It's a fantasy.

We sell fantasies.

If it bothers you, sell a different fantasy.

There's LOTS.

If she's over the age of 18, I don't care if they put her in pampers. She is still a legal ADULT. Everything else ranges on biased feelings, which I hope never become the basis of law.

im 0:151 with LL since i started promoting her last week.

I am not saying it's right or wrong, but, wouldn't you who are complaining rather have Pedos join a legal site to satisfy their sick needs than a site where an actual child has been abused?

My point exactly...YOU never had a problem or looked upon models as "pimping", HOWEVER, people have and still do get pandering charges put on them...

Just like OTHERS never had a problem or looked upon LEGAL models as CP...

the point is that it's just an OPINION, which means absolutely nothing if the whole thing is legal....

You go off this board and into the real world and tell people that you sling porn, moved to tax free costa rica, and fuck women in a country that is notorious for prostitution, ESPECIALLY child prostitution and see how quickly the general public would nail you to the cross....

The public... hmmm..

I remember when Rolling Stone magazine put the (then underage) Olsen Twins on their cover with the title "America's favourite fantasy" under them.

Now *that* was something that pissed me off when I saw it.

Pure and simple, like many have said, the line is LEGAL - as long as she is 18, what she does, wears, and plays with is completely up to her. And I have no problem with it.

BUT....to say she is not photographed (and dressed, placed in sets, given props) to appear as young as possible is bullshit, Stevie Wonder can see that much.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Well put.

she look so fucking good :)

Simple test BVF - ask the "average member of the public" if they ever considered modeling as pimping? Modelling has nothing to do with pimping.

It's not really much about "opinions" - what I think does not matter. It is blatantly clear that this trash is specifically tailored/styled to portray a "kid". Why would that be??? To appeal to MILF lovers???

Get your point, but can't see that standing up too well in reality. There are laws prohibiting using adults as kids in porn scenarios and I'd hate to even begin in front of a jury of "average members of the public" and tell them - "No, it's all legal really - I've got a copy of her passport here" while the prosecution are flashing images of a 12 year old with a cock in her mouth. It's too absurd :)

On the possible public opinion about me, tho diverting a bit from the subject and little could I care less ...

On the contrary BVF - many people know exactly what I do in real life and that is not a problem. I've never ran this anything other than a business and have used judgement on this for decades. The tax free element was never an issue and irrelevant - believe me *lol*

On the prostitution element - know little about it, but there is a positive aspect to this in that it is legal and may be better to have this out in the open than try and stuff it under the carpet and pretend it does not exist. There are apparently "health checks" and other controls which keep pimping out of the scenario. Can't say, but sounds like a possibly sensible way to treat the "world's oldest profession".

On child abuse... totally different story. If you have visited here - you may have read the airline entry ticket - with a promise of 16 years in a jail cell for child-related offenses. They seem rarer at the present time, but the main cause of this problem are "tourists" who think they can forget the law, but end up on a US Marshal air flight each Thursday back to the US for prosecution. If the US does not agree to prosecute - they are tried here. Don't even dream the common fallacy that people can land in whatever country, abuse kids at their leisure and bugger off back home without penalties - it's a tourist myth and perps are tracked wherever they go via the regional Interpol offices.

Hell.. that has nothing to do with the "adult entertainment industry" and it's relationship with the "pedo entertainment industry"...

JMO... but i personally have shot ...performed in and created some of the most twisted stuff out there .. provided models for some of max Hardcore's craziest shoots .. and I in this day and time of adult content and what I have learned and experienced .. would not shoot this model in anything .. personally you just have to draw the line .. and having her work in any of my content would be a moral crossing I just couldn't do .. I 100% believe she is of age .. and that's never been my concern ...she just looks to young ..I can't believe i am saying that .. but yeah she just looks to damn young ..making a model look young .. and even act and say their younger than they are is one thing ....guys will try and believe the story ...but in this specific models case ... i can't even imagine her being of age .. sorry Just my opinion ..

I know Jesus loves Little Lupe :)

http://jesuslovesteens.com/images/lupe1/12.jpg

This site clearly targets pedos... good job!

Teenrevenue Marketing

Post in message boards and let stooges do the rest


Brilliant !


FYI

Pedos are not too happy about girls with sexual experience it takes away their "in control of the innocent" kicks. This is a dirty old man site dreaming about the old days, nothing more nothing less.

Sad and rich and I am perfect OK with that. Being sad and having nothing = suicide - or am I getting it wrong again? :)

Aaron is a class A photog who has done excellent work for us. You don't know what you're talking about obviously.

I love rebills !! :) :) :) :) :) :thumbsup :thumbsup

Hey Chris, you thinking of pairing her up with Summer, Chloe or any of the twins? Those would be great cross promos :)

Little Lupe is my best coverting site at 1:157. What's the problem?

