07-2007, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter

and it is def not sexual explicit so no worry on 2257.

And this from a producer.

Jesus Christ.

JP-pornshooter · 09-07-2007, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KimJI

I don't think so. If it was up to me, people that post other peoples nude pictures online should be prosecuted for posting content with no license and slander.

Imagine what it does to a 18 year old girl, to have her nude pictures distributed worldwide. Why is that OK? Just because she is a star, why do people think its OK to try and ruin her like this?

If she was a porn star it could be defended, but this is a 18 year old girl that preform on the Disney Channel. This is just plain WRONG.

lesson learned = do not take any nude pics, especially if you are a cute 18 yo star of the biggest teenage movie in recent years.

MaDalton · 09-07-2007, 10:36 AM

i was in switzerland last weekend, 16 year old prostitutes are legal there. and now?

WarChild · 09-07-2007, 10:39 AM

It's not CP automatically because there's nudity. For example, I believe the girl in American Beauty is underage, and she's shown half naked, but that isn't CP.

As for 2257, maybe the poster is from somewhere outside your great union and simply doesn't give a fuck about your 2257 laws? Could happen, you know.

BradM · 09-07-2007, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

BradM, it's okay, all the Juggcash content is on the torrents, so I guess it's okay to steal.

Why would I care if juggcash is all over torrents? That's their responsibility.

Plus they have good content, saves me from buying a membership.

Donfoolio · 09-07-2007, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

Dude come on.

"Other peoples problems (sic)" are the reason we're slowly being legislated out of existence. We need MORE people minding each others business.

I totally agree here. I don't want to and never will mind others business, but it is shit like this that will only hurt us all in the long run, and honestly that slag is not even hot imo

WarChild · 09-07-2007, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

You're preaching to the choir, I'm just making the point. And yes, if you follow the letter of the law: If Lohan does it deliberately with the intent to arouse or gain attention of a sexual nature from it, anyone who hosts the image needs docs.

It's that simple man.

Anyone in America, that is.

KimJI · 09-07-2007, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter

lesson learned = do not take any nude pics, especially if you are a cute 18 yo star of the biggest teenage movie in recent years.

A 18 year old girl that takes pictures of herself - maybe to send to her boyfriend or something - do not under any circumstances need "to learn a lesson". I cant believe any sane mind can think like that. Your point of view disgusts me.

jimthefiend · 09-07-2007, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donfoolio

I totally agree here. I don't want to and never will mind others business, but it is shit like this that will only hurt us all in the long run, and honestly that slag is not even hot imo

Only people who find that sexy, are well... You know.

solomonYBM · 09-07-2007, 10:48 AM

too bad so sad...
this is why you dont let your boyfriend film you at a young age

FelixFlow · 09-07-2007, 10:57 AM

she needs to shave her snatch!!!

MrPinks · 09-07-2007, 10:57 AM

Exactly! A lot of people need to get their heads out of the sand when it comes to NEW 2257 regulations and the Adam Walsh Act. If a photo even displays "sexual coyness" you are required to have docs on hand. Either a lot of newbs out there or a lot of ignorant webmasters. The law has changed over the last few months.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

And this from a producer.

Jesus Christ.

Ravage · 09-07-2007, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

Exactly. Whoever leaked that needs to be shot.

Then the one you need to shoot is most likely the one posing in the picture. You honestly think someone else leaked it other than people in her camp? I mean, why did they immediately confirm its her? They could have very easily said its a great fake and the media would most likely have bought that.

This is perfect publicity for her and she gets out of her exclusive Disney contract and can work on other things. Its a risky move, no doubt, but she's young, cute and talented, so it can work in her favor.

The question of her age is an interesting one; and I doubt anyone will date the photo to protect the photographer and her. Being that its confirmed its her, and she's well known in mainstream, I doubt the FBI is going to go after 2257 on it.

TubeTitans_SusieQ · 09-07-2007, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adult Lounge - Brad

Seen it, sucks to be here. what a dumb ass she is for admitting that it was her in the picture.

I totally agree, its not like there aren't many other girls that don't look similar to her....

KimJI · 09-07-2007, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platinum ChrisM

I mean, why did they immediately confirm its her? .

The truth is they didnt make any comment on it (when asked) for the first 24 hours, because they needed/wanted to verify the authenticity.

Brother Bilo · 09-07-2007, 11:13 AM

Jesus, everyone flipping out of the 2257 here. Simma down now!!! She's 18 and probably has been for a while. That looks like it was taken with a cell camera, most likely by the dude that's plowing her, which means she's probably living on her own, or staying with him. Either way, what kind of parent lets a 17 year old live alone or with a guy?

