50 12click Republicans

:winkwink:

One other fact about Ron Paul, unlike all the other Republican and Democratic candidates, Ron Paul hasn't flip-flopped over the issues since day one, and that scares them all.

Ron Paul in 2008! :thumbsup

It's because he's not a whore asskisser like the professional politicals it appears.

His medical and military training call for a person who can definitely keep a cool head under fire. I know flight combat surgeons. That's like trying to thread a needle during an earthquake with people shooting at you.

The other candidates pale in comparison with just those two accomplishments alone.

So let me get this straight. You work in the adult industry, and support a guy who will be the strongest candidate against pornography. It's like a gun shop owner voting for Clinton.

And where exactly do get the information that supports your assumptions from again? Or are you parroting something someone else said?

But what brought 9/11 about was foreign policy dating back to ww1, no?

Or even Bush 1 putting troops in Saudi Arabia.

Fred Thompson has been the farthest of the far right candidates. He's in bed with the Evangelicals. You really think he's not going to take the anti-pornography stance? Here's an article that states how his wife would be a champion for issues like cracking down on pornography.

http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/158771.aspx

I'm amazed that you think the Evangelical candidate is not going to target pornography and obscenity cases.

I can't really in good faith vote for someone that's basically flip flopped on issues, changed their stances depending on poll numbers, etc, and unfortunately that describes most of the candidates running for President (hell just most of the politicians in general).

America really needs a third party, one that isn't beholden to every lobby group and special interested that's been playing in Washington for years. Dems, Reps, are owned by those special interests and its really good to see candidates that aren't bought and paid for.

There is a chance for a third party run, but not with Paul. Most likely you're going to see a Michael Bloomberg run for the presidency. He's not a bad candidate, he's fiscally moderate, socially liberal, and he's done a really good job with NYC...he doesn't really belong to any party as he's flipped between the two. From what I hear he's considering a run, plans on using 1 billion of his own money if he does, and he's going to try and do a bi-partisan ticket. He's someone to look out for as well.

I figure the only viable 3rd party candidate would have to be a filthy rich one...Bloomberg just happens to be filthy rich, lol.

I don't care when a thing was PLANNED. Whose watch was the attack carried out under? That's what it all comes down to in the blame game.

it doesnt really dawn on them, isnt that sad.

And I'm not against voting Republican in 2008, I'd actually prefer a true fiscal conservative in offense. Thompson looks good on that, but his social views are not good for this industry. I just don't know how you could take a chance on your livelihood for that. I'll stick with Rudy who is somewhat conservative on fiscal issues and not retarded on the social ones.

Hmm and he is also an actor that stars on a show featuring partial nudity, and rude language. lol I doubt it will be a big issue for him to go after.

Maybe you should read that article too, but better this time.

Sounds like a lot of assumptions with no foundation in fact. Just like your post was.

Dawn on me what?

its boring to have to type the same things over and over.

He has been catering to the Evangelicals from the start. He lines up with them on EVERY social issue. Do you really think he won't on pornography? I just don't see how you think the most socially conservative candidate would be a good thing for the industry. What about Fred do you like that would put your business and livelihood in jeopardy?

He voted 'Yes' on legalizing marijuana for medical use?

The FDA and the pharmaceutical companies will go ballistic on him for that alone.

He's an old fashioned Republican which I like. He's also progressive.

I'll tell you, I've asked numerous people in various industries what I've asked on this thread and 98% of the people like this guy Ron Paul. Normally no one agrees on anything but when it comes to Ron Paul, they're liking him.

Can you show me where he has stated anything about going after porn? No didnt think so. You are posting under an assumption. And catering since what start? He is a hollywood actor on a show that caters to violence and sex. Use your head.

Not trying to spam this thread with Ron Paul links but i really like this guy..lol..

Internet Freedom: Ron Paul

and


Ron Paul on Technology

His speech last week in front of the House of Reps last week almost brought a tear to my eyes too... The World needs more people like Ron Paul:2 cents:

King George Speech May 2007

and finally

Ron Paul Gets 91% in Straw Poll; Not the Work of Spammers

So your assumption is that someone who aligns himself with the Evangelicals will be good for the adult industry?

