GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   LittleLupe.com (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=723557)

EBORG9 04-23-2007 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12301171)
http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/7889/01iz9.jpg

Sure is ridiculous - never met any 18 year old kid who still played with her "colors" and still had her "toy chair" bla yet - have you??? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I have no business in this discussion but that is a damn good point!:pimp :thumbsup :( :2 cents:

Webby 04-23-2007 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301185)
Some people might wanna look at the pictures on myspace girls profiles that are 20 and over even. Hell my wife even uses crayons and shit to draw hearts on paper.. OMG She is coloring! :1orglaugh

Diversions elsewhere are irrelvant - we are talking about the "adult entertainment industry" - not social networking sites or anything else.

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 06:38 PM

Diversions? So if an 18 year old girl is in adult she is supposed to dress to look older? lmao Whatever. :1orglaugh

Webby 04-23-2007 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EBORG9 (Post 12301187)
I have no business in this discussion but that is a damn good point!:pimp :thumbsup :( :2 cents:

It's actually a criminal offense in a good few countries to "decorate" talent as kids in a sexual scenario EBORG9 (Usually falls under sub-clauses of obscenity laws or child protection legislation.)

Webby 04-23-2007 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301198)
Diversions? So if an 18 year old girl is in adult she is supposed to dress to look older? lmao Whatever. :1orglaugh

Already said more than once that you are stupid - can you not comprehend???

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12301098)
??? You have teens signing up with credit cards to see a "teen" with a cock stuck in her mouth?? :pimp

Sure agree - there is a "teen" niche - depends whether ya push that to pedo level and attempt to portray talent as 12 year old kids.

Correct me if Im wrong, but did you just accuse a sponsor of pushing pedo sites?

Webby 04-23-2007 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301206)
Correct me if Im wrong, but did you just accuse a sponsor of pushing pedo sites?

You are wrong yet again. Your fried brain obviously is in overload mode - yet again :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12301211)
You are wrong yet again. Your fried brain obviously is in overload mode - yet again :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Insinuation is close enough in my book.

Webby 04-23-2007 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301221)
Insinuation is close enough in my book.

Idiot - you opinion is totally irrelevant on *any* subject. You are mentally deficient with severe obsessions clouding your braincell - prob contributing to the level of any sense in your posts. Go and play with your colors :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12301227)
Idiot - you opinion is totally irrelevant on *any* subject. You are mentally deficient with severe obsessions clouding your braincell - prob contributing to the level of any sense in your posts. Go and play with your colors :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Please tell us more about how this sponsor caters to pedos. Dont dance around it. Tell us what you think.

Webby 04-23-2007 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301237)
Please tell us more about how this sponsor caters to pedos. Dont dance around it. Tell us what you think.

You have this need to be "us" again??? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Wash yourself down the toilet - your beginning to smell again :pimp

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 07:09 PM

Thats ok Webby you just keep on making backwards accusations against a program that is 100% 2257 compliant...

Webby 04-23-2007 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301283)
Thats ok Webby you just keep on making backwards accusations against a program that is 100% 2257 compliant...

Will repeat - you are just too stupid. Do you just not comprehend the meaning of irrelevant (you) or just need to behave like a schoolgirl in heat?? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Sure.. the world revolves round 2257 in your closeted fried brain cell - dream on.

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 07:18 PM

You are skating the rules of gfy thats for sure.

Webby 04-23-2007 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301317)
You are skating the rules of gfy thats for sure.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Hell... "irrelevant" has even lower levels than even I thought possible :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

ztik 04-23-2007 07:21 PM

Dang that chick has a big head

Webby 04-23-2007 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ztik (Post 12301330)
Dang that chick has a big head

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

She's prob an OK model - just the camera angle is obviously geared to showing a massive cock suck in her face :1orglaugh - while she plays with her "colors" and teddy bear :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Fucking absurd :1orglaugh

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12301323)
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Hell... "irrelevant" has even lower levels than even I thought possible :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Quote:

Calling someone a Pedo, Refferring to them as a Pedo, post Pedo links, and Death Threats are now grounds for immediate banning.
http://www.tcmphoto.com/images/Skati...kating-000.jpg

Basic_man 04-23-2007 07:26 PM

I don't know.. she looks young and like a tranny !