Just take it for what it is, a good looking girl that ass out.

Ravage · 09-07-2007, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KimJI

The truth is they didnt make any comment on it (when asked) for the first 24 hours, because they needed/wanted to verify the authenticity.

Ahh, the report I heard was they said they confirmed it was her when contacted. Love how the same story never correlates amongst all the news reports

09-07-2007, 09:36 AM	#1
Zebra Banned from Kimmy's couch Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Down at Fraggle Rock Posts: 5,091	Nude photo emerges of 'High School Musical' star OK, who has the goods? http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/TV/0....ap/index.html __________________ Old School

09-07-2007, 09:40 AM	#2
The Duck Adult Content Provider Industry Role: Join Date: May 2005 Location: Europe Posts: 18,243	Sig spotty __________________ Skype Horusmaia ICQ 41555245 Email [email protected]

09-07-2007, 09:43 AM	#5
GooSearch Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: FLA Posts: 2,538	http://restricteddomain.com/2007/09/...musical-naked/ i guess there is a bunch of them out there __________________ GooSearch Real Text Ads Without The Drama Coming Back Bigger and Better Then Ever

09-07-2007, 09:52 AM	#9
Brad Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Toronto Posts: 2,510	Seen it, sucks to be here. what a dumb ass she is for admitting that it was her in the picture. __________________ Affiliate Manager/Media Buyer ICQ 376 978 529 Skype: bradleyjwscott [email protected]

09-07-2007, 09:53 AM	#11
Brother Bilo Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: I live in cage Posts: 4,193	It's good for her. She's too hot for Disney channel anyways, not she'll be able to get her big girl on and start making real movies. __________________

09-07-2007, 09:41 AM	#3
stev0 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Calgary, Alberta Posts: 6,801	http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/20...ens-naked.html

09-07-2007, 09:47 AM	#6
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	Interesting question for all those posting these things... how old is she now? How old was she then? She isn't even 19 at this point (december) so unless that picture was taken in the last 6 months, it is likely CP.

09-07-2007, 09:51 AM	#8
Enzyme Registered User Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 7	She's 18.

09-07-2007, 09:53 AM	#12
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	Shes pretty cute. Who is she? __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

09-07-2007, 09:55 AM	#13
selena Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: On The Edge Posts: 7,994	Damnit, I was hoping they were pics of the male lead in that movie. __________________ ~ Doer of Things at MetArtMoney Where Flawless Beauty Meets Art ~The MetArt Network ~ selena.delgado9

09-07-2007, 09:59 AM	#16
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	BradM, it's okay, all the Juggcash content is on the torrents, so I guess it's okay to steal.

09-07-2007, 10:19 AM	#25
WarChild Let slip the dogs of war. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bermuda Posts: 17,263	Does Raw Alex +EVER+ shut up or is it just a constant storm of tears from that guy? __________________ .

09-07-2007, 10:36 AM	#36
MaDalton I am Amazing Content! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 39,828	i was in switzerland last weekend, 16 year old prostitutes are legal there. and now? __________________ AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003 Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you! Skype: madalton02826 - Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

09-07-2007, 10:39 AM	#37
WarChild Let slip the dogs of war. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bermuda Posts: 17,263	It's not CP automatically because there's nudity. For example, I believe the girl in American Beauty is underage, and she's shown half naked, but that isn't CP. As for 2257, maybe the poster is from somewhere outside your great union and simply doesn't give a fuck about your 2257 laws? Could happen, you know. __________________ .

09-07-2007, 10:48 AM	#43
solomonYBM Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Toronto Posts: 145	too bad so sad... this is why you dont let your boyfriend film you at a young age __________________ High Volume Video Encoding \| Prepaid Adult Website Access \| Porn Photo Comics

09-07-2007, 10:57 AM	#44
FelixFlow Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,779	she needs to shave her snatch!!! __________________ ICQ: 643 339 687

09-07-2007, 11:13 AM	#49
Brother Bilo Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: I live in cage Posts: 4,193	Jesus, everyone flipping out of the 2257 here. Simma down now!!! She's 18 and probably has been for a while. That looks like it was taken with a cell camera, most likely by the dude that's plowing her, which means she's probably living on her own, or staying with him. Either way, what kind of parent lets a 17 year old live alone or with a guy? Just take it for what it is, a good looking girl that ass out. __________________