Impeach Bush & Cheney ?

[Donkey Punch]

Is it going to happen?

Are you for it ? I am.

Watch Keith Olbermann:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=NN-eGOtBGbg

Pretty moving commentary.

[stickyfingerz]

Olberfag is an idiot.

[TheLegacy]

no one is going to get impeached - and I will be pretty surprised if the republicans don't win or loose by a slim margin next election.

[ContentSHOOTER]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Olberfag is an idiot.

No your the IDIOT

[budz]

I vote impeach them ;)

[RobertD]

Yes, today.

[buzzy]

the whole administration should be hung, shot at and fed to a pack of wolves

[headless ghost]

is this the
Ancient History class?
seems like it.

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by TheLegacy

no one is going to get impeached - and I will be pretty surprised if the republicans don't win or loose by a slim margin next election.

Fred Thompson 2008!

[_Richard_]

good for him.. i'm glad someone said it

[pocketkangaroo]

Squishypimp!

[BoyAlley]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Fred Thompson 2008!

You have got to be fucking kidding me?

[spanky part 2]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Fred Thompson 2008!

In your dreams, and then you wake up with stickyfingerz

[who]

I want a gay president.

[spanky part 2]

Way to late for that. Not enough time left, but they can still be tried for crimes against this country and won't be able to use executive privilege once they are out of office. Karma is a fucking bitch and they will get theirs in the end for what they have done to this country.

[budz]

Originally Posted by spanky part 2

Way to late for that. Not enough time left, but they can still be tried for crimes against this country and won't be able to use executive privilege once they are out of office. Karma is a fucking bitch and they will get theirs in the end for what they have done to this country.

One can only hope

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by who

I want a gay president.

I want a female president.

[baddog]

Originally Posted by ContentSHOOTER

No your the IDIOT

I love irony. Looks like you're the idiot here.

[baddog]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

I want a female president.

So vote one in. It isn't going to happen here.

[headless ghost]

Clinton was impeached.
didn't mean shit.
didn't do shit.
cost the country a lot of money.
a few writers wrote books about it a made big money.
whats your point?
impeachment does not remove a president from office.

[ContentSHOOTER]

Originally Posted by baddog

I love irony. Looks like you're the idiot here.

Fuck off dipshit

[billybathgate]

Originally Posted by who

I want a gay president.

[budz]

Originally Posted by headless ghost

Clinton was impeached.
didn't mean shit.
didn't do shit.
cost the country a lot of money.
a few writers wrote books about it a made big money.
whats your point?
impeachment does not remove a president from office.

My point is charge him with the crimes that he's committed..

that's why I'd like to see him impeached

[StuartD]

Only in the US can you have a guy give speech after speech about "freedom this" and "freedom that" while systematically removing those freedoms at the same time... and STILL have people think he's a great president.

[budz]

Impeachment is the process by which a legislative body formally levels charges against a high official of government. Impeachment does not necessarily mean removal from office; it comprises only a formal statement of charges, akin to an indictment in criminal law, and thus is only the first step towards possible removal. Once an individual is impeached, he or she must then face the possibility of conviction via legislative vote, which then entails the removal of the individual from office.

Source:
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Aimpeachment

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by BoyAlley

You have got to be fucking kidding me?

Originally Posted by spanky part 2

In your dreams, and then you wake up with stickyfingerz

Oh it will happen, and lefty nutjobs will cry just like they did in 2004. Like real tears. Flowing down their cheeks.

Like Barbie here.




I had a whole montage of them at one point. Ill have to hunt for that.

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by StuartD

Only in the US can you have a guy give speech after speech about "freedom this" and "freedom that" while systematically removing those freedoms at the same time... and STILL have people think he's a great president.

Love ya Stu, but I cant think of a single thing I cant do now that I could do prior to 2000.

[StuartD]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Love ya Stu, but I cant think of a single thing I cant do now that I could do prior to 2000.

Can you wear an anti-Bush shirt to one of his appearances without fear of being removed, or even arrested? Can you check out any book you want in any library without fear of being flagged? Can you talk on any phone and be 100% certain that there's no one listening in? Can you bring your lighter, nail clippers and bottle of water onto any plane?

These are some of the smaller ones. Things have changed.

[Barefootsies]

That would be festive.

[directfiesta]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Oh it will happen, and lefty nutjobs will cry just like they did in 2004. Like real tears. Flowing down their cheeks.

Like Barbie here.




I had a whole montage of them at one point. Ill have to hunt for that.

... Same valued predictions as the one about " your " ( GOP ) win for the congress in 2006 ....

Oups, forgot ... The republicans lost those on purpose ( according to Sticky ...)

[D]

Originally Posted by headless ghost

Clinton was impeached.
didn't mean shit.
didn't do shit.
cost the country a lot of money.
a few writers wrote books about it a made big money.
whats your point?
impeachment does not remove a president from office.

