Is SOULCASH still around? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

DaddyHalbucks · 09-22-2007, 10:24 PM

Yea, you don't hear much about them anymore.

BusterBunny · 09-22-2007, 10:28 PM

damn i suck

Common Sense · 09-24-2007, 09:39 AM

I just realized I had some old links up for SoulCash. Thanks for the heads up.

janey5 · 09-25-2007, 01:53 PM

pay me my money user janey........asap...........

VexXxed · 10-13-2007, 02:00 AM

VexXxed · 03-23-2008, 09:48 PM

Soulcash members area is officially dead...

Seth is still pushing traffic as an affiliate though through freepornalive.com

NinjaSteve · 03-23-2008, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teomaxxx

Why you didnt sell Soulcash instead of letting it slowly die?
I am sure you would get some nice cash back at the times.
At least we know its time to change a links.

Maybe something big happened and now selling isn't an option.

SENECA-NET · 03-23-2008, 10:50 PM

It looks like spam happened

seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/233448_pornspam21.html

VexXxed · 09-16-2008, 12:19 AM

Is soulcash now TrafficGreen.com ??? Inquiring minds want to know.

commonsense · 09-16-2008, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VexXxed

Is soulcash now TrafficGreen.com ??? Inquiring minds want to know.

What makes you say that?

Mike Dutch · 09-16-2008, 02:04 AM

where's our money?

RyanL · 11-14-2008, 02:59 PM

A bump for $'s owed!

KillerK · 11-14-2008, 03:01 PM

bump for a old program who should have lasted

Tanker · 11-14-2008, 03:21 PM

SoulCash Battled the US GOVERNMENT

The other companies in the suite all bowed down and gave in

Seth battled it out because he knew he was not in the wrong

lost everything in the process but in the end he won against the DOJ

I am sure he is trying to get his stuff going so he can get back up and running and I am sure he has every intention to pay his webmaster base thats what he has been saying he will do

but if you have to start over from scratch and spent all your money in a lawsuite against the DOJ its going to take some time

Fletch XXX · 11-14-2008, 03:32 PM

Soul Cash Rocked!!

SmutGiant · 11-14-2008, 05:28 PM

SoulCash was one of the greatest programs ever.

R.I.P

Odie · 11-14-2008, 07:05 PM

mad love for Seth and Soulcash...I hope he makes a comeback.

nico-t · 11-14-2008, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tanker

SoulCash Battled the US GOVERNMENT

The other companies in the suite all bowed down and gave in

Seth battled it out because he knew he was not in the wrong

lost everything in the process but in the end he won against the DOJ

I am sure he is trying to get his stuff going so he can get back up and running and I am sure he has every intention to pay his webmaster base thats what he has been saying he will do

but if you have to start over from scratch and spent all your money in a lawsuite against the DOJ its going to take some time

what was it about

ronaldo · 11-14-2008, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t

what was it about

Can-Spam if I'm not mistaken.

ronaldo · 11-14-2008, 07:30 PM

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/busine...47_spam25.html

Adult Web business off the hook for spam
Jury: E-mails were fault of affiliates
By TODD BISHOP
P-I REPORTER

After insisting all along that it wasn't spamming, a Renton-based adult Web site operator won Monday in a civil case brought by the Federal Trade Commission under laws regulating unsolicited commercial e-mail messages.

A jury in U.S. District Court in Seattle determined that Impulse Media Group Inc. was not responsible for hundreds of unsolicited, sexually explicit commercial e-mails sent by some of its affiliates to bring traffic to its sites.

Lawyers said the jury's verdict may affect other spam-related cases. The use of affiliates is a common practice in the industry.

The case, brought under the CAN-SPAM Act, hinged on the question of whether Impulse Media "initiated" the illegal e-mails sent by its affiliates. Under the law, that could include intentionally paying or inducing another person to send the messages.

During the trial, Impulse Media cited its policies against unsolicited e-mail, saying the role of its affiliates is to generate referrals using links from other Web sites, not e-mail messages. The company said it terminated relationships with affiliates that broke its own anti-spam rules.

"I didn't do anything wrong," said a victorious Seth Schermerhorn, Impulse Media president, speaking from the defense table in an exchange with U.S. District Chief Judge Robert Lasnik after the jury verdict had been read.

During closing arguments, Jeffrey Steger, a lawyer with the Justice Department's civil division, said Impulse Media's affiliates weren't required to read the program agreement that spells out the anti-spam rules. He said terminated Impulse Media affiliates were able to sign up again.

"The program agreement is a sham," Steger told the jury Monday morning. He declined to comment after the verdict was returned Monday afternoon.

