GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Federal agents patrol GFY.com (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=724927)

GeorgeM 04-17-2007 06:39 AM

i knew that :thumbsup

HomerSimpson 04-17-2007 06:46 AM

naaaaaaaaah... they are here just for free porn and good jokes...

Lykos 04-17-2007 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_Daniels (Post 12266077)

:thumbsup

Bryan G 04-17-2007 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 12266719)
i feel bad for them to have to be here...lol

i bet they have a tgp by now..lol

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Fap 04-17-2007 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 12266719)
i feel bad for them to have to be here...lol

i bet they have a tgp by now..lol

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
Probably.
i also feel bad for having to watch all the pointless threads

TheLegacy 04-17-2007 08:55 AM

speaking to several lawyers in phoenix during the forum, specifically JD - he commented that a federal agent came up to him and said, "thank you for the support you gave to us on the boards".. he mentioned which one he was looking at... but it was clear that the feds not only watch all the webmaster boards but also get into conventions for seminars etc. to see what we are saying.

its how they actually know what the other side is doing and helps them in court. what was clearly stated is that you guys continually brag about how much money your briging in - the feds see that and keep track. eventually someone is going to have their taxes reviewed and your fucked because you bragged about shit. we should be bragging instead of how we are on the front lines of free speech / rights.

Ssv 04-17-2007 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BB-Rick (Post 12266812)
Tengo un gato en mis pantalones:winkwink:

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Kard63 04-17-2007 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 12265808)
Im just sayin. :thumbsup

They should. If someone sells porn the are more likely to be a criminal. Well, I dunno about that but they are definitely more likely to be creepy.

Bryan G 04-17-2007 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kard63 (Post 12267582)
They should. If someone sells porn the are more likely to be a criminal. Well, I dunno about that but they are definitely more likely to be creepy.


Are you for real??? LOL

pornguy 04-17-2007 09:28 AM

Welcome undercover agents. Enjoy the porn. And its ok to spank it, just dont let the covers slip down.
You might get caught! :)

_Richard_ 04-17-2007 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antonio (Post 12266112)
I'm scared now, somebody hold my hand

http://www.joe-ks.com/archives_sep2004/SleeperAgent.jpg

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

DaddyHalbucks 04-17-2007 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porn Farmer (Post 12266181)
And?

You do realise your laws end at your borders don't you? :1orglaugh

That's not my understanding. If you do business in the US, you are subject to our laws.

Ignore at your own peril.

Yahook 04-17-2007 09:45 AM

Sure, here can be bad people too, so they have to read the forum and collect the info.

JohnnyPearl 04-17-2007 10:00 AM

I wouldn't be surprised

polish_aristocrat 04-17-2007 11:56 AM

Franck scared them away with the scat pics he posted

yota71 04-17-2007 12:04 PM

God Bless, The Federal Business of Interrogation..

Domains_Broker 04-17-2007 12:06 PM

As soon as Gonzales and co. get the boot, they will hopefully realize that they're wasting resources and tax payer money when they should be scouring the fucking al qaeda/islamic forums.

[ Nate ] 04-17-2007 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_Daniels (Post 12266077)

LMAO!!!!

Webby 04-17-2007 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12267667)
That's not my understanding. If you do business in the US, you are subject to our laws.

Ignore at your own peril.

You are clearly unqualified to offer an opinion on any topic - no offense.

You speak out of your ass often??

tranza 04-17-2007 12:38 PM

And??....................

DaddyHalbucks 04-17-2007 12:47 PM

Hola, Federales!

:)

Splum 04-17-2007 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Domains_Broker (Post 12268448)
As soon as Gonzales and co. get the boot, they will hopefully realize that they're wasting resources and tax payer money when they should be scouring the fucking al qaeda/islamic forums.

You mean there are no terrorists here?

tASSy 04-17-2007 12:49 PM

i'm pretty sure that patrolling covers more than just gfy. the federal agents are in your interwebs lookin' at yer surfing habitz.

Brad 04-17-2007 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12267667)
That's not my understanding. If you do business in the US, you are subject to our laws.

Ignore at your own peril.

So, are you suggesting that the existence of the internet has eroded international boarders?

It?s an interesting question when you consider that Western companies use sweatshops to manufacture goods while sweatshops remain illegal in the states where these companies are located.

DaddyHalbucks 04-17-2007 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12268623)
You are clearly unqualified to offer an opinion on any topic - no offense.

You speak out of your ass often??


It's not my opinion. One of the attornies at The Phoenix Forum said that foreign webmasters doing business in the US are subject to our law.

Ad hominem only shows the weakness of your position.

DaddyHalbucks 04-17-2007 12:58 PM

"Translated from Latin to English, "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or "against the person."

An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument."...


http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...d-hominem.html

DaddyHalbucks 04-17-2007 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adult Lounge - Brad (Post 12268723)
So, are you suggesting that the existence of the internet has eroded international boarders?

It?s an interesting question when you consider that Western companies use sweatshops to manufacture goods while sweatshops remain illegal in the states where these companies are located.

As a non-lawyer, sure I would suggest that. There is probably a ton of law to back it up too.