I am going on history. Those who line up with the religous folks, don't seem to like us porn guys.

His philosophy is greatly needed in the 3rd World also. I live in the Philippines and many of Ron Paul's basic platform items are needed here as well:

Open markets
Smaller government
Death to artificial monopolies
Open systems

Go Ron Paul!!!

So because the religious right likes the guy Thompson is "lining up with them"?

You havent yet shown me anything to prove your posts except a cbn article that says an unknown person believes something may happen. lol

Have you listened to his interviews? He's hardcore social conservative. I don't think the issue of pornography has come up with any of the candidates. I don't think it's a stretch that the most socially conservative candidate would be against pornography (considering he has been conservative on every other social issue).

Again, what do you like about him that makes you think he'll be good for the industry and your livelihood?

I cannot believe mine own eyes!!!

The majority of GFY posters actually agreeing on something?

Not only are GFYers agreeing but colleagues in aerospace, trucking, computers, animation, comics, literature, technology, all are in the same ratio as here on GFY so far.

I've never seen this before. Steele's links seem to be the favorites and I think because of the internet it's the reason people are making up their own minds instead of being the products of mainstream media hypnosis.

Agreeing that the likelyhood of him being nominated or winning is next to nil? Guy is endorsed by Bill Mahr (sp)? that did him in right there. lol

The Patriot Act violates every principle ever associated with the Republican Party. Small govt., low taxes, the freedom of the individual from govt. interference in their private lives... EVERY BEDROCK PRINCIPLE of the traditional Republican Party is dead against the Patriot Act, everything it does and the philosophy behind it.

The Republican Party needs a new platform or they need to change their name. Right now they seem to be more of a monarchist party than anything else, trying to give every concievable instrument of govt. power to the executive branch and ceding every check on govt. power gratefully.

What politician do you think is going to pick up the porn beacon and fly it proudly? come on now. lol Show me one candidate that is a pro porn candidate. Seriously lol I want a strong no bullshit president. Thompson is the only one that is going to get people excited. I have wanted to see him run for 5 years or so now. Talked with my mom about him along time ago.

Um.. I think this may answer your questions on the porn thing... obviously no candidate is gonna run under a pro-pornography bill, but i think this is as good as we're gonna get

Excerpt: "Legislation outlawing virtual pornography is, to say the least, of dubious
constitutionality. The constitution grants the federal government
jurisdiction over only three crimes: treason, counterfeiting, and piracy. It
is hard to stretch the definition of treason, counterfeiting, or piracy to
cover sending obsence or pornographic materials over the internet.
Therefore, Congress should leave the issue of whether or not to regulate or
outlaw virtual pornography to states and local governments.

In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I share my colleagues' revulsion at child
pornography, I do not believe that this justifies expanding the federal
police state to outlaw distribution of pornographic images not containing
actual children. I am further concerned by the possibility that passage of
HR 4623 will divert law enforcement resources away from the prosecution of
actual child pornography. HR 4623 also represents another step toward the
nationalization of all police functions, a dangerous trend that will
undermine both effective law enforcement and constitutional government."


Why Ron Paul was only Republican to vote no on morphed-porn bill


Correction...there was one guy I know of to run under the pro-porn banner... Citizen Shane ...not for Prez tho

"There will be no loyalty, except loyalty to the Party. There will be no
love, except love of Big Brother... If you want a picture of the future,
imagine a boot stamping on a human face -- forever."

George Orwell, 1984

While Ron Paul is obviously no Bill Richardson... he would get my vote. :thumbsup

:winkwink:

Will wonders never cease?????

Notabook agreeing with people???

Sheesh! Ron Paul must be a magician or something.

Will wonders never cease?????

Notabook agreeing with people???

Sheesh! Ron Paul must be a magician or something.

Thanks for this, I hadn't seen it.

And away.... we go!!

Thompson 2008
WASHINGTON - Fred Thompson, a former Tennessee senator and "Law & Order" actor, will take a step toward a formal presidential candidacy next week, several officials with knowledge of the plans said Wednesday.