During his closing argument, Spencer Freeman, a lawyer for Impulse Media, sought to illustrate the scope of the issue by holding up a container filled with thousands of tiny pellets, to represent all of the company's affiliates, then pulling out four of them, to represent the affiliates who sent the illegal e-mails.

"Is that evidence of inducement?" Freeman asked, answering his question by calling it "evidence of a well-run program."

Freeman acknowledged that the jurors might not agree with the sexually oriented contents of the e-mails. In the end, he asked them to look past that and send a message to the government.

Robert Apgood, lead lawyer for Impulse Media in the case, said afterward that he hopes more companies in similar situations will stand up to the government in the way that it did. "Perhaps the government will stop overreaching the statute and stop trying to read into it what isn't there," Apgood said.

The U.S. CAN-SPAM Act doesn't ban unsolicited e-mail, but it restricts and regulates it -- prohibiting deceptive subject lines and efforts to mask a message's origins, among other things. It also requires sexually explicit e-mails to be labeled as such. The government showed examples in which e-mails from Impulse Media affiliates violated that and other aspects of the law.

The Federal Trade Commission brought the case against Impulse Media in 2005. Several others that faced similar actions at the same time settled their cases with the government. Much of the evidence in the case was in e-mails collected by Microsoft in Hotmail accounts.

The verdict in the case could have broader implications.

"I think it will be less likely for plaintiffs and the government to bring spam cases based on affilate conduct unless there's actually substantial evidence to back up the fact that the marketer knew about the affiliates' violations," said Seattle lawyer Venkat Balasubramani, who tracks spam and related issues on his blog, spamnotes.com. In that way, he said, it's "a big ruling."

Balasubramani said he was somewhat surprised by the verdict because of the negative feelings many people have toward spam, which might create a natural bias against a company accused of helping to spread it.

Apgood, the lawyer for Impulse Media, acknowledged such feelings but said the company isn't part of the problem.

"We all hate spam," Apgood said. "I hate spam. Impulse Media hates spam. ... We condemn the people who signed up for the Webmaster program who then turned around and spammed."

ronaldo · 11-14-2008, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tanker

SoulCash Battled the US GOVERNMENT

The other companies in the suite all bowed down and gave in

Seth battled it out because he knew he was not in the wrong

lost everything in the process but in the end he won against the DOJ

What does that say about justice?

I'm not in the wrong, but hey, I'll pay half a million dollars to get them off my back. OR, I'll spend MILLIONS and go bankrupt in the process of being found not guilty.

How the DOJ isn't responsible for some sort of compensation in a case where the defendant is found not guilty is beyond me.

Quotealex · 10-15-2009, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedShoe

http://SoulCash.com anyone still using them? I have their links EVERYWHERE, sort of a 'set it and forget' type of set up. I just went there and it wasn't there.

Is it just me? Or can anyone else access them?
SixNine used to post here all the time. Haven't heard from him in ages.

The link is dead!

09-22-2007, 10:24 PM	#51
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	Yea, you don't hear much about them anymore. __________________ Boner Money

09-22-2007, 10:28 PM	#52
BusterBunny perverted justice decoy Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: unborn still in the womb connected via blackberry Posts: 19,291	damn i suck __________________ my sig caught gonoherpasyphilaids and died

09-25-2007, 01:53 PM	#54
janey5 Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: london uk Posts: 10	pay me my money user janey........asap........... __________________ FINDADULTSPONSOR.COM

10-13-2007, 02:00 AM	#55
VexXxed Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: What Bitch? Posts: 544	__________________

03-23-2008, 09:48 PM	#56
VexXxed Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: What Bitch? Posts: 544	Soulcash members area is officially dead... Seth is still pushing traffic as an affiliate though through freepornalive.com __________________

09-24-2007, 09:39 AM	#53
Common Sense Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 183	I just realized I had some old links up for SoulCash. Thanks for the heads up.

03-23-2008, 10:50 PM	#58
SENECA-NET Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 18	It looks like spam happened seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/233448_pornspam21.html

09-16-2008, 12:19 AM	#59
VexXxed Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: What Bitch? Posts: 544	Is soulcash now TrafficGreen.com ??? Inquiring minds want to know. __________________

09-16-2008, 02:04 AM	#61
Mike Dutch Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands Posts: 5,607	where's our money? __________________ Advidi.com -- Your Dating, Diet and Skincare Partner with over 1000 offers --

11-14-2008, 02:59 PM	#62
RyanL Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Tampa, FL Posts: 1,145	A bump for $'s owed! __________________ ICQ: #126013016 :: Amateur Index

11-14-2008, 03:01 PM	#63
KillerK Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 3,406	bump for a old program who should have lasted

