Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 06-19-2007, 04:23 PM   #1
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Good, but depressing movie

I watched a movie called After Innocence last night. It is about people that were wrongly convicted of a crime then later, after they were in jail, the DNA evidence (or in some cases other means) proved them innocent. The movie follows them now that they are out and trying to rebuild their lives.

Some interesting things in the movie:
1. Many states won't expunge your record. A guy was wrongly convicted of rape and 16 other sexual assault charges and after 12 years in prison the DNA proved it wasn't him. He was exonerated of all charges, but they won't remove them from his record so it still shows him has a convicted rapist and it was almost impossible for him to get a job or a place to live.

2. Many states don't have any kind of compensation law. After 15 years in jail for a crime you didn't commit they set you free just throw your ass out. No help getting a place to stay, no money, nothing.

3. In Florida a guy served 19 years for rape. The DNA evidence proved he didn't do the crime. The DA fought to keep him in jail arguing that even though the evidence shows he probably didn't do the crime, they did not present the evidence properly so he shouldn't be let free. He did 3 more years while they worked to get him out.

4. In the cases where the conviction was made based on eyewitness accounts and then later the DNA proved the eyewitness was wrong, 88% of the time the eyewitness makes an incorrect identification of someone.

It's a pretty good movie, but a little depressing. Makes you a little worried. One guy got arrested for rape because he had long hair and was wearing a red sweatshirt which was what the victim said her attacker was wearing. He did nothing wrong, he was just walking down the street. They picked him up, the woman said it was him and he went to jail for 23 years for a crime he didn't commit against a person he had never seen in his life.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 04:44 PM   #2
atmclick
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: downtown chicago
Posts: 167
shit is heavy, isn't it? prob too depressing for most cuz its all true...
atmclick is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 04:45 PM   #3
atmclick
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: downtown chicago
Posts: 167
shit is heavy, isn't it? prob too depressing for most cuz its all true...
atmclick is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 04:45 PM   #4
atmclick
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: downtown chicago
Posts: 167
shit is heavy, isn't it? prob too depressing for most cuz its all true...
atmclick is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 06:14 PM   #5
poindexxer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post

4. In the cases where the conviction was made based on eyewitness accounts and then later the DNA proved the eyewitness was wrong, 88% of the time the eyewitness makes an incorrect identification of someone.
that sounds like 100% of the time to me.

scary shit though.
poindexxer is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 06:28 PM   #6
Theo
HAL 9000
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 34,515
ill watch it,thanks
Theo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 06:57 PM   #7
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by poindexxer View Post
that sounds like 100% of the time to me.

scary shit though.
yeah you could just look like the wrong person or be wearing the wrong thing and get arrested and convicted based solely on one person saying it is you.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 08:19 PM   #8
shekinah
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8,452
That sounds very depressing and sad movie... will try to add it on my list of movies to watch.
__________________

[Web Design | Development | Programming | Content Writing ]
ICQ: 238-890-469
shekinah is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.