Fred's 2nd wife is pretty hot tho.. 33 yrs old I think .. same age as his daughter :pimp :pimp 2nd Wife

http://wonkette.com/politics/divorce...ife-247154.php

and his last girlfriend was smokin too Girlfriend

another interesting take on him beware-conservatives-fred-thompson-is-a-neocon-globalist

For the past few days, movement "conservatives" and GOP cheerleaders have been ecstatic that Fred Thompson, former Senator from Tennessee, may form an exploratory committee to seek the GOP nomination for president. "Now we'll have a conservative in there," said one person, who, I assume, has no idea what a real conservative is.

There already are two fine conservative candidates seeking the nomination: Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo. And Fred Thompson does not even come close measuring up to them.

Fred Thompson is a neocon globalist.

I'm going on history. The politicians who have aligned with the Evangelicals have been anti-porn and actively pursued it (it's one of the pet projects of the Evangelicals). I respect your decision to go for Thompson, he does have some good qualities (fiscally conservative, small government). I still say it's akin to a gun shop owner voting for a far left liberal. When I vote, I don't take a chance on my livelihood.

Well Im just wondering who we would vote for though that is pro porn? Democrats? Come on we know better there. :1orglaugh

Anyone else see the patheticness in this? Seriously lol. Already they came out with the catch phrase to use Neocon globalist. OH NOES lol :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Nah Dig, thats just your interpretation of the patriot act.

I would hate to see some of these people if they were around for wwII lol.

Welcome to StickyWonderLand .... :1orglaugh

I never get why people are more interested in our country than they are their own...

Where and how does " Welcome to StickyWonderLand " come into consideration for your answer...
I didn't even post an opinion on the subject ....

I was just making fun of you, showing how much of a moron you are, a parrot repeating stuff that he obviously doesn't understand, a person ( and note that I am very king calling YOU a person ...) that has no way of evaluating a situation ( or candidate ) and making an educated decision on the basis of that evaluation ....

You are a piece of lumber, that is it...

As for your country, I said and repeat :

As long as what you guys do does not affect negatively other countries and my person ( as your illegal invasion has done ) , I couln't care less what you guys do ..

I posted a few days ago ( search yourself, ...) that you can kill your second born childs, paint your houses in pink, force people over 300 pounds to wear thongs , force people to have STICKY as a name, cancel for ever all elections, just allow Fox News as TV station ... I DON'T GIVE A FUCKING SHIT ... I will just laugh ....

Now, do you get it ....

I'd vote someone who is more socially liberal and not aligned with the Evangelicals. My business is more important than what some blogs tell me is a cool guy to vote for.

You still havent shown me where he is aligned with the Evangelicals. He has had 2 wives and a girlfriend, been in a ton of hollywood movies and tv shows filled with sex and violence. You act like he is heir to be pope or something. They guy has logic. He uses it. Horse sense as its called. Says what he believes, and knows how to get his point across. That is exactly what we need right now. No nonsense.

Just because he plays a plain talking country lawyer type on TV doesn't mean he IS one in real life. He's the evangelical's preferred candidate, that should be enough for you to run away from him right there and if it's not I'm sure as fuck not going to waste my breath or keystrokes on you anymore than I already have.

Ronnie - suspending the right of Habeas Corpus. Enabling the executive branch alone to make illegal and unsupervised surveillance of American citizens. Suspending the right to a speedy trial. The abuses of the rights of the private citizen in the Patriot Act are nearly endless, and protecting the private citizen against the power of the federal govt. is SUPPOSED to be what the Republican Party is all about. Bush Co. is NOT conservative, they are less conservative than the most liberal democratic candidate in the race. Ditto the whole neocon movement. They have NOTHING to do with conservatism, nothing to do with liberalism. The fact that you support them just shows me that you haven't done your reading or you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the principles of conservatism.

A BUMP FOR RON PAUL

i fear ron paul is the last hope for america. guys vote for him!

at least he isn't in skull & bones.. like bush *and* kerry were/are....

Well better start buying up your Thompson hate domains while you can, Im sure they are going to sell out quick. He will win the Presidency mark my words.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh