probably lots of fags they keep it under cover though :)

Have you ever looked at her resume?

That's it for me. I'd like to keep my money, thank you. I worked hard for it.

Exactly.

Obama is proof that US politics is often style over substance. He is a nice enough guy, but someone seriously lacking in skills and experience to get the job done. He hasn't even done middle management yet (run a congressional committee) and yet he thinks he can run the country.

The only reason? The idiots running the US now are fucking it up so bad that a constipated monkey throwing darts at a dartboard could make better decisions. Compared to Bush, the tree in my front lawn looks qualified.

Obama is a good guy, and potentially great VP material. But he isn't up for the big job yet. Get in as the VP, get 8 years experience, and then run by yourself.

Any idea who she defeated to become Governor??

Piyush Jindal - son of Indian immigrants, Amar and Raj Jindal. He was a Hindu before being converted to Catholicism as a teenager. He is "brown". How hard do you think it was to beat him? Of course, he has since been voted into congress and is running for Governor again. Not sure what will happen, but don't be so shocked that the "brown Indian Hindu" was beat by a woman in 2003.

Which is exactly why we are not likely to be voting in another female for a long time.

nope, and how was it she got that resume?

nope, and how was it she got that resume? maybe it's about promoting to your level of incompetents. you've heard about that right. the best way to get rid of somebody is kick them up the ladder.

either way the truth is she's a black woman and she's gonna get jobs on that merit in America of the 20 years.

look how well bush did with his 'LATIN' attorney general. or do think that was all about the LATIN's guy experiences too?

from what I've heard though, seems they like him down here now. His tv commercials creep me out though. He's probably going to replace her, no?

People are still supporting Bill Jefferson with yard signs not far from where I live though, so anything is possible in these parts. :1orglaugh

I am from Los Angeles, so living in Louisiana for me is like being in some awesome, twisted reality show.

I think he is growing on people. At this point I think David Duke would beat her. (LOL...mentioning David Duke reminds me of seeing his black supporters at a rally once)

Crazy shit ain't it?? We are famous for our crooked as fuck politicians.

Welcome to Redneckland.:thumbsup

You're letting dislike cloud your judgement :2 cents:

Look up her damn resume, and it should be entirely obvious that she didn't get that resume by being incompetent.

If in Louisiana vote T Lee Horne. Libertarian or nothing.

http://governor.ws/

Too many old people out there for a woman or black guy to get in. They might get a lot of press but when it comes time to vote, they will lose most of middle america. If the dems don't pick someone like edwards, they don't stand a chance.

WARNING: SERIOUS DISCUSSION . . . . Obama
He is on the Daily Show
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
do you ever read what you write?
the Daily Show??????????
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
the Comedy Channel should give you your own show.
you have talent.
:1orglaugh

I liked the part where they talked about Hilary's experience level as she has been a senator for only a few more years than Obama.

None?

Obviously not

I remember a few months ago when I first became aware of him. I thought, "this guy has some potential on down the road. Give him 8 years."

I was amazed that he suddenly became a front-runner.

Sad, because it just means a Republican will win if he gets the nod. :2 cents:

I think it had more to do with the fact that they had already worked together in TX (as I recall).

I can only imagine.

You ever see the show? You think just because it is the Daily Show they can't have a serious discussion?

No kidding. He has a double whammy against him. Being black and having a name like "Obama" probably cost him half the country already. Sad but true.

Yes I know that. WTF does that have to do with my points on Obama in teh general election? NONTHING. So why be an ass?

Once again do you have a point?

Whites still outnumber blacks in the south last time I checked. As I said Edwards/Richardson. Richardson can bring in the hispanic vote. Last time I checked there are more hispanics than blacks.

more complete lack of interest. just commenting.

like it or not i would put my money on this lineup in the whitehouse:

hillary (president) because folks really want Bill back in the big house
obama (vp)

or long shot edwards as vp

Unfortunately that probably is true, but that also speaks volumes about the intelligence of the US population.

When you say a person only got her job through being a black woman, it's probably a good idea to know about her qualifications :2 cents:

independent thinker
 

What are you then?

First you claim to know how every "black" person in this country is going to vote.

Then you claim to know how every Latino is going vote in this country.

And, presume to know how every "white" is going to vote in this country.

I guess you think you speak for everyone.