11-14-2008, 03:21 PM	#64
Tanker Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada Posts: 9,287	SoulCash Battled the US GOVERNMENT The other companies in the suite all bowed down and gave in Seth battled it out because he knew he was not in the wrong lost everything in the process but in the end he won against the DOJ I am sure he is trying to get his stuff going so he can get back up and running and I am sure he has every intention to pay his webmaster base thats what he has been saying he will do but if you have to start over from scratch and spent all your money in a lawsuite against the DOJ its going to take some time __________________ Tanker ICQ 3427575 CCBTools Now featured in the CCBill.com APP STORE

11-14-2008, 03:32 PM	#65
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	Soul Cash Rocked!! __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

11-14-2008, 05:28 PM	#66
SmutGiant Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 4,895	SoulCash was one of the greatest programs ever. R.I.P

11-14-2008, 07:05 PM	#67
Odie Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: The WATER BABY! Posts: 7,040	mad love for Seth and Soulcash...I hope he makes a comeback. __________________ Odie [email protected] Are you Mobile???? MMACanada ICQ # 166208354 See Who I Am At AdultWhosWho.com!

11-14-2008, 07:30 PM	#70
ronaldo Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: ICQ#: 272000271 Posts: 5,475	http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/busine...47_spam25.html Adult Web business off the hook for spam Jury: E-mails were fault of affiliates By TODD BISHOP P-I REPORTER After insisting all along that it wasn't spamming, a Renton-based adult Web site operator won Monday in a civil case brought by the Federal Trade Commission under laws regulating unsolicited commercial e-mail messages. A jury in U.S. District Court in Seattle determined that Impulse Media Group Inc. was not responsible for hundreds of unsolicited, sexually explicit commercial e-mails sent by some of its affiliates to bring traffic to its sites. Lawyers said the jury's verdict may affect other spam-related cases. The use of affiliates is a common practice in the industry. The case, brought under the CAN-SPAM Act, hinged on the question of whether Impulse Media "initiated" the illegal e-mails sent by its affiliates. Under the law, that could include intentionally paying or inducing another person to send the messages. During the trial, Impulse Media cited its policies against unsolicited e-mail, saying the role of its affiliates is to generate referrals using links from other Web sites, not e-mail messages. The company said it terminated relationships with affiliates that broke its own anti-spam rules. "I didn't do anything wrong," said a victorious Seth Schermerhorn, Impulse Media president, speaking from the defense table in an exchange with U.S. District Chief Judge Robert Lasnik after the jury verdict had been read. During closing arguments, Jeffrey Steger, a lawyer with the Justice Department's civil division, said Impulse Media's affiliates weren't required to read the program agreement that spells out the anti-spam rules. He said terminated Impulse Media affiliates were able to sign up again. "The program agreement is a sham," Steger told the jury Monday morning. He declined to comment after the verdict was returned Monday afternoon. During his closing argument, Spencer Freeman, a lawyer for Impulse Media, sought to illustrate the scope of the issue by holding up a container filled with thousands of tiny pellets, to represent all of the company's affiliates, then pulling out four of them, to represent the affiliates who sent the illegal e-mails. "Is that evidence of inducement?" Freeman asked, answering his question by calling it "evidence of a well-run program." Freeman acknowledged that the jurors might not agree with the sexually oriented contents of the e-mails. In the end, he asked them to look past that and send a message to the government. Robert Apgood, lead lawyer for Impulse Media in the case, said afterward that he hopes more companies in similar situations will stand up to the government in the way that it did. "Perhaps the government will stop overreaching the statute and stop trying to read into it what isn't there," Apgood said. The U.S. CAN-SPAM Act doesn't ban unsolicited e-mail, but it restricts and regulates it -- prohibiting deceptive subject lines and efforts to mask a message's origins, among other things. It also requires sexually explicit e-mails to be labeled as such. The government showed examples in which e-mails from Impulse Media affiliates violated that and other aspects of the law. The Federal Trade Commission brought the case against Impulse Media in 2005. Several others that faced similar actions at the same time settled their cases with the government. Much of the evidence in the case was in e-mails collected by Microsoft in Hotmail accounts. The verdict in the case could have broader implications. "I think it will be less likely for plaintiffs and the government to bring spam cases based on affilate conduct unless there's actually substantial evidence to back up the fact that the marketer knew about the affiliates' violations," said Seattle lawyer Venkat Balasubramani, who tracks spam and related issues on his blog, spamnotes.com. In that way, he said, it's "a big ruling." Balasubramani said he was somewhat surprised by the verdict because of the negative feelings many people have toward spam, which might create a natural bias against a company accused of helping to spread it. Apgood, the lawyer for Impulse Media, acknowledged such feelings but said the company isn't part of the problem. "We all hate spam," Apgood said. "I hate spam. Impulse Media hates spam. ... We condemn the people who signed up for the Webmaster program who then turned around and spammed."