|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
06-20-2007, 08:44 AM
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,149
|
adult dating sites and new 2257 rules
As I interpret the Adam Walsh Act additions to 2257, it seems that adult dating sites will be hit by these new regs because of the new inclusion of ?lascivious exhibition of the genitals and pubic area?. If you view this passage conservatively, it seems that any nude pictures your members upload will be subject to the rule, and you will need to force your members to upload releases and copies of ID to publish them to the site. In looking around at some of the bigger adult dating sites out there, it seems as if each of them is approaching this subject a bit differently. Some (like the biggest) do not address the issue at all when it comes time to upload photos. Another large and more recent site has you put the name and address of the record holder if you upload nude photos.
In my eyes, it seems that the only way to truly comply is for the site owner to possess copies of the ID for any nude pictures, but most companies out there seem not to agree. Anyone from adult dating sites out there with thoughts on this? |
|
|
|
06-21-2007, 09:44 PM
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,149
|
any of you night lurkers want to weigh in?
|
|
|
|
|
06-21-2007, 10:10 PM
|
#3 |
|
boots are my religion
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Heart of europe
Posts: 21,765
|
why night - here has just started morning
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
06-21-2007, 10:25 PM
|
#4 |
|
Blow Me U Geeks
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maximum Security
Posts: 5,108
|
No wonder lars wants everyone to donate http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...&highlight=fsc
|
|
|
|
|
06-21-2007, 10:36 PM
|
#5 |
|
rockin tha trailerpark
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
|
seems to me it doesn't fall under financial gain (business) if its not used on geo-targeted landing pages etc.
how does yahoo deal with people uploading nude photos to their "adult profiles" as of right now?
__________________
__________ Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz) 
|
|
|
|
|
06-21-2007, 11:04 PM
|
#6 |
|
Crazy Aussie Bastard
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wherever I lay my hat, that's my home.
Posts: 16,787
|
__________________
Celebs Adult Who's Who ==> Ambush Interview ==> ICQ 293 070 684 ==> intmarpacrim AT gmail DOT com |
|
|
|
|
06-21-2007, 11:31 PM
|
#7 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,341
|
There are a few ways how to look at it. ICQ me. I also spend bunch of $$ on an attorney to explain it to me
|
|
|
|