So that it's understood...

Clinton wasn't removed from office because he was acquitted of the charges by the Senate.

"Impeachment" is just the formal addressing of charges... kinda like an "Indictment" for us normal folk. There still has to be a trial - which, as outlined by the Constitution, the Senate conducts after the Impeachment is issued by the House.

If found guilty by the Senate, the President would then be removed from office. To date, no president has been removed from office by Senatorial trial.

[baddog]

Originally Posted by StuartD

Can you bring your lighter, nail clippers and bottle of water onto any plane?

Can you in Canada? BTW, yes, I can bring water, coffee or any other beverage I purchase at the airport on-board.

[dlzn]

i wish!!!

[StuartD]

Originally Posted by baddog

Can you in Canada? BTW, yes, I can bring water, coffee or any other beverage I purchase at the airport on-board.

Yup, brought one of those green flame lighters on a plane not too long ago and I always have nail clippers with me.
Care to address the other points?

[baddog]

Originally Posted by StuartD

Yup, brought one of those green flame lighters on a plane not too long ago and I always have nail clippers with me.
Care to address the other points?

You are merely making assumptions about the others, so no.

BTW, I brought a Bic lighter on a plane not too long ago, and I have had friends report the same thing.

As I have never attempted to carry nail clippers on board, I can't say with any certainty.

[pocketkangaroo]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Fred Thompson 2008!

I'm really curious why you like him. I'm not being sarcastic either, just curious. When I look at his record, outside of being a Senator, he's primarily been a lobbyist for big business. So have many of his family members.

He's pro-life, anti-gay, anti-science, anti-judicial branch. He's really gravitated toward the evangelicals and a prominent one has even came out and said that his wife would be a champion for cracking down on pornography.

I like him on fiscal issues though, which is about it. I'm just curious why you'd risk your business over supporting someone the blogs conservative blogs think is cool? I put my family before some blogs.

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

I'm really curious why you like him. I'm not being sarcastic either, just curious. When I look at his record, outside of being a Senator, he's primarily been a lobbyist for big business. So have many of his family members.

He's pro-life, anti-gay, anti-science, anti-judicial branch. He's really gravitated toward the evangelicals and a prominent one has even came out and said that his wife would be a champion for cracking down on pornography.

I like him on fiscal issues though, which is about it. I'm just curious why you'd risk your business over supporting someone the blogs conservative blogs think is cool? I put my family before some blogs.

Ive wanted him to run since 2000 or so. He isnt Anti gay, he is just not pro gay marriage. He is a straight shooter. Which one do you think would go after porn more, Al Gores wife, or Fred Thompsons? Most of the fluff about conservatives going after porn is just that fluff. He is anti tax, and for smaller government. Evangelicals support him, that doesnt mean he is going to do whatever they like. Im pro life so Im in support of that. He isnt anti science, he is pro "facts" not bs paid for by grants, to perpetuate more grants. The judicial branch isnt supposed to make laws. That is what he is against there. Straight shooter. Strong backbone, strong on defense, strong on low taxes.

He'll win it I have no doubt.

[Z]

I own www.ImpeachGeorgeW.com

Who wants to cash in on the craziness? Hit me up with a reasonable offer and it's yours.

[directfiesta]

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

I'm just curious why you'd risk your business over supporting someone the blogs conservative ...

No risk ... can't lose his business ....

[pocketkangaroo]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Love ya Stu, but I cant think of a single thing I cant do now that I could do prior to 2000.

Protest in public, challenge your detention, not be charged with a crime that isn't even a law yet, take a picture of a flag draped coffin in Iraq, show support or non-support for a candidate if you're a business or non-profit organization, have your phone records and calls private, have your library records private, have your e-mails private, be told about a search, be searched without a warrant, distribute certain types of consensual pornography, etc.

Just because it doesn't effect you, doesn't mean you haven't lost rights.

[Subtle]

Lo! The majority votes shall win!

[StuartD]

Originally Posted by Subtle

Lo! The majority votes shall win!

I think Bush has already proven that isn't true.

[jennycards]

America has only gay presidents. Dont impeach them - fuck them!

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

Protest in public, challenge your detention, not be charged with a crime that isn't even a law yet, take a picture of a flag draped coffin in Iraq, show support or non-support for a candidate if you're a business or non-profit organization, have your phone records and calls private, have your library records private, have your e-mails private, be told about a search, be searched without a warrant, distribute certain types of consensual pornography, etc.

Just because it doesn't effect you, doesn't mean you haven't lost rights.

Hmm I think you are confused on many of those issues. Most were from before Bush, or are not true.

[ThunderBalls]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Hmm I think you are confused on many of those issues. Most were from before Bush, or are not true.

Holy Christ you have got to be the dumbest fuck I've seen on here.