But, it goes way beyond just the net. For example, US citizens can be prosecuted for travelling to foreign countries to have sex with minors, even if the sex acts are not illegal in the country where they take place.

Making clothing is not generally considered to be a hated industry on the short hit list of law enforcement. Adult ---surprise -- IS.

Ours is an interdependent globally connected multi jurisdictional world. Wake up to that reality, or prepare to pay the piper for his lullabies..

CheneyRumsfeld 04-17-2007 01:06 PM

oh, come on now, the feds are just looking for some free porn















































http://www.gay-boy-cock.com/images/1.jpg

Splum 04-17-2007 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CheneyRumsfeld (Post 12268826)
oh, come on now, the feds are just looking for some free porn

Hey buddy you got the 2257 for that image?

Webby 04-17-2007 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12268724)
It's not my opinion. One of the attornies at The Phoenix Forum said that foreign webmasters doing business in the US are subject to our law.

Ad hominem only shows the weakness of your position.

I personally don't give one flying fuck about the "opinion" of an attorney at the Phoenix Forum - tho, if he did say "doing business in the US" and not, as you have previously tried to claim, "doing business with the US" - he is correct.

Obviously there are considerably less "foreign webmasters" doing business in the US - there is no benefit and more a liability than anything - so no biggie.

The stupid claims you previously made that foreign webmasters are subject to US law because they do business with the US is beyond comment.

DaddyHalbucks 04-17-2007 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12268876)
I personally don't give one flying fuck about the "opinion" of an attorney at the Phoenix Forum - tho, if he did say "doing business in the US" and not, as you have previously tried to claim, "doing business with the US" - he is correct.

Obviously there are considerably less "foreign webmasters" doing business in the US - there is no benefit and more a liability than anything - so no biggie.

The stupid claims you previously made that foreign webmasters are subject to US law because they do business with the US is beyond comment.


For the purposes herein, "with the US" and "in the US" are the same thing.

OK, let's get a real legal opinion, and let's see which one of us is "stupid."

Put up --or shut up.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Webby 04-17-2007 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12268819)
As a non-lawyer, sure I would suggest that. There is probably a ton of law to back it up too.

Stick to being a non-lawyer :1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12268819)
But, it goes way beyond just the net. For example, US citizens can be prosecuted for travelling to foreign countries to have sex with minors, even if the sex acts are not illegal in the country where they take place.

Why you think that is??? It is a criminal offense idiot. It is also covered by various international conventions.

Don't tell me... can't wait to hear what countries you can fuck kids and it's actually legal :1orglaugh

Even heard of the Convention for the Rights of the Child?? The only country on the planet who cannot offer their children the same rights under this charter is the US - bad example using child abuse to excuse your stupidity on international jurisdictions.

Webby 04-17-2007 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12268904)
For the purposes herein, "with the US" and "in the US" are the same thing.

OK, let's get a real legal opinion, and let's see which one of us is "stupid."

Put up --or shut up.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Yea?? Sheesh you are dumb...

Do you check compliance with the laws of China, Canada, Germany, UK, ad nausea when you trade with those countries???

schneemann 04-17-2007 01:23 PM

If any feds reading this know how I can get a gig reading GFY all day, please contact me.

A direct link to the OPM announcement would be great.

kthxbye!

gornyhuy 04-17-2007 01:25 PM

The IPs are mainly from the Oval Office.

Webby 04-17-2007 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12268904)
For the purposes herein, "with the US" and "in the US" are the same thing.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I should really add that quote to my sig -

"According to the braincell of DaddyHalbucks - For the purposes herein, "with the US" and "in the US" are the same thing."

Like this idiot has one clue :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

PS And what US law are you quoting from exactly?? *lol*

DaddyHalbucks 04-17-2007 01:30 PM

Let me re-phrase this, to be 100% clear, so your pea brain can understand it for sure: if you are doing business "with" the US, you are deemed to be "in" the US as far as your obligations to comply with US online pornography laws are concerned. I imagine the same legal principles apply to online gambling.

Webby 04-17-2007 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12268957)
Let me re-phrase this, to be 100% clear, so your pea brain can understand it for sure: if you are doing business "with" the US, you are deemed to be "in" the US as far as your obligations to comply with US online pornography laws are concerned. I imagine the same legal principles apply to online gambling.

You may think so and that may be your "opinion" - but that never did matter.

When are you in compliance with the laws of any other countries when you take a signup from them?? Never.

It's based on the principle of "international jurisdictions", but doubt you have a clue on that either. Odd that all other countries understand this concept which has been in existence long before the US was ever heard of, but a few stupid American's don't quite get it yet :winkwink:

OK.. On gambling... another bad example, and where the US assumes much which does not exist, - and in the process is currently in violation of WTO rulings. Can you get your house in order first before commenting on other nations? Thanks :winkwink:

Splum 04-17-2007 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12268947)
..................

Its only a matter of time till they find you. :2 cents:

Webby 04-17-2007 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 12269001)
Its only a matter of time till they find you. :2 cents:

Oh.. "they" know where I am Splum :winkwink: The only difference is "they" are not as stupid as DaddyHalbucks and your good self - "they" have more than one braincell :winkwink:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123