From the board or from the country? He claims to be from California, but judging by his English skills he must be an illegal immigrant. :winkwink:

Allow me to play Devils advocate. Our current president pretty mush spent most of his young life chasing pussy and getting drunk/high (not that there is anything wrong with that). He then tried to go into business and even with big money backing from his family and their friends he failed. So he ran for governor of Texas and won. Under Bush Texas ranked last in environmental quality and in the bottom five in strength of economy and quality of education. So the only elected position he has ever had he failed at and that didn't stop him from getting elected twice.

A lack of experience can be an asset if played correctly. A Ross Perot once famously said when asked during a debate about his experience, "You are right, I don't have any experience in how to run up a 4 trillion dollar debt."

If he had been in the senate for years and years he could have a voting record (like Kerry) that he had to constantly defend. Without one he will have little to question in his past. Also, he connects with the younger voters. He does this in the same way Bill Clinton did it during his first campaign and those young voters put him in the white house.

I'm not saying he will win or that he would be a good president, but he can win and his lack of experience is not as big of a deal as a lot of people think. Right now it is the only dirt they have on him so they are flinging it.

For the record I see I the election playing out like this:

Hilary gets the nod from the democrats and Rudy gets the nod from the republicans and in a very close election Rudy pulls out the win.

Bet $100?

Dummy
 

How stupid are you? Real stupid would be my guess

I think its too early on both sides to pick someone.There are a bunch hiding in the wings who may run. Perot actually had a chance if he hadnt pulled out and then came back in. The one I would like to see run is Bloomberg, he can throw 500 mil of his own to run so he will owe no one if he went in. That type of president can create real change. Also he is a jew so none of the evangelical bullshit.Ron Paul is interesting but there is no way he is going to be the Republicans choice.

Oh man, you're really fucking reaching on this one.

His name is Bobby Jindal, and his popularity in this state is insane.
To say he lost because of his ethnicity is ridiculous.
He's the congressman for a lilly white affluent district and ran for reelection unopposed.

Blanco won, barely, but it had nothing to do with Jindal's ethnicity.

You said "obama is from illionois which always votes democrat, so he brings nothing to the table"
I was pointing out that Hillary's geography doesn't bring any new states to the table either.


Yes but you were too dumb to see it so I'll type really slow this time.
More black people will register to vote and then vote for Obama on election day than would otherwise vote in this election.
Therefore Obama will receive more votes overall by virtue of MATH!


Whites do outnumber the blacks in the south, but most of the white voters in the south are evangelicals who are going to have nobody to vote for if someone like Rudy gets nominated.
In the meantime the black and young turnout in the south will be huge and you'll see some upsets in those states.

Care to elaborate . . . . idiot?

no joke. The guy is a tool just like everyone else. Want the troops home and your freedoms back there is only one choice. Ron Paul.

That is not going to work in his favor. Just ask Gore.



Very presumptuous. And racist.

He still has time to change skin color.

I just hope the dumb ass people who voted for bush TWICE finally see their mistake and dont vote for such a fuckup again. But i doubt it, if they voted twice for that sack of shit they're just retarded. Make the right decision this time for a fucking change and we all benefit from it... yes it will be fucking hard to clean up the mess bush left behind, but i bet with a non-conservative the economy will finally become better... although ive kinda lost hope for the dollar.

They vote.

I know that 92% of blacks voted for Keyy and Gore. So I'm prety sure the Dem nominee will get significantly more votes than the GOP candidate.

Latino typically vote Dem. Typical republican caniddate can expect 20-25% of hispanic vote. Bush for whatever reason got 35-40%. Last time I checked he's not running again.

America isn't ready for a woman or black president. Sad but true.

I just watched the same interview.

I think he was arguing the point of "experience," and how it factors into people's expectations.... I don' t think he was saying anything about his future cabinet at all... experienced or unexperienced.

I think his point was simply that when people talk about experience, they don't really care about whether or not the person has "experience"... but rather want to know how sound the person's judgement may be.

And he used Rumsfield and Cheney to illustrate that even though they had a bunch of experience, their judgement may not have been as sound as the country needed it to be.

He was trying to make the point that even though he doesn't have the experience that doesn't mean he doesn't have the qualification for the job... which seems to be a mainstay point in the press.

As far as who his future cabinet could be... I figure that's another matter entirely.

easy, count to ten, take a deep breath and lay off the big ass font.
I dont even know what you try to say here, its jibberish