Webby 04-23-2007 07:28 PM

Sheesh.. the troll is back to posting nice little pics again... Gawd help us :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

DWB 04-23-2007 07:33 PM

I would hit it with no rubber AND promote her.

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 12301374)
I would hit it with no rubber AND promote her.

Dwb how many girls from where you frequent are over 18 and look just as young if not younger than Lupe. :winkwink:

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 04-23-2007 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301283)
Thats ok Webby you just keep on making backwards accusations against a program that is 100% 2257 compliant...


I thought you where gonna tone down a bit and stay out of drama... Or are you starting tommorrow?

sarettah 04-23-2007 07:46 PM

US Code Title 18 Chapter 110 section 2256 - Definitions for chapter

paragraph 8:

(8) ?child pornography? means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where?

.................

(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or

paragraph 11:

(11) the term ?indistinguishable? used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.

************************************************

Without getting into any specifics about littlelupe.

if you purposely try to make an over 18 model appear to be underage, you could definitely be looking at some trouble.

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark (Post 12301398)
I thought you where gonna tone down a bit and stay out of drama... Or are you starting tommorrow?

Maybe you'll learn to look at the date the post was you are referring to. And someone is calling a company I promote as pedo panderers. Which is technically breaking a gfy main rule.

sarettah 04-23-2007 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301415)
Maybe you'll learn to look at the date the post was you are referring to. And someone is calling a company I promote as pedo panderers. Which is technically breaking a gfy main rule.

How is it breaking the rule. He did not call anyone a pedo, he did not threaten a life.

Not even "technically" close.

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12300992)
Promoting?? OK if you want to pander to pedos - there are plenty around - some folks would do anything for a dollar.

Promote the site? Nope - never.

Discuss? Discuss this again?? Don't think do :pimp

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12301059)
What is this "legal" thing??? Sure she is of age - and don't matter if she is 46. The marketing is the issue - I don't promote "adult entertainment" to a pedo market.

Already said about promoting it - and, believe me - not losing *anything* :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

PS It already is illegal in a large number of countries.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12301098)
??? You have teens signing up with credit cards to see a "teen" with a cock stuck in her mouth?? :pimp

Sure agree - there is a "teen" niche - depends whether ya push that to pedo level and attempt to portray talent as 12 year old kids.


Sure does like to invoke the word Pedo when referring directly to a site though huh?

sarettah 04-23-2007 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301443)
Sure does like to invoke the word Pedo when referring directly to a site though huh?

Me thinks you doth protest too much.

Webby is not comfortable promoting that particular site and he stated why he wasn't. That is his opinion and he is entitled to it.

If you didn't keep pushing on it, he would not keep replying and using the word you are so uncomfortable with so much.

Each decides in this world what they are comfortable doing and what they are uncomfortable with.

If you are comfortable with littlelupe, promote away.

Those that aren't comfortable with it, shouldn't.

That simple really.

just my :2 cents:

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarettah (Post 12301470)
Me thinks you doth protest too much.

Webby is not comfortable promoting that particular site and he stated why he wasn't. That is his opinion and he is entitled to it.

If you didn't keep pushing on it, he would not keep replying and using the word you are so uncomfortable with so much.

Each decides in this world what they are comfortable doing and what they are uncomfortable with.

If you are comfortable with littlelupe, promote away.

Those that aren't comfortable with it, shouldn't.

That simple really.

just my :2 cents:


Actually none of his pedo accusing posts were directed at me, they were at Aussie Rebel, so that boat doesnt float. So its ok for him to insinuate anyone promoting, or signing up for the site is endorsing pedofile behavior just because there is a thread, he has a right to say that? I dont think so Tim.

sarettah 04-23-2007 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301480)
Actually none of his pedo accusing posts were directed at me, they were at Aussie Rebel, so that boat doesnt float. So its ok for him to insinuate anyone promoting, or signing up for the site is endorsing pedofile behavior just because there is a thread, he has a right to say that? I dont think so Tim.

Who's Tim?