Man I wish there were decent promotional videos for this girl :(

I pimped nobody she built the site and she was the one who called me to say its time to quit your day job lol . Im not a pimp,I dont use or abuse woman sorry actually have talked some really hot ones out of doing porn because it would effect their long term career choices. I know lots of people here think pimp is a cool term, I think its a another word for scumbag.

missed it

Of course it rebills well - it's easy to sell fantasies to pedos, or did you not know this or not wish to accept this?? :pimp That is the only reason it even has any success.

You are foolishly assuming that I have a soul.

Some things just are what they are no matter how hard to believe it's not true. You no doubt have members on your site that are sex and porn addicts. You (and the rest of us) are contributing to their addiction and degradation of their life. I'm not saying that is a bad thing, I'm just laying the facts on the table.

The truth hurts, but at the end of the day we are ALL doing this so some fuck can jack his cock and shoot a load of sperm into his lap. Nothing more, nothing less. Either you are a pornographer, or you're not. There is no middle ground here, no matter how much you want there to be one. :2 cents:

The fact that anyone can get away with legal content like this and sell it to pedos is brilliant if you ask me. Everyone who joins her site knows she is of age, but they still join. They simply like the look of a young girl. The girl is 18, so be it. I love looking at 18 year old girls too, and if that makes me a pedo, add it to the list right behind "tranny aficionado." :upsidedow

Yeah, everyone is into looking at women who look like they're 15

I 100% agree with that statement

edit: except for the last paragraph, just saw that Aaron didn't do that

No..."modeling" isn't considered pimping...

However, "nude modeling" or modeling where there's a dick in her pussy, ass, or mouth, is considered "ho'ing" or at the least "exploitation"...

It's the person making money off of it that is considered pimping...

She look far to illegally young but that is the point...nice site..

Well.. apart from the fact that it is illegal in a number of western countries to basically tart up talent as kids in a porn scenario... The whole marketing concept is based on a pushing as young as possible.

It is questionable "everyone who joins her site knows she is of age" - the first impression is that of a 12 year old kid - a deliberate impression. I was around when two law people saw some images and the dialog went .. "Damn, she looks like a friggin 12 year old!" - they were not impressed. At the same time, stuffing 2257 up as a tongue in the cheek "defense" is a joke - this would most likely be prosecuted in a few countries and, remains to be seen what shit may hit in the US. Even the jurisdiction of the holding corp/2257 records would kick their asses off the island, irrespective of any laws - they just don't care about the niceties of laws when it comes to this stuff.

Now... sure would never hinder your ambitions at casting an eye over 18 year olds DWB *lol* Lupe may be a 20 something, but the set decoration and the styling of her sure is not intended to make her look even 18. Compare other shoots of her when she is not playing in the nursery with her coloring book and she looks a little different.

Na... don't rush to add pedo to your resume - "tranny aficionado" has a nice ring to it :1orglaugh

PS... Think there is a niche in having 18 year olds tarted up as grannies?? A decent stylist can do that nicely - blue rinse old ladies complete with knitting patterns - "wheelchair sex" :winkwink:

Think we got a difference in the use of this word "pimping" BVF :pimp Neither "nude modeling" or porn shoots are particularly known as "pimping"...

Quick explanation from wikipedia...

In that case... every shooter in the US is committing a "sex crime" :winkwink:

I already think they are. But everyone in the world is committing some sort of crime, so none of it matters anyway.

It would be better to take a 15 year old like Tracy Lords was and dress her up to make her look older. Just so the girl "looks" to be of age. The actual age is of no real concern here. Just the appearance.......

un uh...

Sigh - this thread dead yet? Unless I see Chris from TeenRevenue shutting down the doors on Little Lupe, can we all just play along for a little while longer? I'd like to continue making some more cash off her ass.

Believe it was mentioned that that portion has already been somewhat overturned, but I dont recall details.

I was under the impression that pedos viewed cp? no? I'm sure it's not hard to find online.

So why would a pedo want anything to do with the site of an 18+ y/o model? Are you saying they are being tricked into thinking she is a child? It would be hard to find somebody that stupid.

Fantasies? Since when does a pedo go looking for a fantasy?

When someone has a sick preference/obsession as such they don't settle for a mere fantasy. They go for the real thing and Little Lupe clearly is not the real thing.

Any bozo knows before they join that she is over 18 y/o and that simply wont cut for them. So you are wrong in saying that it caters to pedo fantasies...completely wrong you are.

Pretty much each time the court has ruled against a portion of it, Congress has reacted by amending it to close the hole that the courts ruled on. What I posted is the current version of 2256 and I can't find anywhere that the current wording has been ruled against (not a lawyer though). I don't know about anyone else, but I would not want to be a "test case" on it.

The amendment history, closing the holes that have been poked in it:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/h...000-notes.html

Well I had a look and I don't think she has the appearance of someone underrage. She just looks petite. Having said that, I am aware that the majority of people who like the site are the same people who would have sex with children, if it was legal.