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by ThunderBalls

Holy Christ you have got to be the dumbest fuck I've seen on here.

Well then the burden of proof falls on you then. Prove Bush is responsible for each of those items...

[pocketkangaroo]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Ive wanted him to run since 2000 or so. He isnt Anti gay, he is just not pro gay marriage. He is a straight shooter. Which one do you think would go after porn more, Al Gores wife, or Fred Thompsons? Most of the fluff about conservatives going after porn is just that fluff. He is anti tax, and for smaller government. Evangelicals support him, that doesnt mean he is going to do whatever they like. Im pro life so Im in support of that. He isnt anti science, he is pro "facts" not bs paid for by grants, to perpetuate more grants. The judicial branch isnt supposed to make laws. That is what he is against there. Straight shooter. Strong backbone, strong on defense, strong on low taxes.

He'll win it I have no doubt.

Al Gore isn't running from what I've seen (especially since his kid just got busted). When he was VP, obscenity prosecutions were at a low point. Republicans have had a history of going after obscenity cases much more strongly then Democrats. That is fact, not fluff.

For a guy who is so "small government", he wants the government to ban our ability to buy prescription drugs from other countries, ban how much we can donate to a candidate, ban our ability to speak out against a candidate, pumping more money into medicare, banning our ability to sue insurance companies, not allow us to opt out of social security, wants to add internet taxes, fund abstinence education from the government, limiting what self-employed people can deduct for health care, voted against reducing the marriage penalty, and increase spending on drug control.

As for science, he still doesn't believe what the majority of scientists believe on warming, he is against types of stem cell research, and against a separation of church and state in school.

I can understand the view of not having the judicial branch make laws(although if they didn't, blacks would be slaves and drinking out of different water fountains, women wouldn't be voting, different races couldn't marry, our country would end at the Mississippi, you could be convicted of getting a blowjob in your bedroom, wouldn't be able to buy contraceptives if married, have to learn the Bible in science class, no one would have a right to a lawyer, police would have limitless ways of interogation, death penalty would be mandatory, and so on). When I meant he was anti-justice system, I was also referring to the fact he doesn't support the decisions made by them in enforcing the laws. He also doesn't believe we should be allowed to file lawsuits against big companies.

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

Al Gore isn't running from what I've seen (especially since his kid just got busted). When he was VP, obscenity prosecutions were at a low point. Republicans have had a history of going after obscenity cases much more strongly then Democrats. That is fact, not fluff.

For a guy who is so "small government", he wants the government to ban our ability to buy prescription drugs from other countries, ban how much we can donate to a candidate, ban our ability to speak out against a candidate, pumping more money into medicare, banning our ability to sue insurance companies, not allow us to opt out of social security, wants to add internet taxes, fund abstinence education from the government, limiting what self-employed people can deduct for health care, voted against reducing the marriage penalty, and increase spending on drug control.

As for science, he still doesn't believe what the majority of scientists believe on warming, he is against types of stem cell research, and against a separation of church and state in school.

I can understand the view of not having the judicial branch make laws(although if they didn't, blacks would be slaves and drinking out of different water fountains, women wouldn't be voting, different races couldn't marry, our country would end at the Mississippi, you could be convicted of getting a blowjob in your bedroom, wouldn't be able to buy contraceptives if married, have to learn the Bible in science class, no one would have a right to a lawyer, police would have limitless ways of interogation, death penalty would be mandatory, and so on). When I meant he was anti-justice system, I was also referring to the fact he doesn't support the decisions made by them in enforcing the laws. He also doesn't believe we should be allowed to file lawsuits against big companies.

I think you are reading a lot in there.






I as many others believe man made global warming is a crock of shit. Nothing wrong with stopping pollution, but it didnt cause any warming trends. As I said straight shooter. He'll win.

[pocketkangaroo]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Well then the burden of proof falls on you then. Prove Bush is responsible for each of those items...

Protest in public - Bush and the Secret Service created "free speech zones" for when he speaks. They allow him to move protesters miles away from where he is. There are pending lawsuits on this.

Challenge Detention - Just look up the Military Commissions Act of 2006.

Charged with a crime that wasn't a law at the time - Also see Military Commissions Act of 2006.

Flag Draped Coffins - Bush Administration has put a policy on the DOD not to release or allow any photos of the flag draped coffins. They have fought attempts to have them released under Freedom of Information Act.

Show Support/Non-Support for Candidate - McCain/Feingold Act

Phone/Library/Email/Search/Etc - See Patriot Act

Pornography - See huge increase in obscenity indictments.

[pocketkangaroo]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

I as many others believe man made global warming is a crock of shit. Nothing wrong with stopping pollution, but it didnt cause any warming trends. As I said straight shooter. He'll win.

I am basing my opinion on what the majority of scientists believe. I don't know what causes it, just saying I'd probably support what the scientists believe.