Ok, I missed that he was replying to AR and not you. Either way, if an opinion is not attacked, the person with the opinion rarely feels the need to defend it.

And yes, he has the right to his opinion (what you refer to as insinuating), just as you do.

It just seems that there is a lot of wasted arguing going on over what is basically a dead horse.

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 04-23-2007 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301415)
Maybe you'll learn to look at the date the post was you are referring to. And someone is calling a company I promote as pedo panderers. Which is technically breaking a gfy main rule.

10-03-2006, 01:50 AM

I guess it is old.. I didn't really pay much attention.. Just read the paragraph you made and nothing else... I guess the "Represents Split" part shoulda gave me a clue..

You have had alot of piss matches lately though so I figured it was new...



So what made you give up on that idea you had that day?

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarettah (Post 12301487)
Who's Tim?

Ok, I missed that he was replying to AR and not you. Either way, if an opinion is not attacked, the person with the opinion rarely feels the need to defend it.

And yes, he has the right to his opinion (what you refer to as insinuating), just as you do.

It just seems that there is a lot of wasted arguing going on over what is basically a dead horse.

This is Tim

http://i.tbs.com/v5cache/TBS/Images/...2820041524.jpg



This is Al
http://elazulspad.net/j/wp-content/idontthinksotim.jpg

I dont think so Tim.

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark (Post 12301498)
10-03-2006, 01:50 AM

I guess it is old.. I didn't really pay much attention.. Just read the paragraph you made and nothing else... I guess the "Represents Split" part shoulda gave me a clue..

You have had alot of piss matches lately though so I figured it was new...



So what made you give up on that idea you had that day?

Who said I gave up on it. I got tired of all the America bashing that was going on, and made some posts about it. Drew the attention of the Sticky haters and they took advantage of the opportunity. :winkwink:

sarettah 04-23-2007 08:15 PM

So, you don't think he has a right to his opinion?

.

stickyfingerz 04-23-2007 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarettah (Post 12301508)
So, you don't think he has a right to his opinion?

.

To keep it to himself absolutely. He is on a very very thin line with the gfy rules whether you agree or not.

Webby 04-23-2007 08:19 PM

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh Sheesh... this still going on??

Idiot - will repeat again - you are irrelevant and your "opinion" matters little - this has been clear in almost every thread you make a post - and on *any* subject.

Do not even attempt to tell me what is CP or otherwise - or what is, for the lack of a better term, "pedo marketing". You are assured if I know of an actual CP site - this will not be another drama "discussion topic" on a chatboard. If it falls into a category of "pedo marketing" I will say whatever I think without your help and stupid dialog.

If you want your well-punctured ass to have more holes in it - carry on with your pathetic dialog. That is always assured to screw up any thread to the banal level of a 12 year old school kid.

Go and waste your time with another poll and check if everyone "hate's America" and if the have reached your fried-braincell level and posted some pics yet :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

sarettah 04-23-2007 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301516)
To keep it to himself absolutely. He is on a very very thin line with the gfy rules whether you agree or not.

When you are a mod, your opinion on that might count. Right now, it isn't worth spit.

:thumbsup

Webby has a right to his opinion, whether you agree with it or not. He also has the right to express that opinion.

The argument going on here is an old one. I remember discussions of this back in 2001 with Shaw and Ai getting on LS's ass over the age of his models versus the "look" of his models and who did he think was buying memberships to his sites, yadda yadda yadda.

Do you care who your sponsor is marketing to? or not? Not trying to insinuate anything about littlelupe there, it is just a question we all have to deal with at times with various sponsors and products.

I used to be in the liquor business. I got out of there because I watched the targeting of brands that were basically destroying certain parts of our society. I decided I didn't want to be part of it and I left.

We each have to make our own decisions.

Steve Awesome 04-23-2007 08:27 PM

I love you guys.

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 04-23-2007 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301506)
Who said I gave up on it. I got tired of all the America bashing that was going on, and made some posts about it. Drew the attention of the Sticky haters and they took advantage of the opportunity. :winkwink:


Webby 04-23-2007 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarettah (Post 12301540)
When you are a mod, your opinion on that might count. Right now, it isn't worth spit.

Totally agree with your post sarettah :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123