gallery skimming - GoFuckYourself.com

Pipecrew · 08-27-2002, 11:43 PM

Curious to see what your opinions are on it

Skimming can send more to your trades, but galleries without skimming equals more bookmarkers......... anyone drop skimming and see a decrease/increase ?

the Shemp · 08-27-2002, 11:52 PM

I'm sure you would notice an immediate decrease. In theory,and over time, you should be able to get the traffic back, with a clean gallery list and obviously more bookmarkers. But I think its a slow process although, your "revenue per gig used" maybe higher.

shemp

Brown Bear · 08-28-2002, 12:05 AM

As a surfer I hate TGPs that skim.

I also hate TGPs that open a new window for every gallery you visit.

Steve · 08-28-2002, 06:09 AM

I was using perm links with no gallery skimming on one of my sites. It was OK, but I never saw the bookmarkers grow at a rate that validates that theory. Which was surprising to me, as I expected my "old school" site to suck up the bookmarkers from my trades with all my gallery skimming buddies. I also spoke with a few of my friends, and I found that my traffic was not in the Zilla/Shemp range of awesome productivity. So I said fuck it, and redid the site with gallery skimming. The two biggest differences I see from doing this are
1)I can now trade with some non-niche sites. With no skim, they had just shit prod, in the 0.20 or 25% range. Now they are usually around the 1.2 or 120% range.
2)I don't have to re-sort the trade layouts to accomadate a new trade. Gallery skim and random outs only is a lot easier. It lets a trade blow up without me having to babysit it for the first few days.

JFPdude · 08-28-2002, 06:16 AM

People ask me all the time to trade with them my answer is always NO !

I have traded before and I have noticed my bookmarkers and surfers come back more when they are not being skimmed or blind linked out.

Honesty pays even in porn ... go figure.

If you want to place a hard link to me I will place a hard link back. The people I am doing this with now has no complaints.

Except on cheatski.com where if you hitbot me I'll hitbot you back same productivity though.

.:Frog:. · 08-28-2002, 06:37 AM

Has anyone tried to skim at a really low amount. Say 90% of the time they reach a gallery and only 10% to trades.

Would this grab bookmarks?

kmanrox · 08-28-2002, 07:54 AM

the trick is to find a happy medium

08-27-2002, 11:43 PM	#1
Pipecrew Master of Gfy.com Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 14,887	gallery skimming Curious to see what your opinions are on it Skimming can send more to your trades, but galleries without skimming equals more bookmarkers......... anyone drop skimming and see a decrease/increase ?

08-27-2002, 11:52 PM	#2
the Shemp congrats to the winners Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Echo Beach Posts: 10,891	I'm sure you would notice an immediate decrease. In theory,and over time, you should be able to get the traffic back, with a clean gallery list and obviously more bookmarkers. But I think its a slow process although, your "revenue per gig used" maybe higher. shemp __________________ i use Vacares...so should you Submit your picture galleries to my site...Outlaw TGP

08-28-2002, 12:05 AM	#3
Brown Bear Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 4,982	As a surfer I hate TGPs that skim. I also hate TGPs that open a new window for every gallery you visit. __________________ Surrender all your independent thinking and Click Here for re-programming.

08-28-2002, 06:37 AM	#6
.:Frog:. Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: ~ C A N A D A ~ Posts: 2,123	Has anyone tried to skim at a really low amount. Say 90% of the time they reach a gallery and only 10% to trades. Would this grab bookmarks? __________________ <a href="http://www.pornopayouts.com/?rid=pp3076">PornoPayouts</a> Tons of Hosted Galleries.

08-28-2002, 07:54 AM	#7
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,292	the trick is to find a happy medium __________________ Crypto HODLr Crypto mining Angel investor

08-28-2002, 06:09 AM	#4
Steve Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: USA Posts: 6,894	I was using perm links with no gallery skimming on one of my sites. It was OK, but I never saw the bookmarkers grow at a rate that validates that theory. Which was surprising to me, as I expected my "old school" site to suck up the bookmarkers from my trades with all my gallery skimming buddies. I also spoke with a few of my friends, and I found that my traffic was not in the Zilla/Shemp range of awesome productivity. So I said fuck it, and redid the site with gallery skimming. The two biggest differences I see from doing this are 1)I can now trade with some non-niche sites. With no skim, they had just shit prod, in the 0.20 or 25% range. Now they are usually around the 1.2 or 120% range. 2)I don't have to re-sort the trade layouts to accomadate a new trade. Gallery skim and random outs only is a lot easier. It lets a trade blow up without me having to babysit it for the first few days.

08-28-2002, 06:16 AM	#5
JFPdude Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Mountains of Western North Carolina. Posts: 4,027	People ask me all the time to trade with them my answer is always NO ! I have traded before and I have noticed my bookmarkers and surfers come back more when they are not being skimmed or blind linked out. Honesty pays even in porn ... go figure. If you want to place a hard link to me I will place a hard link back. The people I am doing this with now has no complaints. Except on cheatski.com where if you hitbot me I'll hitbot you back same productivity though.