Did this woman just OWN Albert Einstein? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

GigoloMason · 04-14-2007, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

yes, dick, over icecream. I did it.

12stein?

Naw to jewish heheheh

12clicks · 04-14-2007, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GigoloMason

12stein?

Naw to jewish heheheh

pronounce it "stine" and not "steen" and I'll be ok.

$5 submissions · 04-14-2007, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

pronounce it "stine" and not "steen" and I'll be ok.

This reminds me of that early segment in "Young Frankenstein."

It's pronounced "FrankenSTEEN"...

"EYEgore" please.. not "EEgor"

12clicks · 04-14-2007, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

This reminds me of that early segment in "Young Frankenstein."

It's pronounced "FrankenSTEEN"...

"EYEgore" please.. not "EEgor"

dude, it makes all the difference

jmk · 04-14-2007, 07:46 PM

Never say never ?

GigoloMason · 04-14-2007, 08:04 PM

Just in case you're actually interested ;)

Stanford Confirms it with particle accelerators.
http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/th...elativity.html

In particle accelerators, particles are moving very close to the speed of light where the length and time effects are large. This has allowed us to clearly verify that length contraction and time dilation do occur.

GPS Satellites operation also confirms it:
http://www.physicscentral.com/writers/2000/will.html

But at 38 microseconds per day, the relativistic offset in the rates of the satellite clocks is so large that, if left uncompensated, it would cause navigational errors that accumulate faster than 10 km per day! GPS accounts for relativity by electronically adjusting the rates of the satellite clocks, and by building mathematical corrections into the computer chips which solve for the user's location. Without the proper application of relativity, GPS would fail in its navigational functions within about 2 minutes.

Hafele and Keating Experiment with atomic clocks on airplanes:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...iv/airtim.html

These results provide an unambiguous empirical resolution of the famous clock "paradox" with macroscopic clocks."

$5 submissions · 04-15-2007, 04:43 AM

Nice find, Mason!

Quote:

Originally Posted by GigoloMason

Just in case you're actually interested ;)

Stanford Confirms it with particle accelerators.
http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/th...elativity.html

In particle accelerators, particles are moving very close to the speed of light where the length and time effects are large. This has allowed us to clearly verify that length contraction and time dilation do occur.

GPS Satellites operation also confirms it:
http://www.physicscentral.com/writers/2000/will.html

But at 38 microseconds per day, the relativistic offset in the rates of the satellite clocks is so large that, if left uncompensated, it would cause navigational errors that accumulate faster than 10 km per day! GPS accounts for relativity by electronically adjusting the rates of the satellite clocks, and by building mathematical corrections into the computer chips which solve for the user's location. Without the proper application of relativity, GPS would fail in its navigational functions within about 2 minutes.

Hafele and Keating Experiment with atomic clocks on airplanes:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...iv/airtim.html

These results provide an unambiguous empirical resolution of the famous clock "paradox" with macroscopic clocks."

04-14-2007, 08:04 PM	#56
GigoloMason Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 742	Just in case you're actually interested ;) Stanford Confirms it with particle accelerators. http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/th...elativity.html In particle accelerators, particles are moving very close to the speed of light where the length and time effects are large. This has allowed us to clearly verify that length contraction and time dilation do occur. GPS Satellites operation also confirms it: http://www.physicscentral.com/writers/2000/will.html But at 38 microseconds per day, the relativistic offset in the rates of the satellite clocks is so large that, if left uncompensated, it would cause navigational errors that accumulate faster than 10 km per day! GPS accounts for relativity by electronically adjusting the rates of the satellite clocks, and by building mathematical corrections into the computer chips which solve for the user's location. Without the proper application of relativity, GPS would fail in its navigational functions within about 2 minutes. Hafele and Keating Experiment with atomic clocks on airplanes: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...iv/airtim.html These results provide an unambiguous empirical resolution of the famous clock "paradox" with macroscopic clocks." __________________

04-14-2007, 07:46 PM	#55
jmk Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,391	Never say never ?